ライフサイエンスコーパス: non-significant

1 lly transmitted in 28 (50.9%) pedigrees (P = non-significant).

2 for both DSP (80%) and PKP2 (91%) groups (P=non-significant).

3 5, 0.64 and 1.17, respectively (all p values non-significant).

4 predicted MIP and VC were less strong (both non-significant).

5 confidence interval 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant).

6 se subgroups (42.5% vs 49.6% respectively; p=non-significant).

7 ume, and mitral valve leaflet lengths (all P=non-significant).

8 rocumab versus control (interaction P-values non-significant).

9 time-dependent covariate, all hazards became non-significant.

10 scale-dependent, and were generally weak or non-significant.

11 all other differences in adverse events were non-significant.

12 g glucose and insulin the association became non-significant.

13 ternal linkage across the region was weak or non-significant.

14 ion with pro-inflammatory gene expression to non-significant.

15 ratio (HR) of developing T2D was similar and non-significant.

16 tion reported for these disorders is low and non-significant.

17 in KCCQ-TSS and CHQ-SAS dyspnoea score were non-significant.

18 sical or sensory disability only were mostly non-significant.

19 and the association of sex with dementia was non-significant.

20 ated, but differences between SB and TB were non-significant.

21 t circumference with risk of meningioma were non-significant.

22 Bay variant in the field trait were weak or non-significant.

23 zed models and those of PSG is statistically non-significant.

24 ing associations for IL-1RA or TGF-beta were non-significant.

25 cardiovascular events and mortality remained non-significant.

26 h outliers resulted in this difference being non-significant.

27 receiving tenofovir alafenamide alone became non-significant (1.15, 0.96-1.38).

28 06), whereas CRT alone was associated with a non-significant 14.5% reduction (p = 0.33).

29 In the developing world, we found a non-significant 2 point decline (90% UI -9 to 4) in the

30 In the 600 mg group (86, 4.12 [SE 1.19]), a non-significant 22% reduction (95% CI -21.3 to 49.7; p=0

31 non-significant 58% decrease in C(max) and a non-significant 30% increase in AUC.

32 tin use during 3 years was associated with a non-significant 37% reduced tooth loss rate in the year

33 use during last sexual intercourse showed a non-significant 4.3% increase for females and a signific

34 t 7.5 mg/kg previously, CLA-ER resulted in a non-significant 58% decrease in C(max) and a non-signifi

35 3 [0.37-0.77]; I(2)=78.2%; three studies), a non-significant 6% lower risk of cancer incidence (HR 0.

36 Overall, there was a non-significant 7% (95% CI -6% to 19%; p=0.29) reduction

37 llele of the EGF gene showed a statistically non-significant, 78% increased risk of HCC compared with

38 ischaemic heart disease (0.91, 0.85-0.98), a non-significant 9% lower risk of ischaemic stroke (0.91,

39 0.5%) allocated to avoid GCS, resulting in a non-significant absolute reduction in risk of 0.5% (95%

40 credibility classes of evidence (I to IV and non-significant) according to established criteria, comp

41 size of metformin on the primary outcome was non-significant (adjusted mean difference -0.029, 95% CI

42 gnitude (approximately 6%) but statistically non-significant (adjusted PR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.97-1.16; p

43 and topiramate (0.64 [0.52-0.79]), and had a non-significant advantage compared with oxcarbazepine (1

44 (0.75 [0.63-0.90]), and estimates suggest a non-significant advantage for carbamazepine against lamo

45 Similar but marginally non-significant adverse effects were recorded for laser

46 d after adjusting for confounders and became non-significant after additionally adjusting for fatness

47 vs 81.3%, p = 0.004) but this difference was non-significant after adjustment for confounders.

48 s III or IV (p < 0.05); pacing mode remained non-significant after adjustment for these factors (p =

49 gnificant association (q-value </=0.05) were non-significant after adjustment using our model.

50 lative risks: 1.09 to 1.12), but class 2 was non-significant after adjustment.

51 .63, P = 0.042) with meningioma risk, albeit non-significant after correction for multiple testing.

