戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ined from human subjects vaccinated with the monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine.
2  inactivated subunit vaccine (ISV) targeting monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus or live
3 and biopanning, we identified two functional monovalent Abs (nanobodies) targeting ChemR23.
4                                   A maternal monovalent acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine, in developm
5 he divalent GLP-1 analogues were superior to monovalent analogues with respect to control of glucose
6  ligand, have better tumor uptake than their monovalent analogues.
7 that this approach enables the generation of monovalent and bivalent antibodies with nanomolar affini
8                    Specifically, a series of monovalent and bivalent bispecific IgGs composed of the
9 this paper, we study cholesteric shells with monovalent and bivalent defect configurations.
10 eed oleosomes at pH 7 and at the presence of monovalent and divalent cations (Na(+), K(+), Mg(2+)(,)
11 on of -0.96 +/- 0.03 and -0.52 +/- 0.01 with monovalent and divalent cations, respectively, and these
12 s are typically performed in the presence of monovalent and divalent cations.
13 ajority of clinically used opioid drugs, are monovalent and divalent cations.
14                                   Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abru
15 eement with experiments over a wide range of monovalent and divalent ion concentrations.
16 everal RNA molecules in a mixture containing monovalent and divalent ions.
17 in the presence of defined concentrations of monovalent and divalent ions.
18      We next synthesized divalent M2pep with monovalent and divalent KLA ([M2pep]2-[KLA] and [M2pep]2
19  5 A as well as modest (30-40%) retention of monovalent and divalent salts.
20 e in sharp contrast to interactions of ions (monovalent and divalent) with rigid charged rods, in whi
21                 The functional properties of monovalent and heterobivalent ligands were characterized
22  monovalent (single binding site) Pproxy and monovalent and multivalent (multiple equivalent and inde
23 methods are currently available to study how monovalent and multivalent GAG.protein bonds respond to
24 te tertiary fold of the RNA domain, with one monovalent and several divalent ions located in specific
25 ersus intramuscular injection in rats, using monovalent and trivalent formulations of IPV.
26                 Since glutamate is the major monovalent anion in E. coli, these results suggest that
27  manner for POPA and PIP2 lipids; and 6) the monovalent anion type has little influence on the lipid
28 te transporters (FNTs) selectively transport monovalent anions and are found in prokaryotes and lower
29 bsolute salinity concentrations by detecting monovalent anions and cations.
30 nels, which mediate the influx and efflux of monovalent anions in response to the levels of intracell
31 dated using a clinically available blocking, monovalent anti-CD28 antibody (FR104) whose effects in a
32                Here, we introduce a strictly monovalent anti-TCRbeta H57 Fab' ligand that, when coupl
33 bodies exhibit agonistic properties, whereas monovalent antibodies lack potency and the capacity to d
34 es was both sufficient and necessary whereas monovalent antibodies were poor inhibitors.
35  devised an evolutionary strategy to isolate monovalent antibody fragments that bridge together two d
36 nal modeling, we found that the potency of a monovalent antibody targeting Met could be dramatically
37 coded unmutated common ancestors (UCAs), and monovalent antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) to investiga
38 o produce (89)Zr-radiolabeled onartuzumab (a monovalent, antihuman c-MET antibody), starting directly
39 mune myasthenia gravis (MG) are functionally monovalent as a result of Fab-arm exchange.
40 2009 and 1 October 2011 to mothers receiving monovalent AS03-adjuvanted H1N1 influenza vaccine (Pande
41 requirement for stable immobilization, while monovalent attachment is reversible and, in the case of
42  have predicted and measured varied from the monovalent binding interaction by several orders of magn
43 nly found throughout biology to enhance weak monovalent binding such as between glycoligands and prot
44 demonstrate two distinct modes of binding, a monovalent binding to shorter saccharides and a bivalent
45                             Affinity-reduced monovalent bispecific variants, but not their bivalent b
46  of Capsid protein containing VLPs either as monovalent, bivalent or tetravalent formulation resulted
47                          Coadministration of monovalent, bivalent, or trivalent OPV seems to lower RV
48                                        Thus, monovalent blocking of FcgammaR function demonstrates a
49                                              Monovalent blocking of FcgammaR function dramatically in
50                             An electron-rich monovalent boron compound is used as a Lewis base to pre
51 (2)) bond scission in alkenes by inserting a monovalent carbon unit between both sp(2)-hybridized car
52  times lower than those required for similar monovalent catalysts and displays unique kinetic paramet
53 etal halide perovskites ABX(3), where A is a monovalent cation (e.g., methylammonium (MA(+)), Cs(+)),
54                      Ddl is activated by the monovalent cation (MVC) K(+), but despite its clinical r
55 d Mg(2+)) were more than 31-fold of that for monovalent cation (Na(+) and K(+)).
