ライフサイエンスコーパス: nerve fiber

1 ed to a penile-nerve-fiber than to a whisker-nerve-fiber.

2 potential propagating elements of myelinated nerve fibers.

3 med to be interneurons and in a few varicose nerve fibers.

4 ce and functional properties of TRAAK in rat nerve fibers.

5 a ipsi- and contralaterally projecting optic nerve fibers.

6 ease of glutamate onto postsynaptic auditory nerve fibers.

7 lary size range was twice as high as that of nerve fibers.

8 issues via several types of primary afferent nerve fibers.

9 ion of the primary GC subtypes, even beneath nerve fibers.

10 , trigeminal ganglia (TG) neurons, and their nerve fibers.

11 ns at the nodes of Ranvier of teased sciatic nerve fibers.

12 olecules, such as MAG, present in myelinated nerve fibers.

13 truct the responses of entire populations of nerve fibers.

14 y to reflect pathology in sciatic and tibial nerve fibers.

15 ompare this with functional studies of small nerve fibers.

16 for having higher selectivity for the faster nerve fibers.

17 striking inability to engulf small diameter nerve fibers.

18 hondria at functional points of contact with nerve fibers.

19 synaptic vesicles at points of contact with nerve fibers.

20 anges in the responses of remaining auditory nerve fibers.

21 umber of nerve branches, and the diameter of nerve fibers.

22 and chemical sterilization of the tooth with nerve fiber ablation (i.e., endodontic therapy), general

23 e association between mast cells and sensory nerve fibers allows bidirectional communication, leading

24 Surgical injury of corneal nerve fibers alters tear production and often causes dry

25 and in the mean deviation using the GDx-VCC nerve fiber analyzer (Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San

26 ter retinal layers and marked atrophy of the nerve fiber and ganglion cell layers at the central macu

27 fferent features from the firing of auditory nerve fibers and convey that information along separate

28 es can be linked to a particular subgroup of nerve fibers and how these changes are correlated with p

29 Intraepidermal nerve fibers and intrapapillary myelinated endings remai

30 The density of intraepidermal nerve fibers and intrapapillary myelinated endings was r

31 IVCCM can identify an abnormality in corneal nerve fibers and Langerhans cells in patients with and w

32 All of the drugs ablated intraepidermal nerve fibers and produced axonopathy, with a secondary d

33 recovered function of regenerated peripheral nerve fibers and reinnervated mechanoreceptors may diffe

34 ssociated with the augmentation of epidermal nerve fibers and remyelination of sciatic nerves.

35 normalities in communication between sensory nerve fibers and SCs may result in pain states.

36 shment of myelinating cells and remyelinated nerve fibers and slows early axon damage.

37 ic transmission in synapses between auditory nerve fibers and spherical bushy cells (BCs) in the coch

38 tic connections between epithelial cells and nerve fibers and studies using optogenetic activation of

39 Also, we discuss the crosstalk between the nerve fibers and the cancer.

40 se can destroy the synapses between auditory nerve fibers and their hair cell targets without destroy

41 ells detect coincident firing among auditory nerve fibers and transmit signals along monaural pathway

42 s upregulated in PCSK9-HFD, colocalized with nerve fibers, and correlated inversely with root mean sq

43 , subepithelial basement membrane thickness, nerve fibers, and epithelial neuroendocrine cells.

44 Phase locking of auditory-nerve-fiber (ANF) responses to the fine structure of aco

45 Phase locking of auditory-nerve-fiber (ANF) responses to the temporal fine structu

46 Nerve fibers are known to reside within malignant tumors

47 ed pancreatic islet and exocrine sympathetic nerve fiber area from autopsy samples of patients with t

48 g, flame-shaped hemorrhage over the superior nerve fiber area, and well-demarcated retinal ischemia s

49 iated with the presence of 5-HT3 -expressing nerve fibers as it is in the nTS.

