ライフサイエンスコーパス: mycorrhizal

1 Mycorrhizal-acquired nutrient assimilation by plants may

2 allocation to an AM fungus without hindering mycorrhizal-acquired nutrient uptake.

3 ot traits were most strongly associated with mycorrhizal affiliation, leaf hydraulics or growth form.

4 ed, largely independent from leaf changes or mycorrhizal affiliation.

5 varies depending on evolutionary context and mycorrhizal affiliation.

6 two types of mycorrhizal fungi - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi - and t

7 t mycorrhizal groups in forests - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi - diffe

8 t the two dominant associations - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi - posse

9 shed that plants associating with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi cycle c

10 ng in their relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees.

11 ifferent spatial distributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EM) trees in a tem

12 nclude Glomeromycota that form an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) association intracellularly within the

13 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) associations enhance the phosphorous an

14 red root phosphatase activity and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization among two N2 - and two non

15 We found that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) dominant forests, which are characteris

16 ed for both the rhizobial and the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) endosymbioses.

17 e biogeography of plant symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities.

18 saccharides (COs) are proposed as arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal symbiotic signals.

19 Notably, roots associating with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi - generally considered for their

20 mycorrhizae, interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and invasive and native plants ar

21 d plants live in association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rely on this symbiosis to sca

22 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobium bacteria are accomm

23 iations formed between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are characterized by the bi-direc

24 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts that can incre

25 534 535 References 535 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi associate with the vast majority

26 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi associate with the vast majority

27 That arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi covary with plant communities is

28 In general, plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi exchange photosynthetically fixed

29 e lived in close association with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi for over 400 million years.

30 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form endosymbioses with most plan

31 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi interconnect plants in common myc

32 tion and water stress resistance, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi may modulate the effects of chang

33 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi play a key role in the nutrition

34 Trees associating with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi promote soil microbial communitie

35 plants associate with beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi that facilitate soil nutrient acq

36 the global diversity of symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi using currently available data on

37 of soil type on establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, and their effects on plant growt

38 mbiosis formed between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, the root cortical cells are colo

39 form a mutualistic symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which facilitates the acquisitio

40 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which form symbioses with the ro

41 ing ectomycorrhizas (ECM) and not arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi.

42 well as genus-level abundances of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi.

43 growth and spore production of an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, Rhizophagus irregularis, when t

44 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis is a mutually beneficial asso

45 ly diverging fungi that establish arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis with land plants.

46 e expression of genes critical to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis, with a corresponding drop in

47 th transitions from the ancestral arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) to the alternative ectomycorrhizal (ECM

48 c nutrient economy should benefit arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees because they are more suited to a

49 mmunities, as stands dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees had greater N transformation rate

50 We found that sites dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) vegetation harbor relatively more AM fu

51 l taxonomic units (OTUs) such as Mycena, and mycorrhizal and endophytic OTUs were characteristic of t

52 he low compatibility cultivar was reduced by mycorrhizal arbuscule formation.

53 The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy hypothesis propo

54 opy spectral properties to detect underlying mycorrhizal association across a gradient of AM- and ECM

55 ted against measurements of tree species and mycorrhizal association across ~130 000 trees throughout

56 -root traits in statistical models including mycorrhizal association and leaf venation, suggesting su

57 tural enemies are responsible depends on the mycorrhizal association and shade tolerance of tree spec

58 oss 105 studies and 176 sites, we found that mycorrhizal association and woodiness are the best categ

59 We identify the mycorrhizal association as an overlooked driver of globa

60 arly origin of Endogonales suggests that the mycorrhizal association between Endogonales and plants m

61 were able to predict 77% of the variation in mycorrhizal association distribution within the forest p

62 lations of North American trees, the type of mycorrhizal association explained much of the variation

63 ow this influence is affected by the type of mycorrhizal association formed by tree species within lo

64 cations for this work move us toward mapping mycorrhizal association globally and advancing our under

65 cology and support the hypothesis that plant mycorrhizal association is linked to the evolution of pl

66 Our results suggest that knowledge of tree mycorrhizal association may improve predictions of speci

67 Mycorrhizal association type, plant growth form and clim

68 Given previous research linking tree mycorrhizal association with carbon and nutrient dynamic

69 nvestigated relationships among decay rates, mycorrhizal association, phylogeny and climate.

