ライフサイエンスコーパス: mutualism

1 rect defence generates a plant-natural enemy mutualism.

2 n of indirect effects differs among types of mutualism.

3 ect increased rewards from investment in the mutualism.

4 absence of these peptides can break down the mutualism.

5 uncooperative wasps in the fig tree-fig wasp mutualism.

6 s a result of disrupting the fruit-frugivore mutualism.

7 ischeri, which form a highly specific binary mutualism.

8 can be generally applied to any nutritional mutualism.

9 is expected to transition from antagonism to mutualism.

10 in the alga that allow it to engage in this mutualism.

11 sively through the mediation of a protection mutualism.

12 ens while the latter mediates host-commensal mutualism.

13 ntogeny and a concomitant transition towards mutualism.

14 eficial mutualist could maintain mycorrhizal mutualism.

15 eaters will spread and erode the benefits of mutualism.

16 mpetitiveness and help maintain host-microbe mutualism.

17 the stability and environmental patterns in mutualism.

18 is preferential allocation may stabilize the mutualism.

19 cs without the need for synthetic control of mutualism.

20 aecalis through promotion of host-microbiota mutualism.

21 ervations also confirm the precision of this mutualism.

22 eby stabilizes this Cretaceous-age defensive mutualism.

23 t climate requirements disrupt the ant-plant mutualism.

24 in the control of intestinal host-microbial mutualism.

25 ing with the origin of this plant-pollinator mutualism.

26 ry, increases the strength of a carbon-based mutualism.

27 ution of morality in terms of partner-choice mutualism.

28 amental knowledge of nematode parasitism and mutualism.

29 s of traits are possible for maintaining the mutualism.

30 nature occurs in networks of antagonism and mutualism.

31 eeding features of lichen, a model system of mutualism.

32 uenced by polyploidy in the legume-rhizobium mutualism.

33 impacted a common microbe-mediated defensive mutualism.

34 rglycemia further exacerbates this uncoupled mutualism.

35 game theory and explaining the stability of mutualism.

36 plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms.

37 le in regulation of cnidarian-dinoflagellate mutualisms.

38 pollination, seed dispersal and ant defence mutualisms.

39 elucidate the ecology and evolution of plant mutualisms.

40 ization versus generalization in pollination mutualisms.

41 mbionts for intergenerational persistence of mutualisms.

42 ons to evaluate the stability of nutritional mutualisms.

43 he literature on several of the best-studied mutualisms.

44 mpatric speciation and the evolution of true mutualisms.

45 ecosystem processes such as plant-pollinator mutualisms.

46 ered by the nested structure of species-rich mutualisms.

47 ding coextinctions through the disruption of mutualisms.

48 s a worrying future for the pervasiveness of mutualisms.

49 n of both resources and services provided by mutualisms.

50 istent with cheater strains that destabilise mutualisms.

51 nderstanding of the ecology and evolution of mutualisms.

52 r asymmetries (e.g., the cleaner-client fish mutualism [9]) or snapshots of a single behavior within

53 ess of uncooperative symbionts can stabilise mutualism against collapse, but also present a paradox -

54 roach has not been applied to other types of mutualisms, although it could be informative.

55 specialized partners may be more stable than mutualisms among generalists, and theoretical models pre

56 e of antagonistic coevolutionary pressure in mutualism and a biological dilemma for models of coopera

57 iously unrecognized transition state between mutualism and antagonism.

58 have convergently evolved obligate plant-ant mutualism and four closely related species of non-mutual

59 To explore the antagonism between mutualism and genetic drift, we grew cross-feeding strai

60 Little is known about the interplay between mutualism and immunity and the mediator molecules enabli

61 enefits may be achieved through reciprocity, mutualism and kin selection.

62 hosts and bacteria range from parasitism to mutualism and may deeply influence both partners' fitnes

63 ely robust to variation in the prevalence of mutualism and pollinators feeding upon resources in addi

64 ractions among species, such as competition, mutualism and predation.

65 but toxins in this reward could disrupt the mutualism and reduce plant fitness [4].

66 N into these soils is known to disrupt this mutualism and reduce the diversity of ECM fungi.

67 resent a model with saturating benefits from mutualisms and sequentially assembled communities.

68 current convergent evolution of fish-anemone mutualisms and suggest that similar ecological processes

69 ause of shifts in global climate may disrupt mutualisms and threaten partner species.

70 d epithelial cells, maintain host-microbiota mutualism, and communicate with immune cells of the unde

71 ticus and host immune cells that may promote mutualism, and the microbe-derived molecule(s) involved.

