1 asive vs minimally invasive esophagectomy, a
multicenter, randomized trial).
2 12 hours of symptom onset in a prospective,
multicenter randomized trial.
3 rt Failure was an unblinded, parallel-group,
multicenter randomized trial.
4 g for cardioverting atrial fibrillation in a
multicenter randomized trial.
5 esenting to 5 emergency departments within a
multicenter randomized trial.
6 is strategy warrants further evaluation in a
multicenter randomized trial.
7 hese data are currently being confirmed in a
multicenter randomized trial.
8 discharge are still needed from three large
multicenter randomized trials.
9 Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY)
multicenter randomized trials.
10 d Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a
multicenter, randomized trial.
11 ed couples with unexplained infertility in a
multicenter, randomized trial.
12 atin in preventing exacerbations in a large,
multicenter, randomized trial.
13 Within a
multicenter, randomized trial,
150 patients with symptom
14 In this large,
multicenter, randomized trial,
2008 patients with stable
15 Within a large
multicenter randomized trial,
391 patients with acute de
16 Methods: In this
multicenter randomized trial,
494 patients exhibiting Pa
17 and RIF-based tuberculosis treatment in the
multicenter randomized trial (
ACTG A5221).
18 This
multicenter randomized trial aimed at objectifying the e
19 This phase I/II prospective, open label,
multicenter, randomized trial aimed primarily at evaluat
20 The AWESOME
multicenter randomized trial and registry compared the l
21 One
multicenter randomized trial and several nonrandomized r
22 rd approaches for detecting anomalies within
multicenter randomized trials and assist data monitoring
23 In a harmonized dataset of 4
multicenter randomized trials (
APPRAISE-2 [Apixaban for
24 Multicenter, randomized trials are needed to ascertain t
25 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial at 14 CF centers with subj
26 be interpreted cautiously and validated in a
multicenter randomized trial before adoption into practi
27 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial between February 2011 and
28 This open-label,
multicenter randomized trial compared 133 kidney transpl
29 The HiLo pragmatic,
multicenter randomized trial compared a higher versus lo
30 This
multicenter randomized trial compared allopurinol to ras
31 This
multicenter randomized trial compared the prognostic val
32 This
multicenter, randomized trial compared capecitabine plus
33 Adjuvant brachytherapy may reduce LR This
multicenter randomized trial compares SR to SR with brac
34 In the VANISH2
multicenter randomized trial comparing catheter ablation
35 Viral Activation Transfusion Study, an NHLBI
multicenter randomized trial comparing leukoreduced vers
36 Patients were enrolled in a Veterans Affairs
multicenter randomized trial comparing PCI versus CABG f
37 A
multicenter randomized trial comparing TAI (intervention
38 We have carried out a
multicenter randomized trial comparing three versus six
39 Single-center and
multicenter randomized trials comparing primary angiopla
40 ACTG 333 was a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing 2 formulations o
41 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing a specific vacci
42 This was a prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in
43 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing early nasoenteri
44 In a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing open and laparos
45 ILUMIEN IV was the first large-scale,
multicenter, randomized trial comparing optical coherenc
46 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing peginterferon pl
47 The PAVE pilot study was a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing periodontal ther
48 A
multicenter, randomized trial comparing the effectivenes
49 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial comparing thymectomy plus
50 Multicenter randomized trial conducted among 374 critica
51 The Danish Calmette Study is a
multicenter randomized trial conducted from 2012-2015 at
52 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 8,
53 Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 120 intensive
54 In a
multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 17 emergency
55 In a
multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 24 emergency
56 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 28 intensive
57 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial conducted between June 6,
58 ESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a
multicenter, randomized trial conducted in 20 emergency
59 In this
multicenter, randomized trial conducted in Italy, we ass
60 In a
multicenter, randomized trial conducted in seven intensi
61 In this prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial,
DCB was superior to PTA a
62 Symplicity HTN-2, a
multicenter, randomized trial,
demonstrated that cathete
63 ot Study of Anti-Restenosis Treatment) was a
multicenter randomized trial designed to estimate the ef
64 e present large-scale pooled analysis from 2
multicenter randomized trials,
early ST was more frequen
65 This prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial enrolled 502 patients with
66 This
multicenter, randomized trial evaluated safety and effic
67 for Patients with AF Undergoing TAVR) was a
multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the safety and
68 In a
multicenter randomized trial,
family members of hospital
69 Recently concluded
multicenter, randomized trials for breast cancer with 5-
70 severe sepsis enrolled in usual care arms of
multicenter randomized trials have experienced decreasin
71 Four large
multicenter randomized trials have now completed enrollm
72 s global investigator-initiated, open-label,
multicenter, randomized trial,
hepatitis B e antigen (HB
73 We performed a
multicenter randomized trial in 219 patients at 18 hospi
74 This is the first
multicenter randomized trial in ovarian cancer to longit
75 Investigator-initiated, blinded, Australian,
multicenter randomized trial in patients undergoing clin
76 nt Implantation Compared With Angiography: A
Multicenter Randomized Trial in PCI) trial prospectively
77 tent Implantation Compared to Angiography: A
Multicenter Randomized Trial in PCI; NCT03507777).
