戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ng anaesthesia (n = 5) instead of repetitive nerve stimulation.
2  epicardial DOR increased during sympathetic nerve stimulation.
3 anced vascular responsiveness to sympathetic nerve stimulation.
4 mpromised the muscle twitch triggered by the nerve stimulation.
5 dominant repolarizing role during repetitive nerve stimulation.
6 s and stretchable multi-electrode arrays for nerve stimulation.
7 in relocalization to synaptic membranes upon nerve stimulation.
8 sensory evoked potentials elicited by median nerve stimulation.
9 d to achieve directional fiber activation in nerve stimulation.
10 timulation but not F-EPSPs evoked by colonic nerve stimulation.
11 timulation but not F-EPSPs evoked by colonic nerve stimulation.
12 timulation but not F-EPSPs evoked by colonic nerve stimulation.
13  postsynaptic responses elicited by afferent nerve stimulation.
14 vels ([NAD(P)H]m) increase within seconds of nerve stimulation.
15 imary sensory cortex face area due to median nerve stimulation.
16 elicited by bath-applied CCh and cholinergic nerve stimulation.
17 r inhibition of cytokine production by vagus nerve stimulation.
18 but no increased activation following tibial nerve stimulation.
19 ulation, but reduced activations with tibial nerve stimulation.
20 f non-neuronal cells, induced by sympathetic nerve stimulation.
21 firing in pulmonary veins by local autonomic nerve stimulation.
22 irements significantly decreased after vagus nerve stimulation.
23 ter activity evoked in response to selective nerve stimulation.
24 es to acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine, or nerve stimulation.
25 ing the therapeutic mechanisms of trigeminal nerve stimulation.
26  to assess gamma-knife radiosurgery or vagal nerve stimulation.
27 tional inhibition of TNF production by vagus nerve stimulation.
28 recocious corneal thinning, but augmented T4 nerve stimulation.
29 cipital region with electrodes for occipital nerve stimulation.
30 exercise in response to supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation.
31 d for the soleus H-reflex elicited by tibial nerve stimulation.
32 ease of beta-NAD depends on the frequency of nerve stimulation.
33 taste buds on the rostral 1/3 of the tongue) nerve stimulation.
34 e seen with field potentials evoked by sural nerve stimulation.
35 nual therapies and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
36 scranial magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation.
37 vered to tibialis anterior (TA) MNs by sural nerve stimulation.
38 ed by measuring force in response to femoral nerve stimulation.
39 DeltaQTsingle ) evoked by electrical femoral nerve stimulation.
40         In vehicle-treated rats, sympathetic nerve stimulation (1 to 5 Hz) evoked decreases in femora
41  rhodamine-123, we determined how repetitive nerve stimulation (100 Hz) affects Psi(m) in motor termi
42 d, ventilated dogs were elicited via sciatic nerve stimulation (50 Hz; 200 ms duration; 1 contraction
43 ponse to bilateral anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (a pressure <11 cm H2O defined dysfunc
44                   Here, we report that renal nerve stimulation after ureteral obstruction is the prim
45 magnetic stimulation and external trigeminal nerve stimulation (all with regulatory clearance) were w
46                                   Trigeminal nerve stimulation also decreased systemic inflammation c
47         Swallowing evoked by airway afferent nerve stimulation also desensitized at a much slower rat
48 tylcholine release in the ventricle on vagal nerve stimulation and a high density of acetylcholine M2
49 trol that included transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises d
50 (n = 105) received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises.
51 e EAA afferents to the LC, including sciatic nerve stimulation and auditory stimuli and the tonic act
52 defects to interventional techniques such as nerve stimulation and bulking agents.
53 itry more selectively than muscle stretch or nerve stimulation and can be adapted to study GTO feedba
54 therapy, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, vagal nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation.
55  a decremental muscle response to repetitive nerve stimulation and frequently related to postsynaptic
56 paired and decreased in response to unpaired nerve stimulation and is mediated by the opposing action
57 , paired associative stimulation using ulnar nerve stimulation and PA TMS pulses over M1, a protocol
58 AS, which consisted of peripheral electrical nerve stimulation and subsequent transcranial magnetic s
59 le studies have demonstrated that peripheral nerve stimulation and targeted reinnervation can provide
60  a method of transcutaneous mechanical vagus nerve stimulation and then investigated whether this the
61 erminals is more responsive to low-frequency nerve stimulation and this is due to higher cytosolic Ca
62 hich involves repeated pairing of peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation
63 al, twitch responses to supramaximal femoral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation
64  Somatosensory cortical potentials to median nerve stimulation and visual cortical potentials to reve
65 timulation (SNS) and right and/or left vagus nerve stimulation and was compared with DOR during isopr
66 ve electrical, transcutaneous, or sham vagus nerve stimulation and were followed for survival or euth
67 horacic epidural anesthesia, low-level vagal nerve stimulation, and baroreflex stimulation.