50 the cochlea and hypomyelination of auditory nerve fibers as predominant neuropathological substrates

51 patients with SFN would lose intraepidermal nerve fibers at the distal leg more quickly than at more

52 manipulate an object, populations of tactile nerve fibers become activated and convey information abo

53 d corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber branch density (CNBD) and corneal nerve fibe

54 ted by the topographic organization of optic nerve fiber bundles in each subject's retina, successful

55 ase had ganglia in multiple layers and thick nerve fiber bundles without neurons.

56 rane of nociceptive, unmyelinated peripheral nerve fibers, but clarifying the role of sodium channel

57 developed to study activation of peripheral nerve fibers by different cutaneous electrodes.

58 ut normal frequency tuning, of aged auditory nerve fibers can be explained by the well known reductio

59 est that the pathology of the P2X3 epidermal nerve fibers can be selectively linked to neuropathy, hi

60 utes to the 'leak' K(+) current in mammalian nerve fiber conduction by hyperpolarizing the resting me

61 Additionally, nerve bundles and varicose nerve fibers containing the sensory neuropeptides, calci

62 el of a single mammalian myelinated cochlear nerve fiber coupled to a stimulator-electrode-tissue int

63 lary density (cpCD), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber (cpRNFL) thickness, ganglion cell complex (G

64 We discuss nerve fiber crosstalk with the main different components

65 oherence tomography facilitates discovery of nerve fiber damage caused by optic nerve glioma.

66 a with elevated adenosine caused substantial nerve fiber demyelination and mild hair cell loss.

67 (IENFD), sweat gland (SGNFD), and pilomotor nerve fiber densities (PMNFD) were measured.

68 adial sorting defects contributed to altered nerve fiber densities in adult.

69 Lower nerve fiber densities were associated with NIS-LL (p < 0

70 erve fiber branch density (CNBD) and corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) were determined in both a man

71 larly be associated with a loss of epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFD).

72 al scores were used to depict intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and clinical DPN.

73 Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) was reduced at different bio

74 The intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) was significantly decreased

75 Corneal nerve fiber density (mean [SE] difference, -6.78 [2.14]

76 lized IENFD reduction also had lower corneal nerve fiber density (p < 0.01) and length (p < 0.05).

77 er, our findings suggest that intraepidermal nerve fiber density and changes in NCV and amplitude mig

78 sis Severity Score (R = -0.354; P = .007 for nerve fiber density and R = -0.283; P = .03 for RNFL thi

79 lity Status Scale (rho = -0.295; P = .03 for nerve fiber density and rho = -0.374; P = .004 for RNFL

80 Nerve fiber density and RNFL thickness showed inverse as

81 At day 14, epidermal nerve fiber density and total epidermal nerve fiber leng

82 ent groups showed a decreased intraepidermal nerve fiber density compared with controls.

83 y nerve action potentials and intraepidermal nerve fiber density had a shorter CNFL (P = .04 and P =

84 of regenerating axons and the intraepidermal nerve fiber density in the skin were reduced.

85 Corneal nerve fiber density was reduced in patients with HIV com

86 rve conduction velocities and intraepidermal nerve fiber density were restored.

87 in Ada(-/-) mice significantly improved HL, nerve fiber density, and myelin compaction.

88 Comparison of corneal nerve fiber density, corneal nerve branch density, corne

89 Corneal nerve fiber density, nerve branch density, nerve fiber l

90 Epidermal nerve fiber density, the primary outcome, is a measureme

91 splayed progressive decreases in the corneal nerve fiber density.

92 accompanied by a reduction in intraepidermal nerve fiber density.

93 the number of nerve branches (P = .008) and nerve fiber diameter (P = .007).

94 ic responses) from responses of the auditory nerve fibers (electroneural responses), with separate ex

95 adult mice results in a similar decrease in nerve fiber endings and cell bodies.

