戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n) and 375 total events (hard events or late myocardial revascularization).
2  of routine coronary angiography followed by myocardial revascularization).
3 ion or severe unstable angina requiring late myocardial revascularization).
4 on for Cardiothoracic Surgery guidelines for myocardial revascularization.
5 ioplasty are now well established methods of myocardial revascularization.
6 excellent in patients with MCR who underwent myocardial revascularization.
7 ene transfer strategies for the provision of myocardial revascularization.
8                                  Surgery for myocardial revascularization.
9 asty (PMA) associated with complete surgical myocardial revascularization.
10 l revascularizations; nondiagnostic group, 7 myocardial revascularizations.
11         In the medical group, 35.4% required myocardial revascularization: 15.0% in the first year an
12              The utility of performing early myocardial revascularization among patients presenting w
13  devices that may revolutionize the field of myocardial revascularization and allow a broader accepta
14  lifestyle changes, optimal medical therapy, myocardial revascularization and the use of antiplatelet
15 d by using the terms atherosclerotic plaque, myocardial revascularization, and plaque stabilization.
16 ospitalization for acute coronary syndromes, myocardial revascularization, arrhythmic event, or strok
17 ndations of the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization as they apply to patients w
18 nvasive strategy (coronary arteriography and myocardial revascularization, as clinically indicated) t
19 ial infarction, sustained kidney injury, and myocardial revascularization) at 1 year were assessed.
20 mprehensive analysis outlines a future where myocardial revascularization becomes increasingly person
21                                              Myocardial revascularization can be performed with accep
22                             Patients who had myocardial revascularization (coronary artery bypass gra
23                Many patients having elective myocardial revascularization develop postoperative renal
24                                       Direct myocardial revascularization (DMR) has been examined as
25 e of 2989 renal transplant patients required myocardial revascularization either before or after thei
26 cularization modality in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization for LM disease are included
27 ustness of the findings that support current myocardial revascularization guidelines is tenuous and v
28 r of RCTs that support current guidelines on myocardial revascularization have a FI of 3 or lower, an
29 gy (routine coronary angiography followed by myocardial revascularization, if feasible) versus an ear
30  risk for periprocedural complications after myocardial revascularization, in particular neurological
31 larization were measured by the coronary and myocardial revascularization indices (RI(coro) and RI(my
32 onal and perfusion imaging to evaluate laser myocardial revascularization (LMR).
33 MI); positive group, 4 non-Q-wave MIs and 12 myocardial revascularizations; nondiagnostic group, 7 my
34 and late (>3 months after the exercise test) myocardial revascularization, occurred in 41 patients.
35 data could be used to predict the effects of myocardial revascularization on functional status and qu
36 iac surgery has progressed to where surgical myocardial revascularization, or coronary artery bypass
37 tudy retrospectively analyzes the results of myocardial revascularization procedures in these patient
38 rategy in symptomatic patients with previous myocardial revascularization procedures.
39 atter 2 options are commonly referred to as "myocardial revascularization" procedures.
40                                         Late myocardial revascularization rates were also similar in
41 ween groups also favored TAVI for additional myocardial revascularization (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.6
42 failure (RR, 1.8 [CI, 1.3 to 2.6]); previous myocardial revascularization (RR, 1.8 [CI, 1.2 to 2.7]);
43 g therapeutic neovascularization with direct myocardial revascularization techniques.
44 ic technology has offered the possibility of myocardial revascularization through limited access usin
45  who were provided additional treatments and myocardial revascularization, together with their ratio
46 aluate RCTs supporting current guidelines on myocardial revascularization using the FI and FI minus n
47                    Within this cohort, early myocardial revascularization was associated with a signi
48 ), where the use of coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization was guided by the developme
49 n for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Guidelines for Myocardial Revascularization were calculated.
50                                       Prompt myocardial revascularization with percutaneous coronary