ライフサイエンスコーパス: normothermia

1 tricular dP/dt (1.8 +/- 0.1 microg/kg/min at normothermia).

2 s C (hypothermia) or 36.5 to 37.5 degrees C (normothermia).

3 ; spleen: 72 +/- 5%, all P<0.001 relative to normothermia).

4 to 9% in normothermic controls (*p < .01 vs. normothermia).

5 o 2% for normothermic controls (*p < .05 vs. normothermia).

6 sociated with higher rates of intraoperative normothermia.

7 after injury: 119 to hypothermia and 113 to normothermia.

8 a random number generator to hypothermia or normothermia.

9 of decoding performance from hypothermia to normothermia.

10 CBVC (P = 0.03) remained reduced relative to normothermia.

11 ldren randomized to moderate hypothermia vs. normothermia.

12 re marked in animals subjected to continuous normothermia.

13 C was smaller during hypothermia than during normothermia.

14 for 48 hours by means of surface cooling, or normothermia.

15 led conditions of normoxia, normocarbia, and normothermia.

16 hypothermia vs. rats managed with controlled normothermia.

17 ermia increased blood pressure compared with normothermia.

18 er 3 min of hypoxia, this compares to 81% at normothermia.

19 o hypothermic temperature control and 123 to normothermia.

20 needed to increase the rate of perioperative normothermia.

21 lure that is fully reversible upon return to normothermia.

22 ty by 25% and 22%, respectively, compared to normothermia.

23 incidence of death by 6 months than targeted normothermia.

24 roved 90-day survival compared with targeted normothermia.

25 and cognitive function than management with normothermia.

26 ignificantly increase survival compared with normothermia.

27 f patients treated with a strategy of strict normothermia.

28 between hypothermic temperature control and normothermia.

29 lity and functional outcome as compared with normothermia.

30 uel is not sufficient for the maintenance of normothermia.

31 me at day 90 than was observed with targeted normothermia.

32 or 24 hours followed by passive rewarming to normothermia.

33 ukin 6 and 8) during mild hypothermia versus normothermia.

34 s C followed by slow rewarming or controlled normothermia.

35 stantially higher in mild hypothermia versus normothermia.

36 rdiopulmonary resuscitation was started with normothermia.

37 black with hypothermia and remain green with normothermia.

38 r 24 hrs patients were passively rewarmed to normothermia.

39 mins at 34 degrees C) compared with induced normothermia.

40 were principally similar to responses during normothermia.

41 nce interval 0.44-0.73, p</=.01) compared to normothermia.

42 stemic vascular resistance index not seen at normothermia.

43 d by 4 hrs of either moderate hypothermia or normothermia.

44 g (122 +/- 30 ml; mean +/- s.d.) compared to normothermia (110 +/- 20 ml; P = 0.06).

45 olume (pre-reperfusion = 78.6 23.7 mm(3) vs. normothermia = 125.1 44.3 mm(3), p = 0.04) 24 h post-str

46 intervention (hypothermia, 178 of 415 [43%]; normothermia, 168 of 419 [40%]).

47 vels were elevated compared with baseline in normothermia (2.13 +/- 0.27 log pg/mL vs 0.27 +/- 0.17 l

48 ith intervention from 2 to 26 hours, to: (1) normothermia; (2) normothermia + 24 hours 50% inhaled xe

49 4 of 10,962 (18%) and 828 of 6,133 (14%) for normothermia, 235 of 1,046 (22%) for mild hypothermia, 2

50 rom 2 to 26 hours, to: (1) normothermia; (2) normothermia + 24 hours 50% inhaled xenon; (3) 24 hours

51 iven temperature (hyperthermia: -28% +/- 4%, normothermia: -27% +/- 6%, and mild hypothermia: -27% +/

52 ar low mean (SD) Kidney Donor Profile Index (normothermia: 28.99 [20.46] vs hypothermia: 28.32 [21.9]

53 at a pressure of 100 mm Hg (hyperthermia to normothermia: -28% +/- 3% and normothermia to mild hypot

54 uring heating (-48.7 +/- 6.7 ml) compared to normothermia (-33.2 +/- 7.4 ml) and to cooling (-10.3 +/

55 Thus, at normothermia (34 degrees C), the pore cutoff size for th

56 4 degrees C; n = 168) for 24 hours or strict normothermia (36-37 degrees C; n = 166).