72 n constraints, defense syndromes, tolerance, mutualisms, and facilitation.

73 ogical selection increases the prevalence of mutualisms, and limits on biodiversity emerge from speci

74 tionships with ants at opposite sides of the mutualism-antagonism continuum.

75 This mutualism appears to be stable, as both partners remain

76 Thus, molecules that are beneficial during mutualism are diverted to the synthesis of toxins during

77 Nutritional mutualisms are ancient, widespread, and profoundly influ

78 om the tropics, where plant-animal dispersal mutualisms are both disproportionately common and at ris

79 Mutualisms are cooperative interactions between members

80 If mutualisms are costly to plants, then they must be impor

81 Mutualisms are important ecological interactions that un

82 Multi-partite mutualisms are predicted to be unstable due to strong di

83 Ecological partnerships, or mutualisms, are globally widespread, sustaining agricult

84 in our knowledge of gut microbiota (GM)-host mutualism arising from a lifestyle that describes over 9

85 ms can shift from parasitism/commensalism to mutualism as crayfish age.

86 These results identify a novel conflict in mutualisms as well as several public goods dilemmas, but

87 nisms involved in virulence can also support mutualism, as shown here for Arcobacter and Breviatea.

88 ver, there is inherent potential conflict in mutualisms, as each organism benefits more when the exch

89 s directly or indirectly linked to defensive mutualism attributable to alkaloids of fungal-origin.

90 g herbivores are characterised as a keystone mutualism because they restructure arthropod communities

91 tic web in scenarios in which the two-strain mutualism becomes non functional.

92 due to purifying selection [4-6], yet under mutualism (benefits outweigh costs), selection favors th

93 current evidence does not support a cleaning mutualism between burying beetles and P. carabi mites, b

94 In the mutualism between fig trees and their pollinating wasps

95 Despite the lack of obvious mutualism between HEN and HINT domains, HEN domains are

96 A new study reveals that an apparent mutualism between lycaenid caterpillars and their attend

97 p-specific scents, and with the evolution of mutualism between meerkats and their glandular microbiot

98 ether positive interactions in the form of a mutualism between mussels and dominant cordgrass in salt

99 We hypothesized that mutualism between native ants and mealybugs would favor

100 buscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, an ancestral mutualism between soil fungi and most land plants.

101 Our results present a tripartite mutualism between Streptomyces, plant and pollinator par

102 ress this question using an obligate farming mutualism between the ant Philidris nagasau and epiphyti

103 Here, we explore this prediction in the mutualism between the fungus Rhizopus microsporus (Rm, M

104 old that might provide new insights into the mutualism between the HEN and HINT domains.

105 Using the model mutualism between the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri a

106 contributes to the dynamic stability of the mutualism between the squid Euprymna scolopes and its sp

107 We show that an obligate mutualism between the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and

108 nt and maintenance over evolutionary time of mutualisms between fungi and bacteria, we studied a symb

109 Nutrient exchange mutualisms between phototrophs and heterotrophs, such as

110 Mutualisms between species are ecologically ubiquitous b

111 Mutualisms between species play an important role in eco

112 ng in eusocial insects and partner choice in mutualisms between species.

113 and multicellular organisms to societies and mutualisms between species.

114 terns: context-dependency can hence regulate mutualisms both directly and indirectly.

115 ework to unpack this biodiversity-production mutualism (BPM), which bridges the research fields of ec

116 ymbionts, to study the ecological context of mutualism breakdown and the response of a key symbiosis-

117 A corollary is that mutualism breakdown should increase morphological rates

118 w between the partners is a hallmark of this mutualism, but the mechanisms governing this flow and it

119 zal fungi and biotrophic pathogens, promotes mutualism by blocking JA action through the interaction

120 mayri and therefore indirectly benefits the mutualism by increasing the reproductive success of both

121 d show that RELMbeta promotes host-bacterial mutualism by regulating the spatial segregation between

122 Nutrient loading may destabilise these mutualisms by altering the costs and benefits each partn

123 , we show that anoxic conditions can promote mutualisms by providing more opportunities for exchange

124 The mutualism can be established quickly among noncoevolved

125 Foremost, mutualism can either enhance or reduce the network stabi

126 nt types of interactions and illustrates how mutualism can enhance the diversity, stability, and func

127 n the interacting traits of plant-pollinator mutualism can lead to local adaptive differentiation.

