戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 e and were promoted by ectopic expression of Mule.
2 ins of similarity to the mammalian E3 ligase Mule.
3 ds on the MutYH levels that are regulated by Mule.
4 ein levels depend on the amount of expressed Mule.
5 her chances of a gene being acquired by Pack-MULEs.
6 ll the host factors for the transposition of MULEs.
7 er studies of the transposition mechanism of MULEs.
8 ype and account for the majority of the Pack-MULEs.
9 cal to that of a rice Mutator-like element ( MULE-9) and the MDM-2 family has an 8-bp terminus identi
10                                          The mule, a classic example of hybrid sterility in mammals a
11 hus unveils an important new avenue by which Mule acts as an intestinal tumor suppressor by regulatio
12 nzymes, the failure of cells to downregulate Mule after DNA damage results in deficient DNA repair.
13                                              Mule also contains a region similar to the Bcl-2 homolog
14                                              Mule also regulates protein levels of the receptor tyros
15 ts ubiquitylated derivative are modulated by Mule and ARF and siRNA knockdown of Mule leads to accumu
16 und that the kinase GSK3beta, the E3 ligases MULE and betaTrCP, and the deubiquitinase USP9x regulate
17 from reciprocal hybrids of horse and donkey (mule and hinny).
18 genome rearrangement, including domesticated MULE and IS1595-like DDE transposases.
19                      The interaction between Mule and Miz1 was promoted by TNFalpha independently of
20                     The Ka/Ks values of Pack-MULE and parental gene pairs are lower among Pack-MULEs
21 d evidence of a physical interaction between Mule and phospho-ATM.
22  a critical regulatory mechanism of HDAC2 by Mule and suggest this pathway determines the cellular re
23 d: Welsh Mountain, Scottish Blackface, Welsh Mule and Texel (n = 8 per breed).
24            This highlights the importance of Mule and TRIM26 in maintaining steady state levels of NE
25 ation of Miz1 were inhibited by silencing of Mule and were promoted by ectopic expression of Mule.
26 escribed in sheep, elk, and small numbers of mule and white-tailed deer.
27 ion to detect CWD infections in asymptomatic mule and white-tailed deer.
28                                         Each muLED and recording site has dimensions similar to a pyr
29 mportance of the conserved W residue in both MULEs and hATs.
30 h a reduction in expression of both the Pack-MULEs and their parental genes.
31 lyubiquitylation, Mcl-1 ubiquitin ligase E3 (Mule) and tripartite motif 26 (TRIM26).
32 ed this model by focusing on Helitrons, Pack-MULEs, and Sirevirus LTR retrotransposons in the maize g
33 sease of Equidae, including horses, donkeys, mules, and zebras, caused by either of two protozoan par
34 s suggests that a significant number of Pack-MULEs are expressed and subjected to purifying selection
35                            In addition, Pack-MULEs are frequently associated with small RNAs.
36         Therefore, at least a subset of Pack-MULEs are likely functional and have great potential in
37                         About 5% of the Pack-MULEs are represented in collections of complementary DN
38                     Terminal inverted repeat MULEs are the predominant MULE type and account for the
39                     At least 22% of the Pack-MULEs are transcribed, and 28 Pack-MULEs have direct evi
40          Mutator-like transposable elements (MULEs) are found in many eukaryotic genomes and are espe
41          Mutator-like transposable elements (MULEs) are widespread across fungal, plant and animal sp
42          Mutator-like transposable elements (MULEs) are widespread in plants and are well known for t
43 extract, we purified the E3 ubiquitin ligase Mule (ARF-BP1/HectH9) as an enzyme that can ubiquitylate
44                      The E3 ubiquitin ligase Mule/ARF-BP1 plays an important role in the cellular DNA
45  stimulation, the suppression is relieved by Mule/ARF-BP1-mediated Miz1 ubiquitination and subsequent
46 cruitment of the ubiquitin ligase (E3) Huwe1/Mule/ARF-BP1/HectH9/E3Histone/Lasu1 to mitofusin 2, with
47 licon-based microscale light-emitting diode (muLED) array, consisting of up to ninety-six 25 mum-diam
48 inated in vitro and in vivo by the E3 ligase Mule between amino acids 475 and 535.