70 After accounting for mycorrhizal association, sample size, and climatic range

71 nteraction between nitrogen availability and mycorrhizal association.

72 growth responded to the treatments based on mycorrhizal association.

73 Secondary growth eliminated arbuscular mycorrhizal associations as cortical tissue was destroye

74 tion ([CO2]) may modulate the functioning of mycorrhizal associations by altering the relative degree

75 adients and highlight the importance of tree mycorrhizal associations in influencing how the diversit

76 out of mycorrhizal plants on islands), with mycorrhizal associations less common among native island

77 These results suggest that tree mycorrhizal associations play a critical role in driving

78 on-woody plants, while plants with different mycorrhizal associations showed similar responses to low

79 elatedness, climatic ranges, growth form and mycorrhizal associations, we quantified the importance o

80 vegetation biomass distribution by dominant mycorrhizal associations.

81 of trees with ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal associations.

82 O2] significantly altered the functioning of mycorrhizal associations.

83 on in I. conyzae, with a concomitant loss in mycorrhizal benefits.

84 The magnitude and mechanisms driving mycorrhizal-CO2 responses reflected species-specific dif

85 tration Graph (EPG) technique, we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding

86 Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of

87 ching intensity, first-order root length and mycorrhizal colonization - in 27 coexisting species from

88 Third, in Fig. 1c the trait value of mycorrhizal colonization for Machilus kwangtungensis was

89 1c the trait value of mycorrhizal colonization for Machilus kwangtungensis was

90 nce of invasive E. sphaerocephalus decreased mycorrhizal colonization in I. conyzae, with a concomita

91 Mycorrhizal colonization of plant was enhanced by legume

92 weight, but shaded plants in intact CMNs had mycorrhizal colonization similar to that of sunlit plant

93 root length and mass proliferation but lower mycorrhizal colonization than species with thick absorpt

94 Early mycorrhizal colonization was reduced in mlo mutants of b

95 unctions of apocarotenoids during arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization, and the associated maintenance

96 consistently decreased root branching and/or mycorrhizal colonization, but increased lateral root len

97 ced litter decomposition, soil CO(2) efflux, mycorrhizal colonization, fungal production, microbial c

98 first-order root length and consistently low mycorrhizal colonization, whereas species with thicker r

99 onger first-order roots and maintaining high mycorrhizal colonization.

100 We hypothesize that altered mycorrhizal communities and autotrophic C inputs have le

101 observed effects of elevated inorganic N on mycorrhizal communities remain unknown.

102 is or P. putida, only the cultivar with high mycorrhizal compatibility showed a synergistic increase

103 The cultivar with high mycorrhizal compatibility supported higher levels of rhi

104 These findings support mycorrhizal competition for nitrogen as an independent d

105 However, experimental tests of the mycorrhizal competition hypothesis are lacking.

106 cale, climate has been shown to shape forest mycorrhizal composition, but here we show that in commun

107 tricted bioavailable N supply and arbuscular mycorrhizal contribution of N supply to plants.

108 host response indicated a trade-off between mycorrhizal dependence and benefit.

109 In monoculture, mycorrhizal dependency of legumes was higher than that o

110 e hindered by the scarcity of information on mycorrhizal distributions.

111 Our results suggest that knowledge of mycorrhizal dominance at the stand or landscape scale ma

112 When mycorrhizal dominance was switched - ECM trees dominatin

113 ter current theories of ecosystems rooted in mycorrhizal ecology and support the hypothesis that plan

114 Furthermore, mycorrhizal effects are large and frequently similar to

115 ositive values at 700 microL L(-1) [CO2] and mycorrhizal effects on photosynthesis and leaf growth ra

116 n-fixing and phosphate-delivering arbuscular mycorrhizal endosymbioses.

117 land plants able to develop rhizobial and/or mycorrhizal endosymbiosis.

118 s mix of signals is essential for arbuscular mycorrhizal establishment.

119 both CO and LCO perception are necessary for mycorrhizal establishment.

120 The existence of a root/mycorrhizal exudation-hyphal uptake pathway was supporte

121 We find evidence for a mycorrhizal filter (that is, the filtering out of mycorr

122 represent external sinks for plant C, impact mycorrhizal function remains unstudied.