68 pies are available, including surgery, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation.
69 lation, namely deep brain stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation
70 al heat, traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and ultrasonography), spinal manipula
71                    Less invasive versions of nerve stimulation are being researched.
72 eep brain stimulation, vagus, and trigeminal nerve stimulation are effective only in a fraction of th
73  responsiveness, and decrement on repetitive nerve stimulation are present.
74 ner if afferent volleys evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation are repeatedly associated with the pea
75       The anti-inflammatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation are well known.
76 euromodulation approaches, such as occipital nerve stimulation, are currently being actively studied
77 s, could help to explain the effect of vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for headache disorders.
78    ssSEPs were elicited by electrical median nerve stimulation at the left and right wrist, using a s
79 tability of repeatedly delivering peripheral nerve stimulation at three time points (-30 ms, 0 ms, +5
80 enal sympathetic denervation, cervical vagal nerve stimulation, baroreflex stimulation, cutaneous sti
81                  Postjunctional responses to nerve stimulation, beta-NAD and ATP were compared using
82 he amplitude of F-EPSPs evoked by splanchnic nerve stimulation but not F-EPSPs evoked by colonic nerv
83 he amplitude of F-EPSPs evoked by splanchnic nerve stimulation but not F-EPSPs evoked by colonic nerv
84 ic fast EPSPs (F-EPSPs) evoked by splanchnic nerve stimulation but not F-EPSPs evoked by colonic nerv
85        They can also sequester Ca(2+) during nerve stimulation, but it is unknown whether this limits
86 creased activations with handgrip and median nerve stimulation, but reduced activations with tibial n
87 but only reduced contractions evoked by 4 Hz nerve stimulation by approximately 40-60% (n = 4-6) and
88             In adult muscles, PSCs can sense nerve stimulation by increasing intracellular calcium an
89 l time to demonstrate that electrical sacral nerve stimulation can activate colonic enteric neurons.
90                                        Vagus nerve stimulation can ameliorate autoimmune diseases suc
91 t bilateral autonomic activity (SNS or vagus nerve stimulation) cause reversible shifts of apex-base
92 re, we use brief bursts of closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation (CL-VNS) delivered during rehabilitati
93 dly pairing tones with brief pulses of vagus nerve stimulation completely eliminated the physiologica
94                          Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation continues to display superiority to sh
95 anti-inflammatory therapy via cervical vagus nerve stimulation (cVNS) one should selectively activate
96 on, transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, electroconvul
97 in response to supramaximal magnetic femoral nerve stimulation (DeltaQ(tw,pot)).
98 xercise in response to supra-maximal femoral nerve stimulation (DeltaQ(tw,pot)).
99                   Left-sided low-level vagus nerve stimulation did not change vagal nerve activity.
100                    With perivascular sensory nerve stimulation, dilatation and inhibition of sympathe
101                         Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation dose-dependently reduced systemic tumo
102 lammatory pathway." Here, we show that vagus nerve stimulation during endotoxemia specifically attenu
103                                  Sympathetic nerve stimulation elicited localized Ca(2+) increases th
104                                       Pelvic nerve stimulation elicited polarized responses that were
105                                   Trigeminal nerve stimulation elicited strong synergistic coactivati
106                       Earlier we showed that nerve stimulation elicits the appearance of spH fluoresc
107 on, (3) surgical approaches, including vagus nerve stimulation, epidural electrical stimulation, and
108 afferent inhibition of face M1, while facial nerve stimulation evoked LAI but not SAI.
109 y the uncoupling agent carbenoxolone reduces nerve stimulation-evoked catecholamine release in contro
110 of beta-NAD in superfusates of muscles after nerve stimulation exceed ATP by at least 30-fold; unlike
111 lease events increases with the frequency of nerve stimulation; external Ca(2+) entry is required for
112                                        Vagus nerve stimulation fails to control serum TNF levels in e
113                      Here we show that vagus nerve stimulation fails to inhibit tumor necrosis factor
114 od and Drug Administration approval of vagus nerve stimulation for recurrent treatment-resistant depr
115                 Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory OAB have been recently
116 nd muscle action potential decrement at high nerve stimulation frequencies (P < 0.05) and miniature e
