ライフサイエンスコーパス: multidetector CT

1 .8) and eccentric (cardiac MR 23.2% +/- 2.0; multidetector CT 24.4% +/- 2.1) remodeling groups relati

2 66 years; range, 45-81 years) underwent 110 multidetector CT examinations after endovascular repair

3 n both concentric (cardiac MR 25.1% +/- 4.2; multidetector CT 28.4% +/- 2.8) and eccentric (cardiac M

4 fication with multiplanar reformatted and 3D multidetector CT images.

5 In 19 of 45 (42%) multidetector CT scans, ischemia was confirmed at surger

6 reated surgically within the next 7 days, 45 multidetector CT scans were retrospectively reviewed.

7 to control group (cardiac MR 18.9% +/- 1.9, multidetector CT 22.0% +/- 1.7, P < .05, all comparisons

8 Images were reviewed by applying a multidetector CT-based grading system, and the amount of

9 tric high-resolution CT of the chest using a multidetector CT scanner (Ingenuity Core 128; Philips Me

10 umetric thin-section CT of the chest using a multidetector CT scanner (Ingenuity Core 128; Philips Me

11 neral density may go unreported at abdominal multidetector CT if sagittal reconstructions are not rou

12 range, 19-94 years) underwent both abdominal multidetector CT and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (D

13 mage quality parameters of routine abdominal multidetector CT images compared with those of ASIR and

14 te appendicitis who underwent abdominopelvic multidetector CT.

15 Early hypoenhancement was recognized on all multidetector CT and cardiac MR images.

16 ied the fractures with radiography alone and multidetector CT alone.

17 ess differences between (18)F-FDG PET/CT and multidetector CT (MDCT) findings, to compare (18)F-FDG P

18 ngle-snapshot radiography, cone-beam CT, and multidetector CT.

19 Radial strain for both cardiac MR and multidetector CT was abnormal in both concentric (cardia

20 combination of preoperative radiographic and multidetector CT image findings and intraoperative findi

21 d patients who underwent calcium scoring and multidetector CT angiography before conventional coronar

22 however, in addition to coronary assessment, multidetector CT can be used to evaluate numerous noncor

23 ductions of radiation dose are achievable at multidetector CT angiography of the peripheral arteries

24 r quadrant pain, a nonvisualized appendix at multidetector CT reliably excludes acute appendicitis.

25 Measurements of hepatic tumor attenuation at multidetector CT are reproducible.

26 tions of organ-specific injuries depicted at multidetector CT are also discussed.

27 correlation between percent ISR evaluated at multidetector CT versus intravascular US was higher in g

28 of ccRCCs affects their imaging features at multidetector CT examinations.

29 en (13%) wound tracks were not identified at multidetector CT (six upper extremity wounds and four th

30 sterior area of the neck) were identified at multidetector CT.

31 and ground-glass opacity within the lung at multidetector CT are supportive of drowning in the appro

32 The plaque area was overestimated at multidetector CT by 400% (4.61/1.15) on average, and the

33 ent reconstruction improves image quality at multidetector CT coronary angiography but does not signi

34 les with a 0.30-06 rifle and then scanned at multidetector CT.

35 Conversely, when the appendix was seen at multidetector CT and was abnormal, appendicitis was pres

36 quisition of four additional image series at multidetector CT.

37 ee-dimensional elbow scans over gantry-based multidetector CT (MDCT), but studies analyzing their cli

38 on significantly decreased agreement between multidetector CT angiography and QCA to detect a coronar

39 layed hyperenhancement were compared between multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging with Pearson cor

40 t (n = 12) had very good correlation between multidetector CT (4% +/- 4) and cardiac MR imaging (3% +

41 Correlation between multidetector CT and TTE for global function (r = 0.68)

42 There was no significant difference between multidetector CT and myocardial perfusion SPECT groups f

43 arct was not significantly different between multidetector CT (6.3% +/- 0.8 of the LV mass), MR imagi

44 d stent maximal lumen narrowing site between multidetector CT and intravascular US were higher in gro

45 showed good CNR and correlated well between multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging.

