ライフサイエンスコーパス: nominal

1 rates of association tests will be close to nominal.

2 ere exploratory, and P values are considered nominal.

3 regarded as descriptive and the p values are nominal.

4 ghest, while exposure to red wavelengths was nominal.

5 scopy (EELS) showed the stoichiometry of the nominal 15 nm NbO2 layer in the as-fabricated MIM device

6 with a 0.025 significance level to preserve nominal 5% alpha error.

7 rehensive magnetic force microscopy study of nominal 50 nm thick FeRh thin films and subtractively pa

8 In our nominal 6-muscle planar arm model, muscle synergies and

9 iding snapshots of gating transitions in the nominal absence of ligand.

10 In contrast to the calculated nominal absorbed doses of 7.8 and 1.6 Gy (in the cortex

11 In contrast to the calculated nominal absorbed doses of 7.8/1.6 Gy (cortex/medulla), S

12 For each transcript, we compute a nominal abundance that can be converted to absolute by d

13 superoxide-deficient T cells recognizing the nominal Ag OVA323-339 In this study, we demonstrate that

14 e Type-I error rates of all methods close to nominal alpha levels of 0.05 and 0.01.

15 The nominal and estimated viral loads based on the single-hi

16 The combustion conditions included nominal and high burn rate operation and individual comb

17 up demonstrated higher retention in both the nominal and spatial type information for at least a mont

18 harmonized inventory data set including both nominal and uncertainty data is calculated for each stag

19 re selectively deleted donor alloreactive vs nominal antigen-responsive T cells.

20 himeric mice developed antibody responses to nominal antigens, showing preserved functional immunity.

21 rt of 367 LSL cases and 5159 controls showed nominal association (P= 0.03 for rs3746446) resulting in

22 Our data showed a nominal association of MetS with the APOA5 rs662799, BUD

23 de to triplet repeat number (P = .002) and a nominal association of the keratoplasty proportion with

24 %) of LD pruned variants set (n = 56) showed nominal association with gout in our sample (p < 0.05).

25 Twelve variants within CETP demonstrated nominal association with ICH, with the strongest associa

26 er mRNAs, of which 71 and 63 showed at least nominal association with systolic and diastolic BP, resp

27 ociations with schizophrenia and a very weak nominal association with the tight junction protein, cla

28 iple SNPs in LD with the variant support the nominal association.

29 Further, nominal associations (p = 0.03-0.05) were found between

30 In addition, we found nominal associations of the CLOCK SNP rs6853192 with lon

31 Nominal associations that did not survive correction for

32 in the CRP region, including rs3093059, had nominal associations with BPD.

33 ys with profound local deviations from their nominal bulk compositions and indicate further differenc

34 accination campaigns is frequently below the nominal campaign coverage, likely because campaigns nece

35 ted discharge rate of 1,000C with 50% of the nominal capacity delivered in less than 2 seconds.

36 as subsequently used to extrapolate from the nominal cell culture concentration to PCB tissue levels

37 Secondary efficacy measures were nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV)

38 asures: The primary efficacy measure was the nominal change in percent atheroma volume (PAV) from bas

39 ial oxidation states are not consistent with nominal charge counting.

40 lk electrolysis indicates that 94-99% of the nominal charge on different RAPs is accessible and that

41 nd and 1.03 per thousand, respectively, at a nominal CO2 mole fraction of 400 mumol mol(-1) in air.

42 at approximately 400 MPa and 280 K with the nominal composition (H2O)2H2 and three formula units per

43 manganese(II) hexacyanoferrates(II) with the nominal composition Na2MnFe(CN)6.zH2O (Na2-deltaMnHFC).

44 tification was accurate when compared to the nominal concentration inferred from fluorometer measurem

45 Solutions with nominal concentration of 0.4 and 1.0 M were formed.

46 ted from light with only loss of 9.6% of its nominal concentration within 6 months.

47 igated the stability of dilute (4000 cp/muL, nominal concentration, equivalent to 0.02 ng/mL) DNA sol

48 After the treatments with MWCNTs at nominal concentrations of 0.01 mg/L and 1 mg/L, P. aerug

49 ic matter removal, over a 64 day exposure to nominal concentrations of 10 and 100 mug/L.

