ライフサイエンスコーパス: natural population

1 le to measure fitness for all genotypes in a natural population.

2 e is hampered by reproductive behaviour in a natural population.

3 ce between personality and pace-of-life in a natural population.

4 associated with a slower rabies spread in a natural population.

5 me fitness have never been demonstrated in a natural population.

6 xtra-soft cells, the most common defect in a natural population.

7 cross both host and symbiont lineages from a natural population.

8 ad of such drives from the laboratory into a natural population.

9 in the distributions of phenotypic traits in natural populations.

10 eptor-ligand combinations are segregating in natural populations.

11 how genomic background affects adaptation in natural populations.

12 enhance our understanding of the dynamics of natural populations.

13 or long-term changes in genetic variation in natural populations.

14 ifferent life cycle genotypes can coexist in natural populations.

15 ere are distinct genetic clusters present in natural populations.

16 ndings help explain why sex is maintained in natural populations.

17 and maintenance of behavioural diversity in natural populations.

18 ts and (2) extremely rare polymorphisms from natural populations.

19 eed in a given year occur in a wide range of natural populations.

20 clarify the extent and form of sociality in natural populations.

21 and maintenance of behavioural diversity in natural populations.

22 of gene flow between this pair of species in natural populations.

23 hese drivers in determining ITV variation in natural populations.

24 well match the patterns of mutation found in natural populations.

25 hysiological and biogeochemical processes in natural populations.

26 ribution to maintaining genetic variation in natural populations.

27 ty at Avpr1a and Oxtr could be maintained in natural populations.

28 ation rate, and mechanisms of maintenance in natural populations.

29 ood density, and tracheary element size from natural populations.

30 y at behavioral loci are largely unknown for natural populations.

31 at reduces effective population size (Ne) in natural populations.

32 which may explain why it is prevalent among natural populations.

33 ve been limited genome-wide level studies in natural populations.

34 o environmental change, and communication in natural populations.

35 ation rate varies at the individual level in natural populations.

36 chromosome number or structural variants in natural populations.

37 nd the difficulties of tracking selection in natural populations.

38 the effects of standing genetic variation in natural populations.

39 tunities for the study of plant pathogens in natural populations.

40 rived from recently and independently formed natural populations.

41 ral selection shape the genetic variation in natural populations.

42 ut microbiota between hosts and over time in natural populations.

43 he negative effects of ionizing radiation in natural populations.

44 w climate can alter patterns of selection in natural populations.

45 how the level of buffering is controlled in natural populations.

46 anisms is crucial for managing resistance in natural populations.

47 y concordant with phenotypic clines from the natural populations.

48 o the pathogen or resistance being common in natural populations.

49 hich eco-evolutionary feedbacks may occur in natural populations.

50 s known about SAM morphological variation in natural populations.

51 iod to fix chromosome structural variants in natural populations.

52 sticity and subsequent adaptive evolution in natural populations.

53 mutations that are most likely to persist in natural populations.

54 , model organisms, agricultural species, and natural populations.

55 essors shapes the structure and functions of natural populations.

56 ions with high in vitro fitness were rare in natural populations.

57 e substantial backup in the context of large natural populations.

58 problems of estimating these parameters for natural populations.

59 ent mechanisms by which climate has impacted natural populations.

60 understanding of many spreading processes in natural populations.

61 in the survival of neocentric chromosomes in natural populations.

62 e barriers are challenging to measure within natural populations.

63 ine in functionality remain underexplored in natural populations.

64 ency of insecticide-resistant alleles in the natural populations.

65 our need to understand how drive spreads in natural populations.

66 oductive biology, and analyzing gene flow in natural populations.

67 via theoretical models and snapshot tests in natural populations.

68 y forces affecting the genetic adaptation of natural populations.

69 in the divergence of sexual communication in natural populations.

70 ing that prion polymorphs can be utilized in natural populations.

71 and genes associated with complex traits in natural populations.

72 etic variation and evolutionary processes in natural populations.

73 uential for fitness in the laboratory and in natural populations.

74 pable of quickly spreading and persisting in natural populations.

75 for persistence of large-effect mutations in natural populations.