52 Case-control differences in adults were non-significant (all p>0.03).

53 As the primary endpoint was non-significant, all secondary endpoints were considered

54 nificant among insulin users (P = .0154) and non-significant among metformin users (P = .5853).

55 al or memory-related cognitive function were non-significant and in opposing directions for DHCR7 and

56 erial contrast enhancement parameters showed non-significant and mostly negligible correlations.

57 e the difference in the primary endpoint was non-significant and the number of patients in the trial

58 Naspm produced a non-significant ( approximately 10%) attenuation of elec

59 ANES I (OR=0.36; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.96) and a non-significant association in NHANES III (OR=0.73; 95%

60 ceptual speed -0.12 [0.04], p=0.0012), and a non-significant association was noted for visuospatial a

61 We also observed non-significant associations with lead exposure for canc

62 310] EU-wide), although the effect size was non-significant at all ages (0.49%, -0.04 to 1.02), and

63 atio [RR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.99; p=0.0307), non-significant at alpha of 0.025.

64 nfants surviving without neuroimpairment was non-significant at the primary endpoint, timing of deliv

65 se from Calgary were associated with a wide, non-significant Bayesian credible interval.

66 nts alone, computer-generated doses led to a non-significant benefit in all INR ranges (p=0.06), wher

67 s significant in females (p < 0.001), with a non-significant benefit in males (p = 0.07).

68 Current published trials suggest a small, non-significant benefit of omega-3 FAs for major depress

69 Differences in viral loads were non-significant between unvaccinated and fully vaccinate

70 In addition, we found a non-significant but intriguing trend for male-sterile pl

71 36), though on multivariate analysis, only a non-significant but strong trend toward decreased mortal

72 n high-intensity systems species losses were non-significant but yield gains were substantial (+15.2%

73 .71-0.88, p<0.001) and a possible slight but non-significant cardiac mortality benefit (0.89, 0.78-1.

74 PSC in the following phases 23/67 due to the non-significant change of TPSC in these phases.

75 H-RSA of the radiated millet flour exhibited non-significant changes (p<0.05).

76 Results showed non-significant changes for degrees Brix, pH, water acti

77 indings from four of the five studies showed non-significant changes in overall dementia occurrence.

78 Besides, sonication treatment imparted non-significant changes in polyphenoloxidase activity an

79 Non-significant changes were measured in the striatal ex

80 on, and on average 33% (range 13-43) for the non-significant comparisons.

81 the leg, while mechanoreceptors exhibited a non-significant contribution in both patients and contro

82 th time in the cortex (r(2)=0.545; p=0.015), non-significant correlation in the thalamus (r(2)=0.326)

83 orbidities, we generally observed weaker and non-significant correlations between climate and AA flar

84 upon NIR laser irradiation, while it showed non-significant cytotoxicity without.

85 smoke-free vehicle legislation, there was a non-significant decline in the slope for monthly emergen

86 ontraction strain showed a similar, although non-significant decrease (42.8+/-10.6% versus 39.3+/-8.3

87 So also, lycopene content exhibited a non-significant decrease after UV-C treatment.

88 d liposomal doxorubicin showed a minimal and non-significant decrease in LVEF with no change in HR or

89 Ferric derisomaltose was associated with a non-significant decrease in mean F2-isoprostane and no e

90 ificant effects on locomotion and produced a non-significant decrease in rearing.

91 National BMI change for women ranged from non-significant decreases in 19 countries to increases o

92 eptor availability, however, showed mild and non-significant decreases in HIV patients.

93 n's group areas, for years 2 and 3, we noted non-significant decreases in NMR (odds ratio 0.93, 0.64-

94 -determined parasitemia in the PZQ arm and a non-significant decreasing trend in the placebo group (r

95 Non significant degradation was observed in vitamin D2 d

96 Dry-land strength presented non-significant difference (p < 0.05) between the domina

97 g different parameters, baseline data showed non-significant difference between injected eye group an

98 ans FAs during processing and storage showed non-significant difference in all goshtaba products (P >

99 nd CVD risk (2.4% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.03), and a non-significant difference in IGR prevalence.

100 in the community as a whole as shown by the non-significant difference in incidence among infants.

101 Exposure to Cd, non-significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed, in

102 amples collected on days 14, 21, and 30 with non-significant differences among the three groups.