50 ng roughly to 1% and 0.1% the chemicals LC50(nominal concentrations of 4.0 and 12.0 mug/L for PCB 136

51 ributed to the remarkably 30-70x higher-than-nominal concentrations of hypothetical new compounds (vi

52 etween cytotoxicity and embryo toxicity when nominal concentrations were used.

53 o 2559 mumol kg(-1) dry weight soil based on nominal concentrations.

54 precise and accurate over multiple days and nominal concentrations.

55 ets of genes containing the causal gene at a nominal confidence level (for example, 90%) that can be

56 Surprisingly, the nominal configuration of the DWs precludes the alternati

57 rit (Hct) values of whole blood samples with nominal content of 28%, 35%, 40%, and 45% Hct on the nrL

58 s study, RDS was able to rapidly identify at nominal cost a substantial number of unaware and viremic

59 Using the nominal cost model could produce a net benefit of $278.1

60 approach, are projected to be less with the nominal cost model, amounting to $16.9 billion in 2015-3

61 ge populations for this genetic variant with nominal costs.

62 referred method honest estimation results in nominal coverage for 90% confidence intervals, whereas c

63 easured densities were 18-24% lower than the nominal density of metallic silver, with an overall mean

64 ferences between numerical simulations using nominal designed properties and experimental analysis of

65 ochannels possess a tubular profile 70 nm in nominal diameter and fabricated through thermal reflow o

66 ties of engineered silver nanoparticles with nominal diameters of 30, 60, 75, and 100 nm were measure

67 n the AMA-BRS when overexpanded 1.3 mm above nominal dilatation values ( approximately 48%) and lower

68 All nominal dollars were adjusted for inflation by convertin

69 )I activity approximately 30% lower than the nominal dose appears to strike an appropriate balance be

70 mproves the match between SPECT/CT-based and nominal dose distributions.

71 e H7N9 vaccine was given on days 0 and 21 at nominal doses of 3.75 microg, 7.5 microg, 15 microg, and

72 s (C(free)) and embryos (C(int;aq)) based on nominal effect concentrations (C(nom)).

73 improving perioperative outcomes may have a nominal effect on reducing these costs.

74 ed with 10 wt% molybdenum that has different nominal enrichments of 0.20 and 19.75% (235)U, respectiv

75 rotective role for mast cells in exposure to nominal environmental allergens.

76 observed in the expression of genes with top nominal eQTL association p-values < 10-7.

77 at P < 5.0 x 10(-8) in meta-analysis with a nominal evidence (P < .05) in each scan were considered

78 We observed nominal evidence at an observed p < 0.05 using either GR

79 ever, in a locus-by-locus analysis, we found nominal evidence for positive selection at 14 of the loc

80 In the meta-analysis of the Swedish cohorts, nominal evidence of a 3-way interaction (WGRSTGxBMIxsex)

81 on time outdoors, however 5 variants showed nominal evidence of interactions with nearwork (top vari

82 0.9 billion, $262.6 billion)/birth cohort at nominal exchange rates, and $616.5 billion (95% CI: $365

83 truction of domain sizes commensurate with a nominal exciton diffusion length of order 10 nm.

84 Nominal expression was detected in internal organs.

85 se the whole-cell currents in the absence of nominal extracellular Ca(2+), whereas PS produced an inh

86 g gene-gene associations while maintaining a nominal false discovery rate.

87 . sensitivity or recall) with maintenance of nominal false positive and false discovery rates compare

88 , can include covariates, and also maintains nominal false positive and false discovery rates in its

89 groups, and/or have issues with maintaining nominal false positive and false discovery rates.

90 For a nominal familywise error rate of 5%, the parametric stat

91 te out the magnetic excitations derived from nominal Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) states.

92 isomers for each cluster size have the same nominal geometry but differ in the arrangement of their

93 tion about the condition, thereby ending the nominal goal of value-neutral counseling and setting the

94 alue of lifetime societal costs, and 10-year nominal government expenditures.

95 The top short-term priorities identified by nominal group technique culminating in formal voting wer

96 A modified nominal group technique was used to gain the final conse

97 ted with nitrogen uptake under conditions of nominal herbivory.

98 79 years) in the pooled cohort, the ratio of nominal HRs for all-cause mortality was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.

99 compared observations and simulations of the nominal (i.e. observed) C budget to simulations of alter

100 conclude that variation in APOL1 G3 makes a nominal, if any, contribution to ESRD in African America

101 nti-VEGF switching studies: stable vision or nominal improvements in vision with continued substantia

102 sub-millimeter resolution, however, is only nominal in nature as a number of factors limit the spati

103 biome associations were modest for T2D, with nominal increases in Escherichia/Shigella.