76 nosenescence in the ecology and evolution of natural populations.

77 ion remains poorly understood, especially in natural populations.

78 change on the stability and evolvability of natural populations.

79 ation on telomere maintenance is unknown for natural populations.

80 hen studying the impact of climate change on natural populations.

81 for understanding variation and evolution in natural populations.

82 play variation among cells in culture and in natural populations.

83 e stages but decoupling them is difficult in natural populations.

84 f evidence for behavioural plasticity within natural populations.

85 dging strategies might emerge and persist in natural populations.

86 xtinction of ineffective Bradyrhizobium from natural populations.

87 essment of standing genetic variation across natural populations.

88 variation in susceptibility to infection in natural populations.

89 t variation in genome-wide crossover rate in natural populations, (2) at the 200-400 kb scale, recomb

90 s of decreased immigration through time in a natural population [4-6].

91 ulus linkage population (1200 progeny) and a natural population (435 individuals).

92 hypothesis, we quantified trait variation in natural populations across an elevational gradient.

93 The second, rare genetic variation from natural populations allows the study of mutation because

94 Natural population analysis and natural localized molecu

95 d the associated bond orders, valencies, and natural population analysis charges.

96 of randomly sampling maternal plants from a natural population and their half-sib seeds.

97 ism has implications for genome evolution in natural populations and cancer.

98 esents the predominant form of resistance in natural populations and crops.

99 nt-progeny relationships within both in situ natural populations and ex situ genetic resource collect

100 ucturing is critical for the conservation of natural populations and for drawing accurate ecological

101 Selfish genetic elements spread in natural populations and have an important role in genome

102 olutionary significance of SV segregating in natural populations and highlight the need for reliable

103 tion in our population that is comparable to natural populations and highlights the potential for ada

104 ical mismatches of plants and pollinators in natural populations and horticultural crops.

105 F might be a genetic resource useful-both in natural populations and in the context of genome editing

106 te as stable polymorphisms within or between natural populations and influence ecologically relevant

107 bt-1 shared with some Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations and known to confer arsenic resistan

108 lants, limiting geographical distribution of natural populations and leading to major agronomical los

109 nd manifested across individual genotypes in natural populations and pedigrees.

110 freshwater conditions shifts the ionomes of natural populations and populations raised in common gar

111 How such features vary in natural populations and relate to genetic variation are

112 d phenotypic adaptation is often observed in natural populations and selection experiments.

113 of genetic diversity seem to vary greatly in natural populations and species, but the determinants of

114 c scenarios applicable to a diverse range of natural populations and species.

115 ar stress responses can be identified within natural populations and that linking molecular mechanism

116 , and direct human influences, are impacting natural populations and thus biodiversity, ecosystem ser

117 typical for Serbia however the existence of natural populations and unexpectedly suitable agro-clima

118 e uncovered the SL trans-splicing in copepod natural populations, and demonstrated that CopepodSL was

119 sequence space, characterizing diversity in natural populations, and experimentally investigating ev

120 to which these results are representative of natural populations, and of the response over more than

121 ng that they confer an adaptive advantage in natural populations, and our analyses support the presen

122 ary processes governing genetic variation in natural populations, and provides a framework for identi

123 tool for evaluating inbreeding depression in natural populations, and suggest that, to date, the prev

124 elatively few studies have been conducted in natural populations, and they usually only present a "sn

125 tion, genetic mapping, exome resequencing of natural populations, and transcriptome analysis.

126 varying selection maintain polymorphisms in natural populations; and provided important case studies

127 d to understand how demographic processes in natural populations are affected by climate variability,

128 Most natural populations are affected by seasonal changes in

129 Natural populations are exposed to seasonal variation in

130 Estimates of selection in natural populations are frequent but our understanding o

131 t fitness exert deleterious effects and that natural populations are often composed of subpopulations

132 veals that a majority of large-scale CNVs in natural populations are removed by purifying selection.

133 at is an example of this problem, as several natural populations are suffering introgression of genes

134 ut it appears that a significant fraction of natural populations are truncated, conducting only one o

135 ariation in the degree of placentation among natural populations associated with predation risk: fema

136 es are present in 18-26%, 9-14% and <1.5% of natural populations at 150 m with >/=85% identity to str

137 ary metabolism (through metabolomics) in two natural populations at different elevations.