57 ypothermia (32.0-34.0 degrees C) or targeted normothermia (36.0-37.0 degrees C) were included.

58 ted to external cooling (n = 101) to achieve normothermia (36.5-37 degrees C) for 48 hours or no exte

59 assigned to hypothermia (34-35 degrees C) or normothermia (36.5-37.5 degrees C) before donation.

60 omized to hypothermia (34.0-35 degrees C) or normothermia (36.5-37.5 degrees C) between August 10, 20

61 Donor hypothermia (34.0-35.0 degrees C) or normothermia (36.5-37.5 degrees C).

62 Rats were randomized to three groups: a) normothermia (37 degrees C + 0.5 degrees C); b) immediat

63 Normothermia (37 degrees C) attenuated IL-10 release fol

64 s C during the first 24 hours) with targeted normothermia (37 degrees C) in patients with coma who ha

65 lusion performed under conditions of cranial normothermia (37 degrees C) or mild cranial hyperthermia

66 resuscitation hypothermia (at 33 degrees C), normothermia (37 degrees C), or hyperthermia (39 degrees

67 ent moderate or severe HI followed by 5 h at normothermia (37 degrees C), or one of five HT temperatu

68 aoperative hypothermia (t = 33 degrees C) or normothermia (37 degrees C).

69 r hypoxic (n = 6) gas levels and by 4 hrs of normothermia (37 degrees C).

70 ischemia followed by (a) 3 h of postischemic normothermia (37 degrees C); (b) 3 h of postischemic hyp

71 to either heat shock (43 degrees C, 1 hr) or normothermia (37 degrees C, 1 hr) and allowed to recover

72 e (VEH); FGF-2 (45 microg/kg/h for 3 h i.v.)+Normothermia (37+/-0.5 degrees C); FGF-2+Hypothermia (32

73 iddle cerebral artery occlusion under either normothermia (37.5 degrees C) or hypothermia (33 degrees

74 Normothermia (38 +/- 0.5 degrees C), fluid balance (5 mL

75 de infusion, animals were assigned to either normothermia (38 degrees C, n = 7) or mild hypothermia (

76 They were randomized to normothermia (38.0 +/- 0.5 degrees C) or mild hypothermi

77 he effects of hyperthermia (40.5 degrees C), normothermia (38.0 degrees C), and mild hypothermia (33.

78 andomized 42 newborn piglets: (Group i) sham-normothermia (38.5-39 degrees C); (Group ii) sham-33 deg

79 ergy requirements were measured at baseline (normothermia, 38-40 degrees C) and during treatment with

80 output was lower in mild hypothermia than in normothermia (4.5 +/- 0.4 L/min vs 6.6 +/- 0.4 L/min, p

81 heating (8.6 +/- 1.9 ml mmHg(1)) compared to normothermia (4.5 +/- 3.0 ml mmHg(1), P = 0.02).

82 LBNP was comparable to that observed during normothermia (4.8 +/- 2.3 ml mmHg(1); P = 0.78).

83 e, 65.5 years; 287 males [64.9%]) and 470 to normothermia (51.6%; mean age, 65.6 years; 327 males [69

84 t) but in only 6 of 104 patients assigned to normothermia (6 percent, P = 0.009).

85 es 1 or 2 (hypothermia: 256 of 467 [55%] vs. normothermia: 69 of 165 [42%]) and survived for >180 day

86 >180 days (hypothermia: 315 of 467 [67%] vs. normothermia: 79 of 165 [48%]).

