戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 cements for studying disease classification (nosology).
2 ss and the appropriate goals for psychiatric nosology.
3 rvations to clinical practice, research, and nosology.
4 oing attempts to reconceptualize psychiatric nosology.
5 ns that are associated with improved disease nosology.
6  increasing calls for an etiologically based nosology.
7 approaches to inform an improved psychiatric nosology.
8 urobiological measures to inform psychiatric nosology.
9 tly not an explicit component of psychiatric nosology.
10 rom topological phenomenology to etiological nosology.
11  attempts at a tractable, biologically based nosology.
12 heterogeneous phenotypes with poorly defined nosology.
13 aintained an uncertain status in psychiatric nosology.
14 el of explanation for an etiologically based nosology.
15 cal practice and developments in psychiatric nosology.
16 er domains, suggesting the need for improved nosology.
17 s the obvious candidate on which to base the nosology.
18 f brain recovery and refine their diagnostic nosology.
19 s have implications for treatment as well as nosology.
20 and multifaceted problems facing psychiatric nosology.
21 t lead to major breakthroughs in psychiatric nosology.
22 rove the validity and utility of psychiatric nosology.
23 uted using the American Academy of Neurology nosology.
24 nt degeneration and propose new criteria and nosology.
25 ting proposals for the future of psychiatric nosology.
26 uicide risk screening, research, policy, and nosology.
27 tion system to a more etiologically informed nosology.
28 support selected subtypes from each of the 2 nosologies.
29 c findings support or challenge our clinical nosology?
30 n disorder (DMDD), a newcomer to psychiatric nosology, addresses the need for improved classification
31 chiatric illness and, while clinically based nosologies aid in differential diagnosis, etiologically
32 ps identified thus have implications for the nosology and clinical treatment.
33 e loosely grouped into challenges concerning nosology and diagnosis (this Personal View) and problems
34 reas the first paper focuses on questions of nosology and diagnosis, this Personal View concerns path
35 disorders (ASDs) are challenging traditional nosology and driving efforts to reconceptualise the diag
36           Our findings provide insights into nosology and encourage further investigations of shared
37 ety disorders was examined to further inform nosology and etiological/ preventive efforts.
38 irmed would have implications for diagnostic nosology and genetic studies.
39  major mental illness as well as to improved nosology and identification of novel therapeutic targets
40 m a more neurobiologically valid psychiatric nosology and implicate targets for therapeutic developme
41  of depression, we can refine our diagnostic nosology and model a strategy for precision medicine and
42 we summarize the current understanding of CH nosology and origins.
43 nding its clinical epidemiology, psychiatric nosology and pathobiology.
44  review of literature focused on the current nosology and pathology of retinal vasculitis.
45 er research is necessary to characterize the nosology and potential treatment of this syndrome.
46 id presentations of psychopathology, improve nosology and prediction of illness risk and trajectories
47  current state of the psychiatric diagnostic nosology and recent progress in three areas: genomics, n
48 this investigation could improve psychiatric nosology and therapeutic development.
49 ic basis of psychiatric disorders, informing nosology, and advancing the aims of precision psychiatry
50 etic discovery, biological characterization, nosology, and genetic prediction.
51 ypes by shared mechanism to simplify current nosology, and has prodded investigations into common pat
52 s these findings have for our understanding, nosology, and treatment of psychiatric disorders.
53                                   The DSM-IV nosology appears to be a valid diagnostic system for dis
54 thinking and its connection with Kraepelin's nosology are illustrated through a close reading of thei
55 lished his final contribution to psychiatric nosology as an essay in 1920, which both modified and ex
56  novel statistical approaches to psychiatric nosology, assessment and research; deinstitutionalizatio
57                 Is it possible to envision a nosology based on genetically informed disease mechanism
58              This leads to a working disease nosology based on gradients of four types of genetic arc
59 the emergence in the coming decades of a new nosology, certainly in neurology and perhaps also in psy
60 hs and the uncertainty in both diagnosis and nosology coding make interpretation of this finding tenu
61                        Nevertheless, MOGE(S) nosology differs greatly from the key elements of the TN
62                   The limitations of the DSM nosology for capturing dimensionality and overlap in psy
63                                          The nosology for eating disorders, despite having been exten
64                                          The nosology for major psychiatric disorders developed by Em
65 notyping and the promises of a computational nosology for psychiatry.
