ライフサイエンスコーパス: nephrologist

1 agnosis relies on the clinical acumen of the nephrologist.

2 prescribed unless the patient had visited a nephrologist.

3 imated GFR) should be promptly referred to a nephrologist.

4 mortality, is the timing of referral to the nephrologist.

5 pproach to gout management that includes the nephrologist.

6 isk of CKD progression who were not seeing a nephrologist.

7 surgical procedure after discussion with the nephrologist.

8 tions of HNF1beta-associated disease for the nephrologist.

9 n, and by at least one outpatient visit to a nephrologist.

10 mmendation for renal transplantation by U.S. nephrologists.

11 onded, including 191 adult and 125 pediatric nephrologists.

12 creasing pressures to decrease the number of nephrologists.

13 risk of readmissions tended to be lower for nephrologists.

14 genesis than current treatments available to nephrologists.

15 ts need to target patients, generalists, and nephrologists.

16 an advance directive than German or Japanese nephrologists.

17 primary nephrologist or a rotating group of nephrologists.

18 e that relies on the expertise of transplant nephrologists.

19 by surgeons, interventional radiologists, or nephrologists.

20 with care partners; 16 clinicians (84%) were nephrologists; 17 patient participants (43%) were non-Hi

21 r older) who started dialysis in 2021 and 45 nephrologists (23 women and 22 men).

22 Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and oth

23 iologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%).

24 by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a nephrologist, a midwife and an obstetrician with experti

25 7 to 3.3]) and were more likely to consult a nephrologist (absolute risk difference, 0.15% [CI, 0.01%

26 the aim to provide pragmatic information for nephrologists according to the present state-of-the-art

27 ive educational resources are needed to help nephrologists advocate for disadvantaged patients and ad

28 ated by nonowners within facilities owned by nephrologists after accounting for differences in patien

29 Nephrologists also stated whether they would continue or

30 Here, 2 experts-a nephrologist and a general internist-palliative care phy

31 d all-cause mortality hazard ratios for each nephrologist and compared patient- and provider-level ch

32 In particular, delayed referral to the nephrologist and lack of permanent vascular access were

33 ng the importance of antibiotic education to nephrologist and non-nephrologist providers.

34 ng the importance of antibiotic education to nephrologist and nonnephrologist providers.

35 Greater attention to timely referral to the nephrologist and timely placement of vascular access cou

36 ICC among all physicians was 0.64 (0.62 for nephrologists and 0.67 for rheumatologists).

37 Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratin

38 Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists rated each scenario

39 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating.

40 The risk of readmission was 24% for nephrologists and 30% for internists (P = 0.328).

41 United States enabled kidney care providers (nephrologists and advanced practice providers) to substi

42 During DRIVE-II, treating nephrologists and anemia managers adjusted doses of epoe

43 Adult and pediatric nephrologists and geneticists from four continents whose

44 , we combined the expertise of hepatologist, nephrologists and gynecologists to study the effect of l

45 Familiar to nephrologists and hematologists alike, classically assoc

46 The nephrologists and oncologists will have to work together

47 p of paediatric endocrinologists, paediatric nephrologists and patient representatives.

48 y improved outcomes for blacks may encourage nephrologists and patients to aggressively promote acces

49 s, care partners, and kidney clinicians (ie, nephrologists and physician assistants) shared divergent

50 er, prepared by a cross-disciplinary team of nephrologists and radiologists, presents updated guideli

51 ologic correlation on the part of transplant nephrologists and renal pathologists are required to rec

52 Here, we present insights from nephrologists and rheumatologists for a team approach to

53 ients were compared with services covered by nephrologists and services covered by internists.

54 e of intervention, and resource utilization, nephrologists and surgeons had 59% (95% confidence inter

55 Half of respondent nephrologists and surgeons were willing to accept a remo

56 le examined the economic value of transplant nephrologists and the need for adequate compensation.