104 Tumor cells require nominal increases in protein synthesis in order to maint

105 Variants with nominal interaction associations in the discovery analys

106 r dynamics, the Laplacian eigenvalues of the nominal interconnections, and the variance and location

107 ing for twenty minutes measuring spatial and nominal knowledge was taken immediately after the learni

108 specific subacutely toxic Cd concentrations (nominal LC1; E. cyaneus: 18 nM (2.0 mug L(-1)); E. verru

109 Acute 48-h nominal LC50 values for penta- and octabromodiphenyl eth

110 (misleading significance) rate very near the nominal level across 100 distinct null settings in which

111 rejection percentages that are closer to the nominal level in almost every situation, and it is recom

112 Both loci were successfully replicated at a nominal level of significance (P < 0.05).

113 not in the other genes, were associated at a nominal level with an increased risk of exacerbations in

114 s characteristically less than the specified nominal level, and confidence interval evaluation by any

115 and diabetes traits were significant at the nominal level, including those between genetically deter

116 show that type I error is controlled at the nominal level, the statistical power of identifying asso

117 he expected number of false positives at the nominal level, while the two current moderated methods f

118 nd ARMS2 risk alleles (P < 0.0001) and, at a nominal level, with C3 risk alleles (P = 0.04) and CFH r

119 ed number of false positives properly at the nominal level.

120 control the false positive error rate at the nominal level.

121 he type I error (false positive) rate at the nominal level.

122 perly control the false positive rate at the nominal level.

123 3.3; 95% CI, 1.61-7.05), and 2 loci reached nominal levels of significance (deletions at 2q11.2: 6 [

124 orts, n = 3,187), 100% of CpGs gave at least nominal levels of significance, far more than expected b

125 PairedFB is able to control FDR close to the nominal levels.

126 time PCRs, particularly when plotted against nominal log10 IU values.

127 Single-level and multilevel multi-nominal logistic regression models and Lorenz curves wer

128 ikelihood-ratio tests between each specified nominal logistic regression models.

129 emographics, and travel were evaluated using nominal logistic regression.

130 ified 5254 differentially methylated CpGs (p(nominal) < 0.005).

131 Going beyond the nominal M n+1AX n compounds enables not only fine tuning

132 nterfere with ionization or fall at the same nominal m/z.

133 nding on mass resolution, ions with the same nominal m/z.

134 In the study period, the nominal maintenance group had a median time to successfu

135 In three arms, the nominal maintenance model was compared against a "best p

136 /MS experiments with quadrupole isolation at nominal mass (~1 Da).

137 0)-H](-) in the presence of other isobars at nominal mass 393.

138 opes and exchanged deuterium shared the same nominal mass and overlapped at previous resolving powers

139 account whether isotopologues with the same nominal mass are resolved.

140 CD also produced v ions, which have the same nominal mass as the M+1 isotope of the w ion and can onl

141 ability to differentiate ions with the same nominal mass but different elemental composition.

142 Since contaminant isotopologs with the same nominal mass can be resolved using modern mass spectrome

143 ducing an abundant Y1-48 Da ion instead (the nominal mass difference is given relative to the unmodif

144 ease in the number of molecular features per nominal mass due to the WAF isomeric complexity.

145 nce Material (SRM) 2682c Subbituminous Coal (nominal mass fraction 0.5% sulfur).

146 isotopically-labelled peptides of different nominal mass mixed at different concentrations to be use

147 Each of these moieties has a nominal mass of zero and a very small exact mass.

148 and means that different samples of the same nominal material may no longer give rise to the same mea

149 20 years of metal loading, which resulted in nominal metal concentrations of 1450, 100, and 2400 mg k

150 R analysis compared with carbon analyser and nominal methods.

151 The cost of scaling up radiotherapy in the nominal model in 2015-35 is US$26.6 billion in low-incom

152 As nominal models of hydrogenase active sites, these bimeta

153 /calibrants diluted down from standards with nominal mole fractions of 50 mumol/mol.

154 large, reduction-sensitive oligomers with a nominal molecular mass of approximately 400 kDa.

155 separation characteristics of membranes with nominal molecular weight cut-offs (NMWCO) ranging from 3

156 n cellular properties are also seen within a nominal neuronal class and this heterogeneity can be exp

157 group (hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.45-0.95], nominal one-sided p=0.011).