138 ents can rapidly produce strong selection on natural populations at multiple biological levels that r

139 er, been unable to estimate division rate in natural populations at the appropriate timescale (hours

140 Inbreeding is often avoided in natural populations by passive processes such as sex-bia

141 ossing replicate line pairs from two sets of natural populations (C<-->R, B<-->S) separated by simila

142 how a standardised challenge performed on a natural population can reveal the patterns of natural va

143 Although natural populations can harbor evolutionary potential to

144 Crosses between natural populations can result in heterosis if recessive

145 We thereby demonstrate that natural populations can show a rapid and adaptive evolut

146 eld encompasses detailed genetic analyses of natural populations, comparative genomic analyses of clo

147 elated loci based on RAD-seq genotyping of a natural population comprising 286 accessions.

148 have important fitness consequences and that natural populations contain extensive diversity at these

149 lection pressures that act upon cultured and natural populations differ, adaptations that favour life

150 an exploitation is often blamed, the role of natural population dynamics in the passenger pigeon's ex

151 ese changes also may affect the evolution of natural populations either directly or indirectly by alt

152 teractions (S*E), but we reviewed studies of natural populations estimating the extent of genotype-by

153 Because of severe nutrient deficiency, natural populations exhibit near-zero growth (NZG).

154 In natural populations, foliar morphology and ecophysiology

155 ation and population structure in red clover natural populations from Europe and Asia, and varieties

156 n in genomic regions is a recurrent topic in natural population genetic studies.

157 In this case, a natural population harbors a reservoir of alleles preada

158 ion of individual inbreeding coefficients in natural populations has been challenging, and, consequen

159 Intraspecific variation maintained in natural populations has long intrigued scientists and na

160 However, estimating this parameter in natural populations has proved difficult.

161 few cases of this phenomenon arising within natural populations have been described.

162 r lineages, it is nonetheless true that most natural populations have very low mutation rates.

163 productive isolation to emerge from a single natural population in real time.

164 Analyzing amino acid-changing variants from natural populations in a comparative population genomic

165 f bank voles Myodes glareolus collected from natural populations in areas with varying levels of back

166 ection, shaping the adaptive trajectories of natural populations in complex ways, and deserves furthe

167 Moreover, structuring of natural populations in terms of individual size or devel

168 of all protein-encoding CGD target genes in natural populations include at least one target site wit

169 rs report that standing genetic variation in natural populations includes ubiquitous polymorphisms wi

170 Data from many natural populations indicate that growth suppression is

171 der to better understand how the activity of natural populations influences and regulates all major b

172 Natural populations interact with each other in a variet

173 iven to whether or not methods for surveying natural populations introduce systematic bias that will

174 g the forces that explain drive frequency in natural populations is a long-standing focus of evolutio

175 d cognitive effects of the gut microbiome in natural populations is an important goal for behavioural

176 conditions explain evolutionary variation in natural populations is an outstanding question.

177 sublethal effects of disease outbreaks among natural populations is challenging and requires longitud

178 Testing these quantitative predictions in natural populations is difficult because of large enviro

179 g only, the amount of observed inbreeding in natural populations is generally low compared with that

180 entification of genetic variation within the natural populations is likely to be useful for enhancing

181 hitecture of genetic differentiation between natural populations is of central importance in evolutio

182 and use change are making the world in which natural populations live increasingly fragmented, often

183 ry with high-throughput sequencing data from natural populations, major strides have recently been ma

184 Long-term effects of radiation in natural populations might be an important selective pres

185 The mechanisms by which natural populations modulate their thermoresponsiveness

186 ere, we sampled 100 yearling lizards from 10 natural populations (n = 10 per population) along an ext

187 We studied the natural population of a social rodent during 5 years to

188 The study was carried out in a natural population of A. aculeatum distributed over appr

189 ising from this perturbation varies within a natural population of Arabidopsis and is associated with

190 l manipulation of early-life conditions in a natural population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula alb

191 pulation level transcriptomic responses of a natural population of Daphnia magna Straus, (1820), to h

192 We monitored a natural population of field voles using longitudinal and

193 and genomic information from a long-studied natural population of Florida Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma coe

194 When applied to a natural population of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), a w

195 of the bacterial community associated with a natural population of marine phytoplankton under oil spi

196 by Chrysomyxa rhododendri in an unstructured natural population of Norway spruce.