96 Nerve fibers extended into the gill pore papillae, as fa

97 the effects of iDC stimulation on vestibular nerve fiber firing rate was investigated using loose-pat

98 depolarization of acid-sensitive trigeminal nerve fibers, for example, polymodal nociceptors, rather

99 munohistochemistry revealed more directional nerve fiber growth in SU and STG groups compared with ST

100 Sensory afferent nerve fiber growth into the intervertebral disc after in

101 her function-blocking antibodies against the nerve-fiber growth inhibitory protein Nogo-A applied to

102 hat function-blocking antibodies against the nerve-fiber growth inhibitory protein Nogo-A applied to

103 e recovery of sensory responses to surviving nerve fibers, homeostatic adjustments in PV-mediated inh

104 tly reduced nociceptive hypersensitivity and nerve fiber hypertrophy and improved behavioral paramete

105 ients and carriers to measure intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density, sweat gland innervation inde

106 showed substantial innervation by trigeminal nerve fibers immunoreactive for calcitonin gene-related

107 imations of the three categories of auditory nerve fiber in these simple models can substantially imp

108 of peptidergic and non-peptidergic epidermal nerve fibers in a rat model of nerve injury-induced pain

109 taining the functional integrity of auditory nerve fibers in early life rather than at old age.

110 redominantly nociceptive peripheral afferent nerve fibers in head-restrained transgenic mice expressi

111 n IL-17c-specific receptor, was expressed on nerve fibers in human skin and sensory neurons in dorsal

112 We studied the distribution of mucosal nerve fibers in patients with NERD, ERD, and BE, and com

113 ive results of the previous literature about nerve fibers in PDAC and CCA patients.

114 ere DRG pathology and loss of intraepidermal nerve fibers in SIV-infected macaques.

115 proportions of VIP, CGRP, and SP containing nerve fibers in the distal epithelium.

116 m, while it occasionally reaches the sensory nerve fibers in the mouse footpad.

117 l allodynia and loss of intraepidermal small nerve fibers in WT mice.

118 iking response that would be produced in the nerve fiber innervating that receptor.

119 of spectral peaks relative to their auditory nerve fiber inputs.

120 cer cells favoring growth by and through the nerve fibers is not fully understood.

121 ry projections and the terminal and preoptic nerve fibers labeled only for NADPH-d.

122 t epithelium degeneration (2.5%), myelinated nerve fiber layer (1.3%), and internal limiting membrane

123 l to forecast future circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness in eyes of healthy,

124 y of cpCD and global circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness in the 2 groups aft

125 , inner retinal layer (IRL), macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), macular ganglion cell layer (

126 ere was significant, progressive loss of the nerve fiber layer (NFL) (0.25 mum/y) and the ganglion ce

127 p the thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC).

128 struct an optical coherence tomography (OCT) nerve fiber layer (NFL) parameter that has maximal corre

129 En face nerve fiber layer (NFL) plexus angiogram was generated.

130 gth and to assess optic nerve dimensions and nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness using SD OCT in patien

131 ) measured optic disc, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (NFL), and macular ganglion cell compl

132 stimated proportion of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell + in

133 posterior pole and the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) protocols of the Spectralis OC

134 h no significant difference in peripapillary nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and optic nerve head

135 er complex (GCIPL) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness reduction rates were

136 mGCIPL), predominantly peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), or both mGCIPL and pRNFL stru

137 d by the OCT rate of thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell-inner plexifo

138 patients with good-quality baseline retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular OCT images and disc

139 compare the rates of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular retinal ganglion ce

140 nalytic method based on photographic retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) angle defect was proposed.

141 icrocirculation of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) between the hemispheres in eyes

142 of 5 is a simple rule for detecting retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) change on spectral-domain OCT (

143 To quantify retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) changes in patients with multip

144 he internal limiting membrane to the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) interface was quantified within

145 achromatic perimetry, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) OCT, and EDI OCT, as well as me

146 between intraocular pressure (IOP), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and pathologic hypers

147 Sectoral retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and retinal layer vol

148 concentration and the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at presentation (r =

149 cell (DC) density, and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with MS.