158 ut its rejection percentages depart from the nominal ones (<5%), so its use is not recommended when t

159 Results Binary classification and nominal/ordinal grades showed substantial or better agre

160 This phase is found to coexist with the nominal orthorhombic phase at room temperature, and is b

161 ibits a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at a nominal overpotential of 270 mV in 0.1 m KOH with outsta

162 nto the electrolyte, which verifies that the nominal overpotential reduction from using alkaline elec

163 thesis, when the metabolites were assigned a nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC), we found that

164 ents with baseline SRF versus those without (nominal P < 0.001, for interaction).

165 ally expressed in SAT between the ND and CD (nominal P < 0.01; false discovery rate, 25%).

166 g, alcohol drinking and age at menarche (all nominal P < 0.05).

167 associated with age at first live birth (all nominal P < 0.05).

168 etween overweight/obese and lean groups with nominal P < 0.05, but none was altered with a false disc

169 tology-Self-Report (-7.5 vs -5.8; ES = 0.37, nominal P = .009), Clinical Global Impression-Improvemen

170 -rated MADRS remission rate (36.0% vs 22.0%; nominal P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nomi

171 ly higher for C25 (41.6%) versus D75 (30.9%; nominal P = .037, without multiplicity test adjustment).

172 ient-rated MADRS (-16.2 vs -13.3, ES = 0.28, nominal P = .04), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoma

173 ates were 11.8% (eculizumab) and 29.4% (SOC; nominal P = .048).

174 P = .03) and response rate (50.5% vs 40.4%; nominal P = .13), A 0.5-mg dose of basimglurant MR had n

175 rval, reduction of 0.24 to increase of 1.11; nominal P = .15).

176 the eculizumab and SOC groups, respectively (nominal P = .288).

177 tegrast-treated subjects: ocular discomfort (nominal P = 0.0005) and eye discomfort (nominal, P < 0.0

178 t-treated participants at day 42 in itching (nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P =

179 nominal P = 0.0318), foreign body sensation (nominal P = 0.0418), and eye discomfort (P = 0.0048) ver

180 io [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P=0.03, nominal P value).

181 All nominal P values were less than .001 versus placebo, exc

182 rim analysis, updated data are reported with nominal p values.

183 and the results are provided with two-sided, nominal p values.

184 month 60 was also reduced for tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.001).

185 ta-1a qw (nominal p<0.05) and tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.001); T2 and T1 hypointense lesion volume ch

186 was lower for sc IFN beta-1a tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.01).

187 6 candidate SNPs, 2 in ACVRL1 and MMP3 had a nominal p<0.05 in the replication cohort.

188 e lesions were lower with sc IFN beta-1a qw (nominal p<0.05) and tiw versus DT (nominal p<0.001); T2

189 6 SNPs had a nominal p<0.1 in the replication cohort and map to intro

190 S (nominal p=0.01 for 150 mg vs placebo, and nominal p=0.0002 for 300 mg vs placebo).

191 4%) of nine at week 12 in the placebo group (nominal p=0.0008); and the difference between the groups

192 a difference of 7.8 (2.9 to 12.8; two-sided nominal p=0.0020).

193 olymerization and dendritic spine formation (nominal P=0.0031).

194 tinum-etoposide (HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.62-0.91]; nominal p=0.0032); median overall survival was 12.9 mont

195 ticularly diarrhoea as measured by the BSFS (nominal p=0.01 for 150 mg vs placebo, and nominal p=0.00

196 ndard of care (hazard ratio 0.80, 0.65-0.98; nominal p=0.0161).

197 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.90; nominal P=0.02).

198 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI 0.55-0.96]; nominal p=0.025, which did not meet the required thresho

199 ients with BRCAm (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.41-0.94] nominal p=0.025; 34.9 months [95% CI 29.2-54.6] vs 30.2

200 zard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.97; two-sided nominal p=0.029).

201 -41.24% [95% CI -79.28 to -3.20] vs placebo, nominal p=0.03) but not the 150 mg group (-14.32% [-54.3

202 qw 40.7% (nominal p=0.084 vs DT); tiw 39.2% (nominal p=0.032 vs DT).

203 placebo (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.03-3.06, nominal P=0.039).

204 1 year; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-6.13; nominal P=0.043).