103 er adjustment for baseline score, there were non-significant differences between groups of -4.1 (95%

104 ective health measures, with most indicating non-significant differences between the Conversation Map

105 Concerning fat embolism, non-significant differences could be established between

106 vanone activity was pronounced, resulting in non-significant differences in antioxidant activity betw

107 There were non-significant differences in blood glucose concentrati

108 ; 1.40 [1.09-1.80], p=0.0090) with BVS, with non-significant differences in cardiac mortality.

109 However, the results showed non-significant differences in most data obtained after

110 versus 9.6 +/- 6.3 pg/mL, P < 0.0001) while non-significant differences were observed with IL-10 (2.

111 d anatomical division revealed statistically non-significant differences.

112 andardized beta = -0.348, P = 0.008); (ii) a non-significant direct effect of periventricular white m

113 At baseline conditions, a weak, non-significant, direct relationship was found between F

114 : 56% of patients were asymptomatic, 24% had non-significant disability, maintaining independency, 16

115 There was an initial (non-significant) drop in impedance at week 1, followed b

116 non-interdependent tasks (d = 0.108), and a non-significant effect in interdependent tasks (d = -0.0

117 .427 to +0.013, Z = -7.250, p < .0001) and a non-significant effect of hydrophobic statins (WMD: -0.1

118 We found a modest and non-significant effect of tDCS on clinical outcome over

119 ype not phenotype had a small, statistically non-significant effect on 28-day adherence to NRT.

120 n the treadmill had a smaller, statistically non-significant effect on AHN.

121 n and control arms, respectively, yielding a non-significant effect on CVD incidence rate (1.92 and 2

122 Conversely, smaller, non-significant effect sizes occurred when a remission d

123 Three cancers showed a positive but non-significant effect: breast h(2) g = 0.13 (0-0.56); g

124 Importantly, we report consistent non-significant effects for all 14 interactions between

125 ion with persistent variability, this led to non-significant effects of injury on all remaining neuro

126 Combined with the non-significant effects on other ACCORD outcomes, and in

127 ne effluxes into cortical superfusates, with non-significant effects on the efflux of glycine, glutam

128 However, non-significant effects were observed on risk of aspirat

129 roved; however, this effect rested on both a non-significant enhancement and diminution of 2-back and

130 effect size (ES) was small and statistically non-significant (ES 0.27; 95% confidence interval [95% C

131 all ASR performance score, the reduction was non-significant (ES=-0.1, p=0.59).

132 her three subscales of the PAI-BOR (42.7% vs non-significant estimates for self-harm, negative relati

133 out a perspective shift produced smaller and non-significant estimates.

134 nd hypoperfused contacts mainly demonstrated non-significant evoked responses.

135 ts show no evidence of population structure (non-significant F(ST) < 0.001) for M. alfredi along this

136 Using only non-significant features it is still often possible to t

137 omplementary capabilities for distinguishing non-significant fibrosis from significant fibrosis.

138 Possible explanations for this non-significant finding include that the pressure ulcer

139 for HCMV (OR = 4.6; 95% CI = 0.9, 22.7), and non-significant for A. actinomycetemcomitans (OR = 2.0;

140 al risk for GCA was 2.14, 2.40 for women and non-significant for men.

141 pend on creating lists of 'significant' and 'non-significant' genes based on ad hoc significance cuto

142 Despite non-significant genetic correlation (r(g) = -0.0148, P =

143 d but previous studies have reported weak or non-significant genetic correlations and five shared ris

144 ies focused on combining myriad individually non-significant genetic effects.

145 for a diagnosis of IPF, as validated by the non-significant greater prognostic separation of an IPF

146 spite this, controlling for phylogeny yields non-significant group-level results for plants, suggesti

147 dosage's association with CVD-mortality was non-significant (HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.35-1.03, p = 0.065)

148 er hospitalizations, however, the effect was non-significant (HR=1.03, 95% CI=1.00-1.06, p=0.061).

