ライフサイエンスコーパス: motor system

1 ith M1 and with regions within the executive motor system.

2 ld prevent the affordance from provoking the motor system.

3 is a neurodegenerative disorder of the adult motor system.

4 recruiting high-level structures outside the motor system.

5 s capable of inducing plastic changes in the motor system.

6 in preparation for serial production by the motor system.

7 directs voluntary behavior by outputs to the motor system.

8 enerative disease that primarily targets the motor system.

9 than previously assumed in the somatosensory-motor system.

10 onnection between the auditory and the vocal motor system.

11 cation between regions in the frontostriatal motor system.

12 ablish a bilateral sublexical speech sensory-motor system.

13 sented by spike timing in the songbird vocal motor system.

14 forming the left lateralized speech sensory-motor system.

15 unction of cerebellar cortex within the full motor system.

16 ly activated and grounded in humans' sensory-motor system.

17 ese time periods described previously in the motor system.

18 ith, interestingly, some specificity for the motor system.

19 ng with the execution of actions through the motor system.

20 n be overcome by using the faster actomyosin motor system.

21 in any modality can lead to response via any motor system.

22 a central component of the midshipman vocal-motor system.

23 btle changes in action kinematics within the motor system.

24 2-chimaerin during development of the ocular motor system.

25 tor model constrained by requirements of the motor system.

26 this binding occurs in the emotional or the motor system.

27 gnal the need for increased control over the motor system.

28 cortex, through attentional networks, to the motor system.

29 outcomes generated by forward models of the motor system.

30 thought to involve top-down control over the motor system.

31 tion (TMS) to induce plasticity in the human motor system.

32 ort that VEGFA-165 elicits plasticity in any motor system.

33 d how such reward representations act on the motor system.

34 (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the motor system.

35 t are filtered by intrinsic circuitry in the motor system.

36 tone that is associated with lesions of the motor system.

37 ) cells to create a unique MPhi-Mg biohybrid motor system.

38 isorder falls short of the properties of the motor system.

39 r understanding of development of the ocular motor system.

40 celerate recovery from injury to the sensory motor system.

41 generative condition primarily involving the motor system.

42 ive disease-related pathology outside of the motor system.

43 erive from ectopic activity generated in the motor system.

44 counteracts an intrinsically more excitable motor system.

45 ody is continuously shaped by the predictive motor system.

46 sociated with hyperexcitability of the visuo-motor system.

47 fatal neurodegenerative disease of the human motor system.

48 ibition, through close interactions with the motor system.

49 variability in the excitability of the human motor system.

50 (NIf) at the interface between auditory and motor systems.

51 e functional connectivity between visual and motor systems.

52 on, humans generate speech by activating two motor systems.

53 by interacting with signals from sensory and motor systems.

54 riving force in the evolution of sensory and motor systems.

55 evelopmental origins with pectoral appendage motor systems.

56 links the hand representation in visual and motor systems.

57 -by-step parallel development of sensory and motor systems.

58 ing on circuits in the visual, auditory, and motor systems.

59 to columns that control different sensory or motor systems.

60 role in the collective dynamics of multiple motor systems.

61 eway through which the choice system informs motor systems.

62 the auditory rhythm across both auditory and motor systems.

63 diverse sensory inputs with motivational and motor systems.

64 than twice as great as that for previous gel motor systems.

65 and the resulting decision is transmitted to motor systems.

66 apid interactions between auditory and vocal motor systems.

67 rvation from both the trigeminal sensory and motor systems.

68 n modifications throughout somatosensory and motor systems.

69 rds realistic in vivo application of various motor systems.

70 Is it a consequence of changes in the motor system?

71 may play a vital role in the function of the motor system [1-5].

72 espite knowledge about timing in sensory and motor systems [12-17], we know little about temporal mec

73 at the operation of predictive coding in the motor system (a process termed 'active inference') provi

74 tary movement is controlled by the pyramidal motor system, a long CNS pathway comprising corticospina

75 actor is controlled to function as a healthy motor system, a relevant clinical example for neurologic

76 the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar motor systems accompanied with an initial hippocampal co

77 These results suggest that the motor system acquires a new control policy for mirror re

78 in unaffected siblings suggests that altered motor system activation and functional connectivity is n

79 However, its impact on motor system activity and connectivity remains unknown.

80 ns at two months postpartum predicted infant motor system activity during observation of the same exp

81 We show that the rate at which the motor system adapts to changes in the environment is pri

82 sive means of improving function in multiple motor systems after chronic spinal injury.