205 ved complete cytogenic response at 6 months (nominal p=0.058).

206 o significant treatment difference (log-rank nominal p=0.063) through week 96 was observed in time to

207 probability of CDMS was: DT 44.6%; qw 40.7% (nominal p=0.084 vs DT); tiw 39.2% (nominal p=0.032 vs DT

208 2 weeks was -38.22% (90% CI -95.73 to 19.29; nominal p=0.18); the difference in change in Marsh score

209 CA wild-type were HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.55-1.24, nominal p=0.37; 24.5 months [19.8-35.0] for those treate

210 the 150 mg group (-14.32% [-54.39 to 25.74], nominal p=0.47).

211 in change in GSRS score was -0.14 (SE 0.19; nominal p=0.48).

212 CD ratio was 10.67% (95% CI -38.97 to 60.31; nominal p=0.66); and the difference in change in total i

213 yte count was -12.73% (95% CI -77.57-52.12); nominal p=0.69).

214 from baseline was 0.09% (95% CI -1.60-1.90; nominal p=0.92); the difference in VHCD ratio was 10.67%

215 ort (nominal P = 0.0005) and eye discomfort (nominal, P < 0.0001).

216 A survival analysis stratified nominal paclitaxel dose by low, mid, and upper terciles;

217 is simply evaluated using the PP model using nominal parameters for microscopic quantities such as th

218 g spectra of polystyrene suspensions, with a nominal particle size ranging from 0.1 to 12 mum in diam

219 detailed in situ measurements, to determine nominal plant C budgets.

220 by an inductively heated argon plasma with a nominal plasma frequency of 2.65 GHz.

221 hy during hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps at nominal plasma glucose concentrations of 90, 75, 60, and

222 ed in a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR; nominal pore size 0.04 mum): (i) attachment of virus to

223 lts in a four-dimensional data set including nominal precursor ion mass, product ion mobility, accura

224 fter inoculation with attenuated virus vs. a nominal protein antigen supports the use of the salivary

225 Although orally introducing nominal protein antigens is known to induce such pTreg c

226 ed that the MR group performed poorly in the nominal questions compared to the other groups; however,

227 d at the sites in Alabama and Mississippi at nominal rates of 56000 and 42000 ng/m(2) day(-1) in the

228 ork is to ensure high-fidelity tracking of a nominal representation in this latent space in an energy

229 mages ((31)P MRI) of teeth are obtained at a nominal resolution of 0.5 mm in less than 15 minutes usi

230 ceptor 1 (IFNLR1) has been determined at the nominal resolution of 2.1A.

231 determined by cryo-electron microscopy at a nominal resolution of 4.5 angstroms.

232 ltivariate decoders can be as precise as the nominal resolution of single voxels (here 0.8 mm isotrop

233 ametric permutation test is found to produce nominal results for voxelwise as well as clusterwise inf

234 After nominal return of intraocular pressure, focal defects in

235 CpG sites meeting nominal significance (P < 0.05) for each outcome were co

236 located at the promoter region, also showed nominal significance (P < 0.05) in fluoxetine group.

237 f tubulin-folding cofactor D (TBCD) obtained nominal significance (P<0.01) in single SNP analysis.

238 ted at Bonferroni significance and 7 loci at nominal significance (P<0.05 with concordant direction o

239 nes replicated in both directionality and at nominal significance (P<0.05) in an independent post-mor

240 s, including approximately 50% that achieved nominal significance and approximately 75% that continue

241 Two SNPs showed nominal significance for interaction (p < 0.05) between

242 ximately 0.30; P < 0.001), but did not reach nominal significance for participants with no retinopath

243 as the outcome, in DR3/4 subjects, there was nominal significance for two SNPs: rs17615 in CD21 [HR 1

244 d-p < 0.002) and in heart (p < 0.0125), with nominal significance identified in brain, thyroid, lung,

245 ld across all cohorts, while 49 OTUs achieve nominal significance in at least one replication sample.

246 were mainly non-coding and reached at least nominal significance in classical GWAS.

247 0% were directionally consistent and reached nominal significance in the validation cohort.

248 for the interaction test) and replicated at nominal significance level (P=0.013) in SMC5.

249 The new test maintains the nominal significance level and can be adapted to test hy

250 Adopting a cFDR nominal significance level of 0.05, 287 loci were identi

251 in time to final report was determined at a nominal significance level of 5%.