149 reversibility of 12% or greater, we noted a non-significant improvement in asthma exacerbation rate

150 We found a modest but non-significant improvement in prediction with BMI [r(2)

151 eference with RG7713 (ES=0.8, p=0.047) and a non-significant improvement in the composite score (ES=0

152 Numerical, albeit non-significant, improvement in acute exacerbations of C

153 mpact on lentiviral vector yields, but small non-significant improvements could be combined to increa

154 BMI, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were non-significant in all models.

155 xpression and microbial alpha-diversity were non-significant in c.1414G > A (p.Asp472Asn) carriers.

156 test in the hand muscles, smaller in FDS and non-significant in EDC, irrespective of whether stimulat

157 Results remained non-significant in multivariable models adjusting for ty

158 (GDP) per person (-0.055, p=0.0009) becomes non-significant in the presence of norm-related measures

159 roup was found, while the association became non-significant in those with higher education (P for AC

160 e distant metastasis had a 27% statistically non-significant increase (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.88-1.83).

161 L, respectively, and we recorded a small and non-significant increase for haemoglobin A1c (0.04% [-0.

162 plus cyclic progestin was associated with a non-significant increase in coronary heart disease event

163 ith software 2 showing a slightly higher but non-significant increase in detection rates.

164 nts (6.7%vs 8.2% per year, p<0.0001), with a non-significant increase in haemorrhagic stroke but redu

165 previous IS, statins were associated with a non-significant increase in ICH (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.96 to

166 ased with age in females (p = 0.029), with a non-significant increase in males (p = 0.092).

167 s a percentage of the averaged zonal area, a non-significant increase in new input from the body was

168 -90; p=0.005), but this was accompanied by a non-significant increase in perinatal and infant mortali

169 se analogues had no effect on the modest and non-significant increase in phrenic nerve discharge evok

170 (400 um) applied to the cytoplasm produced a non-significant increase in spark frequency and reduced

171 Significant decrease in the SH content and non-significant increase in SS content was observed at h

172 ROC curve analysis revealed a slight, non-significant increase in the area under the curve for

173 e of haemorrhagic stroke and a 6% (-7 to 18) non-significant increase in the incidence of ischaemic s

174 ent per 1000 patients treated [75-206] and a non-significant increase in the number dead (nine per 10

175 ded significant improvements in PASI75 and a non-significant increase in the proportion of patients w

176 ar after cessation of treatment, there was a non-significant increase in the risks of APTC endpoints.

177 of the DLPFC (Cohen's d = 0.81) as well as a non-significant increase in this ratio for the DLPFC as

178 context was associated with a statistically non-significant increase in total expenditures (average

179 0% to 29%; p=0.054) in southern Africa and a non-significant increase of 3% (-0.9 to 16; p=0.618) in

180 in vivo within first 120 h though there is a non-significant increase of active caspase 3 at 120 h.

181 A non-significant increase of similar magnitude in hepator

182 ble solids, and titratable acidity exhibited non-significant increase up to 30min of exposure time.

183 ed by a significant reduction (P < 0.05) and non-significant increase, respectively, of alpha4 and al

184 CI, 1.13 to 2.15), as well as a possible but non-significant increased risk of myocardial infarction

185 They also reported non-significant increases in maximum intensity, duration

186 Non-significant increases in parasite clearance half-lif

187 [95% CI 1.02-2.07], p=0.04), due in part to non-significant increases in peri-procedural myocardial

188 ith infants; and small, mostly statistically non-significant, increases in parental psychological dis

189 There was a modest but non-significant inverse association with aspirin use and

190 A non-significant inverse relationship was observed betwee

191 Non-significant J-shaped curves were found in sub-analys

192 Among people >/=60 y (n = 2990) there was a non-significant 'J'-shaped association.

193 ith significant (p<0.05) model F-value and a non-significant lack of fit.

194 Although at a non-significant level, DNAm changes in genes previously

195 being more likely in CPs with significant vs non-significant levels of kin structure.

196 co-admistration reduced all connectivity to non-significant levels, and, like phMRI measures of morp

197 Parametric linkage analysis gave a non-significant LOD score of 0.31 (theta; = 0.33) for th

198 ormalized dwell time analyses yielded mostly non-significant main effects of the environment, indicat

199 with stability of endothelial cell count and non-significant morphological changes.

