ライフサイエンスコーパス: mutual

1 hey are most critical by improving trust and mutual accountability among stakeholders.

2 tion and T cell cytokine profiles underlying mutual activation between both cell types.

3 of the reaction intermediate indole and the mutual activation of the alpha-subunit TrpA and the beta

4 gh an interplay with platelets, resulting in mutual activation.

5 Specifically, mutual adaptation exhibits a higher between-unit couplin

6 ur of the dyads and found patterns mostly of mutual adaptation.

7 These associations remained with mutual adjustment and persisted when adjusting for basel

8 Following mutual adjustment for the other immune markers, sCD23 re

9 After mutual adjustment for the other PRSs, only the PRS for b

10 fter adjustment for previous performance and mutual adjustment of the biomarkers.

11 many of the conventional risk factors after mutual adjustment.

12 for apoA-I was attenuated to the null after mutual adjustment.

13 n both single- and two-pollutant models with mutual adjustment.

14 Multivariable models with mutual adjustments across immune markers showed further

15 Mutual affection and caring make the development of comm

16 led by coders into gaze motion events with a mutual agreement of 0.74 sample based Cohen's kappa.

17 achieved a 91% Dice score, compared with the mutual agreement of 85% in Dice seen in the interobserve

18 lent technical variance (RSD = 10%) and good mutual agreement was demonstrated for 12 nonesterified F

19 16 Fort McMurray wildfire also confirms good mutual agreement with an acceptable negative bias (mean

20 th evolutionarily-relevant features in which mutual aid and sharing of resources help ensure survival

21 reduce adverse sequelae from ongoing use and mutual aid groups.

22 range attraction, short-range repulsion, and mutual alignment between adjacent swimmers.

23 in North and South hemispheres, break due to mutual annihilation of toroidal flux there.

24 Our work uncovers a mutual antagonism between Gli3 and Hox13 paralogs that h

25 This mutual antagonism between STRIPAK and SAV1 controls the

26 In many cells, polarity involves mutual antagonism between the Par complex and the Scribb

27 E3 ligase VHL interacts with Daam2 and their mutual antagonism regulates oligodendrocyte differentiat

28 Network modeling indicates that VIP-SST mutual antagonism regulates the gain of the cortex to ac

29 atin and euchromatin are globally poised for mutual antagonism, the mechanisms underlying precise spa

30 ation between winner RHP and costs suggested mutual assessment during the pre-escalation phase but no

31 Here we report evidence for mutual assessment in a wild primate.

32 esents some of the first direct evidence for mutual assessment in primate signaling contests.

33 The mutual assessment strategy, where the individual assesse

34 not meet the predictions of either self- or mutual assessment, suggesting their contest behaviour ma

35 agonistic encounters to become proficient at mutual assessment.

36 Collectively, our study uncovers the mutual association between the quality of predicted cont

37 estern blots from co-IP studies revealed the mutual association of OTP86 and OZ1 with native RIP9 com

38 the trimeric FCP complexes indicated a close mutual association, the higher oligomeric pool is only w

39 tions are coincidental based on individuals' mutual attraction to similar reef structure to maximise

40 s between the host and its microbiota are of mutual benefit and promote health.

41 e volatiles mediate interactions of apparent mutual benefit between streptomycetes and springtails (C

42 ical species routinely collaborate for their mutual benefit or compete for available resources, there

43 , an interaction that bound them together in mutual benefit.

44 uman primates coordinate their behaviors for mutual benefit.

45 lternative hypotheses, the kin selection and mutual benefits hypotheses [14], to uncover the selectiv

46 articipation in collections demonstrates the mutual benefits of undergraduate involvement.