150 pregnancy and low birth weight with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in preadolescent chil

151 ng models were trained to use SD OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps, RNFL en face im

152 Describe a new method to analyze retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps.

153 s were evaluated with OCT to include retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurement and gangl

154 change of the average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained

155 MDB and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness values were determine

156 GC-IPL) thickness, and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were also compared.

157 ean deviation (MD) and SD-OCT global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were fitted over time

158 visual field mean deviation (MD) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were used to evaluate

159 nce tomography (OCT) measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness when using automated

160 with the ONH rim area, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and the macular gang

161 Field (HVF) mean deviation (MD), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, as measured by Cirru

162 defects were compared with regard to retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, drusen morphology, s

163 isual acuity, visual fields, and OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, macular thickness an

164 The optic nerve head (ONH) shape, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ONH volume, and papi

165 d signal strength of the OCT scan on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, rim area, and gangli

166 disc margin (DM)-based assessment or retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, yielded higher diagn

167 al rim width (MRW) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness.

168 cell complex (GCC) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses were measured in ad

169 Optical coherence tomography showed retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning in the peripapillary a

170 study evaluated whether the rate of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning is faster in eyes rece

171 ell (RGC) loss and only females have retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning, despite mice of both

172 of peripapillary 3-dimensional (3D) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) volume measurements from spectr

173 al coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and monocular pattern reversal

174 al coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and volumetric OCT scans throu

175 obtain objective measurements of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), optic nerve head, and macula f

176 ptive pills (OCP) on the macula, the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), the ganglion cell layer (GCL),

177 Intereye differences of 5mum for retinal nerve fiber layer and 4mum for macular ganglion cell + i

178 Minimum rim width, retinal nerve fiber layer and GCL thickness, and PD from OCT ang

179 While structural changes in the retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve have demonstrated corr

180 s, 63 patients) had slight thickening of the nerve fiber layer and retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch's

181 l bodies and axons, the unmyelinated retinal nerve fiber layer and the myelinated post-laminar axons,

182 mparing corresponding regions of the retinal nerve fiber layer and the retinal ganglion cell layer wi

183 on was identified by thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer and/or ganglion cell layer.

184 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and d

185 identify thickness variations in the retinal nerve fiber layer around the optic disc and macula in pa

186 or more, neuroretinal rim notching, retinal nerve fiber layer defect, and bared circumlinear vessels

187 retinal undulations and presence of retinal nerve fiber layer fragments.

188 a statistically significant thinning of the nerve fiber layer in AD mouse retinas compared to WT con

189 olds, hyperopic refractive error shifts, and nerve fiber layer infarcts.

190 emonstrated an optimal peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer intereye difference threshold of 5mum

191 have shown that the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer is an important parameter for glaucoma

192 nas demonstrated higher mean and variance in nerve fiber layer light scattering intensity compared to

193 the appearance of the optic nerve or retinal nerve fiber layer occurring before the imaging session.

194 lay an early and regionally specific role of nerve fiber layer phagocytosis in areas of active diseas

195 Five en face OCTA slabs were analyzed: nerve fiber layer plexus (NFLP), ganglion cell layer ple

196 The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP-CD, %ar

197 The peripapillary nerve fiber layer plexus capillary density (NFLP_CD), ma

198 Retinal nerve fiber layer predictions showed an ROC curve area o

199 of open-angle glaucoma with >=5 OCT retinal nerve fiber layer scans, >=5 reliable visual field (VF)

200 ty spectral-domain OCT peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer scans, and 2 reliable SAP tests were i

201 xhibited selective reductions of the retinal nerve fiber layer that correlate with electrophysiologic

202 .86], per dB, respectively), thicker retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (1.08 [1.01, 1.16] per mum),

203 kness (GC-IPLT), and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT) were determined.

204 , OR = 0.75/dB higher MD, P = .007), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (OR = 0.92/mum increase in t

205 .039), axial length (P = .033), and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (P < .001) among the groups.

