戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 69 patients (37 pathological and 32 innocent murmurs).
2 the echocardiography laboratory for systolic murmur.
3 sence of other recognized causes of systolic murmur.
4 tients referred for evaluation of a systolic murmur.
5 tal defect (VSD) among children with a heart murmur.
6 nted with cardiovascular symptoms or a heart murmur.
7 d in the separation of innocent from organic murmurs.
8 ings other than a higher prevalence of heart murmurs.
9 e disease, 2 points; Auscultation of a heart murmur, 1 point (receiver operating characteristic = 0.8
10 ed respiratory distress (16), shock (3), and murmur (2).
11 levated blood pressure, 28% have a diastolic murmur, 31% have pulse deficits or blood pressure differ
12 on and 97% for coloring), and heart (95% for murmur, 97% for rhythms, and 98% for sounds), lung (91%
13 riminator between heart disease and innocent murmur and can, in many instances, eliminate the expense
14 resenting symptom (42.2%), followed by heart murmur and supraventricular tachycardia.
15                                     Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indicat
16  vinsonii antigens and uncharacterized heart murmurs and/or arrhythmias.
17  PR interval, clinically significant cardiac murmur, and heart failure were associated with atrial fi
18 ms were fever, splenomegaly, new or changing murmur, and microvascular phenomena.
19 eelings of repletion, flatulence, intestinal murmurs, and burping (p < 0.04).
20 hould be a clinical consideration when these murmurs are identified.
21                        Solely ECG misses the murmurs associated with the narrowing of the blood vesse
22 , the dog had been diagnosed with a systolic murmur at 16 months of age and underwent balloon valvulo
23  patient had a grade II/IV rumbling systolic murmur best heard at the left upper sternal border.
24 ial biomarkers for improving the accuracy of murmur detection.
25 tid bruits completely resolved, her systolic murmur diminished, and her platelet count rose to 268,00
26                      Presence of a diastolic murmur does little to change the pretest probability of
27 istinguish between innocent and pathological murmurs effectively.
28                                   Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%).
29                     Patients with intestinal murmurs had greater bowel wall thickness of the sigmoid
30 aphy laboratory for evaluation of a systolic murmur have IIVs in the absence of other recognized caus
31 tion between innocent and pathological heart murmurs have met with limited success.
32 , prior valve disease in 2 points, and heart murmur in 1 point.
33 iagnosis was intermediate VSD in 4, innocent murmur in 3, major VSD in 2, pulmonary stenosis in 2 and
34              Physical examination revealed a murmur in 70% of patients.
35 f carotid bruits, and improvement in cardiac murmur in a young female patient with sitosterolemia.
36 men presenting with hypotension and systolic murmur in critical care settings.
37 ar velocities are a common cause of systolic murmur in this group of patients and should be included
38 ed in the differential diagnosis of systolic murmurs in adults.
39  a median follow-up interval of 43.2 months, murmur intensity increased in all patients, and the aver
40 f states, including documentation of a heart murmur, irregular heart rhythm, peripheral pulses, or st
41                                      A heart murmur is an atypical sound produced by blood flow throu
42 es are often diagnosed subacutely when a new murmur is heard.
43  serious heart condition, so detecting heart murmurs is critical for identifying and managing cardiov
44 nferred from a peripheral pulmonary stenosis murmur (n=41) in 76% of subjects.
45 revious Valve disease, Auscultation of heart murmur (NOVA) score-based on the following variables: Nu
46   The majority of our 11 patients reacquired murmurs of mitral regurgitation.
47 r back pain) and signs (aortic regurgitation murmur or pulse deficits) of dissection were less common
48 ed previously because of cardiac symptoms, a murmur, or an abnormal electrocardiogram.
49  in patients with a new aortic regurgitation murmur (P = .019, 95% CI 1.3-20.1).
50 o the diagnosis of endocarditis were cardiac murmurs, persistent or recurrent fever, a history of hea
51                        Only the Austin Flint murmur, the Corrigan pulse, the Duroziez sign, and the H
52 nce of these proposed features for detecting murmurs using a set of classifiers.
53 ation (TR), a long-held concept suggested by murmur variation, remains unproven and of unclear mechan
54 its were audible, and a grade II/VI systolic murmur was detected at the left upper sternal border.
55            The sole explanation for systolic murmur was IIVs in 16.7% of referred patients.
56                    Among patients with MR, a murmur was inconsistently detected clinically.
57                         An ejection systolic murmur was noted most often in the left third intercosta
58  referring veterinarian had detected a heart murmur, which led to progressive dyspnea and a diagnosis
59 37 (19%) had a peripheral pulmonary stenosis murmur with either a normal echocardiogram or no imaging
60 ds ratio, 13.4 [CI, 4.5 to 39.5]), and heart murmur without other known cardiac abnormalities (adjust