ライフサイエンスコーパス: multisensory integration

1 een cross-modal inputs, an important cue for multisensory integration.

2 gesting that the enhancement was mediated by multisensory integration.

3 resent a novel, two-step metric for defining multisensory integration.

4 surround suppression, visual attention, and multisensory integration.

5 emporal and spatial congruence principles of multisensory integration.

6 uity is solved by tracking head tilt through multisensory integration.

7 ion of everyday life events relies mostly on multisensory integration.

8 ks between neural and performance metrics of multisensory integration.

9 superior colliculus (SC) neurons capable of multisensory integration.

10 t inter-area synchronization is important in multisensory integration.

11 s with areas Tpt and TPO, which are sites of multisensory integration.

12 sting that it is an anatomical substrate for multisensory integration.

13 volved in memory of a volatile that requires multisensory integration.

14 frames is therefore a critical component of multisensory integration.

15 in the amygdala rests at the foundation for multisensory integration.

16 s, feature extraction in sensory systems and multisensory integration.

17 s specific to body ownership, not general to multisensory integration.

18 s; a fundamental neural computation known as multisensory integration.

19 S1, suggesting an increase in efficiency of multisensory integration.

20 bit atypical sensory processing and impaired multisensory integration.

21 sensory modalities are responsible for such multisensory integration.

22 f-consciousness and is believed to stem from multisensory integration.

23 lfactory cortex to cerebral areas processing multisensory integration.

24 tion via internal model training and shaping multisensory integration.

25 e explicit divisive normalization to achieve multisensory integration.

26 ute to the combined percept obtained through multisensory integration.

27 erging evidence that STS plays a key role in multisensory integration.

28 and auditory neurons that exhibit nonlinear multisensory integration.

29 ibly reduces deafference during asynchronous multisensory integration.

30 ces influence crossmodal interactions during multisensory integration.

31 ularly interested in cellular computation of multisensory integration.

32 rately approach neuronal operations of human multisensory integration.

33 traints encoded in the body schema influence multisensory integration.

34 e modulation of self-face recognition during multisensory integration.

35 ance the experience of body ownership during multisensory integration.

36 r diverse feature domains (e.g., motion) and multisensory integration.

37 t biomechanical constraints are processed in multisensory integration.

38 ive attention that is triggered by bottom-up multisensory integration.

39 rt for a divisive normalization mechanism in multisensory integration.

40 specialist, is a classic model for studying multisensory integration.

41 same neural mechanisms that are involved in multisensory integration.

42 rship illusions on the temporal dimension of multisensory integration.

43 which one of the neural mechanisms enabling multisensory integration.

44 ility and higher-level processes involved in multisensory integration.

45 structures and is thought to play a role in multisensory integration.

46 a plastic brain representation emerging from multisensory integration.

47 ant pathophysiological processes involved in multisensory integration.

48 of this model to analyze the complexities of multisensory integration.

49 e beyond the classical tasks used to explore multisensory integration?

50 ions and synchrony act as prominent cues for multisensory integration [2-4], but the neural mechanism

51 dy part other than the hand, suggesting that multisensory integration according to basic spatial and

52 ion of higher-order brain regions related to multisensory integration among CA patients suggests a co

53 uman behaviors that require timing-dependent multisensory integration and action planning.

54 ponses to sensory event timing processed for multisensory integration and action planning?

55 While both multisensory integration and adaptive trial-by-trial rec

56 this is explained by a 'moveable window' for multisensory integration and by a 'temporal ventriloquis

57 rmation, enabling mechanistic comparisons of multisensory integration and central processing for navi

58 These areas appear to be specialized for the multisensory integration and coordinate transformations

59 that a similar network can learn to perform multisensory integration and coordinate transformations

60 ly conserved pathway in defense circuits for multisensory integration and cross-modality enhancement.

61 mained consistent across different levels of multisensory integration and evidence accumulation.

62 but also temporal delays to perform optimal multisensory integration and feedback control in real-ti

63 Multisensory integration and interaction occur when bimo

64 Here, we examined the development of multisensory integration and rapid recalibration in the

65 s (SC) is a midbrain structure important for multisensory integration and sensorimotor transformation

66 observations are discussed in the context of multisensory integration and spatial, temporal predictio

67 essential for SC output neurons to engage in multisensory integration and to support normal orientati

68 the significance of preserved abilities for multisensory integration and top-down processing in mini

69 sions), presented across sensory modalities (multisensory integration) and combined with non-sensory

70 ical functions, including spatial attention, multisensory integration, and behavioral responses.

71 a brain region supporting short-term memory, multisensory integration, and decision-making.

72 omotor congruence is sufficient for inducing multisensory integration, and importantly, if biomechani

73 brain area important for spatial perception, multisensory integration, and movement planning.