87 ial node activity in mild hypothermia versus normothermia (87 +/- 5 vs 47 +/- 5, normalized units, p

88 c tolerance by approximately 80% compared to normothermia (938 +/- 152 versus 182 +/- 57 CSI; mean +/

89 Furthermore, in normothermia, a significant increase of creatinine and a

90 hypothermia and 20 of 69 infants (29%) with normothermia (adjusted relative risk [hypothermic/normot

91 h hypothermia and 9 of 78 infants (12%) with normothermia (adjusted relative risk, 1.38; 95% credibil

92 substrate, chlorzoxazone, when compared with normothermia after cardiac arrest, 1.26+/-0.34 mL/min vs

93 ture control (32-34 degrees C) for 24 h with normothermia after IHCA in 11 hospitals in Germany.

94 The Targeted Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2)

95 ss in all 3 hypothermia groups compared with normothermia (all P<0.05).

96 at a pump flow of 2.4 L.min-1.m-2 at stable normothermia and approximately 15 minutes later after th

97 t concentration (150 mg/L) for 30 minutes in normothermia and atmospheric pressure (group 1), or hype

98 elation between allocation to hypothermia or normothermia and cerebral lesions was assessed by logist

99 Under normothermia and delayed whole-body cooling to 35 and 33

100 ction) followed by postexercise ischaemia in normothermia and during heat stress (increase in interna

101 In normothermia and during whole-body heating, 2 min IHG ex

102 eted hypothermia at 33 degrees C or targeted normothermia and early treatment of fever (37.8 degrees

103 rolongs the proinflammatory response whereas normothermia and especially febrile range temperature en

104 which was 51 mins in the control group with normothermia and FIO2 of 0.25, was more than doubled wit

105 Cooling from hyperthermia to normothermia and from normothermia to mild hypothermia i

106 In both normothermia and heat-stress conditions the following re

107 es C) and atmospheric pressure (group 2), or normothermia and high pressure (25 cm H2O) (group 3), or

108 atric hypoxic-asphyxic cardiac arrest during normothermia and hypothermia and tested novel measures o

109 Cold ischemia time was similar in the normothermia and hypothermia groups (15.99 [7.9] vs 15.4

110 ied the lower limit of autoregulation during normothermia and hypothermia in piglets resuscitated fro

111 decreased with cooling from hyperthermia to normothermia and mild hypothermia, whereas left ventricu

112 onist, BHT-933 (1.0 to 10 mug kg min) during normothermia and passive leg heating (water-perfused pan

113 ndependent association between perioperative normothermia and SSI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% con

114 ed at two temperatures-38 degrees C (induced normothermia) and 34 degrees C (induced hypothermia)-in

115 74 +/- 5 mL at hyperthermia, 52 +/- 4 mL at normothermia, and 41 +/- 3 mL at mild hypothermia; all p

116 33 degrees C (hypothermia) or 37 degrees C (normothermia) between 1 and 24 h.

117 rtex, followed immediately by 1 hr of either normothermia (brain temperature 37 +/- 0.5 degrees C) or

118 HOE alone affords significant protection at normothermia but is not a superior alternative to CP, an

119 assigned to the following treatment groups: normothermia (cell culture media, 2 hours, 37 degrees C)

120 tes, randomized (minimum: 30 cells/group) to normothermia: (cell media for 2 hours/37 degrees C), and

121 a cohort of rats was managed with controlled normothermia (CN) by placement in a servo-controlled inc

122 ere more likely to have final intraoperative normothermia compared with controls (87.6% vs. 77.8%, P

123 Normothermia controls received identical anaesthesia pro

124 h and then gradually rewarmed or treated at normothermia, depending upon their initial treatment ass

125 thermic temperature control as compared with normothermia did not improve survival nor functional out

126 ic hypothermia, as compared with therapeutic normothermia, did not confer a significant benefit in su

127 ic hypothermia, as compared with therapeutic normothermia, did not confer a significant benefit in su

128 onors, therapeutic hypothermia compared with normothermia does not appear to prevent delayed graft fu

129 Reestablishing normothermia during anesthesia completely rescued tau ph

130 to monitor core temperature and to maintain normothermia during general and neuraxial anaesthesia.