56  that PFL-AE binds a catalytically essential monovalent cation at its active site, yet another parall
57 PM4, which encodes TRPM4, a Ca(2+)-activated monovalent cation channel, as a cause of an autosomal do
58 t that shear stress indirectly activates the monovalent cation current carried by transient receptor
59 e Ppz1 (ScPpz1) is involved in regulation of monovalent cation homeostasis.
60 ounds tested, salinomycin and monensin, both monovalent cation ionophores, displayed a potent and sel
61                    Potassium (K(+)) is a key monovalent cation necessary for multiple aspects of cell
62                                         This monovalent cation site controls enzyme activity: (i) PFL
63 e NaGaS(2) composition, which contains Na, a monovalent cation slightly larger in size than Li, found
64 se at a range of temperatures, buffer pH and monovalent cation strength.
65  (14C)-citrate anion, as well as the organic monovalent cation, ethidium, but not its divalent analog
66 d perovskite solar-cell absorbers APbX3 (A = monovalent cation; X = Br or I).
67 n member 4 (TRPM4) channels are nonselective monovalent cationic channels found in human atria and co
68 e of divalent cations (Ca(2+) and Ba(2+)) as monovalent cations (K(+)), but a viroporin defective mut
69 or Ca(2+) over Na(+), but nonselective among monovalent cations (Li(+), Na(+), and K(+)).
70 strongly depend on the cation employed, with monovalent cations (Na(+) and K(+)) leading to the highe
71 Kd approximately 1.6 mM) compared with other monovalent cations and relevant, considering lithium dos
72 has high permeability to calcium relative to monovalent cations and shows inward rectification.
73 lex structures made of stacked guanines with monovalent cations bound at a central cavity.
74      Ribozyme activity depends on Mg(+2) and monovalent cations but is resistant to protease treatmen
75  conducted primarily ( approximately 80%) by monovalent cations but not Ca(2+) .
76 al of divalent cations (i.e., hardness) over monovalent cations can simply be achieved using membrane
77 ity: (i) PFL-AE in the absence of any simple monovalent cations has little-no activity; and (ii) amon
78 h a closed transmembrane pore, with resolved monovalent cations intracellular to the hydrophobic gate
79  proximal promoter (kit2) in the presence of monovalent cations K+ and Na+.
80 t metals such as Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Zn(2+), monovalent cations often function as efficient and selec
81 ike many other TRP channels, is permeable to monovalent cations only.
82                              The presence of monovalent cations resulted in aggregation and minor coa
83 channels in TAL: a cldn10b-based channel for monovalent cations such as Na(+) and a spatially distinc
84 ical standpoint is possible, particularly by monovalent cations such as NH4(+), or K(+).
85 ference interaction site (3D-RISM) model for monovalent cations surrounding DNA and RNA helices, and
86 h selectivity ratios of over 100 and conduct monovalent cations up to 5 times more rapidly than dival
87 ivalent cations are preferentially lost over monovalent cations upon A.C protonation, providing exper
88 of cooperative association dependent on GTP, monovalent cations, and Mg(2+).
89 ents, we show that this compound binds large monovalent cations, such as Cs(+) and Tl(+), with a bind
90 interaction model with explicit divalent and monovalent cations, that ion condensation is highly spec
91 lent cations preferentially bind to DNA over monovalent cations, which attenuates non-specific intera
92 p to approximately 4-5 times compared to the monovalent cations.
93 ized by Hoogsten pairing and centrally bound monovalent cations.
94 ionally wide filter but is only permeable to monovalent cations; filter residue Gln973 is essential i
95 curred by substitution of divalent S(2-) for monovalent Cl(-) play a major role in enhancing Li(+) -i
96  to a second distinct site on LRP1 to form a monovalent complex.
97 on, with affinities greatly exceeding either monovalent component.
98 ypes that were specific to each of the three monovalent components of the trivalent influenza vaccine
99 ltivalent binding into actions of individual monovalent components, they also demonstrated a strong a
100  data show that PAM has superiority over its monovalent counterpart in powering NKs to bind to cancer
101  functional profile that was unique from its monovalent counterpart providing evidence of the discret
102 creased affinity and specificity relative to monovalent counterparts, but these emergent biochemical
103                            Relative to their monovalent counterparts, where the sigma-hole is located
104 ng potency by 3- to 5-fold compared to their monovalent counterparts.
