コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 .41) compared with veterans with no baseline neoplasia.
2 ith corresponding spectral signatures of the neoplasia.
3 during development, tissue regeneration and neoplasia.
4 infections and to treat human papillomavirus neoplasia.
5 d PD-L2, in invasive ocular surface squamous neoplasia.
6 d essentially cures Apc(1322T) mice of their neoplasia.
7 res and their risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia.
8 olonoscopy on detection of proximal serrated neoplasia.
9 of these patients for metachronous advanced neoplasia.
10 fective in improving detection of colorectal neoplasia.
11 press ETV1 develop prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
12 fects frequently observed in human sebaceous neoplasia.
13 in wound healing, and potentially to prevent neoplasia.
14 cells resulted in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
15 not increase risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia.
16 isk of synchronous and metachronous advanced neoplasia.
17 de NMD and promoting BCL2 overexpression and neoplasia.
18 10 wk after dosing, well before evidence of neoplasia.
19 to modulate gene expression in early colonic neoplasia.
20 for refractory proctitis, and 20% for rectal neoplasia.
21 cally refractory disease or to treat colonic neoplasia.
22 e genetic models of clonal hematopoiesis and neoplasia.
23 or initiation in a mouse model of intestinal neoplasia.
24 ppression and stochastic effects, leading to neoplasia.
25 is sufficient for the development of T cell neoplasia.
26 otective immunity and limit autoimmunity and neoplasia.
27 ticular, the development of parasite-induced neoplasia.
28 a mechanism by which its deficiency promotes neoplasia.
29 n, suggesting these mutations play a role in neoplasia.
30 biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic neoplasia.
31 significantly associated with progression to neoplasia.
32 generally considered a risk factor for colon neoplasia.
33 translate into higher detection of advanced neoplasia.
34 ly used across the spectrum of hepatobiliary neoplasia.
35 tion of how single mutant cells give rise to neoplasia.
36 is linked to elevated IL-6 concomitant with neoplasia.
37 , recurring bacterial infections, or de novo neoplasia.
38 s found to have at least 1 incident advanced neoplasia.
39 body (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans did not show neoplasia.
40 nsistent, early microbial changes in colonic neoplasia.
41 ry outcome was diagnostic yield for advanced neoplasia.
42 ty, and the microbiota in colitis-associated neoplasia.
43 tumor suppressor mechanism in numerous human neoplasias.
44 y, resulting in growth inhibition of several neoplasias.
45 tiation inducers (eg, retinoids), in myeloid neoplasias.
46 and some enlarged pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias.
47 RAS, premalignant pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (PanIN1) lesions rarely become fully maligna
48 of ADM as well as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-1 (PanIN-1), PanIN-2, and PanIN-3 and delayed
49 low-risk patients with metachronous advanced neoplasia (14.6%) (relative risk for high-risk categoriz
50 who were found to have metachronous advanced neoplasia (17.6%) did not differ significantly from the
52 t cervical lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ [CIN2+]) is an effective way to prevent cer
53 es of death were renal disease (102, 23.4%), neoplasia (37, 8.5%) and mass-associated disorder (35, 8
54 their role in the earliest stages of colonic neoplasia, 75% of the loci harboring methylation changes
55 aracteristics of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with CKD, we used FIT to pro
56 l prognostic factors for advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN, high-grade dysplasia, or CRC) in patien
61 on anal HPV infection, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), and anal cancer among people living wit
63 quent endoscopy, the odds for progression to neoplasia also increased greatly (odds ratio, 9.28; 95%
64 like mucosal inflammation, preneoplasia, and neoplasia, although suggested by several studies, remain
66 nset of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and accelerated prostate tumors in comparison
67 shed technique for staging of neuroendocrine neoplasia and determining the suitability of patients fo
69 hemoattraction to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and increased abdominal hypersensitivity cause
70 at the severity of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and inflammation development gradually increas
74 tly increased detection of proximal serrated neoplasia and other polyp types compared with standard c
75 mice, tissue atrophy was a hallmark of both neoplasia and pancreatitis models in the absence of Ddr1
76 trial, 10 patients with known neuroendocrine neoplasia and positive for uptake on (68)Ga-DOTA-octreot
78 the molecular and cellular features of early neoplasia and the dynamics of the interactions of early
79 of HIF1A developed more advanced pancreatic neoplasias and PDACs with more invasion and metastasis,
81 cerous lesions (endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia) and well-differentiated endometrioid adenocar
85 cancer, which is the second most common male neoplasia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which
86 xic T cells, attenuated growth of pancreatic neoplasia, and conferred survival advantage to PDA-beari
87 ) for any neoplasm 6 mm or greater, advanced neoplasia, and CRC for mt-sDNA were 54.2%, 22.7%, and 1.