206 ial pressure correlated with maximal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (r = 0.60, P </= .001), maxi

207 prelaminar tissue thickness (PLTT), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RFNLT) during an interval f

208 The patients had macular and optic retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) measured with spectra

209 on while the spatially corresponding retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and visual field clu

210 eld mean deviation and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness among study groups were stat

211 .73 +/- 0.80 mum per year for global retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and -0.09 +/- 0.36 dB per ye

212 cal coherence tomography parameters (retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and ganglion cell layer - in

213 GES dataset, the DSF model predicted retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and mean deviation paired me

214 OCT images were obtained of both the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and the MRW-BMO.

215 ated eyes showed an average temporal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of 54 mum before injection a

216 ucoma, visual field mean defect, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness were not found to correlate

217 al parameters, minimum rim width and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, in addition to peripapillar

218 Retinal nerve fiber layer thinning based on OCT results is a use

219 ncreased retinal ganglion cell loss, retinal nerve fiber layer thinning, and pigmentation onto the re

220 including severity of IOP elevation, retinal nerve fiber layer thinning, or electrodiagnostic finding

221 nal layers, solely the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer was decreased in PDR (96 mum; 95% conf

222 ickness and the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer, and visual field in a dark room with

223 d photoreceptor layer thickness; but similar nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell complex, inner nuclear

224 zed rates of change in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell plus inner plexiform la

225 Positive staining was present within the nerve fiber layer, inner plexiform layer, and inner and

226 sible in all eyes and located in the retinal nerve fiber layer, inner plexiform layer, and outer plex

227 Circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, macular ganglion cell layer (mGCL), a

228 afe and does not damage the temporal retinal nerve fiber layer, opening the door next for testing of

229 attering measurements were acquired from the nerve fiber layer, outer plexiform layer, and retinal pi

230 ppearance, visual fields, and global retinal nerve fiber layer.

231 aining was only observed at the level of the nerve fiber layer.

232 hibit a progressive axonal loss in the optic nerve fiber layer.

233 ded NK healing, corneal sensitivity, corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) measured by in vivo confocal m

234 he images were randomly selected and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber branch de

235 hes/mm2; 95% CI, -28.77 to -7.10; P = .001), nerve fiber length (mean [SE] difference, -3.03 [0.89] m

236 Corneal nerve fiber length and density were statistically signif

237 Corneal nerve branch density and corneal nerve fiber length were reduced in patients with HIV, bu

238 nsity, corneal nerve branch density, corneal nerve fiber length, corneal nerve fiber tortuosity, and

239 l nerve fiber density, nerve branch density, nerve fiber length, DC density, peripapillary RNFL thick

240 rmal nerve fiber density and total epidermal nerve fiber length/mm(2) were significantly and consiste

241 2% CI, -50.62 to -3.13; P = .01; and corneal nerve fiber length: 28.4 mm/mm2 for the controls vs 21.9

242 Recent work suggests that newly formed nerve fibers may regulate the tumor microenvironment, bu

243 f beta-III tubulin demonstrated that corneal nerve fiber metrics were decreased significantly in diab

244 n of activation in one population of tactile nerve fibers, namely slowly adapting type 1 (SA1) affere

245 temporal coding was not altered in auditory nerve fibers of aging gerbils.

246 pparent in responses of single-unit auditory nerve fibers of quiet-aged gerbils.

247 tudy was to quantify the morphology of small nerve fibers of the cornea of patients with fibromyalgia

248 yme neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in nerve fibers of the murine vaginal wall.

249 entrally, possibly due to a loss of auditory nerve fibers (or their peripheral synapses) but not due

250 o investigate whether IL-31 promotes sensory nerve fiber outgrowth.

251 ificant decrease in the activity of afferent nerve fibers, particularly those with irregular resting

252 Recent studies showed marked small nerve fiber pathology in critically ill patients, which

253 sing 5-HT3A GFP mice, that 5-HT3 -expressing nerve fibers preferentially contact and receive synaptic

254 eir axonal fibers, including the nociceptive nerve fibers projecting into the brainstem.

255 ring rate was investigated using loose-patch nerve fiber recordings in the acutely excised mouse cris

256 Single-unit auditory nerve fiber recordings were obtained from 41 Mongolian g

257 many observations made from in vivo auditory nerve fiber recordings.