128 results suggest that at least some forms of mutualism can persist and even diversify when the intera

129 Mutualisms can be promoted by pleiotropic win-win mutati

130 Plant-microbe mutualisms can improve plant defense, but the impact of

131 ource mechanisms underlying plant-pollinator mutualisms can increase persistence, productivity, abund

132 Our synthesis suggests that mutualisms can promote or restrict species richness depe

133 l resources, invaders that disrupt plant-RFS mutualisms can significantly depress native plant fitnes

134 ships between organisms of different species-mutualisms-can help individuals cope with such resource

135 ause carbon regulates the costs of all plant mutualisms, carbon dynamics are a common platform for in

136 ulation of newly discovered fungal-bacterial mutualisms challenges the paradigm that fungi and bacter

137 Mutualisms come in different forms, from pairwise intera

138 these context types was not consistent among mutualism, competition and predation studies.

139 exhibit an obligatory mutualism, facultative mutualism, competition, parasitism, competitive exclusio

140 Nonetheless, the hypothesis that defense mutualisms consistently enhance plant diversification ac

141 me increasingly important along a parasitism/mutualism continuum because; (i) negative outcomes favou

142 iont to alter its position in the parasitism-mutualism continuum depending on the mode of between-hos

143 sity for this to occur across the parasitism-mutualism continuum is unknown.

144 ], across an environment-mediated parasitism-mutualism continuum.

145 tic sequences that evolve along a parasitism-mutualism continuum.

146 Mutualisms - cooperative interactions among different sp

147 motorboats affect an interspecific cleaning mutualism critical for coral reef fish health, abundance

148 In protection mutualisms, defensive symbionts protect their hosts from

149 especially profound for nutrient acquisition mutualisms, despite the fact that they regulate global n

150 cross contexts (and predation least likely), mutualism did not strongly differ from competition.

151 ls underestimate the prevalence of cascading mutualism disruption after defaunation.

152 ems challenged by allelopathic invaders: RFS mutualism disruption drives carbon stress, subsequent de

153 Here, we investigate the consequences of RFS mutualism disruption on native plant fitness in a glassh

154 Predation risk has been shown to regulate mutualism dynamics in species-specific case studies; how

155 growth, cross-feeding levels and ultimately mutualism dynamics.

156 tial allocation can promote the evolution of mutualism even when the cost to the symbiont is very lar

157 edation can also explain broader patterns of mutualism evolution.

158 Mutualisms evolve through the matching of functional tra

159 is pair of strains can exhibit an obligatory mutualism, facultative mutualism, competition, parasitis

160 Our understanding of mammalian-microbial mutualism has expanded by combing microbial sequencing w

161 in crop yield, possibly explaining why their mutualism has remained limited in scale and productivity

162 Mathematical modelling of nutritional mutualisms has great potential to facilitate the search

163 We report that fish-anemone mutualisms have evolved on at least 55 occasions across

164 ion for investigation of gut microbiota-host mutualism, highlighting key players that could identify

165 However, it is much less clear how mutualisms impact the genome, as both increased and redu

166 predicts that changes in the dynamics of the mutualism in deteriorating environments can provide adva

167 tion points to a breakdown in host-bacterial mutualism in periodontitis, with interbacterial interact

168 predictions, fits several known examples of mutualism in the aquatic world, and sheds light on how i

169 ion - in what is arguably the most important mutualism in the history of life - the persistence of mi

170 Here, we study a microbial cross-feeding mutualism in which each yeast strain supplies an essenti

171 The persistence of mutualisms in host-microbial - or holobiont - systems is

172 demonstrates the critical role of microbial mutualisms in shaping the distribution of plant species.

173 These results indicate that mutualisms, in supporting stress-resistant patches, can

174 Many heritable mutualisms, in which beneficial symbionts are transmitte

175 ique opportunities for studying fungal-algal mutualisms including mechanisms leading to endosymbiosis

176 In all known algal-fungal mutualisms, including lichens, algal cells remain extern

177 uture directions for research on conflict in mutualisms, including novel research avenues opened by a

178 trient cross-feeding can stabilize microbial mutualisms, including those important for carbon cycling

179 how a stable and longstanding animal-microbe mutualism increased its intergenomic network without gai

180 can conditionally stabilize or destabilize a mutualism, indicating the potential importance of growth

181 We ask here when and how mutualisms influence species richness.

182 ng nutrient-rich conditions, cobalamin-based mutualism intensifies upper water column nitrification,

183 Our results highlight the need to integrate mutualisms into trophic cascade theory, which is based p

184 of warming influences a widespread defensive mutualism involving the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, a

185 Recently, hitherto unknown nutritional mutualisms involving ancient lineages of fungi and nonva

186 The results provided insights into why mutualism is favorable despite seemingly costly cross-fe

187 provide advance warning that collapse of the mutualism is imminent.