78 nt Implantation Compared With Angiography: A
Multicenter Randomized Trial in PCI]; NCT03507777).
79 The external validity of
multicenter randomized trials in cancer treatment has be
80 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial in 27 hospitals in the Net
81 In a
multicenter, randomized trial in 310 noncirrhotic patien
82 We performed an open-label,
multicenter, randomized trial in Europe involving patien
83 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial in the United Kingdom that
84 ost hoc analysis of data from a prospective,
multicenter randomized trial including participants with
85 c Ventricular Tachycardia) is a prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial including patients with is
86 This
multicenter randomized trial involving 200 patients comp
87 We conducted a
multicenter randomized trial involving 446 patients who
88 A
multicenter randomized trial involving patients at a low
89 N, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An open-label,
multicenter, randomized trial involving 126 adults (>=18
90 al is an investigator-initiated, open-label,
multicenter, randomized trial involving 126 centers in 1
91 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial involving 793 newborns who
92 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial involving participants wit
93 We conducted a prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial involving patients 75 year
94 In this
multicenter, randomized trial involving patients with an
95 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial involving women with a sin
96 A
multicenter randomized trial is currently under way to c
97 A prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial is needed to determine whe
98 In this
multicenter randomized trial,
long-term endoscopic varic
99 ed in the Medical Research Council UKALL2003
multicenter randomized trial (
NCT00222612) between 2003
100 Department Patients With Heart Failure) is a
multicenter randomized trial of a patient-centered trans
101 Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) was a
multicenter randomized trial of CRT among 610 patients w
102 In conjunction with a
multicenter randomized trial of fidaxomicin versus vanco
103 The recent U.S.
multicenter randomized trial of FK506 versus cyclosporin
104 ogical harms to patients with cirrhosis in a
multicenter randomized trial of HCC surveillance outreac
105 We used prospectively collected data from a
multicenter randomized trial of high dose ursodeoxycholi
106 d to a shorter hospital stay in this Western
multicenter randomized trial of patients with predominan
107 lysis of prospectively collected data from a
multicenter randomized trial of sedation (Randomized Eva
108 internally and externally using data from a
multicenter randomized trial of suramin plus hydrocortis
109 Future studies should include a
multicenter randomized trial of this model of care.
110 SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Secondary analysis of
multicenter randomized trials of critically ill adults i
111 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial of 384 patients with in-st
112 Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI), a
multicenter, randomized trial of an implantable cardiac
113 A prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial of CABG versus PTCA, which
114 left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) was a
multicenter, randomized trial of CRT among patients with
115 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial of dispatcher instructions
116 on-shock patients enrolled in a prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial of mechanical reperfusion
117 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS:
Multicenter, randomized trial of patients experiencing o
118 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial of patients with a large n