105                                    Moreover, monovalent CTxB does not stabilize membrane domains, unl
106                                     The best monovalent decoy, CTC-445.2, bound with low nanomolar af
107 sed to primary DENV4 natural infections or a monovalent DENV4 vaccine were analyzed.
108                                              monovalent, divalent) and pH.
109 tions revealed significant differences among monovalent, divalent, and trivalent cation distributions
110                     By screening an array of monovalent, divalent, and trivalent metal ions, we demon
111      A systematic comparison of transport of monovalent electrolytes [potassium chloride (KCl), sodiu
112 alf-life and absorption time compared to its monovalent equivalent.
113 se 3 clinical trials showed that inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccines manufactured in China were hi
114                                    Moreover, monovalent Fab fragments generated from the purified IgG
115              In the presence of heparin, the monovalent Fab shows essentially no inhibition, whereas
116 ovalent pMHC and unlike bivalent antibodies, monovalent Fab'-DNA triggers TCRs only when physically c
117            Mature mAbs, UCA mAbs, and mature monovalent Fabs bound to MuSK and demonstrated pathogeni
118 glycans over FimH on the cell surface favors monovalent FimH binding.
119                        Serial passage of the monovalent FluMist 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccine at increas
120 neered MM-131, a bispecific antibody that is monovalent for both Met and epithelial cell adhesion mol
121 iety, we further demonstrate that 1B1 in its monovalent form cannot block TCR-mediated NKT cell activ
122                         Here, we introduce a monovalent form of Strep-Tactin that harbours a unique b
123                  Early studies showed that a monovalent formalin-inactivated HRV vaccine can be prote
124                          Botswana introduced monovalent G1P rotavirus vaccine (RV1) in July 2012, pro
125                                         In a monovalent G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine (RotarixTM) trial in
126 med active diarrhea surveillance to evaluate monovalent G1P[8] rotavirus vaccine (RV1) efficacy and u
127 nited States, we analyzed the association of monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccine (MIV) during pregnancy
128 sed the immunogenicity and safety of a novel monovalent high-dose inactivated poliovirus type 2 vacci
129 , we generated a fusion protein comprising a monovalent human FcgammaRIIIA-specific antibody linked i
130 rom Malawian infants who received 2 doses of monovalent human rotavirus vaccine (RV1) (days 4, 6, 8,
131                                            A monovalent human rotavirus vaccine (RV1) was introduced
132 >=11), from a phase 3 VE trial of Rotavac, a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine, carrie
133  accumulation of somatic mutations such that monovalent IgG4 Fab-arm-exchanged autoantibodies reach a
134 lpha-coated nanoparticles in comparison with monovalent IL-15:IL-15Ralpha.
135 tive antibody response in 75 recipients of a monovalent inactivated A/Shanghai/02/2013 H7N9 vaccine.
136              Vaccination in pregnancy with a monovalent inactivated AS03-adjuvanted split virion infl
137 0.22-6.63) per million doses for inactivated monovalent influenza vaccine (2 cases, 1,090,279 doses g
138 I trial using the Vaxxas HD-MAP to deliver a monovalent influenza vaccine that was to the best of our
139           The small group sizes and use of a monovalent influenza vaccine were limitations of the stu
140 ions of multivalency in order to unravel how monovalent interaction strength, scaffold flexibility, d
141 that stabilize the initial weak (micromolar) monovalent interaction.
142  are determined by several factors including monovalent ion composition and the precise sequence and
143 he substrate secondary structure or solution monovalent ion composition.
144             Slightly acidic pH and increased monovalent ion concentrations favor filament-assembly, -
145 on studies have supported the idea that this monovalent ion reduces agonist binding by stabilizing th
146 imescales are remarkably slow for individual monovalent ions and could have important implications fo
147 and seawater, both of which contain not only monovalent ions but also divalent ions.