117               There was no important phrenic nerve stimulation from IPL pacing.
118  the measurement of the tension generated by nerve stimulation gave evidence of any significant impai
119                      Furthermore, trigeminal nerve stimulation generated sympathetically mediated low
120 ic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) by olfactory nerve stimulation generates slow (2 Hz) oscillations nea
121 t-central gyrus at 13.6-17.5 ms after median-nerve stimulation, gradually slowed down in frequency ar
122 sepsis group (eight pigs), 2) sepsis + vagus nerve stimulation group (nine pigs), and 3) control sham
123                                       Sacral nerve stimulation has been approved for use in treating
124  patients with depression or epilepsy, vagal nerve stimulation has been demonstrated to promote weigh
125                                       Sacral nerve stimulation has minimal risk and more durable long
126 owing conditioning by high-frequency sciatic nerve stimulation (HFS) at intensities recruiting C-fibe
127 icroM) inhibited contractions evoked by 4 Hz nerve stimulation in a concentration-dependent manner (I
128  determine the safety and efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in a large population under the rigors
129 renal catecholamine secretion and splanchnic nerve stimulation in anaesthetised mice.
130 ked by laryngeal and tracheal vagal afferent nerve stimulation in anaesthetized guinea pigs.
131                                    Occipital nerve stimulation in cluster headache seems to offer a s
132 esponse can also be evoked by direct C-fiber nerve stimulation in infant, but not adult, mice.
133                  Ca(2+) transients evoked by nerve stimulation in PDGFRalpha(+) cells showed the same
134 m patients with SSc (SScIgGs) on cholinergic nerve stimulation in rat colon tissues.
135 icating that in vivo electrical perivascular nerve stimulation in rat mesenteric small arteries cause
136 tic force in response to submaximal rates of nerve stimulation in situ producing significantly higher
137 naptic acidification in nerve termini during nerve stimulation in situ.
138 and power in response to submaximal rates of nerve stimulation in situ.
139 imary sensory cortex face area during median nerve stimulation in subjects with spinal cord injury co
140    There has been growing interest in sacral nerve stimulation in the management of both overactivity
141                            Here we show that nerve stimulation in the presence of the styryl dye FM4-
142 cral neuromodulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of men with urge inco
143 in the direction of DOR, but bilateral vagus nerve stimulation increased and reversed DOR to base-->a
144                      Axial stretch and vagus nerve stimulation induced cranial displacement of the LE
145                                  Sympathetic nerve stimulation inhibited both contractions of distal
146          Treatment with transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation inhibited HMGB1 levels and improved su
147                               High frequency nerve stimulation inhibited peripheral spike initiation
148                             Electrical vagus nerve stimulation inhibits proinflammatory cytokine prod
149                                  Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a useful second-line therapy in pat
150                         Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation is an efficacious treatment for mice w
151 incipal functions of the bladder by pudendal nerve stimulation is an exciting prospect for neurorehab
152                                   Trigeminal nerve stimulation is currently being evaluated as an adj
153                                  Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is effective in select patients with a
154                                   Electrical nerve stimulation is insensitive, but specific, at detec
155                             Posterior tibial nerve stimulation is not covered here.
156                             1) If peripheral nerve stimulation is used, optimal clinical practice sug
157  uptake after the trigeminal and hypoglossal nerves stimulation labeled the bilateral hypoglossal mot
158 sfully place percutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation leads in patients on mechanical ventil
159                                              Nerve stimulation leads to readily detectable and reprod
160  hypothesize that left-sided low-level vagus nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) can suppress sympathetic outf
161 stimulation (via a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation machine to the lateral forefoot) once
162 neuromodulatory procedures such as occipital nerve stimulation may be effective for the most disabled
163 stigated 1) the feasibility of a new phrenic nerve stimulation method allowing early diaphragmatic ac
164                     This suggests that vagus nerve stimulation might provide a significant therapeuti
165                                      Splenic nerve stimulation mimics vagal and cholinergic induction
166 vestigated whether rhythmic pulses of median nerve stimulation (MNS) could entrain brain oscillations
167                   In response to mediastinal nerve stimulation, most IC neurons became excessively ac
168                           Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), single-transcranial magnetic s
169 onstrated a mean inspiratory lag for phrenic nerve stimulation of 23.7 ms (p < 0.001 vs null hypothes
170 enhanced the inhibitory effect of splanchnic nerve stimulation on colonic motility.
171 ect measurements of the effects of autonomic nerve stimulation on DOR.
172 pound muscle action potentials on repetitive nerve stimulation on electromyography.