83 vide a continuous flow of information to the motor system, allowing it to prepare in a graded fashion

84 laboratory tasks, like reaching, because the motor system already has extensive prior knowledge about

85 through a corollary discharge sent from the motor system, although the exact neuroanatomical origin

86 or imagery (MI) is capable of activating the motor system and affecting cortical excitability.

87 uch predictive mechanisms originate from the motor system and allow for inferring actions from enviro

88 y shaped by predictive mechanisms run by the motor system and based on the integration of feedforward

89 nd increased functional coupling between the motor system and cognitive networks provide an explanati

90 s the functional organization of the fly leg motor system and establishes Drosophila as a tractable s

91 ncreased functional connectivity between the motor system and frontoparietal cognitive networks.

92 frequency dependency of tACS effects on the motor system and helps discern the functional role of di

93 ude reduced inhibition at many levels of the motor system and increased plasticity, while emerging ev

94 f action perception and comprehension in the motor system and invite a shift in the focus of future r

95 ha2-chn) perturb axon guidance in the ocular motor system and lead to the human eye movement disorder

96 response preparation broadly influences the motor system and likely reflects a process that occurs w

97 ncreased functional connectivity between the motor system and prefrontal cognitive networks during a

98 al and ventral shell project to the cortical motor system and temporal lobe, respectively.

99 GM volume increases in the somatosensory and motor systems and GM volume decreases in the auditory (i

100 relies on interactions between auditory and motor systems and is asymmetrically organized in the hum

101 relationship to the voluntary and emotional motor systems and speculate that neurons in the mGi may

102 reflect the activity of multiple descending motor systems and their interactions with spinal motor c

103 the relationship between body-ownership and motor system, and provides the first physiological evide

104 istory dependence, involves both sensory and motor systems, and is too complicated to model mechanist

105 d an interface between the basal ganglia and motor systems, and its ability to regulate arousal state

106 functional coordination between auditory and motor systems, and that coherence in beta oscillations d

107 e modularized separately from perceptual and motor systems, and that they instead scaffold on top of

108 emonstrates how properties of perceptual and motor systems, and their relation, can underlie the meso

109 rs (1982) conceptual framework of a "lateral motor system," and a projection to lamina IX indicating

110 contributions from changes in the peripheral motor system are less well understood.

111 se executing an action many areas of our own motor systems are active.

112 We conclude that the language and motor systems are intimately linked, yet distinct.

113 cts on motoneurons, the final pathway of the motor system, are unknown.

114 hat directionally selective fMRI patterns in motor system areas faithfully represent movement directi

115 s a gold standard for defining somatosensory-motor system areas for basic research and clinical appli

116 f distributed neural populations in multiple motor system areas that encode ipsilateral and contralat

117 n posterior-parietal cortex and not in other motor system areas, thereby suggesting that individuals

118 variability across movements in a variety of motor system areas.

119 Previously, using the Drosophila motor system as a model, we found the classic temporal t

120 also thought to be important for regulating motor systems, as revealed by studies of large cholinerg

121 ion of the ventrolateral PAG (vlPAG) affects motor systems at multiple levels of the neuraxis through

122 s that the periaqueductal gray (PAG) affects motor systems at the following multiple levels of the ne

123 of choice options should thus emerge in the motor system before the decision process is complete.

124 beta frequencies are prevalent in the human motor system, but their function is unclear.

125 , we then built a more complete model of the motor system by including cerebellar-basal ganglia inter

126 We probed the state of the motor system by perturbing the arm at random times durin

127 tor learning and control of high dimensional motor systems by the cerebellum.

128 thought to provide a mechanism by which the motor system can accurately calculate target position in

129 anning to move the hand down, the predictive motor system can anticipate the consequence of the movem

130 Our results show the motor system can behave like a trajectory controller but

131 then provide direct evidence that the human motor system can behave like a trajectory controller, an

132 mechanics and the intrinsic dynamics of the motor system can contribute to kinematic differences in

133 s that temporal predictions arising from the motor system can enhance auditory perception.