200 as 53 +/- 3.2 (n = 47), 51 +/- 3.2 (n = 35) (non-significant, ns), and 33 +/- 1.9 (n = 32) (p < 0.01)

201 52 +/- 2.1 (n = 46) and 54 +/- 1.9 (n = 38) (non-significant, ns), respectively, whereas in old wild-

202 In the same 25 patients, 34 CAV lesions with non-significant obstructions were identified as referenc

203 ecancerous lesions, although an elevated but non-significant odds ratio (OR) for gastric precancerous

204 Comparable, but non-significant, odds ratios were observed in analyses o

205 8%, RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94), and, albeit non-significant, of 30-day mortality (0.46% vs 0.64%, RR

206 ensibility and body satisfaction were either non-significant or had small effect sizes.

207 h positive association in some subgroups and non-significant or negative association in other subgrou

208 Nitrogen addition exerted non-significant or negative effects on ECE when precipit

209 ffects on health behaviors, mostly reporting non-significant or positive findings.

210 her odds of being fully reported compared to non-significant outcomes (range of odds ratios: 2.2 to 4

211 s, whereas mature data yielded statistically non-significant overall survival findings for 24 (63%) i

212 ment difference 0.14 (95% CI -0.02 to 0.30), non-significant (p=0.0876).

213 d in detail, including misinterpretation of "non-significant" p-values as evidence for the null hypot

214 t specific cell-surface proteins, although a non-significant pattern toward increased total FimA-spec

215 a positive, a hump-shaped, a U-shaped and a non-significant pattern, depending on assembly sequence.

216 es when applied during subjective day, while non-significant phase shifts were seen after 5-HT applic

217 nce and exploration rate, despite a weak and non-significant phenotypic correlation.

218 easures (n = 7)(I2 = 78.8%) and a modest but non-significant pooled estimate (MRR1.14,95%CI 0.95-1.37

219 Regression analyses showed a non-significant positive correlation between cortical th

220 A non-significant positive correlation was observed betwee

221 d significant, while safety climate became a non-significant predictor of mortality odds (OR 0.940, p

222 A higher non-significant prevalence of periodontitis was found in

223 relative risks except one indicated modest, non-significant protective effects.

224 Statin use, overall, was a non-significant protective factor for CRC (OR 0.84; 95%C

225 Both significant and non-significant Psex (probability of sexual reproduction

226 ages is revised to 0.38 when considering the non-significant rate reduction in the control villages.

227 HbA1C showed a small, non significant reduction after dog allocation.

228 in GI, a significant reduction in PI, and a non-significant reduction in GBI.

229 In the ITT population, a non-significant reduction in incidence of bacteraemia wa

230 ion in men with HIV (0.38, 0.18-0.81), and a non-significant reduction in incident syphilis in men wi

231 ion in degree of anaemia between groups, and non-significant reduction in RBC transfusion in the rest

232 schaemic stroke was associated with a small, non-significant reduction in risk of death at 3 years, b

233 = 93.9%) and, with a similar, statistically non-significant reduction in sensitization (RR = 0.78; 9

234 onatal mortality (0.77, 0.65-0.90), and a 9% non-significant reduction in stillbirths (0.91, 0.79-1.0

235 type 2 diabetes was associated with a small, non-significant reduction in the incidence of cardiovasc

236 ion of symptoms was 12.8 years (SD: 15.3), a non-significant reduction of 0.6 years (95% CI: -2, 0.8;

237 By contrast, small non-significant reductions (p>0.05) were noted in the co

238 aplotypes, AGC and GGC, were associated with non-significant reductions in breast cancer risk, and th

239 s in the plasma plus standard care group had non-significant reductions in days in hospital (median 6

240 dentate gyrus molecular layer, with smaller, non-significant reductions in the CA1 and CA3 regions.

241 aRR] = 1.02, 95% CI 0.36-2.91, p = 0.97) and non-significant reductions in the TPR (26.5% pre-interve

242 nce done in Stockholm and Rotterdam reported non-significant reductions.

243 The results showed non-significant relationship between tasking measures an

244 ts while rare species tend to have weaker or non-significant relationships.