74 ts resemble gated amplification phenomena in multisensory integration, and other non-driving modulato

75 hat also has substantial predictive power in multisensory integration, and provides a single computat

76 k emphasises the role of nonlinear fusion in multisensory integration, and provides testable hypothes

77 integration, support a more flexible view of multisensory integration, and suggest a complex, recipro

78 ensory neurons, the share of neurons showing multisensory integration, and the magnitude of multisens

79 Once multisensory integration appeared in a given neuron, its

80 tive process by which the neural products of multisensory integration are achieved is poorly understo

81 These characterizations of multisensory integration are important for the developme

82 ea that the behavioral products derived from multisensory integration are not attributable to simple

83 nvolved in the detection of disease cues and multisensory integration are vital parts.

84 to, among others, the angular gyrus, a known multisensory integration area.

85 We observed that multisensory integration areas exhibited enhanced functi

86 results tend to support earlier concepts of multisensory integration as relatively late and centered

87 We have used the C. elegans model to examine multisensory integration at the interneuron level to bet

88 nsively before decision making, with altered multisensory integration being associated with disorders

89 n the psychological and neural mechanisms of multisensory integration between different sensory modal

90 We investigated the dynamics of multisensory integration between vision and touch using

91 mmunological conditions where alterations of multisensory integration, body representation and dysfun

92 al sulcus (STS) is a critical brain area for multisensory integration, but little is known about its

93 experiences, attentional control facilitates multisensory integration by dynamically regulating the b

94 ry displacement), indicating facilitation of multisensory integration by motoric visuomotor congruenc

95 ational account of the important features of multisensory integration by neurons.

96 fried and Dolan extends our understanding of multisensory integration by showing that facilitation of

97 Studies of multisensory integration by single neurons have traditio

98 We now can appreciate how multisensory integration can alter patterns of neural ac

99 We propose that flexible multisensory integration can be explained by a combinati

100 bit substantial covariance, and consequently multisensory integration can yield more substantial erro

101 visive normalization, acting at the stage of multisensory integration, can account for many of the em

102 Furthermore, once a neuron acquired multisensory integration capabilities at the exposure si

103 ge, the potential for acquiring or modifying multisensory integration capabilities extends well into

104 Development of multisensory integration capabilities in superior collic

105 The multisensory integration capabilities of neurons in the

106 The multisensory integration capabilities of superior collic

107 by noise-rearing can develop visual-auditory multisensory integration capabilities rapidly when perio

108 he normal developmental period for acquiring multisensory integration capabilities.

109 t in the requirements for the development of multisensory integration capabilities.

110 Experimentalists studying multisensory integration compare neural responses to mul

111 chophysical paradigm to objectively quantify multisensory integration, conscious awareness, and their

112 is less well understood but is essential for multisensory integration, coordination between brain reg

113 ject oddity procedure that detects selective multisensory integration deficits in a rat model of schi

114 Bayesian models propose that multisensory integration depends on both sensory evidenc

115 T Intersensory timing is a crucial aspect of multisensory integration, determining whether and how in

116 hape optimal integration mechanisms, or does multisensory integration develop prior to recalibration?

117 Its capacity for multisensory integration develops in cats 1-4 months aft

118 er between sexes, previous studies examining multisensory integration did not evaluate potential sex

119 ssing zone that we believe to be involved in multisensory integration during speech perception and fe

120 This multisensory integration effect required a simultaneous

121 ng debate in neuroscience is to which extent multisensory integration emerges already in primary sens

122 While multisensory integration enables lucidity maintenance an

123 nt of available cognitive resources and that multisensory integration engages top-down o and B oscill

124 w that when available resources are limited, multisensory integration engages top-down o and B oscill

125 nt of available cognitive resources and that multisensory integration engages top-down theta and beta

126 w that when available resources are limited, multisensory integration engages top-down theta and beta

127 found to rapidly initiate the development of multisensory integration, even more rapidly than expecte

128 In the auditory system, multisensory integration first occurs in the cochlear nu

129 We review recent work on multisensory integration, focusing on experiments that b

130 o suggest that DDD cells are not involved in multisensory integration for heading perception.

131 processes ranging from salience detection to multisensory integration for perceptual binding.

132 rtion of these neurons capable of adult-like multisensory integration, gradually increased.

133 Our understanding of multisensory integration has advanced because of recent

134 Altered multisensory integration has been reported in autism; ho

135 Since then, the neuroscientific study of multisensory integration has increased exponentially in

136 hat accounts for these empirical features of multisensory integration has not been established.

137 ed from traditional physiological studies of multisensory integration have been difficult to reconcil

138 bout the role of affective congruency during multisensory integration, i.e. whether the stimuli to be

139 layed maturation of multisensory neurons and multisensory integration in AES suggests that the higher

140 also motivated recent theories of defective multisensory integration in ASD.