258 lothionein II was shown to enhance epidermal nerve fiber regeneration so that it was complete within

259 V-2 reactivation exhibit a higher density of nerve fibers relative to biopsies during virological and

260 em back to the outer hair cells and auditory-nerve fibers, respectively.

261 Increasing evidence suggests that nerve fibers responding to noxious stimuli (nociceptors)

262 IFICANCE STATEMENT Phase locking of auditory-nerve-fiber responses to the temporal fine structure of

263 IFICANCE STATEMENT Phase locking of auditory-nerve-fiber responses to the temporal fine structure of

264 n cell complex (GCC), comprising the retinal nerve fiber (RNFL), ganglion cell, and inner plexiform l

265 is simulated by a Poisson process generating nerve fiber spike trains at variable firing rates.

266 ADA enzyme therapy rescued SNHL by restoring nerve fiber structure in Ada(-/-) mice post two-week dru

267 Further, these 5-HT3 -expressing nerve fibers terminate in a restricted central-lateral p

268 ads to transmitter release and activation of nerve fibers terminating in the brainstem respiratory ce

269 Efferent vagus nerve fibers terminating in the celiac-superior mesenter

270 es less cortical area is devoted to a penile-nerve-fiber than to a whisker-nerve-fiber.

271 Unlike other diseases of the small nerve fibers that cause acral pain syndromes, erythromel

272 of sensory, sympathetic, and parasympathetic nerve fibers that contain classical transmitters plus an

273 hologically decreased densities of the small nerve fibers that innervate the epidermis, one hypothesi

274 I taste cells and 5-HT3 -expressing afferent nerve fibers that project to a restricted portion of the

275 re examined for the presence and location of nerve fibers that reacted with a labeled antibody agains

276 is, subcutis, orbicularis muscle bundles and nerve fibers; the tumour cells were noted to have a mono

277 Patients had retinal nerve fiber thickness compared with a control group.

278 gains are excellent surrogates for auditory nerve fiber thresholds at the base of the cochlea, this

279 Approximately 80 percent of myelinated nerve fibers throughout the central and peripheral nervo

280 ovide our point of view in the potential for nerve fibers to be used as powerful biomarker for progno

281 embryonic development, some SCPs detach from nerve fibers to become mesenchymal cells, which differen

282 le tissue, and to stimulate severed afferent nerve fibers to provide somatosensory feedback.

283 e skin and is transferred through peripheral nerve fibers to the central nervous system.

284 density, corneal nerve fiber length, corneal nerve fiber tortuosity, and corneal Langerhans cell dens

285 ve optical coherence tomography to delineate nerve fiber tracts while confocal fluorescence microscop

286 odulate serotonin-sensitive primary afferent nerve fibers via synaptic connections, enabling them to

287 thresholds, the frequency tuning of auditory nerve fibers was not affected.

288 P2X3 receptor, a marker for non-peptidergic nerve fibers, was not only significantly reduced but cou

289 ne-related peptide, a marker for peptidergic nerve fibers, was not significantly changed on the ipsil

290 e mainly present in vulvar segments and most nerve fibers were found in the lamina propria of the cer

291 Epidermal nerve fibers were lost at similar rates in proximal and

292 uxol-Fast-Blue suggested about 57% of penile nerve fibers were myelinated.

293 inase A-expressing (TrKa-expressing) sensory nerve fibers, which are required for osteochondral proge

294 e to a reduced population of active auditory nerve fibers, which will be of importance for the develo

295 Dispersed maturation of sensory nerve fibers with desynchronized inputs to the CNS also

296 combining damage to high-threshold auditory nerve fibers with increased response gain of central aud

297 A group of vestibular afferent nerve fibers with irregular-firing resting discharges ar

298 abeling both peptidergic and non-peptidergic nerve fibers with the pan-neuronal marker PGP9.5, the ex

299 me, is a measurement of the density of small nerve fibers within the epidermis.

300 uting and arborization of CGRP+TrkA+ sensory nerve fibers within the reactive periosteum in NGF-enric