ライフサイエンスコーパス: nutritional intervention

1 s diseases can be reversed or ameliorated by nutritional intervention.

2 ompared to a more calorically dense standard nutritional intervention.

3 nd their associations with the outcomes of a nutritional intervention.

4 with respect to retinol related therapies or nutritional intervention.

5 (n = 108) with wasting or stunting received nutritional intervention.

6 rest and whether changes can be prevented by nutritional intervention.

7 gesting new approaches for EED refractory to nutritional intervention.

8 rgy-protein (BEP) supplements is a potential nutritional intervention.

9 le during AD development, which could target nutritional intervention.

10 to identify patients who would benefit from nutritional intervention.

11 d at enrollment and, for cases, after a 5-mo nutritional intervention.

12 20-25% was observed which was refractory to nutritional intervention.

13 bating infection in aged individuals through nutritional intervention.

14 ether pigs and humans respond similarly to a nutritional intervention.

15 IBS-36 questionnaire assessed the impact of nutritional intervention.

16 anabolic signaling that may require targeted nutritional intervention.

17 This process may limit the efficacy of nutritional intervention.

18 to alleviate complex disorders via tailored nutritional intervention.

19 and detoxifier) can be reversed by targeted nutritional interventions.

20 infections, smoking cessation, and possibly nutritional interventions.

21 in growth and health outcomes in response to nutritional interventions.

22 isease states and thus could be a target for nutritional interventions.

23 reatment of severe malnutrition in emergency nutritional interventions.

24 tor learning and memory can be reversed with nutritional interventions.

25 th limited access to diverse diets and other nutritional interventions.

26 th burden that is only partially resolved by nutritional interventions.

27 which could have implications for precision nutritional interventions.

28 red to a heart-healthy lifestyle, notably to nutritional interventions.

29 nflammation have been ameliorated in part by nutritional interventions.

30 ata to implement targeted and evidence-based nutritional interventions.

31 c inflammation can be ameliorated in part by nutritional interventions.

32 lights disease-related changes and potential nutritional interventions.

33 treatment targets through pharmacological or nutritional interventions.

34 eviewing the evidence base for metabolic and nutritional interventions.

35 ational and should not be used as a base for nutritional interventions.

36 y alcohol-using women who could benefit from nutritional interventions.

37 ts should be prioritised during school based nutritional interventions.

38 eered filtering systems to phytogenetics and nutritional interventions.

39 ta immaturity that is not rescued by current nutritional interventions.

40 ill drive future development of personalized nutritional interventions.

41 tially ameliorated following two widely used nutritional interventions.

42 erest in evaluating the potential effects of nutritional interventions administered during these crit

43 5 and 2015 was performed to identify RCTs of nutritional interventions administered to critically ill

44 st days were organized: before and after the nutritional intervention and 3 wk after returning to the

45 eening for CF has enabled earlier diagnosis, nutritional intervention and enzyme replacement for thes

46 Promising trials of nutritional interventions and cognitive rehabilitation t

47 mon western diet patterns can support future nutritional interventions and epidemiology.

48 evaluation is required to determine whether nutritional interventions and exercise training may pres

49 to decrease WRA anemia, incorporating direct nutritional interventions and indirect strategies within

50 Nutritional interventions and the IL-6 response to exerc

51 The applicability of many nutritional interventions and their effects on outcomes

52 r interest in the development of biomarkers, nutritional interventions, and drugs to augment the bene

53 dogenous lipase activities may be altered by nutritional interventions, and further, that accelerated

54 for assessing anaemia determinants, advanced nutritional interventions, and integration of infection

55 xplore drivers of this variation, prioritize nutritional interventions, and to design more representa

56 is possible to reverse these effects through nutritional interventions applied later in development.