57 These findings suggest that nephrologists and transplant programs should be cautious

58 ite recipient race, referral by a transplant nephrologist, and employed status.

59 ischemic heart disease, late referral to the nephrologist, and use of temporary vascular access for t

60 llows: $71 000 for radiologists, $89 000 for nephrologists, and $174 000 for surgeons.

61 rs, 58% to 68% (P=0.043) for availability of nephrologists, and 46% to 52% for political factors.

62 Dermatologists, nephrologists, and nephrologists at our institution were

63 sciplinary approach involving cardiologists, nephrologists, and other health care professionals.

64 critical for cardiologists, diabetologists, nephrologists, and primary care physicians to be familia

65 German and Japanese nephrologists appear willing to follow advance directive

66 Nephrologist approval for placement could not be determi

67 Nephrologists are frequently called on to diagnose and t

68 he 45 patients were diagnosed by a pediatric nephrologist as having renal dysfunction that suggested

69 indicate that rheumatologists as a group and nephrologists as a group have equal agreement in their r

70 sion medicine is now a feasible prospect for nephrologists as numerous therapeutic options are availa

71 is a life-changing procedure, and transplant nephrologists, as part of a larger transplant team, play

72 nt hepatologist (GC), a pathologist (MPA), a nephrologist (ASA), and a hepatologist (PG) as moderator

73 t whether a given patient had been seen by a nephrologist at 90 d before first dialysis.

74 Most survey respondents were transplant nephrologists at academic centers.

75 education, and to compare practices between nephrologists at for-profit and nonprofit centers.

76 Dermatologists, nephrologists, and nephrologists at our institution were surveyed for any c

77 We aimed to characterize nephrologists' attitudes regarding kidney transplant edu

78 We aimed to describe nephrologists' attitudes to patients' access to kidney t

79 This study aims to describe nephrologists' attitudes towards recipient eligibility a

80 Most important, nephrologists await development of tools to predict reli

81 ex, dialysis facility ownership, and also 45 nephrologists, based on their sex and years of experienc

82 In this context, it is imperative that nephrologists become familiar with this literature, revi

83 Delayed referral of renal patients to a nephrologist before RRT is significantly associated with

84 e were less likely to be under the care of a nephrologist before the onset of ESRD (62.3% [95% confid

85 Such disparities may be in part explained by nephrologists' beliefs and decisions about recipient eli

86 10-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) who were referred to nephrologists between April 1, 2001, and December 31, 20

87 r and multi-ethnic validation, outperforming nephrologists by 26.98% in accuracy.

88 limate crisis, we, an international group of nephrologists, call on our global community to unite and

89 equires multidisciplinary care that involves nephrologists, cardiologists and other health profession

90 clinics and the need for collaboration among nephrologists, cardiologists, and genetic counselors for

91 We studied patients referred to nephrologist care, listed on the Swedish Renal Registry

92 onic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) patients under nephrologist care.

93 an claims on the timing of first predialysis nephrologist care.

94 ssential dialytic modality for the pediatric nephrologist caring for critically ill children.

95 Many nephrologists caring for patients with cancer in the Uni

96 Hence, these results suggest that nephrologist caseload influences hemodialysis patient ou

97 eview, therefore, is to address, for the non-nephrologist, clinically relevant topical questions rega

98 This Guideline has been written for nephrologists, clinicians and policymakers, to build con

99 disease rarely undergo kidney biopsy because nephrologists commonly believe that biopsy-related risk

100 diologists and 86% higher for interventional nephrologists compared with general surgeons.

101 for hemodialysis patients under the care of nephrologists compared with internists.

102 ders about the timing of the patient's first nephrologist consultation before initiation of dialysis.

103 roup had RRs of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.04-2.02) for nephrologist consultation, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.95) for

104 aims data, was the first observed outpatient nephrologist consultation; secondary analyses used the e

105 ositive results of AKI e-alerts on increased nephrologist consultations and reduced post-AKI NSAID ex

106 Secondary outcomes were nephrologist consultations, post-AKI exposure to nonster

107 ay absolute increase in hospitalizations and nephrologist consultations.

