ライフサイエンスコーパス: mutualistic

1 type of species interaction (antagonistic or mutualistic).

2 ndicating that this microbial interaction is mutualistic.

3 gatum, from mycoheterotrophic gametophyte to mutualistic aboveground sporophyte.

4 We applaud Baumard et al.'s mutualistic account of morality but detect circularity i

5 We describe mutualistic and antagonistic effects of mites on insect-

6 a complex trait of documented importance for mutualistic and antagonistic interactions between plants

7 riments to assess the relative importance of mutualistic and antagonistic interactions for spatial va

8 tats based on the spatial variation of their mutualistic and antagonistic interactions using two mult

9 nd modular architectures would correspond to mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, respectively.

10 We consider systems with varying mixtures of mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, showing that

11 , making it difficult to distinguish between mutualistic and antagonistic interactions.

12 e a model insect-plant relationship based on mutualistic and antagonistic life-history traits.

13 rk, which would differ substantially between mutualistic and antagonistic networks.

14 lationship between pollinator and plant less mutualistic and more exploitative.

15 e that liverwort-Mucoromycotina symbiosis is mutualistic and mycorrhiza-like, but differs from liverw

16 molecule "colibactin" has been identified in mutualistic and pathogenic Escherichia coli.

17 es of ectomycorrhizal fungi, suggesting that mutualistic and pathogenic fungi play important but oppo

18 We show mutualistic and specific symbiosis between a eusporangia

19 nd diverse communities of bacteria establish mutualistic and symbiotic relationships with the gut aft

20 aloarchaeon-haloarchaeon association is both mutualistic and symbiotic; in this case, each microbe re

21 Whether this association is mutualistic, and how its functioning was affected by the

22 etrics are widely used to infer the roles of mutualistic animals in plant communities and to predict

23 with different levels of specialization for mutualistic ant symbionts, to study the ecological conte

24 we examined effects of tending by the native mutualistic ant Tapinoma melanocephalum on growth of P.

25 In mutualistic ant-plant symbioses, plants host ant colonie

26 Mutualistic ants can protect their partners from natural

27 tly found in highly urbanised sites; however mutualistic ants were also more often encountered when t

28 Baumard et al., we can find support for the mutualistic approach to morality even in early instances

29 Among other things, Baumard et al.'s "A Mutualistic Approach to Morality" considers the enforcem

30 In line with this mutualistic approach, the study of a range of economic g

31 have different preferences over the possible mutualistic arrangements.

32 of the bacterium indicates a potential for a mutualistic as well as for a parasitic relationship, who

33 e aspects of an interaction may dominate the mutualistic aspects.

34 acting species in shaping coevolution within mutualistic assemblages.

35 The discovery of this mutualistic association and the elucidation of the under

36 have resulted from an evolutionarily stable mutualistic association between plants and rhizosphere m

37 rous plants as they digest prey in a complex mutualistic association in which the prey-derived nutrie

38 This mutualistic association leads to dramatic developmental

39 ar mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), a widespread mutualistic association of land plants and fungi(1), is

40 es the CSP for the full establishment of its mutualistic association with Populus.

41 In this mutualistic association, the fungus colonizes the root c

42 osts and specific symbiont genotypes in this mutualistic association.

43 ly deceased females indicating a potentially mutualistic association.

44 Stable multipartite mutualistic associations require that all partners benef

45 We find that aphid species that have mutualistic associations with ants that protect them fro

46 Plants establish mutualistic associations with beneficial microbes while

47 Corals are animals that form close mutualistic associations with endosymbiotic photosynthet

48 whether mature O. vulgatum sporophytes form mutualistic associations with fungi of the Glomeromycota

49 organisms can have intimate, ancient, and/or mutualistic associations with hosts without having under

50 Animals often engage in mutualistic associations with microorganisms that protec

51 rs and pathogens, and they engage in various mutualistic associations with other organisms, especiall

52 ng, overlooks some important issues, such as mutualistic associations with parasites that are benefic

