コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sity, and anhedonia, as well as parent-rated negative symptoms).
2 were similar with CVR, and for positive and negative symptoms.
3 e symptoms in both study groups, but not for negative symptoms.
4 rking memory than patients without prominent negative symptoms.
5 ited, 29 were classified as having prominent negative symptoms.
6 could be distinguished by NSS and prominent negative symptoms.
7 y resemble those of schizophrenia, including negative symptoms.
8 nd total NSS than patients without prominent negative symptoms.
9 ore illness domains: psychosis and cognitive/negative symptoms.
10 analysis revealed significant improvement of negative symptoms.
11 ther compounds in treating both positive and negative symptoms.
12 schizophrenia, with the potential to address negative symptoms.
13 MCCB scores were inversely correlated with negative symptoms.
14 ed periods of moderate to severe positive or negative symptoms.
15 lity for increasing severity of parent-rated negative symptoms.
16 associated with schizophrenia in particular negative symptoms.
17 istinguished EOS patients with predominantly negative symptoms.
18 mpal activity was positively correlated with negative symptoms.
19 e self-rated scales and 17% for parent-rated negative symptoms.
20 etween hippocampal activity and positive and negative symptoms.
21 logy of schizophrenia and, in particular, of negative symptoms.
22 lized medicine approach for the treatment of negative symptoms.
23 s were greatest among patients with elevated negative symptoms.
24 oms: the more the volume reduction, the more negative symptoms.
25 pirically developed and evaluated measure of negative symptoms.
26 related with the severity of a participant's negative symptoms.
27 lated with the severity of both positive and negative symptoms.
28 herwise different in patients with prominent negative symptoms.
29 whether these deficits were associated with negative symptoms.
30 esults of trials in patients with persistent negative symptoms.
31 nal alterations was unrelated to severity of negative symptoms.
32 ined sceptical as to its potential to reduce negative symptoms.
33 of auditory verbal hallucinations as well as negative symptoms.
34 everal of these abnormalities were linked to negative symptoms.
35 nia and the relationship between smoking and negative symptoms.
36 last week, compared with those with moderate negative symptoms.
37 choline receptor system for the treatment of negative symptoms.
38 her evaluation of behavioural activation for negative symptoms.
39 inic acetylcholine receptor availability and negative symptoms.
40 rmal activation correlated with positive and negative symptoms.
41 ts operant performance, a potential index of negative symptoms.
42 y in people with schizophrenia and prominent negative symptoms.
43 t and later maintenance of both positive and negative symptoms.
44 otype would be significantly associated with negative symptoms.
45 t is most pronounced in patients with severe negative symptoms.
46 oved efficacy in the treatment of persistent negative symptoms.
47 tween the presence of the risk haplotype and negative symptoms.
48 mediodorsal nucleus was associated with more negative symptoms.
49 variability of change in total, positive and negative symptoms.
50 ted with performance on processing speed and negative symptoms.
51 outcome via impaired cognition and increased negative symptoms.
52 separate pathways that involved or bypassed negative symptoms.
53 the latter accounting for 37% of variance in negative symptoms.
54 VST in CHR and an inverse relationship with negative symptoms.
55 riprazine in adult patients with predominant negative symptoms.
56 measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms.
57 plications for the treatment of positive and negative symptoms.
58 Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms.
59 haloperidol and risperidone for reduction of negative symptoms.
60 er, a trend toward an effect was observed on negative symptoms.
61 tions were correlated with positive, but not negative, symptoms.
62 st shared environment for hallucinations and negative symptoms (17%-24%) and significant nonshared en
63 0.17 (-0.31 to -0.04) for brexpiprazole, for negative symptoms (32 015 participants) from -0.62 (-0.8
64 post hoc analysis of patients with moderate negative symptoms, 5 and 50 mg RG3487 vs placebo signifi
65 the MCCB; however, in patients with moderate negative symptoms, a post hoc analysis revealed signific
67 edicted interpersonal and work skills, while negative symptoms affected interpersonal skills independ
70 patients with schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms and a high-degree of illness severity
72 equired concurrent remission of positive and negative symptoms and adequate social/vocational functio
73 ymorphisms associated with schizophrenia and negative symptoms and anxiety disorder but not with psyc
74 etic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of negative symptoms and call for adequately powered multic
75 nique pharmacological profile for addressing negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophreni
76 lizumab, would improve residual positive and negative symptoms and cognitive deficits in schizophreni
78 onstrated encouraging results on measures of negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in schizophr
81 s with schizophrenia frequently present with negative symptoms and cognitive impairments for which no
85 t in activities could lead to improvement in negative symptoms and function, but few trials have been
86 atistically significant efficacy in reducing negative symptoms and good tolerability in stable schizo
88 tance of developing effective treatments for negative symptoms and hostility in order to improve the
90 sychosis, poor premorbid functioning, stable negative symptoms and impaired social cognition and neur
93 ssions to support activation for people with negative symptoms and mental health professional pessimi
94 etrieval accuracy negatively correlated with negative symptoms and no-retrieval accuracy negatively c
95 blunted ERN was associated with more severe negative symptoms and poorer real-world functioning, as
96 sponses for relevant stimuli help to explain negative symptoms and provide a unified explanation for
97 network hypothesis for medication-refractory negative symptoms and suggesting that network manipulati
98 everity from the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Po
99 re scores on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Po
100 gions is associated with a greater number of negative symptoms and worse performance on tests of exec
101 Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and affective symptoms were assessed
104 s before clinic entry, baseline functioning, negative symptoms, and disorders of thought content.