47 singly, in some cases, despite the lack of a mutual biochemical toolkit for biomineralization or evid

48 propriate level of H(2)S is critical for its mutual change of positive and negative effects of obesit

49 of states provide sound understanding of the mutual chemical interactions between elements and phase-

50 Mutual clustering information exhibits none of the undes

51 and among researchers that One Medicine, the mutual co-study of animals and humans, could be benefici

52 Mutual coherence and equal frequency separation of the m

53 For CDI, a lower bound for the required mutual coherence factor of |mu 12| >/= 0.75 is found by

54 ons for the cross-spectral density (CSD) and mutual coherence functions (MCFs) for twisted space-freq

55 umber of exit channels accessible upon their mutual collision.

56 ifferent strategies of both pathogens in the mutual colonization of an artificial surface and confirm

57 indicate that the BotC neurons may establish mutual connections with the pFRG, providing expiratory i

58 buted representation, and context-sensitive, mutual constraint satisfaction-based processing.

59 nteractions between actomyosin units through mutual contractile deformations of the intervening cytos

60 nally, we highlight both, the standalone and mutual contributions of abnormal ROS signalling and macr

61 Mutual control of the electricity and magnetism in terms

62 lity, suggested the reaction pathways of the mutual conversions of fatty acids and confirmed the decr

63 l phenolics to an antioxidant activity their mutual correlations were evaluated.

64 to drive charge separation and overcome the mutual Coulomb attraction between electron and hole.

65 For 60-GHz band communications, both the mutual coupling and transmission distance restrict the p

66 theoretical framework modeling the dynamical mutual coupling between the neuronal and neurotransmitte

67 se insights demonstrate that the whole-brain mutual coupling between the neuronal and the neurotransm

68 nsional spins interacting only through their mutual coupling to a reservoir.

69 The Zeeman terms and the mutual couplings appearing in the Ising Hamiltonians are

70 The LCC model reveals the mutual couplings between the antenna rings.

71 Including this bi-stable circuit of mutual cRel-Blimp1 antagonism into a multi-scale model r

72 and statistics: phase-space reconstruction, mutual cross mapping, and partial correlation.

73 on cancels phrenic motor facilitation due to mutual cross-talk inhibition.

74 nding sites of FXIII-A concerning evolution, mutual crosstalk, thermodynamic activation profile, subs

75 ion alongside development, emphasizing their mutual dependence on genetic network features, fitness l

76 nical correlation analysis designed to model mutual dependencies between symptom dimensions and neura

77 f this trend, and we propose that increasing mutual dependency on external factors (also known as Mor

78 ric galectin-1 and monomeric galectin-3, the mutual design conversion caused qualitative differences,

79 not necessarily on a line and with arbitrary mutual distances, starting with a generic input wave.

80 -1 and CYP1A2 form a stable complex and have mutual effects on the catalytic behavior of both protein

81 ggregation of monomers and clusters in their mutual electrostatic field proceeds in a fractal manner.

82 The mutual encroachment of underlying kidney disease and cel

83 We further observed mutual enhancement of microbial activity and photodegrad

84 insulator-to-metal transition, recently the mutual enhancement of the electron-electron and the elec

85 roots or pathogenic microbes is initiated by mutual exchange of signals.

86 nderstanding of the origin of betalains, the mutual exclusion of betalains and anthocyanins, and the

87 ain pigments within Caryophyllales and their mutual exclusion with anthocyanin pigments have been the

88 rescent protein-tagged SYNV variants display mutual exclusion/cross-protection in Nicotiana benthamia

89 Our analysis demonstrates the mutual exclusive nature of the PAM2w-mediated interactio

90 tivate NF-kappaB signalling, and we observed mutual exclusivity among tumours with somatic NF-kappaB

91 e computing cost and perform less restricted mutual exclusivity analysis, we developed an efficient m

92 Mutual exclusivity arises because of the complementarity

93 e importantly, our results demonstrated that mutual exclusivity can also provide information that goe

94 Among such patterns, mutual exclusivity has been employed by several recent m

95 lly characterize patterns of co-mutation and mutual exclusivity in 6,456 cancers across 23 tumor type

96 Mutual exclusivity is a widely recognized property of ma

97 resent an intron framework that enforces the mutual exclusivity of two internal exons and demonstrate

98 We observed mutual exclusivity or co-occurrence of events within and

99 at the same time show low deviation from the mutual exclusivity pattern that characterizes driver mut

100 ploring the interplay between co-occurrence, mutual exclusivity, and functional interactions between

101 these pathways but never both, suggesting a mutual exclusivity.