53 Mycorrhizal fungi form mutualistic associations with the roots of most land pla

54 Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that bes

55 findings indicate that in newly established mutualistic associations, an intercellular regulation of

56 To sustain mutualistic associations, host cells also reprogram the

57 tasis in organisms chronically infected with mutualistic bacteria is a challenging task, and little i

58 critical symbiotic relation between host and mutualistic bacteria is attracting increasing attention

59 downregulating fixation(5,6) by sanctioning mutualistic bacteria(7)) are common in the tropics, wher

60 The nematode mutualistic bacterium Photorhabdus asymbiotica produces

61 lated in response to symbiotic (carrying the mutualistic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila) or axenic

62 Altogether, we demonstrate a novel mutualistic bacterium-fungus relationship that occurs at

63 At modest antibiotic concentrations, the mutualistic behavior enables long-term survival of the o

64 nvestigate how genome evolution is shaped by mutualistic behaviour.

65 for the relative roles of kin selection and mutualistic benefits to be disentangled is in the resolu

66 animals and microbes are often described as mutualistic, but are subject to tradeoffs that may manif

67 re usually regarded as nonpathogenic or even mutualistic, but whether plants respond antagonistically

68 he trade-off between competitive ability and mutualistic capacity does not always exist.

69 y dynamics that are likely required to drive mutualistic co-evolution of hosts and microbes.

70 the architecture of interaction networks in mutualistic communities and their stability.

71 examples of generally smaller and primarily mutualistic communities in the context of these network

72 uce mechanisms of persistence in antagonized mutualistic communities that were previously found prone

73 Specifically, we evolved well-mixed mutualistic communities where two engineered yeast strai

74 -independent metabolism for nutrient-limited mutualistic communities.

75 uld promote mutualism persistence in complex mutualistic communities.

76 interaction class between two species (be it mutualistic, competitive, antagonistic, or neutral) may

77 to study the causes and consequences of this mutualistic-competitive transition in experimentally tra

78 However, we will suggest that mutualistic cooperation is not the basis of fairness; in

79 The target article convincingly argues that mutualistic cooperation is supported by partner choice.

80 result predicted by impartiality but not by mutualistic cooperation.

81 actions maintain biofilm homeostasis through mutualistic cross-feeding, metabolic syntrophy, and cros

82 eds; wild Cucurbita were likely left without mutualistic dispersal partners in the Holocene because t

83 To this end, they have built networks for mutualistic (e.g., pollination, seed dispersal) as well

84 We show that mutualistic ecological communities are localized, and lo

85 and the mechanisms ensuring the stability in mutualistic ecological communities are still unclear.

86 g the quantitative methods employed to study mutualistic ecological systems.

87 as well as asymmetric competitive (-/-) and mutualistic (+/+) ecological interactions]).

88 undation tree species (Pinus edulis) and its mutualistic ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) associates, we

89 articular combinations of plant genotype and mutualistic EMF communities improve the survival and gro

90 ial for intracellular arbuscule formation of mutualistic endomycorrhizal fungi.

91 ced by fungi from genus Epichloe, which form mutualistic endophytic associations with cool-season gra

92 fect certain eukaryotic green algae that are mutualistic endosymbionts in a variety of protists and m

93 The mutualistic endosymbiosis between cnidarians and dinofla

94 ve genomics from mitochondria, plastids, and mutualistic endosymbiotic bacteria has shown that the st

95 This suggests a mutualistic evolutionary strategy entertained by the SPb

96 to wild bees' nests, in a rare example of a mutualistic foraging partnership between humans and free

97 els and greenhouse experiments, we show that mutualistic fungal endophytes ameliorate drought stress

98 These alkaloids are produced by mutualistic fungal symbionts (endophytes) living on cert

99 to nutrient addition, driven by decreases in mutualistic fungi and increases in antagonistic fungi th

100 s, growth-independent fermentation inhibited mutualistic growth when the E. coli cell density was ade