57 ematic reviews evaluating dietary intake and nutritional interventions are becoming common but are re

58 The best way to determine if nutritional interventions are effective is to compare th

59 ing cause of tuberculosis (TB) globally, but nutritional interventions are often considered cost-proh

60 malaria chemotherapy combined with targeted nutritional interventions, are essential to mitigate mor

61 clinical and animal studies have identified nutritional intervention as a viable method to curtail t

62 The role of nutritional interventions as adjunct therapies to ART me

63 rcent coverage of the same environmental and nutritional interventions, as envisioned by the MDGs, wo

64 Compared with a baseline with no nutritional intervention, at 50% coverage of adults on t

65 Our findings show that a multi-targeted nutritional intervention attenuated detrimental alterati

66 Nutritional intervention before and throughout pregnancy

67 nominated friends increased adoption of the nutritional intervention by 12.2% compared with random t

68 The findings indicate no dietary or nutritional intervention can currently be recommended fo

69 stic rationale and experimental evidence for nutritional interventions commonly used in PMDs, includi

70 Overall, we argue that early nutritional interventions could address the unmet clinic

71 Targeted nutritional interventions could therefore save millions

72 t their illness and enhance adjustment, or a nutritional intervention, designed to promote a more hea

73 These findings suggest that the early life nutritional intervention determine the initial rumen mic

74 Nutritional interventions directed at these clinical con

75 ients at nutritional risk would benefit from nutritional intervention during processes of care of TAV

76 OFC gains in SGA term infants improve after nutritional intervention during the first 9 mo of life a

77 stence of a second window of opportunity for nutritional interventions during adolescence has been po

78 ck of high-quality evidence that proves that nutritional interventions during critical illness reduce

79 Nutritional interventions during pregnancy have been suc

80 AC, and provide a motivation for considering nutritional interventions during the treatment of patien

81 Thus, whether nutritional interventions early in an intensive care uni

82 A nutritional intervention, exclusive enteral nutrition (E

83 utritional treatment may be efficacious as a nutritional intervention for preschoolers aged 2 to 6 ye

84 A nutritional intervention for tuberculosis-affected house

85 al therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and nutritional interventions for AN; self-help, CBT, dialec

86 is framework are presented in the context of nutritional interventions for chronic diseases.

87 ewborn provision of vitamin K, are important nutritional interventions for infants and children.

88 by nutritional assessment and individualised nutritional interventions for malnourished patients, sho

89 lth outcomes, and investigating the value of nutritional interventions for mitochondrial disease cond

90 irm the considerable potential for a role of nutritional interventions for osteoarthritis, but they e

91 nnovative option for implementing short-term nutritional interventions for people with type 2 diabete

92 expression of endogenous sRNA may be part of nutritional interventions for regulating metabolism.

93 evidence on the effectiveness of dietary and nutritional interventions for treating acute respiratory

94 Targeted nutritional interventions for underweight and pregnant w

95 e training alone, the multimodal fitness and nutritional intervention further improved working memory

96 tophagy/lysosomal system through appropriate nutritional intervention has significant beneficial effe

97 Current nutritional interventions have been largely ineffective

98 Some nutritional interventions have shown their efficacy in r

99 gression, this suggests limited evidence for nutritional interventions having an impact on delaying H

100 supplements (ONS) are a clinically effective nutritional intervention, however, patient acceptance of

101 Hg (HR, 6.9; 95% CI, 1.5-32.1), and use of a nutritional intervention (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.1) were

102 uch growth is complex and may be affected by nutritional interventions imposed many years previously.

103 Behavioral and nutritional intervention improved energy intake and HAZ

104 d that a water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional intervention improved linear growth and was

105 The road to nutritional intervention in cancer prevention has led to

106 perhaps, in view of the adjunctive nature of nutritional intervention in critical illness, be focused

107 blind, dose-response, randomized, cross-over nutritional intervention in healthy adults, and observed

108 Fetal body composition may be modifiable via nutritional intervention in the mother and thus may play

109 and economic efficiencies when investigating nutritional interventions in chronic diseases.

110 Given such complex pathways, nutritional interventions in CKD, when applied in concer

111 tical challenges reduce the effectiveness of nutritional interventions in complex emergencies, and im

112 findings from investigations of dietary and nutritional interventions in individuals with alopecia o

113 lateral sclerosis, and support the study of nutritional interventions in larger randomised controlle

114 Nutritional interventions in LMICs should prioritize bot

115 heterogeneity remain amongst many studies of nutritional interventions in surgical patients.