131 Intracellular free Ca2+ increased from normothermia during hyperkalemic cardioplegia in control

132 grees C, 59% vs. 3%, p < .001), and attained normothermia faster than the SubZero group median (2.4 v

133 have made eliminating fever and maintaining normothermia feasible.

134 or sham surgery and recovered for 2 hrs with normothermia followed by 4 hrs of either moderate hypoth

135 l hearts were then made globally ischemic at normothermia for 30 minutes followed by 2 hours of normo

136 rial compared intraoperative hypothermia and normothermia for potential neuroprotection during neurov

137 iant prophylactic antibiotics, postoperative normothermia, glucose control, and oral antibiotics.

138 utcome between the hypothermia group and the normothermia group (20% vs. 12%; relative likelihood, 1.

139 common in the hypothermia group than in the normothermia group (24% vs. 17%, P<0.001).

140 cantly between the hypothermia group and the normothermia group (36% [48 of 133 patients] and 39% [48

141 112 recipients of kidneys from donors in the normothermia group (39%) (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confiden

142 cantly between the hypothermia group and the normothermia group (49% [81 of 166 patients] and 46% [74

143 common in the hypothermia group than in the normothermia group (5 percent vs. 3 percent, P=0.05).

144 as compared with 314 of 501 patients in the normothermia group (66 percent vs. 63 percent; odds rati

145 cantly between the hypothermia group and the normothermia group (81.3% and 83.2%, respectively; diffe

146 group (80.1%) and 386 of 470 patients in the normothermia group (82.1%) had died (relative risk [RR]

147 othermia group (90.0%) and 413 of 463 in the normothermia group (89.2%) had an unfavorable functional

148 a group had died vs 84 patients (51%) in the normothermia group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0

149 2, as compared with 17 of 297 (5.7%) in the normothermia group (difference, 4.5 percentage points; 9

150 only for the histological score compared to normothermia group (IFD index, P<0.05).

151 39.5 (1.1) weeks and 3378 (380) grams in the normothermia group (n = 34), 38.7 (0.5) weeks and 3017 (

152 rmia group and 36.6 +/- 0.5 degrees C in the normothermia group (P < 0.001) Surgical-wound infections

153 also significantly improved compared to the normothermia group (P < 0.05).

154 histology) and higher blood glucose than the normothermia group (p <.05).

155 the hypothermia group and 27 percent in the normothermia group (P=0.79).

156 in the hypothermia group and 25 of 56 in the normothermia group (relative risk [RR] 1.08, 95% CI 0.76

157 4), as compared with 479 of 866 (55%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.00

158 ed, as compared with 446 of 925 (48%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.04

159 arm, compared with 71.2% (84 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.79-1.

160 trol, compared with 23.7% (28 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.78-1.

161 ol as compared with 57.6% (68 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.86-1.

162 hermia group died compared with eight in the normothermia group (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.58-2.52; p=0.52).

163 None of the 8 animals in the normothermia group achieved resumption of spontaneous ci

164 donors, of which 474 were randomized to the normothermia group and 460 to the hypothermia group.

165 moderate hypothermia group compared with the normothermia group and the risk difference was -11.5% (9

166 thermia group and 38 percent of those in the normothermia group had good outcomes (moderate, mild, or

167 ypothermia group and seven of 15 rats in the normothermia group survived to 24 hrs (p <.05).

168 veloped in 87 of the recipients (18%) in the normothermia group vs 79 (17%) in the hypothermia group

169 The mean (SD) NAA level in the normothermia group was 10.98 (0.92) mmol/kg wet weight v

170 hermia group and 129 (67.9%) in the targeted normothermia group were alive (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% C

171 s (52 in the hypothermia group and 45 in the normothermia group) did not meet any of the second set o

172 ypothermia group) or additional warming (the normothermia group).