134 Our motor system can generate representations which carry in

135 Previous studies have demonstrated that the motor system can learn, and make use of, internal models

136 pt to injury during development; whereas the motor system can maintain connections to the impaired ha

137 ment effect suggests that engaging the vocal motor system can modulate auditory cortical processing o

138 Impulsive errors thus entail both a motor system capture by an urge to act and a failed inhi

139 ue in motor control is to understand how the motor system chooses a solution from the multiple soluti

140 Experiments aiming to understand sensory-motor systems, cognition and behavior necessitate traini

141 The motor system comprises a network of cortical and subcort

142 fluential ideas in motor control is that the motor system computes a "desired trajectory" when reachi

143 An influential idea is that the motor system computes and implements a desired limb traj

144 Motor system connectivity was significantly correlated w

145 The ocular motor system consists of three nerves which innervate si

146 useful framework for thinking about how the motor system constructs movement.

147 s of felt emotions, and a cortical pyramidal motor system controls voluntary facial expressions.

148 Thus, even in the absence of sensory or motor system deficits and comorbidities, HAND is a neuro

149 ly as 4 weeks for phosphocreatine, preceding motor system deficits and decreased ATP levels in striat

150 y-motor circuit dysfunction as the origin of motor system deficits in this SMA model and suggest that

151 S/tDCS on the functional architecture of the motor system depend upon lesion location, degree of impa

152 ing a site of evolutionary divergence to the motor system, downstream of the central brain.

153 Injury to the mature motor system drives significant spontaneous axonal sprou

154 movement [4-7]: a subcortical extrapyramidal motor system drives spontaneous facial expressions of fe

155 aphy to demonstrate recruitment of the human motor system during observation and execution of facial

156 urther modulations in the cortico-cerebellar motor system during voluntary movement.

157 receptor gate sensory feedback to the spinal motor system during walking and are required for the pro

158 BG dysfunction, particularly those involving motor systems (e.g., Tourette syndrome).

159 in young subjects, but little is known about motor system effects in the elderly.

160 How does the motor system efficiently control dexterous finger moveme

161 rating, through its immediate effects on the motor system (eg, movement in a 'paretic' limb), that sy

162 Motor system examination revealed power of grade 2.

163 Motor system excitability is transiently inhibited durin

164 ulnerability and slow recovery of the ocular-motor system following subconcussive head impacts.

165 attention-independent fashion in sensory and motor systems, for different adaptive purposes.

166 Valid biomarkers of motor system function after stroke could improve clinica

167 Similarly, Caenorhabditis elegans motor system function depends on a precise balance betwe

168 tely after a change in the visual scene, the motor system generates independent responses to the erro

169 progressed within the subcortical/brainstem motor system generating greater oculomotors deficits and

170 a." This is an additional example of how the motor system has served the emergence of high-level cogn

171 The motor system has the remarkable ability not only to lear

172 acterize the transport behaviors of multiple-motor systems has improved substantially, many aspects o

173 In motor systems, higher-order neurons provide commands to

174 idity is achieved via a divergent actomyosin motor system, housed within a narrow compartment that li

175 To repair these motor systems impairments and restore function, we manip

176 n of object lifting activates the observer's motor system in a weight-specific fashion: Corticospinal

177 h widespread activity within the distributed motor system in both cerebral hemispheres, more so in pa

178 a general initiation signal that engages the motor system in different sequential behaviors.

179 ticospinal tract (CST) is the most important motor system in humans, yet robust regeneration of this

180 flow of an evolving decision variable to the motor system in humans.

181 our results evidence the involvement of the motor system in motor imagery processes, they do not sup

182 ew sensorimotor realities; and (3) control a motor system in real time.

183 e and functional integrity of the descending motor system in symptomatic SOD1(G93A) animals.

184 (66)met polymorphism affects function of the motor system in young subjects, but little is known abou

185 ased intrinsic asynchrony between visual and motor systems in children with ASD and replicated this f

186 tion, and the possible role of procedural or motor systems in future-oriented behavior.

187 sing can facilitate this process by engaging motor systems in the sampling of sensory information.