46 Total-body multidetector CT was performed, immediately prior to rou

47 /unenhanced multidetector CT and split-bolus multidetector CT for restaging were investigated retrosp

48 Fused FDG PET/split-bolus multidetector CT provides additional information compare

49 Radiation dose was low in both multidetector CT groups (1.9 mSv+/-0.2).

50 pliance with HIPAA regulations by using both multidetector CT and (3)He MR imaging.

51 Endoscopic ultrasonography followed by multidetector CT was performed in all patients.

52 Cardiac multidetector CT was performed in 102 patients (34 with

53 l-enhanced electrocardiography-gated cardiac multidetector CT.

54 y, a noncontrast, ECG-gated, 8-slice cardiac multidetector CT was performed.

55 In four cases, multidetector CT aided in accurate assessment of organ i

56 In 48 negative cases, multidetector CT depicted alternative findings that acco

57 Although certain multidetector CT findings are very specific for the diag

58 All CTAs were performed using a 32-channel multidetector CT scanner.

59 Strain analysis of cine multidetector CT images of the left ventricle was optimi

60 ed contrast agent calibrated with a clinical multidetector CT scanner served as contrast agent-enhanc

61 catheterization were imaged with a clinical multidetector CT scanner.

62 The clinical multidetector CT scanner provides reliable measurements

63 Microscopy measurements confirmed multidetector CT quantitative measurements and differenc

64 al and contrast resolution than conventional multidetector CT systems.

65 the SAN and AVN were examined with coronary multidetector CT in 102 patients (55 men, 47 women; mean

66 and contrast-enhanced CT ((18)F-FDG PET/CT), multidetector CT (MDCT), and MR imaging in differentiati

67 ography, cone-beam computed tomography (CT), multidetector CT, and micro-CT.

68 DE multidetector CT with advanced postprocessing techniques

69 endovascular repair of AAAs underwent 24 DE multidetector CT examinations, which were performed with

70 inary observations suggest that obtaining DE multidetector CT data by using a single 60-second contra

71 m and insert was scanned with five different multidetector CT scanners on five separate occasions by

72 pplication of PICCS to standard FBP low-dose multidetector CT abdominal images results in substantial

73 y sediment is highly suggestive of drowning; multidetector CT findings of pan sinus fluid, mastoid ce

74 ing enables reconstruction of the AIF during multidetector CT perfusion imaging.

75 n the area under the curve (AUC) for dynamic multidetector CT-derived AIF (3108 + or - 1250 [standard

76 the reader's ability to successfully employ multidetector CT imaging protocols for evaluation of TBM

77 mm) were examined at 64-section dual-energy multidetector CT by using a dual-detector "double-decker

78 ns were examined with 64-section dual-energy multidetector CT by using a novel dual-detector "double-

79 on]) and dynamic (13.8% +/- 4.9) dual-energy multidetector CT data sets.

80 T with those determined with the dual-energy multidetector CT enhancement algorithm revealed no signi

81 ired, contrast material-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT images were acquired at 80 and 140 kVp.

82 onenhanced and contrast-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT of the abdomen.

83 Dual-energy multidetector CT performed with optimized acquisition pa

84 Dual-energy multidetector CT with iodine quantification can be used

85 Contrast-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT with material density analysis allows d

86 Dual-energy multidetector CT with novel postprocessing techniques en

87 h OCT with those determined with dual-energy multidetector CT, and the significance of factors such a

88 tion beyond that achieved with single-energy multidetector CT acquisitions with basic attenuation ass

89 tent beyond that achieved with single-energy multidetector CT.

90 ming and beam hardening beyond single-energy multidetector CT.

91 s of signal attenuation at contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and counterstaining of infarct at micro

92 Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT is a suitable noninvasive imaging techn

93 nd RBF were measured using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT, and renal oxygenation by 3-T blood oxy

94 in seven dogs and contrast material-enhanced multidetector CT was performed during adenosine infusion

95 Delayed-enhancement multidetector CT (13% +/- 9) correlated well with delaye

96 ology results and clinical outcome evaluated multidetector CT images for evidence of EPNI and duodena

97 uted tomography (CT) technology has evolved, multidetector CT has become an integral part of the init

98 was measured at histopathologic examination, multidetector CT, and flat-panel-volume CT.