119 In this
multicenter, randomized trial of patients with HFpEF (NC
120 ited (n = 558) after primary treatment for a
multicenter, randomized trial of psychoeducational inter
121 ith Preserved Ejection Fraction) study was a
multicenter, randomized trial of sildenafil versus place
122 In conclusion, in this U.S.
multicenter, randomized trial of therapy for HCV in pati
123 We conducted a phase 3,
multicenter, randomized trial of transplantation of peri
124 Two
multicenter, randomized trials of patients with uncompli
125 In this secondary analysis of a prospective
multicenter randomized trial on treatment of 104 infants
126 thrombosis, using data from 2 international,
multicenter, randomized trials performed between 2014 an
127 Retrospective review of patients enrolled in
multicenter, randomized trials performed from 2006 to 20
128 A
multicenter randomized trial provides Level I evidence t
129 A
multicenter randomized trial recruiting 321 patients 16
130 Recent results from the largest
multicenter randomized trial (
Shockless IMPLant Evaluati
131 This
multicenter, randomized trial showed that tight glycemic
132 Results of this
multicenter randomized trial suggest that multimorbid fe
133 ct of this novel therapy and support further
multicenter randomized trials targeted to address the im
134 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST)
multicenter randomized trial testing laparoscopic versus
135 Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF) was a
multicenter randomized trial testing the impact of silde
136 HiLo was a pragmatic,
multicenter randomized trial that compared higher (>=6.5
137 Neurohormonal Efficacy and Survival Study, a
multicenter randomized trial that included serial KCCQ a
138 s the long-term results of the international
multicenter randomized trial that investigated the use o
139 eeks of gestation and had been enrolled in a
multicenter, randomized trial that compared HFOV with co
140 d Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a
multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled participants
141 The HERA trial was an international,
multicenter, randomized trial that included 5099 patient
142 Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) is an ongoing,
multicenter, randomized trial that randomized 155,000 me
143 on rates after the May 2008 publication of a
multicenter, randomized trial that showed increased mort
144 In this
multicenter randomized trial,
the clinical benefit and s
145 In this prospective, single-blind,
multicenter, randomized trial,
the authors randomly assi
146 In this prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial,
the second-generation Cho
147 In a
multicenter randomized trial,
thermal ablation of the po
148 We designed this
multicenter randomized trial to compare outcomes of prim
149 We report the first
multicenter randomized trial to evaluate use of a distal
150 We conducted an open-label,
multicenter randomized trial to test the impact of presu
151 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial to assess the safety and e
152 We performed a
multicenter, randomized trial to compare physiotherapy a
153 rent standard of care and argue for a large,
multicenter, randomized trial to definitively establish
154 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial to determine the impact of
155 We conducted a
multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether cryob
156 onducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled,
multicenter, randomized trial to test the hypothesis tha
157 This
multicenter randomized trial was conducted in 22 centers
158 A
multicenter randomized trial was conducted on patients u
159 This
multicenter randomized trial was conducted to determine
160 This
multicenter randomized trial was designed to test whethe
161 The purpose of this
multicenter randomized trial was to compare total mortal
162 An investigator-initiated,
multicenter, randomized trial was conducted to assess wh
163 likelihood or durability of the response, a
multicenter, randomized trial was performed at nine acad
164 rapy in heart failURE) trial, a prospective,
multicenter, randomized trial,
was conducted in patients
165 In this
multicenter randomized trial,
we assigned patients with
166 In a
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned 900 patients
167 In this phase 3, double-blind,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned adults with m
168 In this phase 3,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned in a 1:1 rati
169 In this
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned older patient
170 In this
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned patients with
171 In an international,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned patients with
172 In this open-label,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we assigned pregnant wome
173 In a
multicenter, randomized trial,
we compared POEM with LHM
174 In a pragmatic,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we compared the levonorge
175 In a prospective, open-label,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we enrolled patients pres
176 In this
multicenter, randomized trial,
we evaluated the effects
177 In a
multicenter, randomized trial,
we found that including C
178 In this 13-week,
multicenter, randomized trial,
we randomly assigned in a
179 ients (n = 1648) from 2 previously completed
multicenter randomized trials were included.
180 In 2006, short-term outcomes from two large
multicenter randomized trials were published.
181 the long-term results (1-12 months) of this
multicenter, randomized trial,
where patients were assig
182 This
multicenter randomized trial with 2 parallel arms (drain
183 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 x 2 factorial desi
184 On the basis of these encouraging results, a
multicenter, randomized trial with operators and patient
185 vention of Pulmonary Air Leakage study was a
multicenter randomized trial,
with blinded evaluation of