108 t accurately reflect the value of transplant nephrologists' contributions.

109 ed, the care of hemodialysis patients by the nephrologist could diminish the overall expense of the E

110 advanced training or subspecialty track for nephrologists, crafting guidelines for testing and treat

111 Nephrologists' decisions about recipient suitability for

112 r children residing in states with pediatric nephrologist density >1 compared with the reference grou

113 Children residing in states with pediatric nephrologist density >1 had 33% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33

114 those residing in states with <0.5 pediatric nephrologist density (reference group) in unadjusted and

115 ren residing in states with higher pediatric nephrologist density had better access to waitlist regis

116 Pediatric nephrologist density was particularly important for the

117 The density of pediatric nephrologists (determined by the count of pediatric neph

118 Consequently, many nephrologists do not primarily manage gout despite it be

119 pplied early in the diagnostic process, many nephrologists do not use genetic testing to its full pot

120 Only 5 children (4%) had been seen by a nephrologist during follow-up.

121 tion (including lack of predialysis care, no-nephrologist education, and shared decision-making), and

122 Patients with three or more nephrologist encounters (n=55,560) not meeting the compu

123 aborative care model bridging cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physic

124 Through an online survey, responding nephrologists estimated the frequency of CCM (i.e. plann

125 of rating the frequency at which they saw a nephrologist excellent (low: adjusted OR = 0.39, 95% CI,

126 se with CKD (RD, 30%; 95% CI, 5% to 56%) and nephrologist follow-up for those with sustained eGFR <30

127 ho received ACE-I/ARB, statin treatment, and nephrologist follow-up was 28% in the intervention group

128 CKD patients referred to a nephrologist for the first time within 90 d of the start

129 d protocols to the patient and the attending nephrologist for use in their selection of available cli

130 training is needed to better prepare future nephrologists for the growing challenges of kidney care.

131 conducted from June to October 2013 with 41 nephrologists from Australia and New Zealand.

132 However, almost all nephrologists from the 3 countries would stop dialysis w

133 In the cross-sectional survey, nurses and nephrologists from the United States (n = 49), Japan (n

134 n this practice resource, a working group of nephrologists, geneticists, and a genetic counselor prov

135 ecessary, involving coordinated efforts from nephrologists, geriatricians, nurses, allied health prac

136 Patients referred earlier to a nephrologist (> 4 mo versus < or =4 mo) and seen more fr

137 us < or =4 mo) and seen more frequently by a nephrologist (> or =2 visits versus < 2 visits) in the p

138 states with the highest density of pediatric nephrologists had better access to waitlisting and decea

139 The nephrologist has two choices: restrict antiproteinuric t

140 s concern was that it is paradoxical that we nephrologists have focused on optimizing urea clearance

141 ntravenous iron supplementation has grown as nephrologists have gradually moved away from the liberal

142 tly, interventions that are commonly used by nephrologists have not been adequately tested and some m

143 For several decades, nephrologists have wondered whether proteinuria is a res

144 An index visit with a nephrologist (hazard ratio [HR], 2.05 [95% CI, 1.66 to 2

145 Currently, nephrologists, hematologist-oncologists, neurologists, a

146 disciplinary working group of obstetricians, nephrologists, hematologists, intensivists, neonatologis

147 A multidisciplinary panel of transplant nephrologists, hematologists/oncologists, and pathologis

148 R, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.45) and visited a nephrologist (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.48) regardless

149 thin 90 days were highest for interventional nephrologists (HR, 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1

150 In this article, the role of a nephrologist in a capitated environment is outlined in d

151 s or kidney transplant, a prior visit with a nephrologist in the past year, or palliative care billin

152 Patients often are not evaluated by nephrologists in a timely manner.

153 We surveyed nephrologists in four countries to determine whether eGF

154 g-term kidney transplant survival can assist nephrologists in making therapeutic decisions.