188 These findings support the hypothesis that mutualism is likely in P-limited systems and commensalis

189 nthera obtusata orchid, and demonstrate this mutualism is mediated by the orchid's scent and the bala

190 Mutualism is of fundamental importance in ecosystems.

191 maintains diversity, but weak or asymmetric mutualism is overwhelmed by genetic drift even when mutu

192 This capacity for mutualism is phylogenetically broad, extending to other

193 sm is overwhelmed by genetic drift even when mutualism is still beneficial, slowing growth and reduci

194 The mutualism is unbalanced in that the establishment of one

195 effects of warming on specific plant-insect mutualisms is difficult to obtain from complex pollinati

196 e that natural selection favours cheating in mutualisms is sparse.

197 The primary dilemma in evolutionarily stable mutualisms is that natural selection for cheating could

198 w that a fundamental ecological interaction, mutualism, is affected by urbanisation.

199 mediation of biotic interactions, including mutualisms, is unknown.

200 In plant-animal mutualisms it is widely accepted that the total effect o

201 indicate that, despite the stability of the mutualism, L. rostrata experiences stress in coculture w

202 ciated with the ontogenetic stage of anemone mutualisms: larger-bodied species partner with anemones

203 parasitism, competitive exclusion, or failed mutualism leading to extinction of the population.

204 rviving juvenile trees and the potential for mutualism limitation of seedling establishment via alter

205 Second, mutualism losses occurred where symbionts are scarce, in

206 Higher levels of mutualism make a system vulnerable to destabilisation on

207 ighly context-dependent nature of protection mutualisms makes it difficult to identify and quantify t

208 The unbalanced mutualism may be important where additional species alte

209 riod of coevolution, suggesting that similar mutualisms may arise during antibiotic treatment and in

210 hat have been traditionally considered to be mutualisms may in fact be parasitic in nature.

211 These results suggest that ant/sap-feeder mutualisms may regulate forest productivity by mediating

212 results provide a general framework for how mutualisms may transition between qualitatively differen

213 Mutualisms might be stabilised by mechanisms that direct

214 rk has led to divergent hypotheses about how mutualisms modulate diversity.

215 s the size of demixed regions and how strong mutualism must be to survive a spatial expansion.

216 relies on the assumption that benefits from mutualisms never stop increasing.

217 ies tend to exhibit increased co-occurrence, mutualism, niche expansion, and hybridization - and rare

218 tep toward understanding host-microbe immune mutualism of the skin and its implications for health an

219 tter understand the controversial effects of mutualism on ecosystems at the species, guild, and whole

220 unknown whether their evolutionary basis is mutualism or exploitation [5-9].

221 However, removing mutualism or herbivory had a much larger effect in the e

222 n response (PSR) system, resulting in either mutualism or immunity.

223 its from cooperating with one another (e.g., mutualism or reciprocity).(2) Because of the kin-structu

224 cosystems, be it via competition, predation, mutualism or symbiosis processes.

225 ous arthropods may result in cost-effective (mutualism) or energetically expensive (parasitism) inter

226 n species interaction outcomes (competition, mutualism, or predation) for 247 published articles.

227 Mutualisms, or reciprocally beneficial interspecific int

228 The mutualism-parasitism continuum framework can be used to

229 and theoretical models predict that in many mutualisms, partners exert reciprocal stabilizing select

230 ses, we show a near ubiquitous decoupling in mutualism performance across terrestrial and marine envi

231 Nutrient-driven changes in mutualism performance may alter community organisation a

232 Thus, understanding how mutualisms persist remains an essential question in ecol

233 integrated with data to address questions of mutualism persistence at four biological scales: cell, i

234 ness and functional redundancy could promote mutualism persistence in complex mutualistic communities

235 bility and structured interactions influence mutualism persistence, are still lacking.

236 In contrast, the mutualism persists for the later blooming plant regardle

237 Mutualisms play a key role in most ecosystems, yet the m

238 type, both biotic traits known to facilitate mutualisms, played an additional role in driving diversi

239 to both partners in five different types of mutualisms: pollination, seed dispersal, plant protectio

240 immune barrier and promotes host-microbiota mutualism, preventing systemic inflammation.

241 rains can form an effective cross-protection mutualism, protecting each other in the presence of two

242 r replicated analysis indicates that defense mutualisms put lineages on a path toward increased diver

243 as sufficient to disable the aphid defensive mutualism regardless of the timing of warming; a surpris

244 But how does mundane mutualism relate to transcendent notions of morality cri

245 isplayed greater generalization in bacterial mutualisms relative to diploids, illustrating another ax

246 ighlights that consistency in cleaner-client mutualisms relies strongly on the local, rather than wid

247 al role, the genetic basis of their obligate mutualism remains largely unknown, hindering our underst

248 arasites), and their role in the dynamics of mutualisms remains largely unexplored.