173 (180 in the hypothermia group and 190 in the normothermia group).

174 mia group and 287 kidneys from donors in the normothermia group).

175 s after birth in 4 neonates: 1 (2.9%) in the normothermia group, 1 (3.2%) in the 48-hour hypothermia

176 outcome by GOS-extended paediatrics; in the normothermia group, 16 [42%] patients had a poor outcome

177 loss was 50.1% (46.0-51.9%; n = 305) in the normothermia group, and 41.3% (35.1-44.9%; n = 317) in t

178 hypothermia group and 4.1+/-1.2 hours in the normothermia group, and the mean time from injury to the

179 y, 4-6) and three (13%) died, whereas in the normothermia group, three (12%) had a bad outcome and on

180 nt between survivors and nonsurvivors in the normothermia group.

181 p had high intracranial pressure than in the normothermia group.

182 with complications than the patients in the normothermia group.

183 ours at 37.0 degrees +/-0.9 degrees C in the normothermia group.

184 the moderate hypothermia group vs 30% in the normothermia group.

185 the moderate hypothermia group vs 42% in the normothermia group.

186 ): 39 in the hypothermia group and 38 in the normothermia group.

187 rmia group vs two [5%] of 38 patients in the normothermia group; p=0.15).

188 (38% in the hypothermia group vs. 29% in the normothermia group; relative likelihood, 1.29; 95% CI, 0

189 (Group ii) sham-33 degrees C; (Group iii) HI-normothermia; (Group iv) HI-35 degrees C; and (Group v)

190 2-hour survival than delayed hypothermia and normothermia groups (6/10 versus 1/10 and 1/10 survivors

191 f injury were similar in the hypothermia and normothermia groups.

192 ees C and 36.8 degrees C for hypothermia and normothermia groups.

193 auditory discrimination from hypothermia to normothermia has a high predictive value for awakening.

194 Maintaining perioperative normothermia has been shown to decrease the rate of surg

195 ation is lacking, and an exact definition of normothermia has not been described.

196 diated increase in cardiac index observed at normothermia, high-dose dopamine at 25 degrees C left ca

197 Compared with normothermia, hypothermia at 35 degrees C led to 25 and

198 Compared with normothermia, hypothermia has been shown to reduce death

199 ere randomly assigned to one of five groups (normothermia, hypothermia, cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), t

200 ented ICP elevation ( ICP = 0.3 3.9 mmHg vs. normothermia ICP = 5.2 2.1 mmHg, p = 0.02) and reduced i

201 In normothermia, IHG exercise increased sweat rate at the n

202 Restoring normothermia improved sepsis survival from 42% to 60% (p

203 f cooling, rewarming, or within 15 hrs after normothermia in 57% (28 of 49) of cases.

204 ared the effects of moderate hypothermia and normothermia in 82 patients with severe closed head inju

205 s a modern technique that preserves lungs on normothermia in a metabolically active state.

206 and 180-day survival compared to spontaneous normothermia in cardiac-arrest patients.

207 nce in good neurologic outcome compared with normothermia in critically ill patients.

208 eater adiposity, thereby helping to maintain normothermia in obesity.

209 hypothermia (32 degrees C-33 degrees C) vs. normothermia in patients treated in a single center invo

210 ing the effects of hypothermia with those of normothermia in patients with acute brain injury.

211 ltaCVC was observed between hyperthermia and normothermia in the control site (Site A).