123 To evaluate [CO2] effects on mycorrhizal functioning, we calculated response ratios b

124 trations, microbial biomass N and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundance were decreased under 2.1 de

125 Experimentally altering field arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal associations by silencing the Sym-pat

126 Orchid mycorrhizal fungal communities responded most strongly t

127 Orchid and ericoid mycorrhizal fungal communities were more modular than ec

128 effects of climate change on the turnover of mycorrhizal fungal necromass.

129 Orchids are highly dependent on their mycorrhizal fungal partners for nutrient supply, especia

130 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF)

131 the distribution and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and the rules that govern AMF as

132 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are significantly depleted in H.

133 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are ubiquitous in cultivated soi

134 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form a mutualistic symbiosis wit

135 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbioses with most crops,

136 For more than 450 million years, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have formed intimate, mutualisti

137 Understanding the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in plant interaction is essentia

138 ersity and community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is important for potentially opt

139 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protect host plants against dive

140 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) transfer plant photosynthate und

141 Perception of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) triggers distinct plant signalli

142 omote symbiosis between roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), modifying plant nutrient acquis

143 ociated with plant roots, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), the diversity of plant partners

144 ection of legumes by rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF).

145 members of the plant microbiota, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF, Glomeromycotina) symbiotically c

146 or inter-nucleus recombination in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Chen et al., 2018a).

147 iotic relationships with one of two types of mycorrhizal fungi - arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ecto

148 tive and exotic dandelions) with and without mycorrhizal fungi across a broad [CO2] gradient (180-1,0

149 and maintenance of symbioses with beneficial mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria.

150 hat multilateral interactions between roots, mycorrhizal fungi and PGPR can have synergistic effects

151 elowground interactions between plant roots, mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacter

152 d soil biota, including increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and reduced plant-feeding nematodes.

153 osts and benefits of plant interactions with mycorrhizal fungi and symbiotic N-fixing microbes.

154 These results suggest that the identity of mycorrhizal fungi and their ecological interactions, rat

155 seed coating with a consortium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma atroviride (coated and

156 Mycorrhizal fungi appear to have narrower climatic toler

157 Mycorrhizal fungi are critical members of the plant micr

158 Given that mycorrhizal fungi are instrumental for P acquisition and

159 Mycorrhizal fungi are mutualists that play crucial roles

160 s inhabiting most of the world's ecosystems, mycorrhizal fungi are usually absent from roots of the o

161 Overall, we present and discuss how mycorrhizal fungi can affect the feeding behaviour of S.

162 Although mycorrhizal fungi could facilitate plant access to perma

163 Plants associate with beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi facilitating nutrient acquisition.

164 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi form associations with most land plant

165 Mycorrhizal fungi form mutualistic associations with the

166 Plant interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have long attracted interest for their

167 root endophytic communities, with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an intermediate position.

168 A greater prevalence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in more clayey forests that had higher

169 fine-root classes, explicit incorporation of mycorrhizal fungi into fine-root studies, and wider adop

170 ariation in fine-root traits, integration of mycorrhizal fungi into fine-root-trait frameworks, and t

171 nce of root fungal endophytes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant physiology at low temperature

172 The negative impacts of mycorrhizal fungi on root herbivores, for instance, rais

173 ot with low-diversity mixtures of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi or in pasteurised soils.

174 otrophs and heterotrophs, such as plants and mycorrhizal fungi or symbiotic algae and corals, underpi

175 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produce chitooligosaccharides (COs) an

176 il, and the relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ranged from 0 to 50%, all positively c

177 on of whether plants colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond in a gall-like manner, and pre

178 phosphorus-trading strategies of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi simultaneously exposed to rich and poo

179 hich is similar to that in legume-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis.

180 , and thus they are more specialized towards mycorrhizal fungi than autotrophic plants.

181 hat colonize roots of legumes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi that colonize roots of the majority of

182 iderable variation exists in the capacity of mycorrhizal fungi to acquire carbon from soil organic ma

183 nlinear effects may limit plant responses to mycorrhizal fungi under future [CO2].

184 and colonization by rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was maintained.