155 ith patients with chronic kidney disease and nephrologists in the Bretagne, Ile-de-France and Normand

156 support informed use of the test by general nephrologists, including the basic biology of ddcfDNA, m

157 The global median prevalence of nephrologists increased from 9.5 pmp to 12.4 pmp (P<0.00

158 In some cases, women and nephrologists indicated that women's perceptions and exp

159 ed by a multidisciplinary team of paediatric nephrologists, interventional radiologists, and vascular

160 In this manuscript, nephrologist-investigators from one of five Clinical Cen

161 absence of > or = 6 mo of pre-ESRD care by a nephrologist is associated with a higher risk for death.

162 of patients with chronic renal failure by a nephrologist is associated with greater burden and sever

163 It is concluded that late referral to the nephrologist is common in the United States and is assoc

164 ine whether state-level density of pediatric nephrologists is associated with access to waitlisting (

165 The challenge to nephrologists is to provide treatment based on exacting

166 ost-effective delivery of care will occur as nephrologists join together to form Independent Practice

167 eference that primary care providers/general nephrologists manage this, particularly pretransplant.

168 Renal pathologists and nephrologists met on February 20, 2015 to establish an e

169 thesis that late referral of patients to the nephrologist might lead to suboptimal pre-ESRD care.

170 Nephrologists might diagnose HNF1beta-associated kidney

171 These results suggest that primary nephrologist models do not necessarily improve objective

172 specialized care for these complex patients, nephrologists must render less care for more patients, o

173 conducted with 53 transplant professionals (nephrologists [n = 21], surgeons/urologists [n = 17], co

174 Nephrologists need more information about assessing and

175 Dermatologists, oncologists, and nephrologists need to be aware of this potential hazard.

176 Nephrologists need to consider the possibility of this h

177 e from a multidisciplinary team, including a nephrologist, nurse practitioner, exercise physiologist,

178 While nephrologists often observe reduced hematocrit associate

179 codes reported at ESKD onset by the primary nephrologist on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Servic

180 single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotating basis.

181 uires a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrologists, oncologists, urologists and pathologists.

182 s when care was provided by a single primary nephrologist or a rotating group of nephrologists.

183 that patients seen more frequently by their nephrologist or advanced practitioner within the first 9

184 e cared for continuously by a single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotatin

185 reported KTPI (in-person survey of whether a nephrologist or dialysis staff had discussed KT) in a pr

186 s at an academic institution by an attending nephrologist or fellow between June 1983 and June 2002.

187 considered adequate in case of referral to a nephrologist or if proteinuria, blood pressure, low-dens

188 The dialysis nephrologist or the potential transplant recipient is ex

189 mes on alternate days to services covered by nephrologists or by internists from July 1995 to March 1

190 decision-making incorporating cardiologists, nephrologists, other medical professionals, patients, an

191 for differences in patient outcomes between nephrologist owners and nonowners in other facilities.

192 ence in outcomes between patients treated by nephrologist owners and patients treated by nonowners wi

193 Patient treatment by nephrologist owners at their owned facilities was associ

194 Patient treatment by nephrologist owners at their owned facilities was not as

195 This cross-sectional cohort study found that nephrologist ownership was associated with increased hom

196 Outcomes associated with nephrologist ownership were assessed using a difference-

197 Outcomes plausibly associated with nephrologist ownership were evaluated: (1) treatment vol

198 elopment core group, comprising (paediatric) nephrologists, (paediatric) urologists, biochemists and

199 Nephrologists, pathologists, and gastroenterology sub-sp

200 sy databases, dialysis/transplant databases, nephrologists' patients, clinic lists, and lupus patient

201 dialysis vs hemodialysis, compared based on nephrologists' pediatric experience.