99 the AUC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for multidetector CT angiography and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0

100 Mean follow-up interval for multidetector CT after treatment was 30 days.

101 a guide to select blunt trauma patients for multidetector CT angiographic evaluation.

102 and 12.4 seconds +/- 0.6, respectively, for multidetector CT and 17.2 seconds +/- 0.8 and 12.5 secon

103 of the scatterplots indicated a tendency for multidetector CT to overestimate thickness.

104 Strain values for multidetector CT versus cardiac MR showed better agreeme

105 , reconstructions of cartilage geometry from multidetector CT arthrographic data could be used as a p

106 ion of contrast media, and non-cardiac-gated multidetector CT (MDCT) with and without contrast media

107 ion of contrast media, and non-cardiac-gated multidetector CT with and without contrast media to rule

108 the AUC for the AIF measured during helical multidetector CT correlated best with MBF (R(2) = 0.86,

109 f bolus-tracking and time-registered helical multidetector CT data.

110 When AIF analysis was applied to helical multidetector CT myocardial perfusion measurements, the

111 Advances in multidetector CT (MDCT) technology with submillimeter sl

112 Such advances have resulted in multidetector CT being increasingly used as a complement

113 r techniques to analyze bone quality include multidetector CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and quanti

114 In multivariate regression that included multidetector CT findings as well as the three tradition

115 meticulous bowel preparation and inflation, multidetector CT, combined two- and three-dimensional vi

116 zation of parathyroid adenomas that involves multidetector CT image acquisition during two or more co

117 and three-dimensional reconstructions makes multidetector CT an ideal noninvasive method for evaluat

118 At 7-8 weeks after microembolization, multidetector CT and MR imaging were used to assess LV f

119 dy to examine the accuracy of 64-row, 0.5-mm multidetector CT angiography as compared with convention

120 Modern multidetector CT scanners merge acquisition speed and hi

121 Conclusion: Modern multidetector CT and MR imaging are sensitive modalities

122 Enhancement at multiphasic multidetector CT, if prospectively validated, may assist

123 and oncocytoma with preoperative multiphasic multidetector CT with as many as four phases (unenhanced

124 The diagnostic performance of nonenhanced multidetector CT and dual-energy material densities was

125 lecting an improved ability over nonenhanced multidetector CT for diagnosis of lipid-poor adenoma.

126 nostic performance compared with nonenhanced multidetector CT attenuation (sensitivity of 67% [16 of

127 Thus, on otherwise normal multidetector CT scans in patients suspected of having a

128 s, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of multidetector CT for ISR identification were 96%, 95%, a

129 Despite all the advantages of multidetector CT, clearing the spine in which injury is

130 the past decade, mostly due to the advent of multidetector CT.

131 e development and widespread availability of multidetector CT scanners, CT has assumed a greater role

132 The effect of multidetector CT imaging regimen, tube current, cyst dia

133 article, the authors review the elements of multidetector CT technique that are currently relevant f

134 Readers were shown radiographs at the end of multidetector CT image reading to see if this would chan

135 The evaluation of multidetector CT coronary angiography with interactive i

136 ying results from the various generations of multidetector CT scanners used.

137 atically increased since the introduction of multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners.

138 the authors present a step-by-step primer of multidetector CT imaging for evaluating infants and chil

139 ls, two- and three-dimensional processing of multidetector CT data, and image interpretation.

140 Sensitivity and specificity of multidetector CT for ischemia were 63% (12 of 19) and 92

141 This review centers on the current state of multidetector CT as a triage tool for penetrating torso

142 aging algorithm resulted in decreased use of multidetector CT in patients who presented with BAPT to

143 aging algorithm resulted in decreased use of multidetector CT of the head and cervical spine in patie

144 The use of multidetector CT technology has made this a versatile ex

145 In particular, the use of multidetector CT to provide pulmonary and cardiac venous

146 ry angle determination in models with use of multidetector CT.