101 e data suggest that different capsules equip mutualistic gut bacteria with the ability to thrive in v

102 Here, we show that many mutualistic gut Bacteroides spp. have the capacity to ut

103 e immune system is essential to maintain the mutualistic homeostatic interaction between the host and

104 that NilD RNA is conditionally necessary for mutualistic host colonization and suggest that it functi

105 lterations can be viewed as an uncoupling of mutualistic host-microbe relationships, it is valuable t

106 However, mutualistic host-microbial interactions prevent disease

107 t, IgA contributes to the establishment of a mutualistic host-microbiota relationship that is require

108 Our findings demonstrate a novel mutualistic host-protozoan interaction that increases mu

109 al (probably the most common lifestyle), and mutualistic (important beneficial partners).

110 Compared with their free-living relatives, mutualistic insect symbiotic bacteria inhabit a static e

111 ies are regulated by factors external to the mutualistic interaction (e.g., limiting background resou

112 Syntrophy is a tightly coupled mutualistic interaction between hydrogen-/formate-produc

113 >200 million years has been dependent on the mutualistic interaction between the coral host and its p

114 drogen-consuming Arcobacter, indicating that mutualistic interaction between these two groups of micr

115 e conventional view of lichen symbiosis as a mutualistic interaction between two players.

116 ients, we tuned strength and symmetry of the mutualistic interaction.

117 f remaining seed dispersers either increased mutualistic interactions (contributing to "interaction c

118 Antagonistic and mutualistic interactions among bacteria have also been i

119 c mechanism for the long-term persistence of mutualistic interactions and the assembly of complex com

120 ts obtained greater fitness enhancement from mutualistic interactions and were better able to maintai

121 With increased virus discovery, more mutualistic interactions are being described and more wi

122 Mutualistic interactions are characterized by positive d

123 Mutualistic interactions are found in plant, insect, and

124 finest temporal scales (days, weeks, months) mutualistic interactions are highly dynamic, with consid

125 Past work has suggested that mutualistic interactions are inherently destabilizing.

126 Mutualistic interactions benefit both partners, promotin

127 Mutualistic interactions between free-living algae and f

128 We examined differences in mutualistic interactions between frugivores and fruiting

129 ts impose novel selection pressures on naive mutualistic interactions between native plants and their

130 The common occurrence of mutualistic interactions between plants and root symbion

131 Actinorhizal symbioses are mutualistic interactions between plants and the soil bac

132 For example, mutualistic interactions between species are often stron

133 Mutualistic interactions between species are ubiquitous

134 A higher fraction of mutualistic interactions can increase the external stabi

135 nistic to some oral bacteria, while numerous mutualistic interactions contribute to yeast-bacterial c

136 Generalism in mutualistic interactions depends on the range of potenti

137 Empirical studies have found that the mutualistic interactions forming the structure of plant-

138 Tritrophic mutualistic interactions have been best studied in plant

139 A core interest in studies of mutualistic interactions is the 'effectiveness' of mutua

140 of a common framework of 'effectiveness' of mutualistic interactions limits generalisation and the d

141 positive (> 80%), suggesting that extensive mutualistic interactions may occur among rhizosphere bac

142 enefits of mutualisms, studying allometry in mutualistic interactions may shed unexpected light on th

143 autophagy-related process is crucial for the mutualistic interactions of P. vulgaris with beneficial

144 d this issue for one of the most significant mutualistic interactions on Earth, which associates plan

145 Mutualistic interactions play a major role in shaping th

146 odels incorporating biological mechanisms of mutualistic interactions provide better predictions of n

147 imates of the extent and frequencies of such mutualistic interactions remain controversial.

148 mmunities as well as species persistence, if mutualistic interactions tend to provide unique benefits

149 However, data show mutualistic interactions to be common and persistent.

150 Mutualistic interactions typically involve the exchange

151 , and is concordant with the hypothesis that mutualistic interactions with animals can have an impact

152 same functional guild affect the outcome of mutualistic interactions with partner species.

