戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d TPOA, conditioned taste aversion and taste neophobia.
2 s eating habits, including a measure of food neophobia.
3  better understanding of the determinants of neophobia.
4 ental differences to variation in child food neophobia.
5  cognitive impairments, increased anxiety or neophobia.
6 hile only maximum flock size influenced food neophobia.
7 eract with stimuli because of differences in neophobia.
8 stigation of the socio-ecological drivers of neophobia.
9 n socio-ecological factors influenced object neophobia: (1) use of urban habitat (versus not), (2) te
10                                              Neophobia aids in navigating risk and impacts on adaptab
11                                        Lower neophobia allows them approaching changes in the environ
12 eed-accuracy tradeoffs, fear generalization, neophobia and adaptive dispersal.
13          Also, drug-exposed rat pups exhibit neophobia and disrupted juvenile play behavior.
14  identify the socio-ecological correlates of neophobia and grant insight into specific elements that
15 owards problem-solving, expressed in reduced neophobia and increased exploration variety, which led t
16 to-mPFC activity is necessary for both taste neophobia and its attenuation.
17 -mPFC reciprocal connectivity in novel taste neophobia and memory formation, in mice.
18 ild orangutans and suggest that exploration, neophobia and neophilia are independently regulated.
19 ive association between the severity of food neophobia and omega-3 fatty acids was replicated in all
20 acteristics like sex, age, rank, centrality, neophobia and reaction to humans, on the individuals' ab
21 ments showed that the PSTN complex reacts to neophobia and sickness induced by lipopolysaccharide or
22 willingness to explore a novel environment ("neophobia" and "neophilia," respectively) is an identifi
23 eraction with the demonstrator mouse, normal neophobia, and normal learning in a T-maze using scented
24                                              Neophobia appears to be a heritable trait, but almost a
25             Residents may have evolved lower neophobia as costs of missing out on opportunities may b
26  integrated individuals more likely overcame neophobia (as compared to more integrated ones), but onl
27                                         Food neophobia associated significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) w
28                      We also found that food neophobia associations with omega-3 fatty acids and asso
29 acting with objects to gain information) and neophobia (avoiding novelty) are considered independent
30 havioral trait in young-adult males and that neophobia, compared with neophilia, was associated with
31 subsequent avoidance of novel stimuli, i.e., neophobia, determine how animals interact with their env
32                                    Gustatory neophobia dissipates with repeated exposures to an initi
33  demonstrated that consistent differences in neophobia existed among individuals, among species, and
34 trategy with migrants expressing much higher neophobia (fewer birds feeding and for a shorter time wi
35  Our study shows that the evolution of avian neophobia has been shaped by ecological drivers and demo
36 ationship between a species' ecology and its neophobia have so far been restricted to comparing only
37                                         Food neophobia, i.e. the avoidance of novel foods, is common
38 ., fear), SEB challenge augmented appetitive neophobia in a context-dependent manner, being marked in
39                                         Food neophobia in children has been associated with a low int
40  tested for effects of ecological factors on neophobia, including diet, sociality, habitat, and range
41 ortex prevented the attenuation of gustatory neophobia indicating that this process is an NMDA recept
42 , in the literature it is often assumed that neophobia inhibits exploration.
43 elty responses in all conditions, indicating neophobia is a stable behavioral trait.
44  and prospective study, we examined how food neophobia is associated with dietary quality, health-rel
45                                         Food neophobia is considered a behavioral trait closely linke
46 on, but not initial occurrence, of gustatory neophobia is dependent upon NMDA receptors in the BLA, a
47 rstanding of the wider ecological drivers of neophobia is hampered by a lack of comparative multispec
48                      The results showed that neophobia is highly heritable.
49  dataset, rejecting the null hypothesis that neophobia is highly plastic at all taxonomic levels with
50 viduals, species and other taxonomic levels, neophobia is known to vary considerably, but our underst
51                  This suggests titi monkeys' neophobia may augment their visual abilities to help the
52                 The attenuation of gustatory neophobia occurs during repeated exposures to an initial
53                                              Neophobia, or aversion to novelty, is important for adap
54 uding threat-evoked fear/anxiety, arousal or neophobia, predator imminence, and safety.
55               The current study investigated neophobia reactions to experimentally-induced changes in
56                                        Taste neophobia refers to a reduction in consumption of a nove
57  a great alternative protein source but food neophobia remains the main barrier to consumption.
58 nt 1 revealed that IC lesions impaired taste neophobia, retarded acquisition of conditioned saccharin
59 f food neophobia was assessed using the Food Neophobia Scale, dietary quality was evaluated using the
60                                 Furthermore, neophobia showed a relationship to diet breadth with few
61  discussed with respect to a forebrain taste neophobia system.
62 ve'), and one using behaviours from the food neophobia test (3 factors: 'Eating', 'Inspecting', and '
63 determine if behavioural responses in a food neophobia test (exposure to a novel total mixed ration)
64          These results suggest that the food neophobia test in our study resulted in context-specific
65 ed if individual factor scores from the food neophobia test predicted factor scores from the traditio
66 ed plus maze test, open field test, and food neophobia test.
67  generalist diets, providing support for the Neophobia Threshold Hypothesis; (ii) migratory species w
68  stimuli because the lesioned rats displayed neophobia to a novel odor in Experiment 3 and used an ol
69                      The application of food neophobia to assess specific or generalized personality
70 res of anxiety in the elevated plus maze and neophobia to novel tastes.
71 however, disrupted the initial occurrence of neophobia to the taste stimulus.
72 anxious animals can be confounded further by neophobia towards novel test environments and avoidance
73                            The level of food neophobia was assessed using the Food Neophobia Scale, d
74 Finnish and Estonian adult populations, food neophobia was associated with adverse alteration of heal
75                            Furthermore, food neophobia was associated with reduced dietary quality (B
76                                The degree of neophobia was related to migratory strategy with migrant
77 ioural traits (activity, group cohesion, and neophobia) were recorded.
78 nvironment often elicit avoidance reactions (neophobia) which protect animals from dangerous situatio