88 n traditionally viewed as unique features of neoplasia, and have been used as biomarkers and therapeu
91 AM, conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial neoplasia, and the WHO 4th edition classification of con
93 a context of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, and vascular resections were independently as
94 itotic activity, axonal disruption, vascular neoplasia, and with several brain metabolites including
95 n in the distal colon of multiple intestinal neoplasia (Apc(min/+) ) mice; tumor formation is depende
96 nd postmenopausal women with intraepithelial neoplasia are discussed in the Clinical Considerations s
99 ls are increased in cervical intraepithelial neoplasias as well as cervical carcinomas, consistent wi
101 3).ConclusionThe detection rates of advanced neoplasia at CT colonography screening were greater than
102 nal joint model to estimate risk of advanced neoplasia at each subsequent examination after baseline,
103 for prior surveillance, the risk of advanced neoplasia at each subsequent examination was not signifi
104 ce developed more pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, at a faster rate, than KC mice, and had more
105 Viral infections at any time and malignant neoplasia beyond 2 years were less frequent with mTORi-C
107 nting recurrence from breast intraepithelial neoplasia but have a lower toxicity than the standard do
109 anscription factor activity in hematological neoplasia, but do not confirm the putative role of TET2
110 ed in stroma across all stages of pancreatic neoplasia, but epithelial Tlr7 expression is relatively
112 ns are indicative of tissue inflammation and neoplasia, but whether these alterations contribute to d
115 eloid leukemia (CML)-like myeloproliferative neoplasia by repressing an inhibitory mechanism of prese
116 the progression of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, by promoting cell proliferation, micro-invasi
118 relationship between blastic plasmacytoid DC neoplasia cells and healthy DCs; and circulating progeni
119 L) is a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-driven neoplasia characterized by expression of the constitutiv
120 stiocytosis (LCH) is an inflammatory myeloid neoplasia characterized by granulomatous lesions contain
121 and bone represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasias characterized by a wide variety of genetic ab
122 yield of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the influence on biopsy and treatmen
123 logically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher regardless of HIV stat
124 We analyzed data on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2-3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (d
125 ial lesion (SIL) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) prevalence, incidence, progression, or r
126 he population-based cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) trends when adjusting for changes in cer
127 Comparison of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) vs SCC revealed SCC with greater diffuse
130 HPV) infection, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); however, causal inference remains uncer
131 h disease severity (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 3, 17.9% [+/-7.2] vs CIN2, 11.6% [+/-6.5
132 (PVL) on high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) detection at follow-up after CIN manag
134 stic lesions called cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) need be treated to prevent cervical ca
137 s with CRC and 10 persons without colorectal neoplasia (control samples) and a second series of 81 pa
139 s, as well as 129 persons without colorectal neoplasia (control samples); 72 FIT samples from a third
140 ociated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) or extracolonic cancers has not been rob
142 d to determine the 10-year risk for advanced neoplasia (defined as adenomas >=10mm, adenomas with vil
143 he TFF1 knockout (KO) mouse model of gastric neoplasia, demonstrated phosphorylation of STAT3 in the
144 rizes current evidence for FIT in colorectal neoplasia detection and the comparative effectiveness of
145 n the intention-to-screen analysis, advanced neoplasia detection rates were comparable among the cont
150 ere, we show that pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia driven by oncogenic mutant KrasG12D progressed
151 erhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a myeloid neoplasia, driven by sporadic activating mutations in th
153 ulated that metformin would enhance the anti-neoplasia effect of BPTES by suppressing malignant cells
154 esearch in high-germline risk for pancreatic neoplasia, elucidating early ontogeny in BRCA1-mutation
155 prostatic susceptibility to hormone-induced neoplasia from early-life exposure to low-dose bisphenol
156 histological images to differentiate tongue neoplasia from normal tissue, and then correlate these d
157 0.695, and discriminate patients with early neoplasia from patients without BE with AuROC values ran
158 s to discriminate patients with BE and early neoplasia from patients without BE, using findings from
159 n cancer, and in rodent models of intestinal neoplasia, FXR knockout increases the size and number of
160 e cervical disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, invasive