49            Here we report that TNF activates Mule by inducing the dissociation of Mule from its inhib
50         In addition to genic sequences, rice MULEs capture guanine-cytosine (GC)-rich intergenic sequ
51                                              MULEs carrying nontransposon sequences have longer termi
52 risingly, mares carrying interspecies hybrid mule conceptuses did not exhibit this transient, pregnan
53 , and in horses carrying interspecies hybrid mule conceptuses.
54                   Here, we show in vivo that Mule controls murine intestinal stem and progenitor cell
55 e previously showed that Mule/Huwe1/Arf-BP1 (Mule) controls murine intestinal stem and progenitor cel
56    Comparison of the cellular genes and Pack-MULE counterparts indicates that fragments of genomic DN
57                                In our coyote-mule deer (Canis latrans-Odocoileus hemionus) system, le
58 ment data from four populations of migratory mule deer (n = 91).
59  Here we show that asymptomatic CWD-infected mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) excrete CWD prions in th
60 en isolated from North American free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) exhibiting mucocutaneous
61 ers by following 16 mother-daughter pairs of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) from each daughter's fir
62 video footage taken from systems deployed on mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in north-central Washing
63  range and arrival to summer range of female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in northwestern Colorado
64 enology across 99 unique migratory routes of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western Wyoming, Unit
65 a 10-year duration, we study a population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in Wyoming that lack rel
66 d that when energy development occurs within mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) migration corridors, mig
67 fat-free body mass; IFFFBMass) of 136 female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) over 8 years.
68                                              Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations in the weste
69  of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in captive mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) that is attributable to
70 or cervid endogenous gammaretrovirus) in the mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) that is insertionally po
71                 In a population of migratory mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), 31% surfed plant phenol
72 lemetry data from 50 cougars, 14 wolves, 142 mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and 90 white-tailed dee
73 California eat primarily black-tailed and/or mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and THg in deer fur fro
74     We used telemetry data from GPS-collared mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), cougars (Puma concolor)
75 ite-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), denoted Tg(DePrP).
76                                              Mule deer abundance declined by 36% during the developme
77 ttle in the United Kingdom and Europe and in mule deer and elk in parts of the United States has emph
78 is model to chronic wasting disease (CWD) in mule deer and elk populations in the Greater Yellowstone
79 same prion strain caused CWD in the analyzed mule deer and elk.
80          Common mammalian prey species, like mule deer and hares and rabbits (members of the family L
81              Despite increased selection for mule deer and intensified search behaviour by coyotes du
82  specialist species and management plans for mule deer and other large ungulates.
83                                          For mule deer and other species where migration is informed
84 rt-term studies of 2-3 years have shown that mule deer and other ungulates avoid energy infrastructur
85  behavioral effects of energy development on mule deer are long term and may affect population abunda
86                                   Impacts to mule deer are of particular concern because some of the
87 on levels appeared to influence selection by mule deer because of variability in crop rotation and su
88 uantified antler size of 11,000 male elk and mule deer born throughout the intermountain western US (
89     Primary cultures derived from uninfected mule deer brain tissue were transformed by transfection
90 nological changes along the migratory route, mule deer closely followed drought-altered green waves d
91                                              Mule deer consistently avoided energy infrastructure thr
92 ntain proviruses that are closely related to mule deer CrERVgamma in a conserved region of pol; more
93 e show that prairie voles are susceptible to mule deer CWD prions in vivo and that sPMCA amplificatio
94                     Our results suggest that mule deer detection probability was influenced by the in
95  the predator mediating foraging hypothesis: mule deer generally selected for burned areas in summer
96 re, on average, 100 CrERVgamma copies in the mule deer genome based on quantitative PCR analysis.
97 reased in areas with greater availability of mule deer habitat: coyotes shifted their behaviour relat
98 ars during development, to determine whether mule deer habituated to natural gas development and if t
99 bal Positioning System collars to monitor 14 mule deer in an agricultural area near public lands in s
100 n exists to understand resource selection of mule deer in response to annual variation in crop rotati
101 arious levels of insertional polymorphism in mule deer individuals.
102 chewan where the CWD prevalence rate in male mule deer is greater than 70%, 75% of the soil samples t
103 e hypothesized that prion transmission among mule deer might also be enhanced in ranges with relative
104  arrival on birthing areas, especially where mule deer migrate over longer distances or for greater d
105 elop step selection functions to examine how mule deer navigated species-specific predation risk acro
106                                              Mule deer occupying rabbit habitat (Sylvilagus spp.; coy
107                                              Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus and moose Alces alces exhi
108 pace use and survival of 61 pronghorn and 96 mule deer on a gradient of fence density in Wyoming, USA
109 development on habitat selection patterns of mule deer on their winter range in Colorado.