202 ts, medical biochemists, pediatric and adult nephrologists, pediatric and adult urologists experts in

203 ogists (determined by the count of pediatric nephrologists per 100,000 children in each state) was es

204 lysis, and less than a quarter of transplant nephrologists performed frequent visits with their patie

205 Studies that assessed nephrologists' perspectives toward patient referral, scr

206 Six themes underpinned nephrologists' perspectives: prioritizing individual ben

207 Pediatric nephrologists play a critical role in evaluating childre

208 We surveyed 906 nephrologist practicing in the United States.

209 proach to initiation in patients followed by nephrologists pre-ESRD.

210 antibiotic education to nephrologist and non-nephrologist providers.

211 We examined whether a higher patient-nephrologist ratio affects patient mortality risk using

212 ite recipient race, referral by a transplant nephrologist, recipient employment, and the diagnosis of

213 barrier(s) present, a study coordinator gave nephrologists recommendations about optimizing dialysis

214 determine whether eGFR reporting influences nephrologists' recommendations for dialysis initiation.

215 ed the association between late versus early nephrologist referral (LR, ER) and poor clinical outcome

216 lt to test the association between timing of nephrologist referral and mortality during the first yea

217 explore a possible association between late nephrologist referral before onset of renal replacement

218 % CI, 3.46 million to 4.46 million), reverse nephrologist referral for 75,800 (95% CI, 35,400 to 116,

219 Late nephrologist referral is an independent risk factor for

220 to estimate the number of patients for whom nephrologist referrals and drug and renal replacement re

221 246,000 (95% CI, 189,000 to 303,000), expand nephrologist referrals for 41,800 (95% CI, 19,800 to 63,

222 edish Renal Registry 2007-2022 that included nephrologist-referred patients with moderate-advanced CK

223 The decision by nephrologists, renal dietitians, federal agencies, healt

224 henotype by a multidisciplinary committee of nephrologists, renal pathologists, geneticists, and gene

225 eated with peritoneal dialysis and pediatric nephrologists report its use in 65% of patients receivin

226 American, German, and Japanese nephrologists reported withdrawing dialysis for 5.1%, 1.

227 65 [55-76] versus 103 [78-144] patients per nephrologist, respectively; P<0.001).

228 According to responding nephrologists (response rate 53%), females were less lik

229 ratings of accuracy of information from the nephrologist, response to pain, amount of fluid removed,

230 Nephrologists reviewed medical records for clinical pres

231 isease, which we now appropriately label the nephrologist's tumor.

232 racteristics of men and women as well as the nephrologist's views for each theme were described.

233 tory study may serve as a starting point for nephrologists seeking to improve on payer-specified valu

234 nephrology and offers practical guidance for nephrologists seeking to incorporate AI into CKD and AKI

235 Referral to a nephrologist should be considered if chronic kidney dise

236 Practicing ophthalmologists and nephrologists should be aware of the risk of kidney fail

237 mized trials that are underway is available, nephrologists should remain cautious in reconsideration

238 For many practicing nephrologists, sildenafil has become the first-line ther

239 individual needs, involving rheumatologists, nephrologists, social workers and other health professio

240 Nephrologist staffing models for patients receiving hemo

241 ational Expert Panel comprised 24 transplant nephrologists, surgeons, diabetologists and clinical sci

242 volved in kidney transplant care (transplant nephrologists/surgeons/coordinators/dietitians, endocrin

243 twork of 225 private practice and university nephrologists (the Glomerular Disease Collaborative Netw

244 In 28 countries with five or more responding nephrologists, the median percentage of candidates for k

245 in), when many of these patients are seen by nephrologists, the use of diets very low in protein, and

246 This work is intended primarily for clinical nephrologists; therefore, each antiproteinuria intervent

247 ent with chronic renal failure will give the nephrologist time to fit the treatment to the patient.

248 to provide the documentation needed for the nephrologist to choose between these strategies.

249 kidney disease, coordination of care with a nephrologist to ensure vein preservation in the context

250 enal or extrarenal symptoms should alert the nephrologist to HNF1beta-associated kidney disease.