66 movement disorders, it is timely to define a nosology for these diseases that is based on their genet
67                The intention was to free the nosology from the influence of unproven theories, and th
68       MFS is diagnosed based on the Ghent II nosology; genetic testing confirming the presence of a F
69                                  Psychiatric nosology has been a particular focus of debate in recent
70 ns consistently report that the quantitative nosology has more utility than traditional diagnoses, bu
71                                         This nosology has taken root because of the dramatic advances
72 oses are available, but the optimal insomnia nosology has yet to be determined.
73  of a syndromal versus etiologic psychiatric nosology have actually been debated within our field for
74 ost of the ongoing debates about Kraepelin's nosology have roots in these earlier discussions and wou
75                                  Established nosology identifies schizoaffective disorder as a distin
76                         Despite this unified nosology, important questions about LCH remain unanswere
77                  The implications of the new nosology in precision medicine are discussed, in which t
78 DI)--Kraepelin's key categories--psychiatric nosology in the United States underwent a transformation
79  of mental disorders described in recent DSM nosologies, including most notably substance use disorde
80                          Current psychiatric nosology is based on observed and self-reported symptoms
81                                  Psychiatric nosology is limited by behavioral and biological heterog
82 utations in different genes; a comprehensive nosology is needed that could inform the clinical phenot
83 ting progress of psychiatric diagnostics and nosology is the lack of tests which enable mechanistic i
84 eous symptoms and trajectories, with current nosology not accurately reflecting their molecular etiol
85 s a subtype of schizophrenia, but changes in nosology now recognise the high prevalence in mood disor
86 l assessment is key to reconceptualizing the nosology of ADs on the basis of process and etiology, an
87           In addition, recent changes in the nosology of ADs, challenges to current classification sy
88 tudies of anxiety may be a refinement of the nosology of anxiety disorders.
89 is currently considerable imprecision in the nosology of biomarkers used in the study of neuropsychia
90                         However, the precise nosology of compulsive hoarding has yet to be determined
91                                          The nosology of DBA has recently expanded to include two dis
92                                       As the nosology of FTD evolves, frontotemporal lobar degenerati
93 ill, in time, lead to changes in the current nosology of major psychoses.
94           The authors suggest that a genetic nosology of panic and phobic disorders may incorporate f
95                   Recent developments in the nosology of primary systemic vasculitis are placed in th
96 ades is consistent with the current clinical nosology of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and parse
97                     In summary, we propose a nosology of SMZL that can implement its classification a
98  diagnosis, help better understanding of the nosology of these disorders, and will likely in the near
99 nd why there has been such evolution in this nosology over the years, from Jennett and Plum in 1972 t
100                                 Defining the nosology, pathogenic mechanisms, and histopathological p
101 agnostic criteria) to ultimately improve the nosology, prevention, and treatment of SUDs.
102                    The emerging quantitative nosology promises to provide a more useful guide to clin
103                 Emil Kraepelin's psychiatric nosology, proposed in the 5th and 6th editions of his te
104          The imprecise nature of psychiatric nosology restricts progress towards characterizing and t
105                                      Revised nosology should limit the term to primary inflammation o
106 itional diagnostic systems, the quantitative nosology shows an approximately 2-fold increase in relia
107 d Kraepelin each saw similar patients, their nosologies started from different first principles: symp
108 gths and limitations of his clinically based nosology, still has quite a bit to teach modern psychiat
109  disorders may not be so distinct as current nosology suggests.
110 order will ultimately inform movement toward nosology supported by neurobiology.
111                The recently proposed MOGE(S) nosology system embodies all of these characteristics, a
112 sued the first official American psychiatric nosology that contained DP and manic-depressive insanity
113 cs may require the development of a "genetic nosology" that can classify individuals in terms of the
114       The ability of our current psychiatric nosology to accurately delineate clinical populations an
115 ctivity on important key concepts related to nosology, validity, and reliability of the Diagnostic an
116                                  Kraepelin's nosology was derived from and was championed by individu
117       Subjects diagnosed with MFS by Ghent 2 nosology were included for analysis.
118 utism, the benefits of an updated diagnostic nosology will translate into the delivery of more effect

 
Page Top