212 rative hypothermia and the group assigned to normothermia in the duration of stay in the intensive ca

213 Mild hypothermia, as compared with normothermia, in organ donors after declaration of death

214 s: In control group 1 (n = 7), CPCR was with normothermia; in group 2 (n = 6, 1 of 7 excluded), with

215 Dopamine half-time was 5.4 +/- 0.7 min at normothermia, increased to 11.6 +/- 0.8 min at 25 degree

216 , mild hypothermia during UHS, compared with normothermia, increases blood pressure, survival time an

217 Abrupt temperature shift from hypothermia to normothermia incurred on reperfusion of organ grafts has

218 Maintaining normothermia intraoperatively is likely to decrease the

219 with hypothermia (IQ = 0.74), compared with normothermia (IQ = 0.60) and hyperthermia (IQ = 0.56) (p

220 Although intraoperative normothermia is an important quality performance measure

221 ac surgery, the perioperative maintenance of normothermia is associated with a reduced incidence of m

222 there is limited evidence that perioperative normothermia is associated with lower rates of SSI.

223 Normothermia is defined as the normal temperature of the

224 r-fold compared to the same infusion rate at normothermia, leading to increased systemic vascular res

225 Thus, the effects of spontaneous normothermia (<37.5 degrees C) compared with mild therap

226 armed by 0.5-1.0 degrees C every 12-24 h) or normothermia (maintained at 36.5-37.5 degrees C).

227 videomicroscopy under three conditions: (1) normothermia, maintained in cell medium (37 degrees C) f

228 reporting measures focusing on perioperative normothermia may be of limited value in preventing SSI a

229 osed to currently mandated publicly reported normothermia measures.

230 Compared with normothermia, mild hypothermia increased the survival ti

231 ditive to CP provides significant benefit at normothermia, moderate hypothermia, and severe hypotherm

232 nobarbital and midazolam over 24 hours under normothermia (n = 8) or mild hypothermia (n = 6).

233 Newborn piglets were randomized to: (i) HI-normothermia (n=12), (ii) HI-35 degrees C (n=7), and (ii

234 , 23.0+/-0.6 kg) were divided into 4 groups: normothermia (n=8), mild hypothermia (35 degrees C) (n=8

235 ical care strategies directed at maintaining normothermia, normoglycemia, and prevention of anemia ma

236 During normothermia, NP decreased CVC by 0.032 +/- 0.007 arbitr

237 tes after birth, (2) Delayed intubation, (3) Normothermia on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission,

238 ates younger than 6 hours were randomized to normothermia or 72-hour hypothermia (33.5 degrees C), an

239 d at 37 degrees C throughout the experiment (normothermia) or reduced to 33 degrees C between 1 and 2

240 s C (mild hypothermia), 35.5-36.5 degrees C (normothermia), or 37.5-38.5 degrees C (mild hyperthermia

241 lower in all treatment groups compared with normothermia (p < 0.01) (although >40mmHg); the combined

242 B and Site C during hyperthermia compared to normothermia (P < 0.05).

243 ned to hypothermia than in those assigned to normothermia (P = 0.002), and the duration of hospitaliz

244 incomplete recovery of brainstem reflexes in normothermia (p = 0.013), and neuron-specific enolase hi

245 CA prolonged T50 by approximately 19% from normothermia (P<0.05) and was further prolonged with ET-

246 A reduced PERSHORT by approximately 35% from normothermia (P<0.05), which was further reduced with ET

247 =-4.69+/-0.44; r(2)=0.84+/-0.03) compared to normothermia (P<0.05), while the relationship between ar

248 rmia group (6 of 8 hypothermia versus 1 of 8 normothermia; P=0.04).

249 (maximal decreases in FVC during heating vs. normothermia: PE: 7.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.5 ml min mmH

250 , indicating a role for FGF21 in maintaining normothermia, possibly via activation of BAT.

251 lactic intravenous antibiotic, postoperative normothermia, postoperative day 1 glucose control, and o

252 correlated with the reduction in PCWP during normothermia (r = 0.93), skin-surface cooling (r = 0.91)

253 urgical Care Improvement Project must report normothermia rates during major surgery.

254 led conditions of normoxia, normocarbia, and normothermia, rats were subjected to 2 hrs of MCAO.

255 3) hours for the groups with hypothermia and normothermia, respectively.

256 ients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia and normothermia, respectively.