188 vocalizations are generated by the emotional motor system, in which the mesencephalic periaqueductal

189 tions were indexed by SRP sources within the motor system-in dorsolateral hand motor areas for expect

190 ury would more strongly affect movement than motor system injury in children with unilateral cerebral

191 Sensory and motor systems interact closely during movement performan

192 rently, there is little insight into whether motor systems interact during development to coordinate

193 sults suggest that a high WM load "sets" the motor system into a suppressed state that mitigates moto

194 To address the hotly debated question of motor system involvement in language comprehension, we r

195 Our results show that the motor system is capable of a spectrum of corrective resp

196 The motor system is capable of adapting to changed condition

197 The human motor system is capable of remarkably precise control of

198 Here, we show that activity in the human motor system is indeed modulated dynamically during acti

199 present neurophysiological evidence that the motor system is involved in predictive timing, a brain f

200 Whether the speech sensory-motor system is lateralized, like higher-order language

201 ling models maintain that the speech sensory-motor system is left lateralized and facilitates the tra

202 Neural latency deeper in the motor system is more strongly predictive of behavioral l

203 he CNS is intensely active, but the skeletal motor system is paradoxically forced into a state of mus

204 which rapid mechanosensory feedback to wing motor system is provided by halteres, reduced hind wings

205 ork-level functional connectivity within the motor system is related to the degree of inhibition in M

206 The human motor system is remarkably proficient in the online cont

207 that indicate that plasticity in sensory and motor systems is reciprocally linked.

208 rganizing principle in the somatosensory and motor systems is somatotopy, where specific body parts a

209 The major link between the visual and motor systems is via the dorsal stream pathways from vis

210 y our conception of the syndrome, but of the motor system itself.

211 espite the clinical importance of the ocular motor system, little is known of the molecular mechanism

212 In an uncertain external environment, the motor system may need to respond rapidly to an unexpecte

213 Emerging evidence indicates that the motor system may participate in decision-making but the

214 These findings signal that our motor system may underpin more of social cognition than

215 ing faked actions facilitated the observers' motor system more than truthful actions in a body-part-s

216 ethods, and may open up new possibilities in motor systems neuroscience and rehabilitation.

217 ing that it can co-opt the basic anterograde motor system of cilia.

218 organization of connectivity within the leg motor system of Drosophila.

219 gy, or short-term cortical plasticity in the motor system of healthy elderly subjects.

220 nization of cholinergic systems which impact motor systems of the brainstem.

221 lying object grasping in both the visual and motor systems of the macaque monkey.

222 in lead to neurodegenerative diseases of the motor system or atypical parkinsonism.

223 ting the actions of others in the observers' motor system or on the access to conceptual knowledge st

224 the simulation of actions in the observers' motor system, or is based on access to conceptual knowle

225 ing from specific signals within the brain's motor systems, or rather depends on associative learning

226 CANCE STATEMENT Cross-species comparisons of motor system organization can provide fundamental insigh

227 in the liver are evident at birth, prior to motor system pathology, and impair essential liver funct

228 activity patterns are linked to compromised motor system performance as evinced by bradykinesia, rig

229 The current study assessed motor system physiology and behavior, plus a measure of

230 urons are a necessary cellular substrate for motor system plasticity following transection.

231 Patient improved symptomatically with a motor system power of grade 4 after hematoma evacuation

232 Many believe the motor system predicts the timing of beats, yet current m

233 Existing theories posit that the motor system prepares for all potential goals by generat

234 The motor system prepares for movements well in advance of t

235 understanding optic neuropathies, the ocular motor system, pseudotumor cerebri, posterior reversible

236 The human motor system rapidly adapts to systematic perturbations

237 Together, these results suggest that the arm motor system receives an urgency/vigor signal that adjus

238 th a Bayesian estimation framework where the motor system reduces its learning rate by virtue of lowe

239 t control could be achieved, however, if the motor system reduces the safety margin when LF variabili

240 ere, we examined how the excitability of the motor system relates to reaction time and the regional c

241 sensory systems, and the exact inputs to the motor system required to regulate contractions in the ta

242 icy that sets feedback gains shaping how the motor system responds to errors induced by noise or exte

243 o, its signature might be present in how the motor system responds to perturbations in the preparator

244 Broadly speaking, therefore, the motor system selectively accumulates iron with age.

245 findings support the normative view that the motor system selects only a single, flexible motor plan,