110 r relative to deer habitat, and the pulse in mule deer parturition and movement of neonatal deer duri
111 arch behaviour by coyotes during the peak in mule deer parturition, mule deer were afforded protectio
112 ance of expanding residential development on mule deer populations, a factor that has received little
113 he open reading frame (ORF) in exon 3 of the mule deer PRNP gene revealed polymorphisms in all 145 sa
114            Analysis of BAC clones containing mule deer PRNP genes revealed a full length functional g
115 rom CWD-positive elk, white-tailed deer, and mule deer produced disease in Tg(ElkPrP) mice between 18
116 production and reclamation efforts underway, mule deer remained >1 km away from well pads.
117  One CrERVgamma provirus was detected in all mule deer sampled but was absent from white-tailed deer,
118 ing changes in exon 3 were identified in the mule deer samples examined.
119                We tested the hypothesis that mule deer select certain crops, and in particular sunflo
120                                              Mule deer selected areas closer to forest and alfalfa fo
121                                     Notably, mule deer showed a stronger predicted negative response
122 functional gene alleles from 47 CWD-positive mule deer showed the predominant allele encoded 20D225S
123       Concurrently, we measured abundance of mule deer to indirectly link behavior with demography.
124 es during the peak in mule deer parturition, mule deer were afforded protection from predation via pr
125 first to correlate a demographic response in mule deer with residential and energy development at lar
126 gion of North Dakota (11% prevalence in male mule deer), none of the soils contained prion seeding ac
127    Comparable data have not been derived for mule deer, a species susceptible to the TSE chronic wast
128 and-use change with the demographic rates of mule deer, an iconic species in the western United State
129 prion protein in tissues from sheep, cattle, mule deer, and elk with naturally occurring transmissibl
130 l lymph node samples from white-tailed deer, mule deer, and moose, collected in the field from areas
131 e findings suggest that CWD prions from elk, mule deer, and white-tailed deer can be readily transmit
132                 We captured 205 adult female mule deer, equipped them with GPS collars, and observed
133                                          For mule deer, fence density determined the correlation betw
134 ive cycle of 232 free-ranging, adult, female mule deer, we revealed that nutrition is a critical piec
135 on disease) of North American cervids, i.e., mule deer, white-tailed deer, and elk (wapiti).
136                 Therefore, CWD isolates from mule deer, white-tailed deer, and elk were inoculated in
137 ulated with brain tissue from a CWD-infected mule deer.
138 repared from the brainstem of a CWD-affected mule deer.
139 of the PRNP gene in susceptibility to CWD in mule deer.
140 of barrier behaviours for both pronghorn and mule deer.
141 e known to influence habitat use patterns in mule deer.
142 n analysis to identify resources selected by mule deer.
143 hospho-p53, and Brca1 levels were reduced in Mule-deficient B cells and MEFs subjected to genotoxic s
144 ivation was increased by two- to fourfold in Mule-deficient B cells at steady state.
145                     Accumulation of HDAC2 in Mule-deficient cells leads to compromised p53 acetylatio
146         p53 protein was increased in resting Mule-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and em
147 (IR), although this occurs specifically in a Mule-dependent manner.
148 hip of cattle; chickens; donkeys, horses, or mules; ducks; goats; sheep; and pigs.
149 ts dissociation from ARF, thereby inhibiting Mule E3 ligase activity and TNF-induced JNK activation a
150                      Alternatively, the Pack-MULEs evolve into additional exons at the 5' end of exis
151                               Elimination of Mule expression by RNA interference stabilizes Mcl-1 pro
152 ntified what appears to be a legume-specific MULE family that was previously identified only in funga
153 one- and multiphoton optogenetics, implanted muLED/fiber systems, and nanomaterial-mediated transduct
154                           The resulting Pack-MULEs form independent, GC-rich transcripts with a negat
155                                         Pack-MULEs frequently contain fragments from multiple chromos
156 tivates Mule by inducing the dissociation of Mule from its inhibitor ARF.