257 al arch replacement for AAD using either the normothermia (SD-FET) or conventional FET (control) tech

258 ether, these results could be interpreted in normothermia septic rats as an adaptive mechanism that c

259 ucose target levels less than 200 mg/dL, and normothermia should be maintained in all patients.

260 Our results suggest that intraoperative normothermia should be strictly maintained in patients u

261 -pressure (LBNP) of 0, 15 and 30 mmHg during normothermia, skin-surface cooling (decrease in mean ski

262 1 +/- 10, 131 +/- 7 ml prior to LBNP, during normothermia, skin-surface cooling, and whole-body heati

263 led conditions of normoxia, normocarbia, and normothermia, spontaneously breathing, halothane-anesthe

264 led conditions of normoxia, normocarbia, and normothermia, spontaneously breathing, halothane-anesthe

265 in ventricular filling pressure, compared to normothermia, suggests that the heart is operating on a

266 es C for 12 h) and the other half (n = 7) to normothermia (T = 37 degrees C).

267 thermia (target temperature 33 degrees C) or normothermia (target temperature 36.5 to 37.7 degrees C)

268 th the use of surface cooling techniques) or normothermia (target temperature, 36.5 degrees C).

269 temperature, 33.0 degrees C) or therapeutic normothermia (target temperature, 36.8 degrees C).

270 temperature, 33.0 degrees C) or therapeutic normothermia (target temperature, 36.8 degrees C).

271 Temperature over time was classified as normothermia (temperature >=36 degrees C), hypothermia (

272 PB has a positive slope that is greater with normothermia than hypothermia.

273 Upon return to normothermia, the vascular particles dissolve into the p

274 s C range from very mild hypothermia to full normothermia, there was no evidence that any substantive

275 To maintain normothermia, therefore, obese individuals must increase

276 er in patients randomized to hypothermia vs. normothermia, this difference was not statistically sign

277 SCIP adherence ranged from 75% for normothermia to 99% for hair removal and all significant

278 The control group had strict normothermia to a temperature of 36-37 degrees C for 72

279 g from hyperthermia to normothermia and from normothermia to mild hypothermia increased left ventricu

280 yperthermia to normothermia: -28% +/- 3% and normothermia to mild hypothermia: -20% +/- 5%) was of co

281 pectively in 10 hypothermia-treated and nine normothermia-treated children who were randomized to 48

282 ation in rats and did not affect recovery of normothermia-treated rats.

283 voiding razors for hair removal, maintaining normothermia, use of chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcoho

284 ature levels (38 degrees C [100.4 degrees F; normothermia] vs. 34 degrees C [93.2 degrees F; mild hyp

285 ree rectal temperature levels (38 degrees C [normothermia] vs. 34 degrees C [mild hypothermia] vs. 30

286 Normothermia was maintained.

287 04), indicating a 55% reduction in risk when normothermia was maintained.

288 auditory discrimination from hypothermia to normothermia was observed for 33 out of 94 patients.

289 Normothermia was present in 6,133 (55%) and mixed fever/

290 Anesthesia, fluid balance, and normothermia were maintained.

291 A total of 168 infants with hypothermia and normothermia were preterm (mean [SD] age, 34.0 [0.8] wee

292 P = 0.015); rates of immediate postoperative normothermia were similar (70.6% vs. 65.3%, respectively

293 Infants with normothermia were to be maintained at 37 degrees C (acce

294 physiological responses required to maintain normothermia, while immune insults or negative energy ba

295 a lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) during normothermia, whole-body heating (increase in blood temp

296 day having a unique experimental condition: normothermia, whole-body heating, and whole-body heating

297 ery-FET) procedure allows distal suturing in normothermia with a shorter circulatory arrest time.

298 h povidone iodine plus alcohol); maintaining normothermia with active warming such as warmed intraven

299 ollowed by controlled rewarming, or targeted normothermia with early treatment of fever (body tempera

300 hrs, and perioperative warming reestablished normothermia within 1 hr.