245 ment these OR reduced to 1.41 and 1.38 (both non-significant), respectively.

246 HR are non-significant results.

247 isms were also associated with increased but non-significant risk of CAL.

248 d with low heterogeneity and a statistically non-significant risk of small study bias, resulting in a

249 ective, single-arm, multicenter, open-label, non-significant risk trial that evaluated the safety and

250 tionated heparin (0.81 [0.61-1.08]) led to a non-significant shift towards worse modified Rankin Scal

251 Compared with ASC alone, we noted a small, non-significant survival benefit for ASC plus chemothera

252 Patients on minocycline also had non-significant tendencies towards faster decline in FVC

253 r of FoxP3(+) Tregs in both locations showed non-significant tendencies towards poor prognosis.

254 There was a non-significant tendency for hours worked to be reduced

255 In addition, there was a non-significant tendency for statin users to bleed less

256 trategy equilibrium, participants revealed a non-significant tendency to over-select Rock.

257 A non-significant tendency was found for vibration-induced

258 There was a clear, although non-significant, tendency to increased regeneration in t

259 between direct and indirect strategies were non-significant, the difference in favour of direct inte

260 Although non- significant, there was an increasing trend in the m

261 Given the predominantly non-significant to weak evidence levels, further studies

262 le male growth during the fall and a similar non-significant trend among adult males, and (3) spatial

263 A non-significant trend for higher levels of monocytic cEP

264 There was a non-significant trend for higher numbers of new enhancin

265 ut atherosclerotic lesion size showed only a non-significant trend for reduction.

266 A non-significant trend in annual asthma exacerbation rate

267 There was a non-significant trend of increased diversity with urbani

268 body mass in exclosures resulted from: (1) a non-significant trend of increased survival of large mal

269 es in cortical NE and 5-HT while producing a non-significant trend to increase cortical levels of nor

270 There is a non-significant trend to shorter time in the operating t

271 ard swallowing therapy was associated with a non-significant trend toward a reduction in death (0.80,

272 eographic location and study quality, with a non-significant trend towards a dose-response relationsh

273 he antioxidant enzyme peroxiredoxin-V, and a non-significant trend towards decreased manganese supero

274 There was a non-significant trend towards fewer distant metastases i

275 A non-significant trend towards higher MCM rate with incre

276 IL-12 caused a non-significant trend towards improvement in airway hype

277 Furthermore, there was a non-significant trend towards less rescue medication use

278 ittent hypoxia (P < 0.05), and a similar but non-significant trend was observed after sustained hypox

279 A non-significant trend was observed for group II versus g

280 A non-significant trend was recorded between c-erbB3 level

281 Intensive BP-lowering treatment showed a (non-significant) trend for an association with lower 3-m

282 P area, the southern part showed a downward (non-significant) trend in direct obstetric mortality (0.

283 concentration in leaves with a similar, but non-significant, trend for inflorescences.

284 A similar, though non-significant, trend was observed for BRCA2.

285 For questions (1) and (2), we find weak and non-significant trends in the expected directions, which

286 y at select time scales showed statistically non-significant trends toward increases.

287 Irrespective of stroke subtype, there were non-significant trends towards future ICH with statins.

288 Similar but non-significant trends were observed for relative reduct

289 There was a moderate and statistically non-significant unadjusted increase in PrEP uptake among

290 ion of Cd86 (marker of inflammatory M1), and non-significant upregulation of Arg1 (marker of M2).

291 olesterol, and LDL-C levels, while showing a non-significant upward trend in HDL-C levels.

292 f 10 animals, reduced coherence estimates to non-significant values.

293 holesterol upto 6th month, thereafter showed non-significant variation.

294 These associations remained non-significant when adjusted for current cigarette smok

295 n individual tracts, all associations became non-significant when analyses were adjusted for multiple

296 ly noted on the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (became non-significant when corrected for multiple comparisons)

297 howed that its partial predictive effect was non-significant when depressive symptomatology and AD bi

298 cant when the most stable genes were used to non-significant when the least stable genes were used.

299 anges in financial and quality measures were non-significant, with the exception of hospital closures

300 Primary outcomes were negative, with non-significant worsening for both active groups vs. pla