157 o the MURA protein of Mutator-like elements (MULEs) from Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Oryza sativa)
158 and that the control of Pol lambda levels by Mule has functional consequences for the ability of mamm
159 stand the evolutionary relationships between MULE, hAT and Transib elements and the V(D)J recombinase
160 e their abundance and importance, few active MULEs have been identified.
161  the Pack-MULEs are transcribed, and 28 Pack-MULEs have direct evidence of translation.
162 n 5 piezometers in the pristine catchment of Mule Hole.
163  sites on the HECT domains of Smurf2, Nedd4, Mule/Huwe1, and WWP1, and thus act as specific inhibitor
164                    We previously showed that Mule/Huwe1/Arf-BP1 (Mule) controls murine intestinal ste
165                     To elucidate the role of Mule in B lymphocyte homeostasis, B cell-specific Mule k
166                                      Loss of Mule in both MEFs and B cells at steady state resulted i
167 d thereby inhibits the E3 ligase activity of Mule in the steady state.
168 LEs in rice and the widespread occurrence of MULEs in all characterized plant genomes, gene fragment
169 nalysis of the prevalence and nature of Pack-MULEs in an entire genome.
170 TEs, or TIR TEs) capturing sequences as Pack-MULEs in plants.
171 ression and purifying selection on 2809 Pack-MULEs in rice (Oryza sativa), which are derived from 150
172             In this study, we identified all MULEs in rice and examined factors likely important for
173                             The abundance of MULEs in rice and the availability of most of the genome
174                  Given the abundance of Pack-MULEs in rice and the widespread occurrence of MULEs in
175 ere we report that there are over 3,000 Pack-MULEs in rice containing fragments derived from more tha
176           Maize Helitrons resemble rice Pack-MULEs in their ability to capture genes or gene fragment
177     These chimaeric elements are called Pack-MULEs in this study.
178                        We also find that, as Mule inactivation is required for stabilization of base
179 e's influence on oncogenesis by showing that Mule interacts directly with beta-catenin and targets it
180                                              Mule is a Miz1-associated protein and catalyzes its K48-
181                                        Thus, Mule is a unique BH3-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase apic
182                          It is not known how Mule is activated by TNF.
183                      The E3 ubiquitin ligase Mule is often overexpressed in human colorectal cancers,
184 Our data describe a novel mechanism by which Mule is regulated in response to DNA damage and coordina
185                 However, how the activity of Mule is regulated in response to DNA damage is currently
186  Here, we report that HECT-domain-containing Mule is the E3 ligase that catalyzes TNFalpha-induced Mi
187  with orthologs among parental genes of Pack-MULEs is observed in rice, maize (Zea mays), and Arabido
188                   Mcl-1 ubiquitin ligase E3 (Mule) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the proapop
189                                         Like MULEs, Jit resembles Mutator in the length of the elemen
190 in B lymphocyte homeostasis, B cell-specific Mule knockout (BMKO) mice were generated using the Cre-L
191 lated by Mule and ARF and siRNA knockdown of Mule leads to accumulation of Pol beta and increased DNA
192 itored via direct injection of polycistronic MuLE lentiviruses into mouse tissues.
193 ing cultured primary mouse cells with single MuLE lentiviruses, we engineered tumors containing up to
194 indicates that a considerable number of Pack-MULEs likely have been under selective constraint.
195 action with its specific E3 ubiquitin ligase MULE (MCL-1 ubiquitin ligase E3) and specific deubiquiti
196 ECT-domain-containing ubiquitin ligase named Mule (Mcl-1 ubiquitin ligase E3) that is both required a
197 asts lacking a HECT domain ubiquitin ligase, Mule (Mcl-1 ubiquitin ligase E3).