141 n widespread theories of impaired global and multisensory integration in ASD.

142 zation of the SC and for the neural basis of multisensory integration in general.

143 We investigated multisensory integration in human superior temporal sulc

144 tisensory object oddity (MSO) task to assess multisensory integration in ketamine-treated rats, a wel

145 g of the computational principles underlying multisensory integration in mammals, this model provides

146 These relationships suggest a role for multisensory integration in migraine.

147 well as to the mature neural mechanisms for multisensory integration in motor learning.

148 Nonetheless, multisensory integration in obesity has been scantily in

149 ide the first comprehensive investigation of multisensory integration in obesity.

150 Procedures to evaluate multisensory integration in rodent models are lacking.

151 the cortical influences that are crucial for multisensory integration in superior colliculus (SC) out

152 to investigate audio-haptic coordination and multisensory integration in the auditory cortex.

153 ances our understanding of the mechanisms of multisensory integration in the brain.

154 ntly, present a novel framework for indexing multisensory integration in the context of continuous sp

155 primary sensory cortex, suggesting possible multisensory integration in the early stages of cortical

156 at training leads to two distinct effects on multisensory integration in the form of (i) a specific n

157 ry and association cortices, thereby framing multisensory integration in the generalized context of a

158 Consistently, we demonstrated that multisensory integration in the habenula relies on compe

159 tent with a nicotinic-GABAergic mechanism of multisensory integration in the prefrontal cortex, resul

160 This suggests that multisensory integration in the premotor cortex provides

161 Because the location of multisensory integration in the STS varies from subject

162 was functionally connected to core areas of multisensory integration in the superior temporal sulcus

163 igned to investigate the temporal profile of multisensory integration in this model system.

164 sciousness, consistent with an inhibition of multisensory integration in this network.

165 ty of separating cross-modal modulation from multisensory integrations in neurons that receive excita

166 gnals reaching the brain [7-9] but also, via multisensory integration, increases coherence of cogniti

167 These canonical operations subsume multisensory integration into a fundamental set of princ

168 ance of conscious perception of synchrony to multisensory integration is a controversial topic.

169 robiologists have traditionally assumed that multisensory integration is a higher order process that

170 Multisensory integration is a powerful mechanism for con

171 Multisensory integration is a salient feature of the bra

172 Atypical multisensory integration is an understudied cognitive sy

173 Although multisensory integration is crucial for sensorimotor fun

174 These data reveal that SC multisensory integration is dependent on the cooperative

175 cotectal projections in the abrupt gating of multisensory integration is discussed.

176 Multisensory integration is disrupted in patients with s

177 Multisensory integration is essential for the expression

178 This suggests that multisensory integration is flexible and context depende

179 l processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although multisensory integration is generally considered benefic

180 urons show that this "temporal principle" of multisensory integration is more nuanced than previously

181 Multisensory integration is particularly important in th

182 he large-scale cortical network underpinning multisensory integration is reorganized due to expertise

183 Previous research suggests that multisensory integration is shaped by a context-dependen

184 y other modalities.(1) One important type of multisensory integration is the cross-modal modulation,

185 A dramatic illustration of this multisensory integration is the McGurk effect, an illusi

186 A compelling example of auditory-visual multisensory integration is the McGurk effect, in which

187 or extrinsic factors.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Multisensory integration is the process by which the bra

188 Multisensory integration is ubiquitous, facilitating per

189 We analyse modularity, multisensory integration, left-right, and intersegmental

190 nsory processing streams, which implies that multisensory integration may be a low-level rather than

191 Multisensory integration may explain some of this abilit

192 ies have investigated the neural sites where multisensory integration may occur.

193 They are interpreted in terms of a multisensory integration mechanism that increases the st

194 Thus, low-level audiovisual multisensory integration might contribute to disrupted r

195 Multisensory integration (MSI) combines information from

196 long-range connectivity putatively underlie Multisensory Integration (MSI) deficits in Autism Spectr

197 Although multisensory integration (MSI) has been extensively stud

198 Studies have shown multisensory integration (MSI) in humans is consistent w

199 We compared the emergence of multisensory integration (MSI) in the IC of behaviorally

200 The presence of a spatial modulation of multisensory integration (MSI) is considered a hallmark

201 A predominant concept for the underlying multisensory integration (MSI) is the linear summation o

202 Multisensory integration (MSI) is the process that allow

203 Here we directly compared the effect of multisensory integration (MSI) on reaction time across t

204 n from different sources, a process known as multisensory integration (MSI).