153 Microbes can establish mutualistic interactions with plants and insects.

154 corrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria, establish mutualistic interactions with plants, which can indirect

155 The modeling results suggested a lack of mutualistic interactions within the community.

156 ain urban land uses affect predator-prey and mutualistic interactions, and (2) how specialist and gen

157 Many mutualistic interactions, such as seed dispersal of larg

158 long-term advantage in an important class of mutualistic interactions.

159 genetic diversity in environments requiring mutualistic interactions.

160 the ecology and evolution of complex webs of mutualistic interactions.

161 rophic levels, and increased nestedness with mutualistic interactions.

162 erges from the dynamics of partner choice in mutualistic interactions.

163 alone can allow the persistence of obligate mutualistic interactions.

164 interactions and with decreasing strength of mutualistic interactions.

165 riation between insect virulence (V) and the mutualistic (M) support of nematode reproduction and col

166 y a host-bacterial interaction that promotes mutualistic mechanisms at the intestinal interface.

167 impacts those cellular interactions between mutualistic microbes and their hosts.

168 unism and geographical expansion by invasive mutualistic microbes could profoundly influence the resp

169 The ability of root cells to distinguish mutualistic microbes from pathogens is crucial for plant

170 nd generally limit the invasion potential of mutualistic microbes in insects.

171 ow as 3 ug/L saw a significant loss of a key mutualistic microbial species and a subsequent colonizat

172 Knowledge of the plant-mediated effects of mutualistic microorganisms is limited to aboveground ins

173 by allowing the emergence and maintenance of mutualistic microorganisms within the host.

174 these relationships are typically viewed as mutualistic, molecular and cellular analysis reveals num

175 In such systems, mutualistic motivations are not necessarily a key compon

176 Therefore, although mutualistic motives are likely an important contributor

177 cult to understand such behavior in terms of mutualistic motives.

178 played by defended prey are mimicked by both mutualistic (Mullerian) and parasitic (Batesian) species

179 decreased C-assimilation and generated less mutualistic mycorrhizal phenotypes with reduced plant an

180 sting quantitative analyses oversimplify the mutualistic nature of SM networks, in which failure of i

181 The mutualistic nature of this relationship depends on maint

182 Empirical observations of mutualistic networks across genres and geographic condit

183 We study empirical mutualistic networks and a gene regulatory network, for

184 association between the nested structure of mutualistic networks and community persistence.

185 ses for our understanding of the dynamics of mutualistic networks and their response to global change

186 Mutualistic networks are vital ecological and social sys

187 how these processes structure hawkmoth-plant mutualistic networks from five communities in four bioge

188 Most studies of plant-animal mutualistic networks have come from a temporally static

189 ctions, recent studies increasingly focus on mutualistic networks including plants that exchange food

190 erature on temporal dynamics of plant-animal mutualistic networks including pollination, seed dispers

191 Thus, large mutualistic networks may be inherently buffered from exp

192 r of realized pollinators, thereby rendering mutualistic networks more vulnerable to environmental ch

193 haracterise robustness include nestedness of mutualistic networks or exploration of degree distributi

194 e mechanisms enabling coevolution in complex mutualistic networks remains a central challenge in evol

195 tude of interaction compensation within real mutualistic networks remains largely unknown.

196 Plant-animal mutualistic networks sustain terrestrial biodiversity an

197 We use the structure of 79 empirical mutualistic networks to simulate a scenario of gradual e

198 works, including food webs, antagonistic and mutualistic networks, and find that the number of dimens

199 ze antagonistic interactions and destabilize mutualistic ones; as a species or type becomes rare, inf

200 athogens when infecting humans and behave as mutualistic or commensal organisms when colonizing arthr

201 If the interaction is mutualistic or commensal, there is no buffering and only

202 ned interactions (for example predator-prey, mutualistic or competitive).

