戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al mechanisms that create DTNs in the IC are monaural.
2 s reported perceived distance in response to monaural 1 octave 4 kHz noise source sounds presented at
3  between the binaural ABR and the sum of the monaural ABRs (i.e., binaural - (left + right)).
4                                       Unlike monaural AM coding, temporal factors, such as the coinci
5 puts had only minor effects on LSO output to monaural AM inputs.
6 ngs in vivo found considerable variations in monaural AM-tuning across neurons.
7 fected only the low-frequency portion of the monaural AM-tuning curve.
8  of single and multiple units in response to monaural and binaural acoustic stimulation.
9 c parameters of coincidence detection affect monaural and binaural AM coding.
10  is essential for LSO neurons to encode both monaural and binaural AM sounds.
11  These models, calibrated to reproduce known monaural and binaural characteristics of LSO, generate l
12                      Distinct pathways carry monaural and binaural information from the lower auditor
13                                   Thus, both monaural and binaural interactions can occur at single i
14 site of convergence for nearly all ascending monaural and binaural projections.
15 alization relies on the neural processing of monaural and binaural spatial cues that arise from the w
16 e rate of nucleus laminaris neurons for both monaural and binaural stimulation increased with sound i
17 MGV) were characterized extracellularly with monaural and binaural tone and noise bursts (100- to 250
18 hat low-frequency LSO neurons of cat are not monaural and can exhibit contralateral inhibition like t
19  data under typical experimental conditions: monaural and diotic stimulation; and whole-head beamform
20   An evaluation of auditory neural activity, monaural/binaural processing, and functional hearing was
21 f interaural time differences is composed of monaural cells in the cochlear nucleus (CN; nucleus magn
22 frequency-sensitive neurons report primarily monaural cells with no contralateral inhibition.
23 d to binaural signals as weakly inhibited or monaural cells.
24 e of stimulus levels under binaural, but not monaural, conditions.
25 re, we show in young adult rats that 10 d of monaural conductive hearing loss (i.e., earplugging) lea
26                   Here, we show that 10 d of monaural conductive hearing loss leads to an increase in
27 ated to detection performance, at least when monaural cues are sufficient.
28 oth of these tasks likely involve the use of monaural cues due to the absence of any relevant binaura
29 ry spatial planes, such that learning to use monaural cues for the horizontal plane comes at the expe
30 mporal analysis of the waveform at each ear (monaural cues).
31 ng total signal magnitude either by doubling monaural current or by binaural stimulation produced equ
32 underlie "amblyaudio" by inducing reversible monaural deprivation (MD) in infant, juvenile, and adult
33                                Adaptation to monaural deprivation in adulthood is also possible, but
34                              Using temporary monaural deprivation in mice provided an internal contro
35 ery in sound-localization accuracy following monaural deprivation.
36 itating adaptation during a second period of monaural deprivation.
37 hypothesis that a novel mechanism can create monaural distance sensitivity: a combination of auditory
38                             Summation of the monaural EPSCs predicted the binaural excitatory respons
39  binaural convergence in the brainstem where monaural excitatory and inhibitory inputs converge.
40                             To determine how monaural excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs integ
41  a glass recording pipette during a constant monaural excitatory stimulus.
42                                              Monaural frequency-tuning curves of nucleus laminaris ne
43 ght to perform a coincidence analysis on its monaural inputs.
44 response but less well than the summation of monaural IPSCs.
45 ividuals have been shown to possess superior monaural localization abilities in the horizontal plane,
46 the tympanum deflections and suggestive of a monaural mechanism of auditory tracking.
47 article reviews our studies of the effect of monaural middle ear destruction on midbrain auditory res
48                                              Monaural middle ear destruction was performed on juvenil
49 s are discussed in relation to the effect of monaural middle ear destruction.
50                                              Monaural neurons early in the interaural time difference
51 r paraolivary nucleus (SPON), which contains monaural neurons that extract rapid changes in sound int
52      We studied two classes of predominantly monaural neurons: those that displayed a sustained respo
53 ons of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus or monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus may provide the
54                                          The monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, whose roles ar
55  auditory midbrain and a functional role for monaural nuclei of the lateral lemniscus.
56 tional excitatory and inhibitory inputs from monaural nuclei.
57 An example of this plasticity is provided by monaural occlusion during infancy, which leads to compen
58  sound localization behavior after long-term monaural occlusion.
59 thms that separate target speech from either monaural or binaural mixtures, as well as microphone-arr
60                     Using this technique and monaural or binaural stimulation, responses in the IC th
61 curring within a submillisecond epoch and on monaural pathways that transmit level and timing cues wi
62 tory nerve fibers and transmit signals along monaural pathways, and bushy cells sharpen the encoding
63 EEG responses were greater for binaural than monaural presentation of modulated tones, and when a mas
64 nd were consistently lower for binaural than monaural presentation of modulated tones.
65 tion attempts to increase performance over a monaural prosthesis by harnessing the binaural processin
66 tures of the in vivo neurophonic response to monaural pure tones: large oscillations (hundreds of mic
67                                     We found monaural response properties to be unaffected by this me
68 ected neither the ratio between binaural and monaural responses nor the interaural time difference fo
69                   The temporal properties of monaural responses were well matched, suggesting connect
70 d these injection sites were correlated with monaural responses.
71  with vector summation of the left and right monaural responses.
72           Stimulation of one side at a time (monaural) showed that individual leg muscles receive equ
73  distance could be discriminated only if the monaural sound in reverberation had AM.
74 h the angle of incidence, producing cues for monaural sound localization in the spectra of the stimul
75        A new approach for the segregation of monaural sound mixtures is presented based on the princi
76 nal processing problems, using as an example monaural source separation using solely the cues provide
77 ch became relatively more sensitive to these monaural spatial cues.
78 res of human spatial hearing: sensitivity to monaural spectral cues and interaural time and level dif
79 hite noise stimuli found that high-frequency monaural spectral cues and interaural-level differences
80 these adjustments may involve greater use of monaural spectral cues provided by the other ear.
81 t the development of MNTB collaterals to the monaural SPON.
82                                              Monaural stimulation in either ear produced EPSCs and IP
83 sing an interrupted, single-event design and monaural stimulation with random spectrographic sounds.
84 predicted to change substantially when using monaural stimuli compared to binaural stimuli.
85 able to detect stimulus omission when either monaural stimuli or those in different frequencies were
86                                 Furthermore, monaural stimuli that were ineffective in eliciting spik
87 s (binaural) were compared with responses to monaural stimuli.
88 wever, was only 64-74% that predicted by the monaural sum.
89                                       In the monaural system, another large somatic synapse targets n
90 ticipants performed auditory tasks involving monaural targets presented against binaural white noise
91 trol mediates the linear transformation from monaural to binaural spike responses.
92 e-like Ve patterns in sustained responses to monaural tones with frequencies > approximately 1000 Hz.
93 e and non-dipole features of Ve responses to monaural tones with frequencies ranging from 600 to 1800
94 y ranges which are not consistent with their monaural tuning.
95 ests included pure tone signal audibility, a monaural word recognition test, and 2 dichotic tests: th