251 Time from first evaluation by a nephrologist to initiation of dialysis, classified as la

252 ed nephrology nurse practitioner, allows the nephrologist to provide care for a great number of patie

253 This model allows the nephrologist to provide specialized care to more patient

254 Our aim in this article was to empower nephrologists to (further) implement genetic testing as

255 It is essential for nephrologists to be informed and involved in cancer care

256 ed a working group of nephropathologists and nephrologists to establish consensus-based terminology a

257 linary collaboration between oncologists and nephrologists to predict and prevent chemotherapeutic-in

258 Primary care clinicians' collaboration with nephrologists to promote shared decision-making and deli

259 osely with older adults, their families, and nephrologists to promote shared kidney therapy decision-

260 ephrologists were 60% more likely than adult nephrologists to recommend peritoneal dialysis for ident

261 driven by the highest principles will allow nephrologists to work together as a cohesive force in ac

262 rtension, and, in some cases together with a nephrologist, to institute pharmacologic therapy.

263 ing several healthcare professionals such as nephrologists, transplant physicians and surgeons, prima

264 d with meaningful clinical outcomes may help nephrologists treat all their patients with CKD in an op

265 perfusion may become clinically relevant as nephrologists try to avoid the cognitive complications s

266 15 min), which was defined as the duration a nephrologist typically spends with a patient receiving P

267 d kidney stone clinic staffed by a pediatric nephrologist, urologist, dietitian, and clinical nurse.

268 cal practice recommendation was developed by nephrologists, urologists, paediatric radiologists, inte

269 A panel of nephrologists used a modified Delphi method to score eac

270 nducted a national random survey of 271 U.S. nephrologists using hypothetical patient scenarios to de

271 ns, and will hopefully serve as guidance for nephrologists utilizing these agents.

272 ed as the proportion of individuals having a nephrologist visit within 1 year after index time.

273 progressing to kidney failure do not have a nephrologist visit within 1 year of established risk.

274 Cr values reached 3.0 mg/dl, at which time a nephrologist was consulted.

275 verall cost for admissions under the care of nephrologists was $7,925 versus $10,773 under the care o

276 The median global prevalence of nephrologists was 11.8 per million population (IQR 1.8-2

277 Pre-ESRD care of patients treated by nephrologists was also less than ideal.

278 The number of nephrologists was variable and was low (<10 per million

279 lling for patient characteristics, pediatric nephrologists were 60% more likely than adult nephrologi

280 ly requests withdrawal of dialysis, American nephrologists were much more likely to stop dialysis in

281 Nephrologists were not more likely to prescribe ACEI tha

282 Nephrologists were randomly assigned to an intervention

283 as their relationship with their family and nephrologist, were substantial determinants of KT percep

284 Care tended to be transferred to the nephrologist when the Cr reached 4.0 mg/dl.

285 Of nephrologists who spent </=20 min, those at for-profit c

286 d by a committee of three independent expert nephrologists who were masked to the results of the test

287 It is important that nephrologists, who are frequently called upon to diagnos

288 resents a financial conflict of interest for nephrologists, who may change their clinical practice to

289 Nephrologists will need to serve as advocates for ESRD p

290 sis of left inguinal hernia presented to the nephrologist with recent onset of dysuria and increasing

291 A total of 41 nephrologists with a caseload of 50-200 hemodialysis pat

292 A panel of Spanish cardiologists and nephrologists with expertise in heart and kidney transpl

293 d significantly lower patient caseloads than nephrologists with the highest mortality rates (median [

294 rovider-level characteristics between the 10 nephrologists with the highest patient mortality rates a

295 Nephrologists with the lowest patient mortality rates ha

296 Additionally, patients treated by nephrologists with the lowest patient mortality rates re

297 e highest patient mortality rates and the 10 nephrologists with the lowest patient mortality rates.

298 tative and qualitative aspects of transplant nephrologists' work, while navigating regulatory require

299 No practicing nephrologist would use their absence to predict any spec

300 associated with a decreased likelihood that nephrologists would recommend renal transplantation for