185 In addition, the reliance on mycorrhizal fungi was reduced by nutrient additions acro

186 ies of desert truffles with respect to other mycorrhizal fungi while providing a first glimpse on pla

187 tic controls on decomposition (compared with mycorrhizal fungi)-are most abundant in arid biomes with

188 ecies (1) associating with similar guilds of mycorrhizal fungi, (2) of increasing phylogenetic distan

189 forms elaborate symbiotic relationships with mycorrhizal fungi, and includes several nonphotosyntheti

190 arily driven by interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and root traits were stronger predict

191 ed application in wheat fields of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, entomopathogenic Pseudomonas bacteria

192 ated to soil nutrients or to colonization by mycorrhizal fungi, suggesting that highly specialized pa

193 ole of intra- and interspecific diversity of mycorrhizal fungi, which are critical for plant fitness,

194 Lipids are transferred from the plant to mycorrhizal fungi, which are fatty acid auxotrophs, and

195 form beneficial associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which facilitate nutrient acquisition

196 ost plants, for example, form symbioses with mycorrhizal fungi, whose limited dispersal to islands co

197 Mycorrhizal fungi, with their vast filamentous networks

198 or intracellular accommodation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

199 lants capable of associating with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

200 fficient wood-degraders such as brown rot or mycorrhizal fungi.

201 e in beneficial interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

202 cost than plants associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

203 with and without inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

204 ring plant species, endophytic bacteria, and mycorrhizal fungi.

205 s-specific responses to [CO2] and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

206 mutualisms such as those between plants and mycorrhizal fungi.

207 46) in plants that associate with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

208 al interactions between roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

209 g and symbiotic interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

210 ffects on plant-fixed carbon transfer to the mycorrhizal fungi.

211 with plants, notably the arbuscular and ecto mycorrhizal fungi.

212 ative effect on fungi, especially arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

213 roots and allowing symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

214 form mycorrhiza were (co)inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and the rhizo

215 le for MLO in colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis.

216 We identified, in the genome of the orchid mycorrhizal fungus Tulasnella calospora, two functional

217 and 62 mycorrhizal species, including 29 new mycorrhizal genomes.

218 Across each site's 'mycorrhizal gradient', we measured fungal biomass, funga

219 amics, we hypothesized that the two dominant mycorrhizal groups in forests - arbuscular mycorrhizal (

220 cant difference in litter decay rate between mycorrhizal groups, and variation in decay rates was bes

221 clade of the MLO family that is specific to mycorrhizal-host species, we investigated the potential

222 cit and globally quantitative assessments of mycorrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning and biogeoc

223 Quantitative analyses of mycorrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning are hindere

224 Those levels were augmented by mycorrhizal infection.

225 mpact of host genotype on growth response to mycorrhizal inoculation was investigated in a panel of d

226 We investigated the mycorrhizal interactions of both green and mycoheterotro

227 fy the nutrient availability associated with mycorrhizal interactions, indicating that FTIRI has the

228 ated the potential role of MLO in arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions.

229 N, P, S and Mg concentrations of mycorrhizal legumes were larger than these of non-mycorr

230 rhizal legumes were larger than these of non-mycorrhizal legumes.

231 naceae genomes possess typical signatures of mycorrhizal lifestyle.

232 own whether Endogonales possess genomes with mycorrhizal-lifestyle signatures and whether Endogonales

233 They also form mycorrhizal-like association with some nonspermatophyte

234 onse ratios based on the relative biomass of mycorrhizal (MBio) and nonmycorrhizal (NMBio) plants (RB

235 es at low latitudes as C-intensive root- and mycorrhizal-mediated nutrient capture is progressively r

236 Mycorrhizal-mediated uptake of (33)P by plants was maint

237 dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms.

238 em, including wood decomposers, pathogens or mycorrhizal mutualists.

239 Root and mycorrhizal mycelial production also decreased substanti

240 ochemical traits as well as microsites where mycorrhizal necromass is deposited will determine how th

241 ate change on the long-term decomposition of mycorrhizal necromass, utilising the Spruce and Peatland

242 zal (AM) fungi interconnect plants in common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) which can amplify competitio

243 the effect of intact or disturbed arbuscular mycorrhizal networks (CMNs), were examined.

244 sed that Endogonales were among the earliest mycorrhizal partners with land plants.

245 ot-internal and -external fungal structures, mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake, and accumulation of trans

246 compartment system, using (33) P to quantify mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake.