197 Using a dataset spanning 31 years from a natural population of pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleu

198 its 12 target genes in 435 individuals of a natural population of Populus tomentosa.

199 es with phenotypes in 435 individuals from a natural population of Populus.

200 ted fine-scale recombination rate maps for a natural population of the Eastern house mouse, Mus muscu

201 ze the epidemiology and genetic structure of natural populations of an obligate fungal pathogen, Podo

202 Here, we investigate wAnga in natural populations of An. coluzzii and its interactions

203 ted pCO2 on trait-shifts observed throughout natural populations of Astroides calycularis, an azooxan

204 he hypothesis that CRISPR plays this role in natural populations of bacteria and archaea, and experim

205 sted if variable exposure to radiation among natural populations of bank voles Myodes glareolus in Ch

206 d whole genome sequences from laboratory and natural populations of both strains.

207 en to interrogate the alleles segregating in natural populations of Caenorhabditis elegans: we induce

208 ts of Cl NPs on both laboratory cultures and natural populations of cyanobacteria and algae at single

209 We tested these predictions in natural populations of Daphnia ambigua from lakes that v

210 rate (rate of meiotic crossing over) in two natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura from Uta

211 es that recombination rate divergence in two natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura has been

212 f enzymes and proteins to study variation in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, at a se

213 he cold-adapted ants, and so we first assess natural populations of early and late blooming plants.

214 erations) leads to reproductive isolation in natural populations of feather lice on birds.

215 here are limited data on the extent to which natural populations of fish can recover from exposure to

216 locus controlling wing-pattern variation in natural populations of H. numata The combined effect of

217 ness has rarely been examined empirically in natural populations of long-lived mammals, particularly

218 ct sex differences in life-history traits in natural populations of long-lived mammals.

219 a offer new opportunities for the control of natural populations of malaria vectors.

220 The prevalence of cataracts in natural populations of mammals, and their potential ecol

221 compared Cu stress responses in cultures and natural populations of marine Synechococcus from two co-

222 -Cas systems to the ecology and evolution of natural populations of microbes and the strength of sele

223 method to map loci for flowering time within natural populations of Mimulus guttatus, collecting the

224 d color dimorphism (FLCD) that segregates in natural populations of more than 20 species of the Droso

225 predator-prey relationship, we investigated natural populations of nematodes and NTF that we found t

226 Natural populations of pathogens are frequently composed

227 election or other human activities.(3)(,)(4) Natural populations of plants that are used by humans ha

228 In natural populations of Podospora anserina, seven spore k

229 In the North Atlantic Ocean, we found that natural populations of Prochlorococcus adhered to Redfie

230 ome-wide similarity between experimental and natural populations of R. pomonella underscores the impo

231 database of long-term life-history data for natural populations of seven primate species that have b

232 f intra- and interspecific SV segregating in natural populations of seven songbird species in the gen

233 000 word-use choices for 418 meanings in two natural populations of speakers.

234 ort a case of homoploid hybrid speciation in natural populations of the budding yeast Saccharomyces p

235 n of laboratory and greenhouse studies of 32 natural populations of the common agricultural weed, Ipo

236 relate to growth rates and longevity in two natural populations of the conifer species Pinus pondero

237 to molecular and non-molecular phenotypes in natural populations of the most studied model plant.

238 garden experiment with seeds collected from natural populations of the native annual plant Lepidium

239 We study natural populations of this small animal and its relativ

240 omus (P.) papatasi but no data available for natural populations of Turkey, where leishmaniasis is en

241 idemiological complexity of CWD infection in natural populations of white-tailed deer.