147 the established appropriate clinical uses of multidetector CT in the assessment of structural heart d

148 Pseudoenhancement is strongly dependent on multidetector CT convolution kernel.

149 mated quantification of RV myocardial fat on multidetector CT images is feasible and performs better

150 The size of PD on multidetector CT had a moderate correlation against SPEC

151 on is centered on the increasing reliance on multidetector CT in the work-up of these patients but al

152 46 mL +/- 4, and 50% +/- 3, respectively, on multidetector CT images and 92 mL +/- 8, 48 mL +/- 5, an

153 icrosphere deposition increased after TAE on multidetector CT, cone-beam CT, and micro-CT images (P <

154 iagnosis of perforated appendicitis, overall multidetector CT sensitivity is poor.

155 tage of left ventricular mass) at first-pass multidetector CT (11% +/- 6) correlated well with those

156 al myocardium were comparable for first-pass multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging, cardiac MR imag

157 First-pass multidetector CT and MR imaging demonstrated significant

158 For detection of acute MI in patients, multidetector CT sensitivity was 94% (32 of 34) and spec

159 Portal venous phase multidetector CT images are highly specific and moderate

160 patients was measured on portal venous phase multidetector CT images by using a single ROI, the avera

161 tion was observed from pre- to posttreatment multidetector CT (P < .05).

162 PNI and/or duodenal invasion on preoperative multidetector CT images have significantly reduced survi

163 atients with PDAC who underwent preoperative multidetector CT and subsequent pancreaticoduodenectomy.

164 g clinical indications, patient preparation, multidetector CT techniques and protocols, two- and thre

165 less abscess or extraluminal gas is present, multidetector CT cannot enable the diagnosis of perforat

166 The accuracy of quantitative multidetector CT angiography to depict substantial (>/=

167 X-ray multidetector CT provides a new, noninvasive way to inve

168 With the use of x-ray multidetector CT with interactive 3D reconstruction, the

169 The authors recommend multidetector CT with oral, rectal, and intravenous cont

170 s who preoperatively underwent 40- or 64-row multidetector CT for penetrating torso trauma below the

171 ducts (40, 75, 110, and 150 mAs) on a 64-row multidetector CT scanner with 10-cm scan length.

172 low velocity can be measured from row-to-row multidetector CT projectional data obtained during a sin

173 fractures on chest radiographs and sagittal multidetector CT reconstructions.

174 ransverse (axial) and retrospective sagittal multidetector CT reconstructions were reviewed for the p

175 jection (MIP) images created at a 16-section multidetector CT console with three-dimensional (3D)-wor

176 age, 27 years) were scanned with 16-section multidetector CT prior to routine autopsy.

177 al axial scans were obtained with 16-section multidetector CT while a 10-mL bolus of contrast materia

178 imaged with both cardiac MR and 320-section multidetector CT at a temporal resolution of less than 5

179 rd deviation]) were examined with 64-section multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging 5 days or fewer

180 ocardiograms (ECGs), and coronary 64-section multidetector CT angiograms in 317 patients were reviewe

181 al occlusive disease referred for 64-section multidetector CT angiography of the lower limb (0.625-mm

182 ed with both electron-beam CT and 64-section multidetector CT at 1-week intervals in randomized order

183 andard deviation]) underwent both 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography and conventional a

184 Diagnostic accuracy of 64-section multidetector CT for ischemia associated with SBO was ex

185 el-wall attenuation on unenhanced 64-section multidetector CT images is a specific sign for ischemia

186 a, who had undergone preoperative 64-section multidetector CT of the chest and abdomen, and who had s

187 enhancement was the most accurate 64-section multidetector CT sign for diagnosing ischemia (sensitivi

188 ears) with urolithiasis underwent 64-section multidetector CT with 75-150 mA and noise index of 30.

189 ies for detection of PDI by using 64-section multidetector CT with postprocessing software ranged fro

190 iver tumors underwent dual-energy 64-section multidetector CT.

191 emodynamics and function by using 64-section multidetector CT.

192 Sixty-four-section multidetector CT trajectography facilitates the identifi

193 Sixteen-section multidetector CT data sets for 40 patients (30 men, 10 w

194 s performed using contrast-enhanced 64-slice multidetector CT imaging, and vitamin D levels and the p

195 oracic electrocardiography-gated dual-source multidetector CT angiographic images were used from 250

196 obtained with single-source and dual-source multidetector CT implementations.

197 n phantom was scanned by using a dual-source multidetector CT platform.