161 tivity of detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater in HIV-negative women using
165 elial lesion (HSIL) and anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (HSIL/AIN2+),
166 tered, diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) or grade 3 or worse (
168 wart diagnoses, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) to summarise the most recent
169 nd invasive cancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ [CIN2+]) compared to cytology, but no
170 and vaginal disease (vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3, vaginal cancer) related to HPV 31,
171 oma), vulvar disease (vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3, vulvar cancer), and vaginal disease
173 confirmed CIN2+ or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse associated with HPV 16/18 cer
174 CI, 3.64 to 12.25) for anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, 4.97 (95% CI, 3.26 to 7.57) for vulva
175 I, 9.69 to 19.25) for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, 86.08 (95% CI, 11.98 to 618.08) for v
176 10.50 to 62.69) for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, and 5.51 (95% CI, 1.22 to 24.84) for
177 in patients with pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias grade 3 and PDAC lesions relative to matched
178 d HPV 16/18 to find cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (grade >/=2 [CIN2+] or grade >/=3 [CIN3+]).
179 changes in rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2, 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+)
180 We analyzed data on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (CIN2+)
181 datory reporting of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2/3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (cervica
182 on of gene fusions as a driving mechanism in neoplasia has led to development of U.S. Food and Drug A
183 esented high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PIN) and hyperproliferation, while Pten si
184 enotypes-and high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) in men who have sex with men (MSM) who
185 ed from high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), a pre-malignant intraductal prolifera
186 l significance of UDD in predicting advanced neoplasia [high grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma (H
188 fied the optimal site for biopsy of detected neoplasia in 97% and 92% of cases (data sets 4 and 5, re
189 een testicular microlithiasis and testicular neoplasia in a large geographically diverse pediatric po
190 ubjects with IBD undergoing surveillance for neoplasia in Australia (23 with Crohn's colitis, 29 with
191 n images of rigorously confirmed early-stage neoplasia in BE and nondysplastic BE, derived from 669 p
193 scoring of images that contained early-stage neoplasia in data sets 2-5 were delineated in detail for
195 colorectal cancer is the fourth most common neoplasia in Europe with 28.2 new cases per 100,000 inha
196 egradation of Pten, lung adenocarcinoma, and neoplasia in mouse prostate with aberrantly high levels
197 ce, to improve endoscopic detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE).
199 either ICMT or NOTCH1 accelerates pancreatic neoplasia in Pdx1-Cre;LSL-Kras(G12D) mice, suggesting th
200 tified on a per genome basis, with germ cell neoplasia in situ possessing the least (median 1, range
205 tirely surrounded pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias in KPC/Cdh11(+/+) mice and incompletely in KP
206 umor Analysis (IOTA) Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa model system, a risk prediction
208 communication between the immune system and neoplasia includes an increasingly complex cellular micr
209 ncluded detection of any adenoma or advanced neoplasia (including CRC) and screening-related harms (i
210 carcinogens, are risk factors for colorectal neoplasia, including polyps, the precursor for colorecta
212 enome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) breast cancer gen
213 ROUND & AIMS: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasias (IPMNs) are precancerous cystic lesions that
217 inal surgery for the treatment of colorectal neoplasia is typically carried out using electrocautery
219 cy with magnesium defect, EBV infection, and neoplasia) is a complex primary immunological deficiency
221 in a specific research area, like pancreatic neoplasia, may yield informative insights for researcher
223 crossed with the Kras(G12D/+); Ptf1a(Cre/+) neoplasia model and subjected to cerulein-induced experi
225 se-related proteins, with causative roles in neoplasia, neurodegeneration, hepatosteatosis, and other
226 nogenital warts and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 and cases of cervical cancer a
227 nogenital warts and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 and cases of cervical cancer a
228 ent qHPV infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or higher [CIN2+], or genital warts
229 ecurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade two or worse (CIN2+) and compared it
230 es quantifying the architectural features of neoplasia on a microscopic scale, with the spectral sign
232 < .001) or HIV-positive individuals without neoplasia or opportunistic infection (1.2%; P < .001).