102 lly communicating with each other via either mutual eye contact and/or pointing gestures, and then jo

103 e interaction outcome was preceded either by mutual eye contact or by a perceived pointing gesture.

104 extent, genetic factors appear to influence mutual eye gaze in adult chimpanzees, and is the first t

105 Mutual eye gaze plays an important role in primate socia

106 Finally, heritability analyses revealed mutual eye gaze to be modestly heritable and significant

107 ntial, genetic, and neuroanatomical basis of mutual eye gaze variation in adult captive chimpanzees.

108 irst to report neuroanatomical correlates of mutual eye gaze variation in chimpanzees.

109 lting gray matter covariation components and mutual eye gaze.

110 ion-making tasks that are shaped by dynamic, mutual feedback between participants.

111 acid metabolism and glucagon are linked in a mutual feedback cycle, the liver-alpha-cell axis.

112 Our study reveals a mutual feedback mechanism between pattern formation and

113 display, non-damaging aggression, biting and mutual fighting) is influenced by aggressiveness.

114 Aging male chimpanzees have more mutual friendships characterized by high, equitable inve

115 ies with common fragments/core structure and mutual functional groups, using precursor lines and neut

116 graph will be clustered into groups by their mutual functional relevance, which is iteratively update

117 r than as different entities, boosting their mutual functions in different phases of disease.

118 bal financial assets under management across mutual funds, hedge funds, real estate, and private equi

119 ucing measurable progress, 4) working toward mutual gain, and 5) being aware of the downside alternat

120 People often coordinate for mutual gain, such as keeping to opposite sides of a stai

121 conflicts into coordination games that allow mutual gains and dispute resolution.

122 ared chimpanzees engaging in longer bouts of mutual gaze compared to mother-reared and wild-born indi

123 by modulating the expression of distinct and mutual genes also regulated by E2.

124 , where macrocycles adopt a slipped cofacial mutual geometry with an edge-to-edge distance of ~3.6 an

125 eate as a byproduct of algal tending and the mutual habituation that damselfish and mysids exhibit to

126 dictated by the induction, and possibly the mutual hijacking, of the host and pathogen autophagy mac

127 mune homeostasis raise the question of their mutual impact on each other's course.

128 bind DNA in a cooperative manner, enabling a mutual increase in occupancy.

129 re a spectral purity of 0.9904 +/- 0.0006, a mutual indistinguishability of 0.987 +/- 0.002, and >90%

130 f this motif beyond disinhibition due to the mutual influence between network and synaptic plasticity

131 ion, which are significant for capturing the mutual influence of proteins sequences.

132 The mutual influence of this interaction and the more tradit

133 conceptual challenges because of the strong mutual influences between the microbes and their chemica

134 identification of the indirect effects when mutual influences exist among the mediators, which is ex

135 schizophrenia liability and cognition (e.g. mutual influences in a cyclical manner).

136 ce Evolutionary Trace and Evolutionary Trace-Mutual information (ET-Mip), revealed residues and resid

137 based registration, multi-attribute combined mutual information (MACMI) registration and scale-invari

138 Mutual information (MI) analysis revealed sensitivity to

139 We evaluate the mutual information (or "free entropy") from which we ded

140 ems analysis methods including the pointwise mutual information (PMI) measure to provide an indicatio

141 on made by Selection of Alignment by Maximal Mutual Information (SAMMI), an information-theory-based

142 e Lag Index (wPLI) and the weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI) represent two robust and widel

143 This manifests in decreased mutual information across epigenetic modifications and g

144 Finally, mutual information analyses quantifying the relation bet

145 We also found that the mutual information and correlation FC was informative in

146 Information sources with positive pointwise Mutual Information and Random Walk with restart algorith

147 onal connections (FC) were derived using the mutual information and the correlations, between the blo

148 This learning is accompanied by increases in mutual information and transfer entropy, formal measures

149 nd intrasubject registration with normalized mutual information as the cost function was used to tran

150 m into smaller subsystems and estimating the mutual information between each pair of halves.