203 y of strain-specific exoproteins involved in mutualistic or hostile interactions (i.e. hemolysins, pi

204 is may be a previously overlooked commensal, mutualistic or parasitic relationship which may be ecolo

205 ses, in which microbes have either positive (mutualistic) or negative (parasitic) impacts on host fit

206 Mutualistic organisms can be particularly susceptible to

207 ment, mediated by DGKs, are required for the mutualistic outcome of the Rhizopus-Burkholderia symbios

208 ntified consistent and dynamic predictors of mutualistic outcomes.

209 wever, certain circumstances can rupture the mutualistic pact with our intestinal counterpart, pushin

210 trade may reflect competition for access to mutualistic partners among plants.

211 hat competition for the benefits provided by mutualistic partners could be a source of negative densi

212 A model of the carbon trade-offs for the mutualistic partners shows that the observed strategies

213 nally, game theoretical models of trade with mutualistic partners suggest that the optimal trade may

214 gling the molecular interactions between the mutualistic partners supports an old hypothesis that man

215 spatial expansions may also make it hard for mutualistic partners to stay together, because genetic d

216 reorganization of the adaptive landscape of mutualistic partners under changing environments.

217 othesis, in structuring interactions between mutualistic partners, revealing that the role of niche-b

218 er territorial space through kin-selected or mutualistic pathways can reduce both immediate energetic

219 that interact with plants in pathogenic and mutualistic patterns, as well as in microbes that feed o

220 Mutualistic phenotypes are most likely in P-limited syst

221 In mutualistic pollinators and antagonistic herbivores, pas

222 sects, and their historical association with mutualistic polydnaviruses have all contributed to Micro

223 rstood about how antagonistic (negative) and mutualistic (positive) interactions combine to create ca

224 is driven by the transfer of hydrogen and is mutualistic, providing benefits to both partners.

225 how that improved environments can slow down mutualistic range expansions as a result of genetic drif

226 n evolution that has resulted in a passively mutualistic relationship analogous to that connecting Pr

227 hanisms that prevent overexploitation of the mutualistic relationship are still poorly understood.

228 is defined as a distinctive coevolutionary, mutualistic relationship between domesticator and domest

229 This mutualistic relationship between plants and microbes may

230 igen presentation by cDCs is essential for a mutualistic relationship between the host and intestinal

231 same bioreactor was achieved by designing a mutualistic relationship between the two species in whic

232 aci Q rather than B in China suggests a more mutualistic relationship between TYLCV and Q.

233 attachment-related genes, consistent with a mutualistic relationship in which they are dependent on

234 This mutualistic relationship of nucleic acids and proteins,

235 als is often attributed to photosymbiosis, a mutualistic relationship scleractinian corals developed

236 but multiple bacteria and fungi establish a mutualistic relationship with plants, and some act as pa

237 harbors an enormous amount of bacteria in a mutualistic relationship with the host.

238 Gut microbiota and the host exist in a mutualistic relationship, with the functional compositio

239 rphs exhibits the conventional trophobiotic (mutualistic) relationship with ants of the genus Tetramo

240 Mutualistic relationships have been described in detail

241 he context of establishment and evolution of mutualistic relationships involving these bacteria.

242 The ability of plants to form mutualistic relationships with animal defenders has long

243 Animals coexist in commensal, pathogenic or mutualistic relationships with complex communities of di

244 ammaproteobacterial Photorhabdus genus share mutualistic relationships with Heterorhabditis nematodes

245 evealed the thin line between pathogenic and mutualistic relationships, how the intestine physically

246 tionships and establishes the partnership in mutualistic relationships.

247 Mutualistic rhizosphere microbes of the S. ericoidesPR p

248 A mutualistic role of gut microbes is to digest dietary co

249 This novel finding may explain the mutualistic role of S. mutans and C. albicans in carioge

250 maximus is not resolved, we propose possible mutualistic roles for these bacteria in protection of th

251 c variation and can have both pathogenic and mutualistic roles.