249 olic interdependence drives the emergence of mutualism, robust interspecific mixing, and increased co

250 lly beneficial interactions between species (mutualisms) shaped the evolution of eukaryotes and remai

251 ic interactions, raising questions about how mutualism shapes the realised niche.

252 ollinators are generally considered cases of mutualism since both agents gain benefits.

253 In generalized mutualisms, species vary in the quality of services they

254 ation to population processes that determine mutualism stability and, as such, represents a significa

255 s variation, with different implications for mutualism stability.

256 onships can impact the costs and benefits of mutualisms, studying allometry in mutualistic interactio

257 e emphasized narrowly specialized pollinator mutualisms such as figs and fig wasps and yuccas and yuc

258 iscuss the applicability of this scenario to mutualisms such as those between plants and mycorrhizal

259 ies-rich networks formed by multiple-partner mutualisms, such as pollination or seed dispersal by ani

260 mall and modular networks formed by intimate mutualisms, such as those between host plants and their

261 Strong mutualism suppresses genetic demixing during spatial exp

262 species that have evolved a species-specific mutualism system with wasp pollinators.

263 terotrophic bacterium SAR11 form a coevolved mutualism that maximizes their collective metabolic rate

264 Mutualisms that become evolutionarily stable give rise t

265 Mutualisms that involve symbioses among specialized part

266 hunting-induced extinctions of plant-animal mutualisms that maintain long-term forest dynamics.

267 e interaction patterns of a service-resource mutualism (the cleaner-client interaction), we identifie

268 Our analyses support three predictions from mutualism theory.

269 itions are known to change the expression of mutualisms though the causal agents driving such changes

270 onary continuum of interactions ranging from mutualism to antagonism.

271 ut the crucial adaptations that allowed this mutualism to become the prime herbivorous component of n

272 s expected to cause phenotypes to shift from mutualism to commensalism and even parasitism.

273 utrient addition shifted an interaction from mutualism to commensalism or parasitism depended on whet

274 el whereby IL-22RA1 enhances host-microbiota mutualism to limit detrimental overcolonization by oppor

275 The capacity of coral-dinoflagellate mutualisms to adapt to a changing climate relies in part

276 ay frequently drive reversions of generalist mutualisms to autonomy.

277 sphorus) mediated the responses of different mutualisms to enrichment.

278 s own transmission, needed for antagonism-to-mutualism transition in heritable symbioses.

279 le in preserving the distinctive patterns of mutualism under species invasions and extinctions.

280 the effects of nutrient limitation within a mutualism using theoretical and experimental approaches

281 quently, the decoupling of nutrient exchange mutualisms via alterations of the world's nitrogen and p

282 differ among species interactions, and while mutualism was most likely to change sign across contexts

283 Focusing on between-species cooperation (mutualism), we hypothesize that the temporal sequence in

284 ient regime, before collapse of the obligate mutualism, we find that the ratio rapidly reaches its eq

285 Protection mutualisms were historically considered rare ecological

286 or-domesticate relationships are specialized mutualisms where one species provides multigenerational

287 We show that such tumors exhibit interclonal mutualism wherein cells with high-Myc expression facilit

288 ue that partner choice leads to fairness and mutualism, which then form the basis for morality.

289 or seed dispersal by ants, is a generalized mutualism with ant species varying in the quality of dis

290 e of context-dependence for the evolution of mutualism with increasing nutrient deposition.

291 tance of herbivory dependent on a co-evolved mutualism with specialized bacteria.

292 Commensal microbiota establish mutualism with the host and form an important part of th

293 ILC3 act to maintain tissue homeostasis and mutualism with the mucosal-dwelling commensal microbiota

294 nto an antibacterial mechanism that promotes mutualism with the resident microbiota.

295 t ecosystem pioneers, often form nutritional mutualisms with arbuscular mycorrhiza-forming Glomeromyc

296 ioral, morphological, and physiological) and mutualisms with carnivorous plants, and the ecological a

297 e physiological and genomic underpinnings of mutualisms with ecological and evolutionary processes.

298 ing that native plants develop opportunistic mutualisms with prokaryotes that solve context-dependent

299 Cheating is a focal concept in the study of mutualism, with the majority of researchers considering

300 o strains form a successful cross-protection mutualism without a period of coevolution, suggesting th