ライフサイエンスコーパス: mydriatic

1 Then all participants had mydriatic 45 degrees fundus photographs obtained from th

2 t baseline and 4-year follow-up visits using mydriatic 7-standard field Early Treatment Diabetic Reti

3 Baseline mydriatic 7-standard field Early Treatment Diabetic Reti

4 Commercial mydriatics administered in preterm infants during retino

5 mydriasis in all participants regardless of mydriatic agent or iris color.

6 Provocative testing with mydriatic agents (tropicamide and atropine 1%) caused si

7 3650 eyes [61.7%]), and 757.0 (69.7) mm2 for mydriatic and MLL BEI images (851 eyes [14.4%]).

8 efficacy of an intracameral combination of 2 mydriatics and 1 anesthetic (ICMA, Mydrane) for cataract

9 ct, side effect, blood pressure, heart rate, mydriatic, and eye drops.

10 L (1418 eyes [24.0%]), 688.1 (119.9) mm2 for mydriatic BEI images (3650 eyes [61.7%]), and 757.0 (69.

11 ith a retinologist's clinical examination by mydriatic bio-microscopy, according to a locally adopted

12 ading of images from a digital hand-held non-mydriatic camera at a medical clinic, with dilatation of

13 A stand-alone, mydriatic camera prototype was successfully developed at

14 We have found that using a mydriatic cocktail-soaked wick - an alternative way to a

15 r purpose was to investigate the effect of a mydriatic-cocktail soaked cellulose sponge on perioperat

16 ts using tamsulosin were dilated either with mydriatic-cocktail soaked sponge (group 1) or with conve

17 tion in children while maintaining a similar mydriatic effect as eye drops.

18 The mydriatic effect of ibopamine was completely blocked by

19 nce for the potential artifact caused by its mydriatic effect.

20 Microdrops proved to be superior regarding mydriatic efficacy at 45 minutes (mean difference, 0.12;

21 ieving mydriasis with Mydriasert compared to mydriatic eye drops (tropicamide [1%] plus phenylephrine

22 5) experienced in using both Mydriasert and mydriatic eye drops and results from the current clinica

23 ost of Mydriasert compared with conventional mydriatic eye drops to induce pupil dilation prior to ca

24 gery showed that when Mydriasert substituted mydriatic eye drops, annual total costs decreased by 18%

25 rated that despite its higher unit cost than mydriatic eye drops, Mydriasert resulted in overall savi

26 condary to a protocol in which perioperative mydriatic eyedrop bottles are used across multiple patie

27 sizes, with savings of 99.23% to 96.69% for mydriatic eyedrop sizes of 15 mul per drop to 65 mul per

28 Multiuse perioperative mydriatic eyedrops are a viable option for cost and envi

29 m retinal images acquired using handheld non-mydriatic fundus camera by non-technical field workers i

30 camera to images from a traditional tabletop mydriatic fundus camera.

31 table quality imaging could be obtained, non-mydriatic fundus images had a better DOR of 143 (95% CI:

32 cular pressure, pachymetry, pupils, and took mydriatic fundus photographs and retinal nerve fiber lay

33 ants were concurrently examined for AMD from mydriatic fundus photographs, which were graded using th

34 e screened for DR using the single-field non-mydriatic fundus photography at the point of care during

35 nonmydriatic fundus photography, and 7-field mydriatic fundus photography for their abilities to dete

36 ne fundus photography, compared with 7-field mydriatic fundus photography, for the detection of any D

37 aluation of disc images on par with standard mydriatic fundus photography.

38 comparison with the standard method, 7-field mydriatic fundus photography.

39 mpact DL models can effectively classify non-mydriatic, handheld retinal image gradability with poten

40 Ungradable image proportion in non-mydriatic imaging was 43.4% (either eye-31.3%, both eyes

41 CI 86.4-96.5%) for grader 2 (PPV 68%), using mydriatic imaging, after including ungradable images as

42 as successfully performed without additional mydriatics in 24 (96.0%; modified-ITT set) patients in t

43 ps compared with standard drops of a diluted mydriatic mixture, showing reduced systemic adverse even

44 Non-mydriatic ocular fundus cameras and OCT have become read

45 using modified Wisconsin grading of 4-field mydriatic photographs.

46 tients, we used non-stereoscopic three-field mydriatic photography and modified Wisconsin grading.

47 adable, reflex dilation (1% tropicamide) and mydriatic photography were performed for repeat AI-based

48 The multiuse mydriatic protocol allowed for a 97.1% reduction in the

49 Mydriatic red-free monochromatic 60-degree digital fundu

50 eveloped from images acquired with high cost mydriatic retinal cameras and cannot be applied in the s

51 Non-mydriatic retinal images were captured as part of SMART

52 Non-mydriatic retinal images were used to grade diabetic ret

53 We did non-mydriatic retinal screening and assessed risk factor bur

54 ic receptor inhibtors were also dilated with mydriatic sponge (group 3).In all groups oxybuprocain 0.

55 en with a nonmydriatic portable camera and a mydriatic standard camera.

56 re dark adapted overnight, eyes dilated with mydriatics; the right eye was light occluded and the fun

57 successful capsulorhexis without additional mydriatic treatment.

58 A second cohort of mydriatic UWFI was acquired at an academic retina practi

59 fter pupil dilatation, using a hand-held non-mydriatic (Visuscout 100(R)-Germany) digital retinal cam

60 Routine topical mydriatics were instilled before surgery.