252 roni correction and another 12 replicated at nominal significance level.

253 .39 [95% CI, .14-1.07] in the 2-dose group; nominal significance of combined suptavumab group vs pla

254 1.69 [95% CI, .92-3.08] in the 2-dose group; nominal significance of combined suptavumab group vs pla

255 nts at eight loci have demonstrated at least nominal significance with other metabolic traits in prio

256 all 3 loci, although rs35991305 did not meet nominal significance.

257 5% were directionally consistent and reached nominal significance.

258 sted and 11 SNPs (8 independent SNPs) showed nominal significant association with high-density lipopr

259 In the fully adjusted model, a nominal significant interaction between SSB intake categ

260 We detected nominal significant interactions between PRS and dietary

261 a miniprotein) conformational changes, with nominal simulation times ranging from nanoseconds to mic

262 method, surface charge (zeta-potential), nor nominal size had any influence in the observed biologica

263 mn with either Ag(0), Ag2S, CuO or CuS ENMs (nominal sizes of 4.67 +/- 1.4, 18.1 +/- 3.2, 31.1 +/- 12

264 hown by negligible effect on skin integrity, nominal skin irritation potential and cytotoxicity.

265 le image quality with 1.5 mm x 1.5 mm x 2-mm nominal spatial resolution and 6-minute predictable imag

266 D maps of N-acetylaspartate and lactate at a nominal spatial resolution of 2.0 x 3.0 x 3.0 mm3 with n

267 arine Canyon (California), resembles the two nominal species from Sweden.

268 The genus and two nominal species were described from the west coast of Sw

269 isplacements (0.1-0.3 mum per sarcomere) and nominal speeds (0.4 and 0.8 mum/s).

270 nce vessel diameter (RVD) was calculated as (nominal stent diameter-RVD)/RVDx100 (%).

271 ing C/Zr to samples are determined either by nominal stochiometric ratios or combustion carbon analys

272 es) than nature, fully reversibly and with a nominal stoichiometry that mimics nature.

273 In the intervention, GPs were paid a nominal sum for setting up searches of records, reimburs

274 xtends the locus of neuromodulation from the nominal target to afferent brain regions.

275 ra, coalescent analyses recovered almost all nominal taxa as "species".

276 pillary part, (v) inter/extrapolation to the nominal temperature, (vi) internal standard-based correc

277 Most differences were nominal (that is, relative difference <10%).

278 ts show that self-organized In seeds of 5 nm nominal thickness give rise to the best separation and t

279 ks of single crystal sheets of CaCO3, with a nominal thickness of 17 A, the same as a unit-cell dimen

280 A), interleaved with amorphous carbon with a nominal thickness of 8 A.

281 deposited Ag nanoparticles on ITO by varying nominal thicknesses, and post annealing was carried out

282 me effect direction and are significant at a nominal threshold.

283 l moments, which seem to be at odds with the nominal valence of Ru(5+) in the [Formula: see text] con

284 y an escalation to forces higher than 43 pN (nominal value).

285 eviation of nanoparticle size and shape from nominal value, significantly influences GNR heat generat

286 em to be at least 50% lower than the current nominal value, which is outside its present error bars.

287 adherin is lower than dsDNA unzipping force (nominal value: 12 pN) during initial cadherin-mediated c

288 .0 (5.0-10.5) when overexpanded 1.0 mm above nominal values ( approximately 34%).

289 ed in the Amaranth BRS group at 1.3 mm above nominal values ( approximately 48% overexpansion).

290 The relationship between the nominal values of standards and the measured values vari

291 lts were compared in a pairwise fashion with nominal values provided by each manufacturer.

292 ppeared to have a much better correlation to nominal values than did the other two.

293 Quantitative accuracy (compared to nominal values) and variability were determined based on

294 o distinct tension levels: 12-54 piconewton (nominal values) tensions generated during platelet adhes

295 e to accurately measure (to within 1% Hct of nominal values) whole blood Hct in ~10-20 s after sample

296 better agreement between SPECT/CT-based and nominal values, considerable discrepancies remain.

297 e oxidation states that are lower than their nominal values, suggesting the existence of oxygen defic

298 with various magnitudes of bias compared to nominal values.

299 were serially diluted into 25-ml samples to nominal viral loads ranging from 39 to <0.5 copies (cp)/

300 a prove the identity of synthetic (-)-1 with nominal xestocyclamine, but the spectra differ from thos