173  interneurons by testing the effect of ulnar nerve stimulation on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elic
174                    The effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation on survival rate, autonomic nervous sy
175 e that the anti-fibrillatory effect of vagus nerve stimulation on the ventricle is mediated by nitric
176 of temporary percutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation on user-specified inspiratory breaths
177                                    Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is an effective treatment for me
178 ause current methods to study GTO circuitry (nerve stimulation or muscle stretch) also activate muscl
179 timulate immune cell activation, sympathetic nerve stimulation or other factors.
180 tal development and, when activated by optic nerve stimulation or visual stimuli, induce sustained de
181  positive edrophonium or abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation, or abnormal single fibre electromyogr
182                                        Vagus nerve stimulation paired with exposure to conditioned cu
183                These studies used peripheral nerve stimulation paired with transcranial magnetic stim
184                                        Vagus nerve stimulation partially or completely prevented the
185                                              Nerve stimulations, pharmacological block and current cl
186                                     Pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) aims to maximize afferent or eff
187  ageing alters MA reactivity to perivascular nerve stimulation (PNS) and adrenoreceptor (AR) activati
188 sympathetic neurotransmission), perivascular nerve stimulation (PNS) evoked dilatation in Young but n
189                                      Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) is a common complication of card
190 t periodic diaphragm contraction via phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) substantially reduces MV-induced
191 bition of the micturition reflex by pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS).
192 c fields powerful enough to cause Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS).
193 t (up to 72%) in response to 3 Hz repetitive nerve stimulation pointed towards a neuromuscular transm
194          We have previously shown that vagal nerve stimulation prevents intestinal barrier loss in a
195  the mechanisms are poorly understood, vagal nerve stimulation prevents weight gain in response to a
196                          In contrast, facial nerve stimulation produced significant LAI (P < 0.05) as
197 cral neuromodulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation prove to be viable, durable options fo
198 he long-term efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in fecal incontinence (FI).
199                          Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a new ambulatory therapy for
200 ponse to bilateral anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (Ptr,stim).
201 ect disrupted emotion circuits include vagal nerve stimulation, rapid transcranial magnetic stimulati
202 ction of muscle force in situ at sub-maximal nerve stimulation rates.
203                      It is unclear how vagus nerve stimulation regulates leukocyte trafficking becaus
204                                        Vagus nerve stimulation remains a promising, yet unproven trea
205                             Pudendal sensory nerve stimulation resulted in a significant increase in
206                                       Pelvic nerve stimulation resulted in significant increases of c
207                                   Repetitive nerve stimulation revealed low amplitude of compound mus
208 tion of botulinum toxin, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral neuromodulation, and surgical
209 pansion with fluid resuscitation, trigeminal nerve stimulation significantly attenuated sympathetic h
210                             Similarly, vagus nerve stimulation significantly attenuates neutrophil su
211                                   Trigeminal nerve stimulation significantly increased the short-term
212                                       Sacral nerve stimulation significantly reduces symptoms and imp
213 oea-predominant or mixed IBS subtypes sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) alleviates IBS-specific symptoms
214 r sinus rhythm, during bilateral sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) and right and/or left vagus nerv
215 tudy aimed to evaluate the outcome of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for fecal incontinence at 5 year
216     Here, we performed bilateral sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) in fully innervated, Langendorff
217            In innervated hearts, sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) increased heart rate to a lesser
218                                       Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an evolving treatment for con
219       : Stimulation amplitude used in sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is at or just above the sensory
220 tudy, we performed physiological sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS) while optically mapping cardiac
221 t viral activation of inflammation and vagal nerve stimulation, suggesting a mechanism by which tiotr
222 iac nerve abolishes TNF suppression by vagus nerve stimulation, suggesting that the cholinergic pathw
223                   Left-sided low-level vagus nerve stimulation suppresses stellate ganglion nerve act
224 Together, these results establish that vagus nerve stimulation targeting the inflammatory reflex modu
225 he effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS, Cerbomed Nemos) with sham stim
226 al evidence on the feasibility of a proximal nerve stimulation technique in controlling a variety of
227  the capabilities of a non-invasive proximal nerve stimulation technique in eliciting various hand gr
228 d electrophysiological (selective electrical nerve stimulation) techniques.
229 eral low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) applied on the first dorsal int
230                    Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a commonly utilized non-phar
231  amputee's phantom limb using transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS).
232  slight voluntary contraction and electrical nerve stimulation that each electrode recorded motor uni
233 ring normal bursting activity and antidromic nerve stimulation, the conduction delay over the length
234                   During right or left vagus nerve stimulation, there was no change in the direction
235 easing cerebral perfusion, making trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) a promising strategy for TBI man
236 tudies have supported potential use of vagus nerve stimulation to deliver autonomic regulation therap
237 e the voltage response, enabling sympathetic nerve stimulation to increase the heart rate.