242 Natural populations often experience different environme

243 d on two populations: (1) the sole remaining natural population, on the island of Te Hauturu-o-Toi, a

244 ge analyses involving association studies in natural populations or segregating populations resulting

245 ory strains reflect the hotspot diversity of natural populations or whether broad-scale variation in

246 t the nature of this individual variation in natural populations, or which components of immune pathw

247 erns of methylation diversity in A. thaliana natural populations over evolutionary timescales.

248 this is the result of selection manifest in natural populations over millennial timescales, so has n

249 to climate change, our understanding of how natural populations persist and respond to changes has b

250 Natural populations persist in complex environments, whe

251 veral years before collapse, a sharp drop in natural population productivity, and a lagged response t

252 oved transformation protocols and structured natural populations provide rapid methods to study gene

253 This ongoing spread of the P-element in natural populations provides a unique opportunity to und

254 In natural populations, quantitative trait dynamics often d

255 ugh the mechanisms underlying recognition in natural populations remain poorly understood.

256 biological mechanisms determining the DFE in natural populations remain unclear.

257 enomenon and the mechanisms that drive it in natural populations remain unresolved.

258 erred among individuals during early life in natural populations remains unknown.

259 ted tetraploid potatoes, showing that extant natural populations represent an essential source of unt

260 an alter selection on phenological traits in natural populations, something that has important implic

261 owever, profiling these SNPs across multiple natural populations still requires substantial time and

262 Natural populations subjected to strong environmental se

263 re it is difficult to study social traits in natural populations, such as bacteria and other microbes

264 ed in Trichodesmium metagenomic samples from natural populations suggesting them to be potential in s

265 ndance of recessive deleterious mutations in natural populations suggests they are likely to be prese

266 Our long-term data show that in a natural population, telomere dynamics vary in a complex

267 may explain more expression variation within natural populations than currently appreciated.

268 y and address some of the cryptic threats to natural populations that are likely to result from any n

269 man-mediated selection on rapid responses of natural populations that can lead to unexpected long-ter

270 assimilation and the survival mechanisms of natural populations that face changing environments.

271 ce, SNPs were scored for 53 clones from five natural populations that varied in lake trophic status.

272 intenance of a high genetic variation within natural populations, the factors underlying the evolutio

273 arasitic B chromosomes invade and persist in natural populations through several mechanisms for trans

274 ces of anthropogenic environmental change on natural populations throughout historic time periods.

275 olutionary change in allele frequencies in a natural population to date.

276 a melanogaster isogenic lines derived from a natural population to extreme heat and cold stress after

277 ensified the need to assess the capacity for natural populations to adapt to abrupt shifts in the env

278 e importance of maintaining variation within natural populations to bolster species' adaptive capacit

279 riation to better understand the response of natural populations to stressors.

280 nd it foreshadows a selective response among natural populations to these chemicals.

281 ation variation and its phenotypic impact in natural populations to those made using near-isogenic po

282 Evidence-based management of natural populations under strong human influence frequen

283 generate epialleles that are not present in natural populations, underlying epigenetic dynamics in y

284 Analysis of population structure in natural populations using genetic data is a common pract

285 Studies on the impact of temperature on natural populations usually use lethal or viability thre

286 es are beginning to provide a glimpse of how natural population variation together with multiplexed,

287 Each natural population was sampled twice within a three-year

288 fection prevalence in several laboratory and natural populations was surveyed.

289 determinants of gene expression evolution in natural populations, we analyzed the transcriptome from

290 previously associated with adaptation across natural populations, we found that the more common allel

291 evolutionary dynamics of transcripts across natural populations, we here study transcriptomes from s

292 ts seedlings clustered around the parents in natural populations, when transplanted into the range of

293 refore, that findings can be extrapolated to natural populations, where new mutations may be transfer

294 to assess the relevance of these findings to natural populations, where selection pressures are unkno

295 rganism will be depleted of such variants in natural populations, whereas non-essential genes will to

296 ntrol the number of mating types observed in natural populations, which ranges from two to many thous

297 ble temperatures as well as physical flux in natural populations, which will affect the ecology and e

298 tain microbial group was also more common in natural populations with high relative abundance of that

299 ongly impact the evolution and demography of natural populations, with consequences for the rate of a

300 of introgression after a range expansion in natural populations without the need to evoke other mech