148 ive excellent agreement with experiments for monovalent ions but underestimate Mg(2+)-DNA and Mg(2+)-
149  including Ca(2+), inhibit the permeation of monovalent ions by directly blocking the TRPP2 channel p
150  cations are known to be more efficient than monovalent ions in driving them to a compact state, alth
151             Our analysis shows that solvated monovalent ions permeate through the selectivity filter
152 oncentration difference between divalent and monovalent ions used in experiments, we develop a theory
153 ioning step to exchange divalent cations for monovalent ions, 0.2% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) 700
154 ledge on ionic signals mediated by the major monovalent ions, which occur in microdomains, as global
155 keeping the implicit screening effect due to monovalent ions.
156  exhibit regulated permeability of water and monovalent ions.
157 d (N-N: 1.111(6) A) that bridges between two monovalent (iPr2) TpCu fragments.
158 critical to gain access to this 14-electron, monovalent Ir intermediate.
159  heptarepeats (starPEG-(KA7)(4))-but not its monovalent KA7-subunits-show advanced, biologically rele
160 increased by up to 1500-fold compared to the monovalent ligand, while maintaining the selectivity for
161 ng the negative cooperativity of binding of "monovalent" ligand tafamidis.
162 ser' family, is notably more potent than the monovalent ligands and we show here that this apparently
163                        While the synthesized monovalent ligands retained the 5-HT(2A) antagonist and
164 nt capturing agents, released by competitive monovalent ligands, and then separated by filtration.
165  protein receptor have only low affinity for monovalent ligands.
166 hat define DNA-nanoparticles and compared to monovalent linker systems.
167 tion with minimal systemic exposure, whereas monovalent lipid-conjugated siRNAs were quickly released
168                               In contrast to monovalent lithium or sodium ions, the reversible insert
169 0-fold lower concentration than required for monovalent M2pep activity.
170 acrophage-selective toxicity not observed in monovalent M2pep treatment.
171  different activation profiles than natural, monovalent, membrane-associated pMHC.
172  The phase II study GO27819 investigated the monovalent MET inhibitor onartuzumab plus bevacizumab (O
173  Ni(2+), Cu(2+), Zn(2+), and Cd(2+), but not monovalent metal ions, Cr(3+), Mg(2+), Y(3+), Sr(2+) or
174          Unlike conventional Fabs, which are monovalent monomers, Fab HC84.26.5D assembles into a biv
175 ii) conjugation with DNA and purification of monovalent MPNs, (iii) modular targeting of MPNs to cell
176        We sought to determine whether use of monovalent (mv) anti-FcepsilonRIalpha mAbs increases des
177 y evaluating the free energies for replacing monovalent Na(+) with H3O(+) in various model selectivit
178 ding aggregation kinetics in the presence of monovalent (Na(+)) and divalent cations (Ca(2+)) show th
179 -exchange metadynamics) to study and compare monovalent (Na(+), K(+)) ion permeation in the open-acti
180  aggregation under varying concentrations of monovalent (NaCl) and divalent (CaCl(2)) electrolytes.
181  avid binding by fusing multiple (different) monovalent Nanobody building blocks via linker sequences
182 ultivalent ureidopyrimidinone monomers and a monovalent naphthyridine molecule which acts as an end-c
183 ty of the bivalent configuration against the monovalent one is controlled by c = h/p, where h is the
184 to the substitution of divalent cations with monovalent ones, asphaltene deposition is repelled and t
185 lso model the trade-offs of use vs nonuse of monovalent OPV (mOPV) for outbreak response considering
186      The interference caused by bivalent and monovalent OPV formulations, which will be increasingly
187 adesh, were randomized to receive 3 doses of monovalent OPV type 1 or bivalent OPV types 1 and 3 at e
188 -specific IgA were measured in stool after a monovalent OPV type 2 challenge at 18 weeks of age.
189 omly assigned to receive one or two doses of monovalent OPV2 (n=50 in each group).
190 ion rate 28 days after one dose was 100% for monovalent OPV2 and both novel OPV2 candidates.
191 day 28 after the first vaccine dose) between monovalent OPV2 and the two novel OPV2 candidates.
192             Outbreak response campaigns with monovalent OPV2 are the only available method to induce
193 st was a phase 4 historical control study of monovalent OPV2 in Antwerp, done before global withdrawa
194 y of novel OPV2 day 28 seroprotection versus monovalent OPV2 in infants (non-inferiority margin 10%).