106 Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and volumetric measurements of the en
107 ammatory state, its association with primary negative symptoms, and whether there are significant dif
111 al circuits responsible for the positive and negative symptoms, as well as key new information about
113 provement was seen at week 24 on the 16-item Negative Symptom Assessment Scale total score for ABT-12
118 n between DeltaBP(ND) in VST and severity of negative symptoms at baseline in the CHR group (r = -0.6
120 itive dysfunction is commonly accompanied by negative symptoms (avolition, alogia, and affective flat
121 P < .001), cognition had a direct effect on negative symptoms (beta = -0.16, P < .001), and both cog
122 ion (beta = 0.26, P < .001) and experiential negative symptoms (beta = -0.75, P < .001) had direct ef
123 lly significant difference in improvement in negative symptoms between the two groups at day 21 (p =
124 ptoms, the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) was developed using an iterati
125 drome Scale (PANSS), Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizoph
127 condary outcomes were change in positive and negative symptoms, categorical response to treatment, st
128 istically significant strong relationship of negative symptom change in response to functional connec
129 om Interview at 12 and 18 years of age), (2) negative symptoms (Community Assessment of Psychic Exper
132 NC=0.04 vs dDC-NC=-0.49, p=0.008) but not on negative symptoms (dCC-NC=-0.09 vs dDC-NC=-0.31, p=0.41)
133 itional functional deficits in patients with negative symptoms, deficits which may explain the accomp
136 hrenia appears to be manifest as anxiety and negative symptoms during adolescence, a greater focus on
137 more severe in patients with high scores of negative symptoms during reward anticipation (r = -0.41;
139 ria for either residual positive or residual negative symptoms entered a 16-week double-blind, parall
141 ched significance only in the alleviation of negative symptoms from an antipsychotic-free baseline (P
142 ANSS) outcomes (e.g., PANSS-Factor Score for Negative Symptoms [FSNS]) with Clinical Global Impressio
145 neuropsychological functions, the prominent negative symptoms group still exhibited poorer motor coo
146 year), stable schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms (>6 months) at 66 study centres (mainl
148 t twice as many patients with absent or mild negative symptoms had met a friend in the last week, com
149 A major barrier to developing treatments for negative symptoms has been measurement concerns with exi
151 ere are currently no licensed treatments for negative symptoms, highlighting the need to understand t
153 BP1 risk haplotype and a lifetime history of negative symptoms in 181 Caucasian patients with schizop
155 ive striatum correlated with inattention and negative symptoms in CD, and with poorer working memory
156 with decreased goal-directed task effort and negative symptoms in consumers with schizophrenia was in
157 task and its relationship with positive and negative symptoms in early psychosis (EP, N = 88) and ch
162 differential benefit for either positive or negative symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant s
163 e was support for behavioural activation for negative symptoms in psychosis from some mental health w
164 tors, the difficulty in engaging people with negative symptoms in psychosocial treatments and service
165 are urgently searching for options to treat negative symptoms in schizophrenia because these symptom
166 s could underlie anhedonia in depression and negative symptoms in schizophrenia by disrupting learnin
174 ties, in comparison with placebo in treating negative symptoms in stabilized patients with schizophre
176 s associated with a significant reduction of negative symptoms in the 10-mg/d (mean [SE] reduction in
178 mptoms performed worse than patients without negative symptoms in working memory functions but not ot
180 sure without reflux-symptom association (ie, negative symptom index and symptom association probabili
181 h absence of reflux-symptom association (ie, negative symptom index and symptom association probabili
184 py on prodromal states, acute schizophrenia, negative symptoms, loss of insight and relapse preventio
185 and paroxysmal positive symptoms as well as negative symptoms may be a consequence of varying degree
186 inic acetylcholine receptor availability and negative symptoms may explain the high rates of smoking
187 y matter observed in patients with prominent negative symptoms may provide unique insight into the ea
188 ailability was also strongly correlated with negative symptoms measured using the Positive and Negati
189 dity was demonstrated by linkages with other negative symptom measures, self-report scales of sociali
190 dence-based treatment for depression, to the negative symptoms observed in psychosis from the perspec
191 set P </= .05 threshold were associated with negative symptoms (odds ratio [OR] per SD increase in PR
192 n hedonic responses that are relevant to the negative symptoms of disorders such as schizophrenia.
193 is defined by core symptoms in two domains: negative symptoms of impairment in social and communicat
194 aceutical THC (with or without CBD) worsened negative symptoms of psychosis in a single study (SMD 0.