252 Mutualistic root microbiota can also influence plant dis

253 Here we address this data gap by analysing mutualistic seed-dispersal interactions from 410 local n

254 how the natural selection theory of people's mutualistic sense of fairness and the biofunctional theo

255 g strategies, specialized versus diversified mutualistic services, and the role of spatial structures

256 ted by kin-selected (genetic relatedness) or mutualistic (social familiarity) mechanisms.

257 us theory predicts persistence provided that mutualistic species are regulated by factors external to

258 trait correlations affect the coevolution of mutualistic species not only in pairs of species but als

259 f microbe-derived molecules that mediate the mutualistic state remains elusive.

260 y are especially relevant for pathogenic and mutualistic strains that inhabit iron-limited environmen

261 er, some TEs have evolved commensal and even mutualistic strategies that mitigate the cost of their p

262 al dynamics sufficient to favor parasitic or mutualistic strategies.

263 Our study reveals that mutualistic strategy profoundly affects the pace of morp

264 y analysis, where we demonstrate that nested mutualistic structures are minimally stable.

265 s katoptron' is the first described obligate mutualistic symbiont of a vertebrate.

266 Fungi are perhaps also the most important mutualistic symbionts in modern ecosystems, transporting

267 d-decaying species, as well as pathogens and mutualistic symbionts.

268 ed Queen effect"), but disfavored in certain mutualistic symbioses (the "Red King effect").

269 Mutualistic symbioses shape the evolution of species and

270 ycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have formed intimate, mutualistic symbioses with the vast majority of land pla

271 In mutualistic symbioses, such as division of labor, both p

272 The mutualistic symbiosis between gut microbiota and host im

273 ur experimental data uncover an unrecognized mutualistic symbiosis between Varroa and DWV, which perp

274 The mutualistic symbiosis involving Glomeromycota, a distinc

275 Plants form a mutualistic symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) f

276 nutrients, especially nitrogen (N), through mutualistic symbiosis with ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi.

277 for Mucoromycotina establishing the earliest mutualistic symbiosis with land plants.

278 A sequencing of Populus trichocarpa roots in mutualistic symbiosis with the ectomycorrhizal fungus La

279 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form a mutualistic symbiosis with two-thirds of land plants, pr

280 ting nutrients to their plant host through a mutualistic symbiotic relationship with host roots.

281 ent, offering bacteria ample opportunity for mutualistic, symbiotic, and pathogenic interactions.

282 anic matter, making nutrients circulate in a mutualistic system.

283 he community structure of a pollinator-plant mutualistic system.

284 that the range of coexistence conditions in mutualistic systems can be analytically predicted.

285 tions compatible with species coexistence in mutualistic systems, also known as structural stability.

286 l rule that predicts the various outcomes of mutualistic systems, including coexistence and productiv

287 ere it is thought to promote biodiversity in mutualistic systems.

288 ramework that addresses these challenges for mutualistic systems.

289 ower with various simulated and experimental mutualistic systems.

290 Mutualistic theory explains convincingly the prevalence

291 may shift seagrass-bivalve interactions from mutualistic to antagonistic, which is important for cons

292 This view accommodates the range from mutualistic to parasitic symbioses that plants form with

293 o cover the whole spectrum of symbiosis from mutualistic to parasitic.

294 ay have driven the spread of the N2-fixation mutualistic trait.

295 ssion of symbionts leads to the evolution of mutualistic traits, whereas horizontal transmission faci

296 nalysis revealed that, in both parasitic and mutualistic treatments, evolution repeatedly targeted th

297 same strain becoming part of a three-species mutualistic web in scenarios in which the two-strain mut

298 This relationship can be mutualistic, when the algal host provides food for the b

299 esponds by reestablishing TE suppression, or mutualistic, where TEs are co-opted to benefit their hos

300 nt, %GC, and repetitive DNA allied wPpe with mutualistic Wolbachia, whereas gene repertoire analyses