233 irus (HIV)-infected patients with underlying neoplasia or opportunistic infections, including tubercu
235 surgical outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) following wide excisional biopsy with a
238 es of preinvasive pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) in the KrasLSL-G12D/+ Trp53LSL-R172H/+
239 to fibrogenesis, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) lesion growth, and generation of an im
240 samples of human pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), along with several biochemical approa
242 he progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), and resulted in the accumulation of (
243 rmal pancreas and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)- and PDAC-bearing pancreas from both h
245 ion of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanIN-3), generally regarded as the non-inva
246 ion of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanIN-3s), generally regarded as the noninva
247 iate precancerous pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs) when induced in mouse acinar cells.
248 features of human pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs), the precursor to pancreatic ductal a
251 metaplasia (ADM), pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) and ultimately pancreatic ductal ade
254 ated in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, primary prostate carcinoma, and metastases.
256 related species at the clade level revealed neoplasia rates as low as 3.1% and 1.8%, while infectiou
259 idered at low risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia, resulting in an inappropriately long surveill
260 was strongly associated with progression to neoplasia; risk for progression increased greatly when a
261 of post-treatment effects for any colorectal neoplasia (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80, 1.28; P = 0.94), and
264 oncogenic pathways implicated in pancreatic neoplasia, such as MYC, KRAS, VEGFA, and BRD4 Specifical
265 and cohesin mutations are common in myeloid neoplasia, suggesting a critical role in hematopoiesis.
266 ore accurate in discriminating BE with early neoplasia than GERD frequency and duration alone (AuROC,
267 tion, occur more frequently in early colonic neoplasia than previously believed, and identify epigeno
269 al and environmental insults associated with neoplasia that jeopardize proteostasis within the endopl
272 h different phenotypes of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 as well as sporadic medullary thyroid c
273 the following phenotypes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A) and multiple endocrine neopla
275 ng surgery is feasible in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B and affords a good chance for normal a
277 pe and natural history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B, to increase awareness and improve det
279 BACKGROUND & AIMS: The multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1 (MEN1) locus encodes the nuclear prote
280 ve nature of STAT5B(N642H) in driving T-cell neoplasia upon hematopoietic expression in transgenic mi
281 The cumulative 10-year incidence of advanced neoplasia was 6.3% (95% CI 4.1%-8.5%) and 4.1% (95% CI 2
282 those who extended treatment, any colorectal neoplasia was found in 118 (36%) participants assigned t
283 The cumulative 10-year incidence of advanced neoplasia was highest among those with baseline CRC (43.
284 ssess microbiome changes prior to colorectal neoplasia, we investigated samples from 100 Lynch syndro
286 graphy, overall detection rates for advanced neoplasia were 2.7% and 5.0%, respectively (P < .001); c
288 ients at high risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia were defined as patients with polyps that had
289 sitive predictive values (PPVs) for advanced neoplasia were determined weekly, quarterly, and yearly.
293 diseases, including inherited disorders and neoplasia, which arise from rare failures at different N
294 ic lesions called pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias, which are challenging to detect by any curre
295 lve the recurrence of breast intraepithelial neoplasia with a limited toxicity, which provides a new
297 ) classification system, is used to identify neoplasias with invasion of the submucosa that require e
298 esions (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia) with striking nuclear atypia and invasive, po
300 with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and neoplasia (XMEN), a disease that has a broad range of cl