197 ctively selected for persistent, predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia (PNS), and minimal po
198 negativity, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (SANS) and the Brief
199 nAChR availability was associated with lower negative symptoms of schizophrenia and better performanc
201 ignificant improvements in both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia compared to placebo (
202 tive effects across cognitive, positive, and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in animal models and
203 ds to a clinical impression in patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia may help define the c
204 agonist prodrug decreased both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia raised hopes that glu
205 , and clinical studies have revealed reduced negative symptoms of schizophrenia with a dose of pregne
206 nderlying social withdrawal, one of the core negative symptoms of schizophrenia, are not well underst
207 onia in depression and both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but it remains uncle
208 plus vitamin B12 supplementation can improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but treatment respon
209 ary outcomes included change in positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, categorical response
210 tal signaling appears blunted in MDD and the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, elevated in bipolar
211 More effective treatments are needed for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, which are typically
212 rically focused on reducing the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, with recent increase
226 ncluding total symptoms, depression/anxiety, negative symptoms, overall functioning, positive symptom
227 and Negative Syndrome Scale factor score for negative symptoms (PANSS-FSNS) analysed in a modified in
229 reliable measures of diagnosis, positive and negative symptoms, periods of untreated psychosis and pr
232 x were associated with a greater severity of negative symptoms (r=0.42; P=0.017) and a lower level of
233 25) on sensitivity as well as of positive-to-negative symptom ratio (p=0.022) and antipsychotic medic
234 t of which have been shown to correlate with negative symptoms: reduced learning from rewards; blunte
235 rons to electrophysiological, cognitive, and negative-symptom-related behavioral phenotypes of schizo
236 des showed significantly greater severity of negative symptoms relative to consumers with mild defeat
237 , and core pathologies such as cognition and negative symptom remain unmet therapeutic challenges.
240 (range, 24-168), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) (range, 0-125), Montgomery-Asbe
241 effects, and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Sc
242 te of change" of Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total scores and change in the
244 CSB composite score; Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS); Clinical Global Impression-Glo
245 luded a modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS-18) and Positive and Negative Sy
247 eline in the total score on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS; range, 30 to 210; higher
248 Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and a PANSS negative symptom scale that eliminated items that most o
249 al Global Impressions Scale (CGI), the Brief Negative Symptom Scale, the Brief Assessment of Cognitio
251 The key predictor of total positive and negative symptom score was greater in the primary psycho
253 ptoms in the 10-mg/d (mean [SE] reduction in negative symptoms score, -25% [2%]; P = .049) and 30-mg/
255 lateral prefrontal cortex is associated with negative symptom severity and that correction of this br
258 hat correction of this breakdown ameliorates negative symptom severity, supporting a novel network hy
264 ity with TMS corresponded to amelioration of negative symptoms, showing a statistically significant s
266 itive symptoms (SMD 0.45) improved more than negative symptoms (SMD 0.35) and depression (SMD 0.27).
267 n difference: -0.25, 95% CI=-0.38 to -0.12), negative symptoms (standardized mean difference: -0.30,
270 ucinations, delusions and thought disorder), negative symptoms (such as social withdrawal, apathy and
272 network of regions predicted the severity of negative symptoms, such as impoverished speech and flatt
273 Analysis of primary outcomes (depressive and negative symptoms) suggests small, beneficial effects of
274 e symptoms (t = 0.249, df = 289, P = 0.803), negative symptoms (t = 0.151, df = 289, P = 0.879), or a
275 inic receptors, improved clinical ratings of negative symptoms that are generally resistant to treatm
276 Health's Consensus Development Conference on Negative Symptoms, the Clinical Assessment Interview for
277 strikingly and significantly correlated with negative symptoms: the more the volume reduction, the mo
278 uperior compared with sham rTMS in improving negative symptoms; this is in contrast to findings from
279 d inversely with the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms total score and was lower in patients
280 econdary outcome measures, such as the PANSS negative symptom, total, and activation factor scores, t
281 Secondary outcomes included positive and negative symptoms, treatment recommendations by authors,
282 velopment and/or maintenance of positive and negative symptoms typically observed in schizophrenia.
284 chizophrenia spectrum patients, positive and negative symptoms were associated with largely non-overl
286 osis and dimensionally measured positive and negative symptoms were elevated in deletion carriers.
289 consumers with mild defeatist attitudes and negative symptoms were significantly correlated with def
292 of olanzapine over haloperidol in improving negative symptoms when the PANSS and the Scale for the A
293 ate highly significant beneficial effects on negative symptoms when these compounds are added to both
294 al psychopathology, thought disturbance, and negative symptoms, whereas patients carrying the G allel
295 y symptoms, cognitive impairment, and severe negative symptoms, which impair functioning and require
296 ine induced a 35.7% (SD 17.8) improvement in negative symptoms, which was significant compared with p
298 prospective criteria for moderate to severe negative symptoms without marked positive, depressive, o
299 associated with significant improvements in negative symptoms without positive symptom worsening.