247 uralized floras show a greater proportion of mycorrhizal plant species on islands than in mainland re

248 nt species diversity, with the proportion of mycorrhizal plants being highest near the equator and de

249 We also show that mycorrhizal plants contribute disproportionately to the

250 from 2,940 woody plant species to show that mycorrhizal plants differ systematically in nitrogen and

251 Furthermore, the proportion of native mycorrhizal plants in island floras decreased with isola

252 rhizal filter (that is, the filtering out of mycorrhizal plants on islands), with mycorrhizal associa

253 t1 transcripts and high phosphorus uptake by mycorrhizal plants.

254 raits may provide a framework for predicting mycorrhizal responses to global change.

255 Based on the increased expression of MLO in mycorrhizal roots and its presence in a clade of the MLO

256 ate concentration was five times higher near mycorrhizal roots than further out into the rhizosphere.

257 l based on the C costs of N acquisition from mycorrhizal roots, nonmycorrhizal roots, N-fixing microb

258 MtCBS1, MtCBS2, was specifically induced in mycorrhizal roots, suggesting common infection mechanism

259 ntly known chitin-based rhizobial/arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling molecules.

260 her soil fungal richness, while Ecto/Ericoid mycorrhizal species had higher soil bacterial richness a

261 he ascomycete Cenococcum geophilum, the only mycorrhizal species within the largest fungal class Doth

262 c, endophytic and pathogenic species, and 62 mycorrhizal species, including 29 new mycorrhizal genome

263 phosphorus use-conservative than arbuscular mycorrhizal species.

264 lance is hypothesised to be sensitive to the mycorrhizal strategies that plants use to acquire nutrie

265 underlying the relative fitness of different mycorrhizal strategies.

266 ean rain forest containing species with both mycorrhizal strategies.

267 sotopes), variation was also associated with mycorrhizal strategy.

268 rder to investigate the role of N-fixing and mycorrhizal symbionts in N-budgets during successional t

269 evated [CO(2)]) on resource exchange between mycorrhizal symbionts.

270 Mycorrhizal symbioses arose repeatedly across multiple l

271 orests remains elusive, but may be linked to mycorrhizal symbioses.

272 Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), a widespread mutualistic as

273 During arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), considerable amounts of lip

274 iments as evidence of an interaction between mycorrhizal symbiosis and soil nitrogen availability.

275 It is required not only for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis but also for rhizobia-legume and a

276 AMF-hosts, demonstrating the central role of mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant resource economies.

277 und in flowering plants that form arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, an ancestral mutualism between so

278 The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, characterised by roots and fungi

279 ution of phosphoinositides during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, we generated fluorescent reporter

280 sible combined effects during the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

281 The well-characterized mycorrhizal tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotype 76

282 degradation rates with any addition level in mycorrhizal treatments were all significantly higher tha

283 e all significantly higher than those in non-mycorrhizal treatments.

284 By contrast, arbuscular mycorrhizal trees dominate in aseasonal, warm tropical f

285 Additionally, arbuscular mycorrhizal trees exhibited strong conspecific inhibitio

286 l collected beneath conspecifics, arbuscular mycorrhizal trees experienced negative feedback, whereas

287 s dominated by ectomycorrhizal or arbuscular mycorrhizal trees occur relatively abruptly along climat

288 y data, we explored how dominant forest tree mycorrhizal type affects understory plant invasions with

289 We also found no difference in the mycorrhizal type composition of understory invaders betw

290 as the second most important factor, whereas mycorrhizal type had little effect.

291 r results indicate that dominant forest tree mycorrhizal type is closely linked with understory invas

292 Forest mycorrhizal type mediates nutrient dynamics, which in tu

293 We show that mycorrhizal type mediates tree neighborhood interactions

294 These results suggest that mycorrhizal type, through effects on plant-soil feedback

295 ed nestedness and modularity among different mycorrhizal types and endophytic fungal guilds.

296 etation type and nutritional traits, such as mycorrhizal types and symbiotic nitrogen-fixation.

297 Ecosystems dominated by distinct mycorrhizal types differ strongly in their biogeochemist

298 Mycorrhizal uptake represented the dominant pathway by w

299 Arbuscular, ectomycorrhizal, and ericoid mycorrhizal vegetation store, respectively, 241 +/- 15,

300 T carbon in aboveground biomass, whereas non-mycorrhizal vegetation stores 29 +/- 5.5 GT carbon.