238 e no recommendation on the use of peripheral nerve stimulation to monitor degree of block in patients
239 of direct muscle responses evoked by sciatic nerve stimulation to pretransection levels over an 8-wk
240           The current study delivered median nerve stimulation to produce SEPs during a force-matchin
241  function, or with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to reduce pain (Grade: conditional rec
242 ood flow (CBF) fMRI during unilateral median nerve stimulation to show that the poststimulus fMRI sig
243                   SAI was tested with median nerve stimulation to the wrist preceding TMS pulse to mo
244                        One example is sacral nerve stimulation to treat overactive bladder, urinary i
245 val rate at 60 minutes was 90% in trigeminal nerve stimulation treatment group whereas 0% in control
246 ed to either control, vehicle, or trigeminal nerve stimulation treatment groups.
247                         Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has been proposed to stimulate
248                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (up to four times daily) in RA patient
249                                       Sacral nerve stimulation using InterStim Therapy is a safe and
250 ifically, the authors demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) activates the cholinergic antiin
251 al assessed the safety and efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) among patients with HF and a red
252 of this study was to determine whether vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can enhance the consolidation of
253                               Cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can improve left ventricular dys
254                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to enhance learni
255                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to exert cardiopr
256 ATEMENT Recent studies have implicated vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in enhanced learning and memory.
257                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a bioelectronic therapy for d
258                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a common treatment for medica
259                                        Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an alternative therapy for ep
260                              ABSTRACT: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging therapy for treat
261            Noninvasive, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is currently used as a treatment
262 nity, and modulation of this reflex by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective in various inflamma
263                                        Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is well established.
264                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is widely used to treat drug-res
265  to investigate the effect of cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on cerebral blood flow (CBF), in
266 ot study was to evaluate the effect of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with sounds in chronic ti
267 a novel strategy that uses closed-loop vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with tactile rehabilitati
268         Recent research has shown that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with tones or with rehabi
269 ly shown the safety and feasibility of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with upper-limb rehabilit
270   We have previously shown that direct vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reduces the slope of action pote
271 d cardiac response to bipolar cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reflects a dynamic interaction b
272                                        Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy was shown to improve per
273 gistry investigated whether adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with treatment as usual in depre
274 igate the effect of vagotomy (VGX) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), on the development and severity
275                                   Only vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), which continues to develop new
276 in to the same levels as implant-based vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).
277 ge animal model of progressive sepsis, vagus nerve stimulation was associated with a number of benefi
278 with either pudendal sensory nerve or pelvic nerve stimulation was examined in the female rat using c
279                                   Trigeminal nerve stimulation was explored as a novel resuscitation
280                         The effect of facial nerve stimulation was found to be dependent on stimulati
281                             Magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation was performed before the first loading
282              Percutaneous electrical phrenic nerve stimulation was used for six 2-hour sessions at 8-
283     Unilateral electrical superior laryngeal nerve stimulation was used to elicit early (R1) and late
284 e cortical, cervicomedullary, and peripheral nerve stimulation we examined in humans motor-evoked pot
285                            Using optogenetic nerve stimulation, we demonstrate activity-dependent syn
286 ne an energy-efficient waveform for cochlear nerve stimulation, we used a genetic algorithm approach,
287                                 Responses to nerve stimulation were abolished by MRS-2500 and not obs
288 ded (i) handgrip; and (ii) median and tibial nerve stimulation were assessed using functional magneti
289 osensitive rVLM neurons evoked by splanchnic nerve stimulation were reduced by EA and then restored w
290 z; 200 ms duration) via supramaximal sciatic nerve stimulation were used to manipulate metabolic rate
291 f release, indicated by a response to single nerve stimulation, whereas Shab channels regulate repeti
292 ves during surgery involves neurophysiologic nerve stimulation, which has practical limitations.
293                 They respond to an olfactory nerve stimulation with a short barrage of excitatory inp
294 xcitability by combining paired-pulse median nerve stimulation with recording somatosensory evoked po
295  6) We suggest against the use of peripheral nerve stimulation with train of four alone for monitorin
296                5) We suggest that peripheral nerve stimulation with train-of-four monitoring may be a
297  that the dose should be based on peripheral nerve stimulation with train-of-four monitoring.
298 tion frequency-dependent manner during vagus nerve stimulation, with comparable increases seen during
299  concurrent BOLD and CBF responses to median nerve stimulation, with primary signal increases in cont
300  failed, or been denied access to, occipital nerve stimulation within the UK's National Health Servic

 
Page Top