198 Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT resulted in vascular, liver, and pancre

199 od was developed and validated to synthesize multidetector CT data sets at multiple radiation exposur

200 and positive predictive values indicate that multidetector CT angiography cannot replace conventional

201 stic regression analysis results showed that multidetector CT grade and the abbreviated injury scale

202 The multidetector CT finding of frothy airway fluid or high-

203 The multidetector CT group was less likely to undergo corona

204 mage reading to see if this would change the multidetector CT-based classification.

205 aphs add little information for changing the multidetector CT classification.

206 Two radiologists reviewed in consensus the multidetector CT images obtained in all patients for var

207 es of angina were significantly lower in the multidetector CT group (4.3% vs 6.4%, P < .001).

208 Adjusted CAD costs in the multidetector CT group were 25.9% lower than in the myoc

209 Those in the multidetector CT group were more likely to undergo downs

210 In this article, the authors review the multidetector CT technique for evaluation of congenital

211 e images and interpretations to validate the multidetector CT determinations.

212 The shift from single-detector CT to multidetector CT and the use of decreasing section thick

213 In patients with blunt head trauma, multidetector CT venographic evaluation should be perfor

214 g cohorts) using prospectively ECG-triggered multidetector CT.

215 and sex-matched control patients undergoing multidetector CT.

216 tion and/or other aortic disorders underwent multidetector CT.

217 patients with blunt splenic injury underwent multidetector CT at admission to the hospital.

218 y one patients with splenic injury underwent multidetector CT.

219 individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT (n = 1647) compared with those in a mat

220 c or distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent multidetector CT angiography and surgery at our institut

221 Individuals without known CAD who underwent multidetector CT as an initial diagnostic test, compared

222 ized small intestinal tumours, who underwent multidetector CT enterography.

223 asymptomatic outpatient adults who underwent multidetector CT for colorectal cancer screening (unenha

224 e DSSE strategy in 19 patients who underwent multidetector CT of the liver for metastatic colorectal

225 f the 400 consecutive patients who underwent multidetector CT, 132 (33.0%) were male and 268 (67.0%)

226 tion, 54 years +/- 12; 1639 women) underwent multidetector CT for colorectal screening or renal donor

227 eviation, 54 years 12; 1639 women) underwent multidetector CT for colorectal screening or renal donor

228 ic patients who underwent FDG PET/unenhanced multidetector CT and split-bolus multidetector CT for re

229 information compared with FDG PET/unenhanced multidetector CT in oncologic patients.

230 ers and the percentage infarct size by using multidetector CT (r = 0.82 for creatinine phosphokinase,

231 PD was detected by using multidetector CT and was correlated with cardiac biomark

232 age thickness measurements obtained by using multidetector CT arthrography and yielded data pertinent

233 nts with acute MI can be identified by using multidetector CT on the basis of RWM abnormalities and P

234 with contrast material, and scanned by using multidetector CT.

235 ransthoracic echocardiography (TTE) by using multidetector CT.

236 lent correlation between regional MECV using multidetector CT and microscopy (r(2) = 0.92).

237 With multidetector CT, radiologists can now perform objective

238 iography and substantial (kappa = 0.70) with multidetector CT.

239 diac MR imaging at all examinations and with multidetector CT at 11 of 15 examinations.

240 thout DM, we assessed coronary arteries with multidetector CT angiography and invasive conventional a

241 Compared with multidetector CT, endoscopic ultrasonography is superior

242 -HU cysts; was significantly correlated with multidetector CT imaging regimen (P<.0001), cyst diamete

243 trauma over 9 years and were evaluated with multidetector CT angiography.

244 ardiac structures that can be evaluated with multidetector CT, and outlines the established appropria

245 ute blunt head trauma and were examined with multidetector CT venography because they were considered

246 the surgeons' classification was higher with multidetector CT than with radiography (P < .01 for one

247 ex vivo coronary arteries were measured with multidetector CT and intravascular US.

248 TACs obtained with multidetector CT were qualitatively similar to those obt

249 The data provided with multidetector CT imaging are useful for treatment planni

250 Three ex vivo hearts were scanned with multidetector CT and flat-panel-volume CT after institut

251 In two cases of a chest wound, multidetector CT aided in accurate assessment of the che