151 variable using two measures: maximizing the mutual information between stimuli and responses, and mi

152 sitive rates of subjects' decisions, and (3) Mutual information between subjects.

153 n in optimal sensing, quantified through the mutual information between the signal and the sensors.

154 ubMat, that uses eigenvalue decomposition of mutual information derived from molecular dynamics traje

155 derive entropy, interaction information and mutual information for gene sets on interaction networks

156 The recently introduced mutual information in frequency (MIF) technique makes no

157 ides its role in estimating the entropy, the mutual information itself can provide an insightful diag

158 Mutual information measures identified the central featu

159 Examples include correlation and mutual information methods for coexpression analysis, cl

160 Further, we used mutual information methods to identify the neurons in th

161 Mutual information related collective motions to local f

162 ties which are fused with positive pointwise mutual information to build a large-scale lncRNA-disease

163 employ the information-theoretic concept of mutual information to derive a novel test statistic, whi

164 m protein engineering attempts that leverage mutual information to the reconstruction of ancestral pr

165 Normalized mutual information was used to determine top contributin

166 dues, correlated motion between side chains (mutual information), dynamical correlations of the enzym

167 Spearman correlation, distance correlation, mutual information, and maximal information coefficient.

168 ictive information, measured using bivariate mutual information, cannot distinguish between these two

169 F-score, Adjusted Rand Index and Normalized Mutual Information, especially while using the real data

170 The methods apply mutual information, statistical analysis, structure clus

171 ial correlation-, likelihood-, Bayesian- and mutual information-based methods) and integrates the res

172 artitions are then compared through adjusted mutual information.

173 escriptors using the concepts of entropy and mutual information; (iii) generation of sparse networks

174 on of distributional alignment shows 60%-78% mutual-information score between the real and synthetic

175 origin selection assay coupled with a custom mutual-information-based modeling approach, and a separa

176 circuit in E. coli populations and show that mutual inhibition alone is sufficient to produce stable

177 gued against the idea that decisions rely on mutual inhibition at the level of offer values.

178 tive pattern of developmental integration by mutual inhibition between components and compensatory ev

179 long-range mutual inhibition between reflexes in distant segments,

180 e, we engineer a synthetic morphogen-induced mutual inhibition circuit in E. coli populations and sho

181 receptors within a selective population and mutual inhibition mediated by GABAergic interneurons bet

182 weakening of the actin cortex, together with mutual inhibition of anterior and posterior PAR proteins

183 interpreting opposing morphogen gradients is mutual inhibition of downstream transcription factors, b

184 fact, we showed that previous arguments for mutual inhibition were confounded by differences in valu

185 is driven by both attentional modulation and mutual inhibition, which have distinct selectivity (feat

186 re due to binocular combination, rather than mutual inhibition.

187 h conceptualization with a fifth brain mode (mutual inhibition/masking summation).

188 e "simulation neurons" encoded signatures of mutual-inhibitory decision computation, including value

189 Cases were identified by the Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company from closed case files and by t

190 oach, finding considerable evidence that the mutual integration of disciplines leads to improved educ

191 development in north Shanxi was a result of mutual interaction between natural factors and human act

192 This mutual interaction between spin waves and magnetic domai

193 Here, to detect the mutual interaction between superconductivity and topolog

194 ives rise to the formation of polarons whose mutual interaction can be effectively tuned using an ext

195 ing central composite design, individual and mutual interaction effects were evaluated to obtain opti

196 n explored under homogeneous conditions, the mutual interaction of gene circuits, growth phenotype an

197 [Formula: see text] scaling arising from the mutual interaction of the reconnecting strands and a [Fo

198 We provide evidence that a tonic and mutual interaction process (tonic entrainment) between f

199 ed by symptom status and showed considerable mutual interaction.