246 le of simulating observed movements in their motor system should have difficulty perceiving and inter

247 o motorically simulate observed actions, our motor systems should also be modulated dynamically, and

248 possibly to compensate for a more excitable motor system.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study brings to

249 ng system that allows us to monitor multiple motor systems simultaneously and found that each visual

250 eed the case by demonstrating that the human motor system sizes the GF safety margin in proportion to

251 Although it is well accepted that the speech motor system (SMS) is activated during speech perception

252 This is the first demonstration of one motor system steering development, and ultimately functi

253 SMN depletion disrupts the motor system subsequent to circuit development and can b

254 mirror neuron function that involve abnormal motor systems such as depression.

255 eful to enhance function after damage to the motor system, such as after stroke.

256 estingly, most of these disorders affect the motor system, suggesting a systematic relationship betwe

257 s non-essential for early development of the motor system, suggesting that important CNS functions ma

258 In the human motor system, tACS coincident with the idling beta rhyth

259 continua, we show that changes in the speech motor system that accompany learning drive changes in au

260 Together these data identify the descending motor system that commands left-right locomotor asymmetr

261 s high precision (around 100 nm) air-bearing motor system that connects the different end-stations, a

262 is the somatosensory system rather than the motor system that dominates learning in the early stages

263 ut those changes in connectivity observed in motor systems that could be attributed to activity in se

264 Many mammals are born with immature motor systems that develop through a critical period of

265 terminals are found in pathways issued from motor systems that innervate other brain centers to help

266 onments requires coordination of sensory and motor systems that underpin appropriate survival behavio

267 on-related signals across the human cortical motor system, these findings uncover a much stronger rep

268 teral component of the volitional or somatic motor system, they are able to modulate vocalization int

269 resentations associated with the sensory and motor systems through which they are acquired.

270 discharge is a highly conserved function of motor systems throughout evolution, and we provide clear

271 The failure of the motor system to accurately predict less prototypical spe

272 a decision, and the outcome is passed to the motor system to be converted into action.

273 in a state of high cognitive load "sets" the motor system to be imperturbable to distracting motor in

274 on the central connections of the trigeminal motor system to elucidate premotor centers controlling S

275 d via the visual system and then used by the motor system to guide defensive movements.

276 is a relationship between the ability of the motor system to produce a surplus of movements (tics) an

277 rect for any errors that arise, allowing the motor system to regulate force output so as to both mini

278 the actual mechanistic contributions of the motor system to sensory processing are unknown.

279 The ability of the motor system to show plastic change underlies skill lear

280 dbrain dopamine and integrated basal ganglia motor systems to control movement.

281 nt the anatomical organization of the spinal motor system, uncovering a multilayered topographic plan

282 with subacute spinal cord injury (SCI), the motor system undergoes progressive structural changes ro

283 this beta-band resynchronization pauses the motor system until conflict can be resolved.

284 ical context establishes a distinct class of motor system used for the transport and positioning of l

285 a-bursting is a fundamental signature of the motor system, used by both sensorimotor and frontal area

286 stimulus during decision-making affected the motor system via the vigor with which the eyes moved tow

287 n from development to aging, here, the aging motor system was used as a model to analyze the interdep

288 integrator, analogous to that in the ocular motor system, was proposed for the control of head movem

289 Using the Drosophila motor system, we manipulate expression of the classic te

290 nto the neurocomputational properties of the motor system, we propose that beat anticipation relies o

291 the accumulation process and activity in the motor system when people are free to respond at any time

292 A better analogy might be with other motor systems, where a common principle is rhythmic neur

293 rimotor beta-bursting signifies an inhibited motor system, which has to be overcome to initiate movem

294 coustic signals requires assistance from the motor system, which is uniquely organized to chain-link

295 rved temporal incongruity between visual and motor systems, which may reflect diminished integration

296 ough topography is a key feature also in the motor system, whole-body somatosensory-motor mapping usi

297 ential organizational principle of the human motor system, whose disruption in PD and ET dictates how

298 dults and monkeys, this process involves the motor system, with a neural matching mechanism believed

299 egenerative disorder primarily affecting the motor system, with extramotor involvement to a variable

300 These synthetic motor systems, with rapid transporting and efficient car