116 timates of delta occur frequently in RCTs of nutritional interventions in the critically ill that are

117 suggest that future research should focus on nutritional interventions in the pre- and postdischarge

118 The results may be used to provide tailored nutritional interventions in these patients.

119 Combined with other studies of choline and nutritional interventions in this population, this study

120 Nutritional interventions included general ration distri

121 However, in the United States, several nutritional interventions, including high-protein diets,

122 Dietary and nutritional interventions, including minerals and vitami

123 Clinical trials focusing on dietary or nutritional interventions, including supplementations, i

124 Findings of controlled trials indicate that nutritional interventions, including vitamin A palmitate

125 Furthermore, nutritional intervention increased renal, hepatic, and i

126 PHCCs were randomly allocated to either nutritional intervention [intervention group (IG), n = 5

127 Nutritional interventions involve provision of regular m

128 ly susceptible to nutrient deficiencies, and nutritional intervention is an essential way to maintain

129 This nutritional intervention is likely to affect local gut i

130 gy expenditure and energy intake change, but nutritional intervention is not necessarily beneficial.

131 ve studies and longitudinal studies in which nutritional intervention is provided before cognitive de

132 will serve to re-define how the efficacy of nutritional interventions is assessed.

133 ce supporting similar metabolic responses to nutritional interventions is lacking.

134 tochondrial disorders (PMDs), and the use of nutritional interventions is routine in their supportive

135 sensitive period of the life cycle in which nutritional intervention may reap the greatest benefits.

136 Nutritional intervention may therefore selectively influ

137 (a stage before overt disease) through early nutritional interventions may be an alternative, benefic

138 Early nutritional interventions may modulate health risks in p

139 rol diet (sham and MCT group) and isocaloric nutritional intervention (MCT + NI) were administered.

140 We examined the effect of a community-based nutritional intervention on anthropometric and clinical

141 iveness of a low-intensity and high-coverage nutritional intervention on maternal and offspring outco

142 ght fast (control [CTR]) prior to isocaloric nutritional interventions on 3 occasions separated by ~6

143 ributions of combined social, cognitive, and nutritional interventions on brain development in nonhum

144 ese methods to estimate the causal effect of nutritional interventions on clinical outcomes among cri

145 graphy for evaluating the effect of prenatal nutritional interventions on components of fetal growth.

146 fically answer the question on the impact of nutritional interventions on HIV disease progression and

147 ed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of nutritional interventions on outcomes in patients with A

148 Pediatrics statement on the effects of early nutritional interventions on the development of atopic d

149 We synthesize the evidence on the effect of nutritional interventions on the gut microbiome in infan

150 Effects of nutritional interventions on the prevention of major dep

151 and the importance of this period for either nutritional intervention or nutritional withdrawal.

152 ntal characteristics to predict responses to nutritional interventions or programs.

153 Counseling and nutritional interventions or residential lead hazard con

154 m the perspective of their relationship with nutritional intervention outcomes.

155 tensity exercise program 3 times per week, a nutritional intervention, psychological support, and a s

156 Nutritional intervention reduced hemolysis-related renal

157 Nutritional intervention requires repeated measurement o

158 ing leads, and describes future prospects in nutritional intervention research.

159 , the search plan for a systematic review of nutritional interventions should be comprehensive.

160 art defect risk would help to refine current nutritional intervention strategies to reduce risk and m

161 ects by personalizing drug prescriptions and nutritional intervention strategies.

162 Most nutritional intervention studies in CHD patients traditi

163 Nutritional intervention studies performed in animals an

164 eviewed the results of randomized controlled nutritional intervention studies that have assessed the

165 The first generation of phase III nutritional intervention studies to prevent cancer has b

166 ition studies, possible extensions of N-of-1 nutritional intervention studies, and areas of future re

167 entification of immune system endpoints from nutritional intervention studies, effects of human milk

168 In this nutritional intervention study 46 healthy and non-obese

169 articipants of the prospective German Infant Nutritional Intervention study after 10 years of follow-

170 amples and 29 quality control samples from a nutritional intervention study.

