戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n analysis to identify resources selected by mule deer.
2 ulated with brain tissue from a CWD-infected mule deer.
3 repared from the brainstem of a CWD-affected mule deer.
4 of the PRNP gene in susceptibility to CWD in mule deer.
5 of barrier behaviours for both pronghorn and mule deer.
6 e known to influence habitat use patterns in mule deer.
7    Comparable data have not been derived for mule deer, a species susceptible to the TSE chronic wast
8                                              Mule deer abundance declined by 36% during the developme
9 and-use change with the demographic rates of mule deer, an iconic species in the western United State
10 ttle in the United Kingdom and Europe and in mule deer and elk in parts of the United States has emph
11 is model to chronic wasting disease (CWD) in mule deer and elk populations in the Greater Yellowstone
12 same prion strain caused CWD in the analyzed mule deer and elk.
13          Common mammalian prey species, like mule deer and hares and rabbits (members of the family L
14              Despite increased selection for mule deer and intensified search behaviour by coyotes du
15  specialist species and management plans for mule deer and other large ungulates.
16                                          For mule deer and other species where migration is informed
17 rt-term studies of 2-3 years have shown that mule deer and other ungulates avoid energy infrastructur
18 prion protein in tissues from sheep, cattle, mule deer, and elk with naturally occurring transmissibl
19 l lymph node samples from white-tailed deer, mule deer, and moose, collected in the field from areas
20 e findings suggest that CWD prions from elk, mule deer, and white-tailed deer can be readily transmit
21  behavioral effects of energy development on mule deer are long term and may affect population abunda
22                                   Impacts to mule deer are of particular concern because some of the
23 on levels appeared to influence selection by mule deer because of variability in crop rotation and su
24 uantified antler size of 11,000 male elk and mule deer born throughout the intermountain western US (
25     Primary cultures derived from uninfected mule deer brain tissue were transformed by transfection
26                                In our coyote-mule deer (Canis latrans-Odocoileus hemionus) system, le
27 nological changes along the migratory route, mule deer closely followed drought-altered green waves d
28                                              Mule deer consistently avoided energy infrastructure thr
29 ntain proviruses that are closely related to mule deer CrERVgamma in a conserved region of pol; more
30 e show that prairie voles are susceptible to mule deer CWD prions in vivo and that sPMCA amplificatio
31                     Our results suggest that mule deer detection probability was influenced by the in
32                 We captured 205 adult female mule deer, equipped them with GPS collars, and observed
33                                          For mule deer, fence density determined the correlation betw
34  the predator mediating foraging hypothesis: mule deer generally selected for burned areas in summer
35 re, on average, 100 CrERVgamma copies in the mule deer genome based on quantitative PCR analysis.
36 reased in areas with greater availability of mule deer habitat: coyotes shifted their behaviour relat
37 ars during development, to determine whether mule deer habituated to natural gas development and if t
38 bal Positioning System collars to monitor 14 mule deer in an agricultural area near public lands in s
39 n exists to understand resource selection of mule deer in response to annual variation in crop rotati
40 arious levels of insertional polymorphism in mule deer individuals.
41 chewan where the CWD prevalence rate in male mule deer is greater than 70%, 75% of the soil samples t
42 e hypothesized that prion transmission among mule deer might also be enhanced in ranges with relative
43  arrival on birthing areas, especially where mule deer migrate over longer distances or for greater d
44 ment data from four populations of migratory mule deer (n = 91).
45 elop step selection functions to examine how mule deer navigated species-specific predation risk acro
46 gion of North Dakota (11% prevalence in male mule deer), none of the soils contained prion seeding ac
47                                              Mule deer occupying rabbit habitat (Sylvilagus spp.; coy
48                                              Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus and moose Alces alces exhi
49  Here we show that asymptomatic CWD-infected mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) excrete CWD prions in th
50 en isolated from North American free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) exhibiting mucocutaneous
51 ers by following 16 mother-daughter pairs of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) from each daughter's fir
52 video footage taken from systems deployed on mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in north-central Washing
53  range and arrival to summer range of female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in northwestern Colorado
54 enology across 99 unique migratory routes of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in western Wyoming, Unit
55 a 10-year duration, we study a population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in Wyoming that lack rel
56 d that when energy development occurs within mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) migration corridors, mig
57 fat-free body mass; IFFFBMass) of 136 female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) over 8 years.
58                                              Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations in the weste
59  of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in captive mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) that is attributable to
60 or cervid endogenous gammaretrovirus) in the mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) that is insertionally po
61                 In a population of migratory mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), 31% surfed plant phenol
62 lemetry data from 50 cougars, 14 wolves, 142 mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and 90 white-tailed dee
63 California eat primarily black-tailed and/or mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and THg in deer fur fro
64     We used telemetry data from GPS-collared mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), cougars (Puma concolor)
65 ite-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), denoted Tg(DePrP).
66 pace use and survival of 61 pronghorn and 96 mule deer on a gradient of fence density in Wyoming, USA
67 development on habitat selection patterns of mule deer on their winter range in Colorado.
68 r relative to deer habitat, and the pulse in mule deer parturition and movement of neonatal deer duri
69 arch behaviour by coyotes during the peak in mule deer parturition, mule deer were afforded protectio
70 ance of expanding residential development on mule deer populations, a factor that has received little
71 he open reading frame (ORF) in exon 3 of the mule deer PRNP gene revealed polymorphisms in all 145 sa
72            Analysis of BAC clones containing mule deer PRNP genes revealed a full length functional g
73 rom CWD-positive elk, white-tailed deer, and mule deer produced disease in Tg(ElkPrP) mice between 18
74 production and reclamation efforts underway, mule deer remained >1 km away from well pads.
75  One CrERVgamma provirus was detected in all mule deer sampled but was absent from white-tailed deer,
76 ing changes in exon 3 were identified in the mule deer samples examined.
77                We tested the hypothesis that mule deer select certain crops, and in particular sunflo
78                                              Mule deer selected areas closer to forest and alfalfa fo
79                                     Notably, mule deer showed a stronger predicted negative response
80 functional gene alleles from 47 CWD-positive mule deer showed the predominant allele encoded 20D225S
81       Concurrently, we measured abundance of mule deer to indirectly link behavior with demography.
82 ive cycle of 232 free-ranging, adult, female mule deer, we revealed that nutrition is a critical piec
83 es during the peak in mule deer parturition, mule deer were afforded protection from predation via pr
84 on disease) of North American cervids, i.e., mule deer, white-tailed deer, and elk (wapiti).
85                 Therefore, CWD isolates from mule deer, white-tailed deer, and elk were inoculated in
86 first to correlate a demographic response in mule deer with residential and energy development at lar