198 n and degradation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Mule (Mcl-1 ubiquitin ligase E3; also known as Huwe1 or
199 , supplemented to sheep (Charolais x Suffolk-Mule (mean weight = 57 +/- 2.9 kg) at two European indus
200 f Pol lambda by Cdk2/cyclinA counteracts its Mule-mediated degradation by promoting recruitment of Po
201             Here, we show that the E3 ligase Mule mediates the degradation of Pol lambda and that the
202 t genomes, gene fragment acquisition by Pack-MULEs might represent an important new mechanism for the
203                     We demonstrate that Pack-MULEs modify the 5' end of genes and are at least partia
204 from the soybean genome, resembling the Pack-MULEs (Mutator-like transposable elements) found in maiz
205                                         Pack-MULEs, nonautonomous Mutator-like elements (MULEs) that
206                             These defects in Mule-null cells can be partially reversed by HDACis and
207 ly rescued by lowering the elevated HDAC2 in Mule-null cells to the normal levels as in wild-type cel
208 IBBS is also orders of magnitude faster than MULE, one of the most efficient maximal frequent subgrap
209        One example is Mutator-like elements (MULEs, one type of terminal inverted repeat DNA TEs, or
210 sent minimal-stimulation-artifact (miniSTAR) muLED optoelectrodes that enable effective elimination o
211  we reduced stimulation artifact on miniSTAR muLED optoelectrodes to below 50 muV(pp), much smaller t
212                                     MiniSTAR muLED optoelectrodes will facilitate functional mapping
213               An siRNA-mediated knockdown of Mule or TRIM26 leads to stabilisation of NEIL1, demonstr
214  group of transposable elements, called Pack-MULEs or transduplicates, is able to duplicate and ampli
215 , we demonstrated that a rice (Oryza sativa) MULE, Os3378, is capable of excising and reinserting in
216                                Inhibition of Mule phosphorylation by silencing of the Spleen Tyrosine
217                       Furthermore, MutYH and Mule physically interact.
218                                        Thus, Mule regulates the ATM-p53 axis to maintain B cell homeo
219 study reveals a molecular mechanism by which Mule regulates TNFalpha-induced JNK activation and apopt
220 by which parental genes are captured by Pack-MULEs remains largely unknown.
221          Here we extend our investigation of Mule's influence on oncogenesis by showing that Mule int
222                                         Pack-MULEs selectively acquire/retain parental sequences thro
223 s were implanted into 8 female adult English Mule sheep.
224        Cells that are unable to downregulate Mule show reduced ability to upregulate p53 levels in re
225 lar a quartet pedigree composed of a fertile mule showed a mosaic of sequences and number of ZF domai
226                                              Mule specifically targets HDAC2 for ubiquitination and d
227 SP7 deubiquitylation enzyme (USP7S) controls Mule stability by preventing its self-ubiquitylation and
228                                 Silencing of Mule stabilized Miz1, thereby suppressing TNFalpha-induc
229 n plants, the transposition mechanism of the MULE superfamily was previously unknown.
230   Together, our results demonstrate that the MuLE system provides genetic power for the systematic in
231  performing combinatorial genetics using the MuLE system.
232 describe the multiple lentiviral expression (MuLE) system that allows multiple genetic alterations to
233 and parental gene pairs are lower among Pack-MULEs that are expressed in sense orientations.
234 ack-Mutator-like transposable elements (Pack-MULEs) that carry gene fragments specifically acquire GC
235 -MULEs, nonautonomous Mutator-like elements (MULEs) that carry genic sequence(s), are potentially inv
236                Despite the abundance of Pack-MULEs, the functionality of these duplicates is not clea
237                Despite the abundance of Pack-MULEs, the mechanism by which parental genes are capture
238 2 homology region 3 (BH3) domain that allows Mule to specifically interact with Mcl-1.
239 DBDs of two classes of Mutator-like element (MULE) transposases.
240 al inverted repeat MULEs are the predominant MULE type and account for the majority of the Pack-MULEs
241 ly ubiquitin E3 ligase, Huwe1 (also known as Mule, UreB1, ARF-BP1, Lasu1, and HectH9), and Huwe1 poly
242                    Our findings suggest that Mule uses various mechanisms to fine-tune the Wnt pathwa
243 ssment of the selection pressure on the Pack-MULEs using the ratio of nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymo
244                      We created a toolbox of MuLE vectors that constitute a flexible, modular system
245                   Intramuscular injection of MuLE viruses expressing oncogenic H-RasG12V together wit
246            Analysis of BMKO mice showed that Mule was essential for B cell development, proliferation
247 roduction of giant bloodlines at a time when mules were essential to the Roman economy and military.
248         In maize, rice and Arabidopsis a few MULEs were shown to carry fragments of cellular genes.
249 biquitylation and proteasomal degradation of Mule, which eventually leads to p53 accumulation.
250      TNF induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Mule, which subsequently dissociates from ARF and become
251                                Chimeric Pack-MULEs, which contain gene fragments from multiple genes,
252 after Oryza sativa) found to be rich in Pack-MULEs, with >1000 elements that have captured and amplif

 
Page Top