200 these differences may inform us about their mutual interaction.

201 ical systems modulate each other by a steady mutual interaction.

202 involve fine-tuning of expression levels and mutual interactions among electron/proton transfer compo

203 Their mutual interactions can be short or long range, and thei

204 ucture, magnetic and optical properties, and mutual interactions have been poorly understood, which h

205 we report on the pivotal role played by the mutual interactions in the regime of ultra-low-T and van

206 Mutual interactions of these subunits constitute the bas

207 tance of 4.00 to 6.00 angstrom and form weak mutual interactions.

208 batic magnetization by only manipulating the mutual interactions.

209 ange mass spectrometry was used to map their mutual interactions.

210 veil unprecedented aspects emerging from the mutual interactions.

211 Because we excluded a mutual interference of ATP and nucleosome binding, we po

212 by providing a key mechanism for minimizing mutual interference.

213 ch larger than it actually is, which fosters mutual intergroup hostility.

214 brium state of the system resulting from the mutual interplay between binding molecules and chromatin

215 merization; however, close scrutiny of their mutual interplay has been largely unexplored.

216 ence cancer and stromal cell function, their mutual interplay, and their interactions with the extrac

217 The mutual intracellular interaction of constructs results i

218 Social bonds, maintained by mutual investments of time and energy, have greatly infl

219 [6,6][6,6][5,6]-isomers and that some showed mutual isomerization or remained intact at room temperat

220 C(1) (methane) exhibit a separate pattern of mutual isotopic equilibrium (generally at reservoir cond

221 ed property of tissue-specific genes - their mutual linearity - and use it to reveal the structure of

222 analyzed, and probable electro-pathological mutual matching was investigated.

223 ive mating in a direct experimental test for mutual mate choice in captive populations of Zebra finch

224 surfactants, which display a broad range of mutual miscibilities in mixed micelles.

225 A mechanism of mutual modulation between the surface chemistry and the

226 pe and response to sorafenib, as well as the mutual modulation of TP53/MDM2 pathway, in HCC tissues a

227 tain noxious compounds, we conclude they are mutual Mullerian acoustic mimics.

228 zipper lock" by controlled loading, avoiding mutual nonspecific H(1)/H(2) hybridization.

229 undation for developing understanding of the mutual obligations of close relationships that contribut

230 ut also cases of evolution from absorbing to mutual or even to back-nurture behaviors.

231 y by the topology of this network and by the mutual order of binding affinities.

232 related to the degree of aggregation and the mutual orientation of BODIPY units within these aggregat

233 e dependence of the collision outcome on the mutual orientation of the colliding partners.

234 yl-substituted derivative, we found that the mutual orientation of two BODIPY units in the cage's cav

235 BP reduce the inter-C(60) distance and cause mutual orientation, thereby optimizing the pai-pai wave

236 d solvents", which bind pigments at specific mutual orientations, thus tuning the overall energetic l

237 6% of all growth-required Msmeg genes have a mutual ortholog in Mtb.

238 st for both fields, whereas others might see mutual overlap in the future.

239 molecular materials depend on the molecules' mutual packing arrangements.

240 ed at a protein's core are often involved in mutual paired interactions.

241 olutionary trajectories, such as divergence, mutual persistence, and natural hybridization, can occur

242 lose approach of the anions leading to their mutual polarization.

243 ed phosphorylation at Ser-632, pointing to a mutual posttranslational modification cross talk of (car

244 al, and transcriptomic properties and robust mutual predictability.

245 er shows how integrating behavioral data and mutual prediction models into hyperscanning studies can

246 Mutual preference seemed to be dictated by the specific

247 sensitizer as it is converted to a PS by the mutual presence of glutathione (GSH) and hydrogen peroxi

248 with neural progenitor cells (NPC) promoting mutual proliferation, formation of tubular-like structur

249 l complex pathological mechanisms and have a mutual promoting effect to secondary brain injury.