171 fortification strategies, and evaluating non-nutritional interventions such as delayed cord clamping

172 Nutritional interventions, such as saffron extract suppl

173 a range of early-life chemical exposures and nutritional interventions, suggesting that environmental

174 al benefits of ART were not enhanced by this nutritional intervention targeting the gut-associated ly

175 Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a nutritional intervention that confines the daily time-wi

176 Protein restriction represents an alternate nutritional intervention that improves longevity and hea

177 esults establish the NAM/PN combination as a nutritional intervention that stimulates MuSCs, enhances

178 Pancreatic insufficiency was managed with nutritional interventions that included high-calorie die

179 plasma ANGPTL4 concentrations after various nutritional interventions that increase NEFA concentrati

180 We detail various nutritional interventions that may affect the IL-6 respo

181 ted to result in dietary recommendations and nutritional interventions that optimize individual healt

182 rs are particularly interested in developing nutritional interventions that reverse the negative effe

183 s for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of nutritional interventions that used mortality as the pri

184 The relationships between the type of nutritional intervention, the gut microbiota, and therap

185 cts may be partially mitigated with targeted nutritional intervention, thereby potentially improving

186 ines regarding the kind or the timing of the nutritional intervention to improve LT outcomes.

187 and provides a potential proactive maternal nutritional intervention to minimize FASD progression, r

188 >90 d survival), creating an opportunity for nutritional intervention to stop or reverse cachexia.

189 Nutritional interventions to complement breastfeeding af

190 is a promising means for designing effective nutritional interventions to control glycemic responses

191 a pipeline for the design of genomic-driven nutritional interventions to improve outcomes of rectal

192 metabolites suggests that the development of nutritional interventions to limit parasite proliferatio

193 iseases, and to demonstrate the potential of nutritional interventions to mitigate mortality and morb

194 There is particular interest in developing nutritional interventions to mitigate the adverse effect

195 portant considerations in the development of nutritional interventions to prevent or treat OA.

196 Studies addressing pretransplant nutritional interventions to reduce AML relapse rates ar

197 These results emphasize the need for early nutritional interventions to reduce daily sugar intake i

198 nal pathology, providing a basis for testing nutritional interventions to reduce malaria-associated m

199 dings warrant further studies of therapeutic nutritional interventions to restore arginine metabolism

200 Targeting nutritional interventions to tuberculosis-affected house

201 f Maori and Pacific infants, nested within a nutritional intervention trial for pregnant women with o

202 f the abnormal metabolic profile, a targeted nutritional intervention trial with folinic acid, betain

203 vestigations of the complexities inherent to nutritional intervention trials.

204 Maternal nutritional interventions using methyl donors have been

205 A 4-mo nutritional intervention was conducted in 305 overweight

206 eutical), and a baseline-final, uncontrolled nutritional intervention was performed (28 g of pistachi

207 Importantly, the favorable response to nutritional interventions was similar in both sexes.

208 ka, Bangladesh, and had not benefited from a nutritional intervention, we performed endoscopy in 80 c

209 ction (PCR), were assessed over 5 years of a nutritional intervention, which promoted adherence to th

210 eir predictive value regarding response to a nutritional intervention while providing similar prognos

211 from both groups initially received the same nutritional intervention, while patients of successful e

212 investigated the effects of a multi-targeted nutritional intervention with extra protein, leucine, fi

213 The long-term effect of nutritional intervention with hydrolysate infant formula

214 status after treatment suggest that targeted nutritional intervention with methylcobalamin and folini

215 Nutritional intervention with olive oil, vitamin D and o

216 A set of real samples obtained after human nutritional intervention with placebo or polyphenol-rich

217 ting-mimicking diet (FMD) is an experimental nutritional intervention with potent antitumor activity

218 taining optimal nutrition, is the only known nutritional intervention with the potential to attenuate

219 Emphasis on combination of nutritional interventions with exercise and newer bone-s

220 While nutritional interventions with prebiotics and probiotics

221 Studies of nutritional interventions with the highest-quality evide

222 on could guide management practices, such as nutritional interventions, with the purpose of boosting

223 A robust nutritional intervention would be highly cost-effective

224 a water, sanitation, handwashing (WSH), and nutritional intervention would slow TL attrition during

225 ng water, sanitation, handwashing (WSH), and nutritional interventions would improve environmental en