195  as safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic as monovalent OPV2 in previously OPV-vaccinated and IPV-vac
196            Yet our analysis shows that using monovalent OPV2 is generating more paralytic VDPV2 outbr
197  OPV2-c1 and high-dose novel OPV2-c2 despite monovalent OPV2 recipients having higher baseline immuni
198 OPV-vaccinated participants, 62 (62%) of 100 monovalent OPV2 recipients, 71 (71%) of 100 recipients o
199 valent Sabin OPV2 before global cessation of monovalent OPV2 use, and a phase 2 study with low and hi
200 100% of novel OPV2 vaccinees and 97 (97%) of monovalent OPV2 vaccinees were seropositive.
201 ted solicited systemic adverse events, four (monovalent OPV2), three (novel OPV2-c1), and two (novel
202 8]) of 97 were seroprotected after receiving monovalent OPV2, 134 (94% [88-97]) of 143 after high-dos
203 e genetically stable than the licensed Sabin monovalent OPV2, have been developed to respond to ongoi
204  assigned to either one dose or two doses of monovalent OPV2.
205 2) and OPV seroconversion was increased with monovalent or bivalent OPV compared with trivalent OPV (
206 ontrolled study, adults were challenged with monovalent oral poliovirus type 1 vaccine (mOPV1) and su
207 hromycin on the immunogenicity of serotype-3 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine given to healthy infa
208 nce daily for 3 days, followed by serotype-3 monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine on day 14.
209 e performed a randomized controlled trial of monovalent oral rotavirus vaccine (RV1).
210 accine-derived polioviruses, we tested novel monovalent oral type-2 poliovirus (OPV2) vaccine candida
211                                   FR104 is a monovalent pegylated Fab' Ab, antagonist of CD28, under
212 fold higher potency compared to those of the monovalent peptides for the human Na(V)1.4 channel.
213                                            A monovalent pH1N1 vaccine was separately produced in addi
214                            Importantly, like monovalent pMHC and unlike bivalent antibodies, monovale
215                              Here, we used a monovalent probe, the silver ion, that, similarly to div
216 quinidine through a glycine linker, making a monovalent quinidine-polymer conjugate, which was then e
217 orrelation forces play a central role in the monovalent Rb(+) distribution and a combination of ion-c
218  assess the safety and immunogenicity of the monovalent, recombinant, chimpanzee adenovirus type-3 ve
219 red with dodecaglycosylated fullerenes and a monovalent reference.
220  and transcription factor-binding sites than monovalent regions.
221 rus vaccine (OPV) is known to interfere with monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) immunogenicity.
222                             Kenya introduced monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) in July 2014.
223 among the first African nations to introduce monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1) into its childhood im
224 ne's Phase II and III clinical trials of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine (RV1), Rotarix, were analyz
225                       We sought to determine monovalent rotavirus vaccine cost-effectiveness in Malaw
226                                 We evaluated monovalent rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) under co
227                                              Monovalent rotavirus vaccine is effective in preventing
228                                            A monovalent rotavirus vaccine remains effective against a
229                              Togo introduced monovalent rotavirus vaccine starting 19 June 2014.
230                                  In Bolivia, monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in 2008 and
231                                          The monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in Tanzania
232                                              Monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in the routi
233                                              Monovalent rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline),
234 ntirotavirus antibodies on immunogenicity of monovalent RV vaccine (RV1).
235 ainst rotavirus in Guatemala, where both the monovalent (RV1; 2-dose series) and pentavalent (RV5; 3-
236 e seek to determine the crystal structure of monovalent SA at 1.7-A resolution.
237                              We found that a monovalent SA receptor binds to N2 with a significantly
238 protein of the influenza A virus than to the monovalent SA receptor.
239                The structural information of monovalent SA will be valuable for its applications acro
240                                A SA variant, monovalent SA, was developed with a single and high affi
241 the two novel OPV candidates compared with a monovalent Sabin OPV in children and infants.
242 eks) in Panama: a control phase 4 study with monovalent Sabin OPV2 before global cessation of monoval
243                       High concentrations of monovalent salt can induce the solubilization or crystal
244 K over a range of mechanical forces (fs) and monovalent salt concentrations (Cs).
245 ime-resolved dynamic light scattering at low monovalent salt concentrations and at three pH levels, i
246 ations in the electrolyte, NPs pairs at high monovalent salt concentrations interact via remarkably s
247                        However, under purely monovalent salt conditions (K+, Na+), TALEs bind to spec
248               The phase transition occurs as monovalent salts are used to modify the ionic strength f
249 effect of trehalose to alter the activity of monovalent salts in aqueous solution.
250 own to bind selectively to the dockerin of a monovalent scaffoldin (ScaG), thus enabling formation of
251 nzymes either directly or through additional monovalent scaffoldins (ScaC and ScaD).