250 This observation shows that the mutual proximity of molecular or atomic species is suffi

251 actors by analyzing co-occurrence within the mutual ranges of species pairs.

252 ton brings about considerable changes in the mutual ratios of the individual conformers compared to t

253 individual hepatic transcription factor via mutual redundancy.

254 Different tumour-intrinsic pathways and mutual regulation between macrophages (or monocytes) and

255 The mutual regulation between p53 and LMP1 may play an impor

256 es PABPN1 transcription, suggesting that the mutual regulation between p63 and PABPN1 forms a feedbac

257 -myocytes are known to communicate and exert mutual regulatory effects.

258 The coupling of the two components leads to mutual reinforcement and creates an ultrastrong membrane

259 scillations in stomatal closure, revealing a mutual reinforcement between repeated increases in cytos

260 Here, we show that neutrophil swarms require mutual reinforcement of damage signaling at the wound co

261 We derived equations describing mutual relationships among parameters of the functional

262 , and 92.2% of HS pairs that have sufficient mutual relative data; the parent sex in 100% of HS and 9

263 s shared between a pair of samples and their mutual relatives, leveraging the fact that sharing rates

264 uts of Nanog and Hoxa1 on shared targets and mutual repression between Hoxa1 and the core pluripotenc

265 To summarize, mutual repression by cyclin D1 and HNF4alpha coordinatel

266 lude subcircuits encoding positive feedback, mutual repression, and coherent feedforward, as well as

267 events break the axial symmetry, allowing a mutual repressor system to establish invariant, distinct

268 paradigm of immune system-tumor vasculature mutual reprogramming opens the possibility of identifyin

269 We further unmask a mutual requirement for Hivep3, a zinc finger transcripti

270 lection, not avoiding end-of-life decisions, mutual respect within the interdisciplinary team, involv

271 ere we introduce a task that investigates if mutual reward delivery in male rats can drive associativ

272 ocial information exchange was impeded, when mutual reward outcomes were disadvantageously unequal to

273 Taken together, these results suggest that mutual rewards can drive associative learning in rats an

274 s with incommensurate lattices and arbitrary mutual rotation(1,2).

275 utational psychiatry: social interaction and mutual sense-making.

276 Moreover, the presented methodology provided mutual separation of various AAs, allowing chiral analys

277 present a mathematical approach based on the mutual Shannon information theory to study the relations

278 liferation and actin assembly by revealing a mutual signaling axis wherein actin assembly drives prol

279 c functioning; people interacting often show mutual, simultaneous changes in activity of the sympathe

280 he underlying slender substrate due to their mutual sliding after engagement.

281 ssociation implies partner fidelity based on mutual social preference, but even seemingly complex non

282 found relations among chemical compositions, mutual solubilities of constituent elements, phase insta

283 Even for fully layered cases, the large mutual solubility could make the boundary between rock a

284 This work provides an unusual example of mutual stabilization between metal clusters and a self-a

285 in direct interactions with RNA resulting in mutual stabilization.

286 might show an interaction mediated by their mutual state dependence.

287 This article reminds us of the importance of mutual support and caring for our own mental health, inc

288 uce premature death by providing a forum for mutual support for recipients and their families as well

289 roductive risks by building relationships of mutual support outside local groups that are underwritte

290 We posit that mutual symbiotic interactions are well described by thre

291 Indeed, the communities robustly recovered mutual targets for drugs [area under Receiver Operating

292 Domains and subdomains mutual to both perspectives are related to "Auditory" (l

293 as of resident dominance and larger zones of mutual tolerance.

294 ss-releasing benefits via gait-synchrony and mutual-touch.

295 (vi) Mutual transphosphorylation between pUL97 and CDK7 is no

296 Sharing requires mutual trust and open acknowledgement of strengths and w

297 d experiences among team members improve the mutual understanding of individual habits, techniques an

298 tween academic and industry teams requires a mutual understanding of what each partner brings to the

299 e from different cultures and thereby foster mutual understanding.

300 This mutual weakening effect is explained by the formation of