205 Following principles of multisensory integration, multiplicative combination of

206 ely captures the three essential features of multisensory integration, namely, super-additive respons

207 For example, the need for multisensory integration necessitates vestibular represe

208 r interneurons of mdVI (including Basin-2, a multisensory integration neuron necessary for rolling) p

209 ggest that the prolonged period during which multisensory integration normally appears is due to deve

210 Therefore, multisensory integration not only improves the precision

211 In background noise, multisensory integration occurred at much lower frequenc

212 Results indicated significant multisensory integration occurred in central/post-centra

213 These data provide a rare example of multisensory integration occurring at the level of the s

214 and visual speech responses, suggesting that multisensory integration occurs at both spectrotemporal

215 Convergence of pathways for multisensory integration occurs throughout the network-m

216 n mechanism operating in brain regions where multisensory integration occurs.

217 ern of these adjustments are consistent with multisensory integration of all information regarding mo

218 Multisensory integration of auditory and tactile informa

219 ncement of speech comprehension reflects the multisensory integration of auditory and tactile informa

220 ains to the level of processing at which the multisensory integration of featural information, such a

221 However, the computations that govern multisensory integration of flavor components and their

222 icating that V6 is unlikely to contribute to multisensory integration of heading signals, unlike othe

223 only males with dyslexia showed a deficit in multisensory integration of simple nonlinguistic stimuli

224 Multisensory integration of somatosensory, visual, audit

225 nt to changing environments effortlessly via multisensory integration of the effector's state, motor

226 and depression may be a general property of multisensory integration operating at different levels o

227 rrent theories of claustrum function such as multisensory integration or salience computation.

228 the present study, we applied a widely used multisensory integration paradigm, the Rubber Hand Illus

229 ision-making, context-dependent integration, multisensory integration, parametric working memory, and

230 ith quiet wakefulness and attention modulate multisensory integration, predictive coding, and percept

231 is known about how these areas implement the multisensory integration process at the computational le

232 s of sensory stimulation is important to the multisensory integration process leading to embodiment,

233 as differences in how priors are used in the multisensory integration process.

234 d be used as a reliable measure for studying multisensory integration processing in humans.

235 In multisensory integration, processing in one sensory moda

236 -by-trial variations in neural signatures of multisensory integration relate to the elicitation of th

237 ions suggest that acquiring the rudiments of multisensory integration requires little more than expos

238 principles, including timescale invariance, multisensory integration, rhythmical structure, and atte

239 Our study indicates that deficits of multisensory integration seem to be more severe in males

240 ount for many of the empirical principles of multisensory integration shown by single neurons, such a

241 more accurate functional topography of human multisensory integration.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The bimo

242 s, as well as the higher-order properties of multisensory integration, such as the dependency of mult

243 perception of synchrony is a prerequisite to multisensory integration, support a more flexible view o

244 ship, implying that the self-related form of multisensory integration supporting body ownership is la

245 Development and validation of multisensory integration tasks for animal models is esse

246 e growing realization that the same rules of multisensory integration that have been thoroughly explo

247 enhancements and spatial characteristics of multisensory integration that were indistinguishable fro

248 sory channels has been taken as evidence for multisensory integration (the "redundant target effect";

249 ogically inspired, general-purpose model for multisensory integration, the multisensory correlation d

250 viding a constraint for developing models of multisensory integration, the relationship between respo

251 in the brain includes three key operations: multisensory integration-the task of combining cues into

252 g a well established behavioral correlate of multisensory integration: the redundant target effect (R

253 known function of LEC in working memory and multisensory integration, these results suggest it may s

254 what and where visual streams; together with multisensory integration, this enables behavioral respon

255 here that acute pain can also be reduced by multisensory integration through self-touch, which provi

256 science understanding of the rules governing multisensory integration to the design of better product

257 Between 180-220 ms, significant multisensory integration was evident in central/post-cen

258 The development of multisensory neurons and multisensory integration was examined in the deep layers

259 temporal sulcus (STS) is a critical site for multisensory integration, we hypothesized that activity

260 relationship between temporal processing and multisensory integration, we presented 101 participants

261 ltisensory integration, and the magnitude of multisensory integration were all found to differ by lay

262 to propose a simple nonlinear algorithm for multisensory integration which is compatible with our cu

263 of visual-somatosensory co-activation (i.e., multisensory integration), while younger adults demonstr

264 amework, but our findings support a model of multisensory integration with reciprocal interactions be

265 role for primary olfactory cortical areas in multisensory integration with the olfactory system.

266 While we found neural signatures of multisensory integration within temporal and parietal re

267 in the amygdala establishes a foundation for multisensory integration within this structure.

268 e PPC is considered to be a cortical hub for multisensory integration, working memory, and perceptual

269 As noted earlier, multisensory integration yielded SC responses that were