252 h a structurally related [Cp*Ir(biot-p-L)Cl].monovalent scdSav highlights the advantages of the prese
253                                              Monovalent scdSav thus provides a versatile scaffold to
254 d within the biotin-binding vestibule of the monovalent scdSav.
255                             Switching from a monovalent scFv to a bivalent scFv-Fc format improved it
256              Bivalent mAb-TM was superior to monovalent scFv-TM in both pulmonary targeting and lung
257                          Most viroporins are monovalent selective cation channels, with few showing t
258                                              Monovalent-selective Neosepta CMS is known to block diva
259 lter residue Gln973 is essential in defining monovalent selectivity.
260 ty filter may be an important determinant of monovalent selectivity.
261                                              Monovalent shells have a single radial defect, which is
262  implementation of the method in the case of monovalent (single binding site) Pproxy and monovalent a
263 ges, we report on our efforts to engineer a (monovalent) single-chain dimeric streptavidin (scdSav) a
264                            Specifically, the monovalent sodium cation (Na(+)) has been known for deca
265                                Surprisingly, monovalent sodium or ammonium ions, positioned in the pr
266 on on MWCNTs through bridging effects, while monovalent sodium reduced SRHA adsorption.
267                   HD-MAPs were coated with a monovalent, split inactivated influenza virus vaccine co
268  native signaling conformation, leading to a monovalent "stapler," a single-chain variable fragment (
269  and green fluorescent protein, we show that monovalent Strep-Tactin is generally applicable to prote
270                                    We expect monovalent Strep-Tactin to be a reliable anchoring tool
271  of the interaction between Strep-tag II and monovalent Strep-Tactin were characterized.
272 e of biotin-streptavidin bonds, we find that monovalent streptavidin constructs with specific attachm
273 play equal enzymatic activities on a soluble monovalent substrate and similar substrate specificities
274 g hemagglutination inhibition (HI) data with monovalent swine antisera and antigenic cartography to e
275           Glycoconjugates containing stable, monovalent synthetic oligosaccharide analogs of ST-5 CPS
276 se events and have reasoned that designing a monovalent targeting strategy could circumvent the infla
277                            This is the first monovalent transition metal dependent RNA-cleaving DNAzy
278 roprojection array, the Nanopatch, delivered monovalent type 2 IPV (IPV2) vaccine to the skin.
279 all infants were challenged with one dose of monovalent type 2 OPV (mOPV2).
280                            After April 2016, monovalent type 2 OPV will be available for type 2 outbr
281 valent OPV (bOPV) and IPV and challenge with monovalent type 2 OPV, and stools samples were collected
282 on after a polio vaccination campaign with a monovalent type 2 oral polio vaccine (mOPV2).
283                                              Monovalent type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine (mOPV2) stockp
284   Infants in all groups were challenged with monovalent type 2 vaccine (mOPV2) at 18 weeks (groups 1,
285  Indian infants (aged 6-11 months) receiving monovalent type 3 OPV (CTRI/2014/05/004588).
286 earlier, had a greater interfering effect on monovalent type 3 OPV seroresponse than did persistent i
287 Indian infants who received a single dose of monovalent type 3 OPV.
288                                     However, monovalent UCA Fabs bound to MuSK but did not have measu
289 dy assessed the cost-utility of a first-dose monovalent (V) or quadrivalent (MMRV) followed by a seco
290                                        After monovalent vaccination, subjects developed high levels o
291  for H1N1; VE was 73% (61-81; I(2)=31.4) for monovalent vaccine against H1N1pdm09.
292                        TCL derived from DENV monovalent vaccinees induced CD8 and CD4 T cells that cr
293 uced nAbs in volunteers who received the NIH monovalent vaccines against each DENV serotype.
294 mmunization with DENV1-4 VLPs as individual, monovalent vaccines elicited strong neutralization activ
295                          The DENV1, 2, and 4 monovalent vaccines induced type-specific nAbs directed
296 pared to sera from guinea pigs receiving the monovalent vaccines, sera from guinea pigs receiving the
297                                 Experimental monovalent vaccines, which all utilize the sole envelope
298 rum antibodies recognized both the H1 and H3 monovalent vaccines.
299 tective mechanisms in animals immunized with monovalent versus polyvalent vaccines.
300 COMPASS is in part mediated by a new type of monovalent zinc finger (ZnF).

 
Page Top