ライフサイエンスコーパス: nutritional support

1 y needs of critically ill patients requiring nutritional support.

2 red in the ICU results in grossly inadequate nutritional support.

3 us total parenteral nutrition (IV TPN) or no nutritional support.

4 feeding tube placement in patients requiring nutritional support.

5 capuchins or to important, if intermittent, nutritional support.

6 ive way in which to optimize the response to nutritional support.

7 ition in the hospital who were not receiving nutritional support.

8 utritional risk showed the most benefit from nutritional support.

9 a survival benefit among patients receiving nutritional support.

10 medical needs of the participant and provide nutritional support.

11 ntacts of persons with TB, as compared to no nutritional support.

12 s the current recommendations for artificial nutritional support.

13 regard to clinical outcomes and response to nutritional support.

14 inform estimates of the impact and costs of nutritional support.

15 trition for patients needing chronic enteric nutritional support.

16 ould be improved with the use of hypocaloric nutritional support.

17 A bottom-up protocol improved nutritional support.

18 ween the endocrine response to infection and nutritional support.

19 rapy, and isocaloric, isonitrogenous enteral nutritional support.

20 ammatory response in the presence of limited nutritional support.

21 ically ill septic children receiving limited nutritional support.

22 long been limited to treating symptoms using nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and ant

23 of lean body mass that was not prevented by nutritional support alone.

24 Nutritional support also significantly improved function

25 have been used safely in patients receiving nutritional support, although some probiotic products (s

26 nsulin resistance, cell membrane remodeling, nutritional support and antioxidative stress (leucine, a

27 and Children (WIC) is an important source of nutritional support and education for women and children

28 lation-specific REE equation has led to poor nutritional support and impairment of nutritional status

29 it from specific preconception and pregnancy nutritional support and increased monitoring of fetal gr

30 hat cannot be fully reversed by conventional nutritional support and leads to progressive functional

31 tays of therapy for cystic fibrosis, such as nutritional support and mechanical mucus clearance, are

32 bers and types of infections while receiving nutritional support and nitrogen balance after 5 days of

33 Both nutritional support and orexigenic agents play a role in

34 ant hepatic failure (FHF) would help develop nutritional support and other nonsurgical medical therap

35 aembryonic yolk sac (YS) ensures delivery of nutritional support and oxygen to the developing embryo

36 Previous studies showed that nutritional support and pharmacologic intervention with

37 An analysis of the changes induced by nutritional support and those obtained only at the end o

38 remains as it was 40 years ago: abstinence, nutritional support, and corticosteroids.

39 on, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, nutritional support, and critical care management for re

40 sion of consistent carbohydrate calories and nutritional support, and dextrose replacement for hypogl

41 CTs) have investigated enteral or parenteral nutritional support, and evidence-based clinical guidanc

42 ombined activities of daily living training, nutritional support, and exercise (1.79, 0.67 to 4.76; l

43 bined cognitive training, medication review, nutritional support, and exercise (1.93, 0.79 to 4.77; l

44 boembolism prophylaxis, surgical infections, nutritional support, and other complications that may be

45 , appropriate resuscitation, sepsis control, nutritional support, and re-establishment of esophageal

46 admission serum albumin, time to initiating nutritional support, and route of nutrition did not affe

47 y drugs, coordinated care packages, improved nutritional support, and the intensive use of antibiotic

48 Data detailing the effects of aggressive nutritional support before transplantation are scarce, a

49 f patients who experienced side-effects from nutritional support between the intervention and the con

50 t developments in the field of perioperative nutritional support by reviewing clinically pertinent En

51 greatest efficacy may require individualized nutritional support combined with early, prolonged physi

52 Patients receiving nutritional support, compared with those not receiving n

53 g its importance in clinical evaluations and nutritional support consultations.

54 Nutritional support, dialysis, and chronic kidney diseas

55 Thirteen RCTs (n = 439) of nutritional support [dietary advice (1 RCT), oral nutrit

56 uality RCTs and provides new perspectives on nutritional support during critical illness and recovery

57 Guidelines recommend the use of nutritional support during hospital stays for medical pa

58 Whether nutritional support during hospitalization reduces these

59 o provide crucial signaling, structural, and nutritional support during pregnancy.

60 nutritional risk, the use of individualised nutritional support during the hospital stay improved im

61 ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.92), and type of nutritional support (e.g., early enteral nutrition: odds

62 patients who required ECMO and were provided nutritional support, either enterally or parenterally.

63 deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, plus nutritional support extended median survival of spinal m

64 ned on oxygen on an "as needed" basis and on nutritional support for 1 to 2 mo.

65 nt of micronutrient deficiency diseases, and nutritional support for at-risk groups, including infant

66 reater mean (+/-SE) improvements in favor of nutritional support for body weight (1.94 +/- 0.26 kg, P

67 e enteral nutrition therapy is the preferred nutritional support for dysphagic patients with a range

68 Prompt nutritional support for household contacts of persons wi

69 The ineffectiveness of nutritional support for muscle was due to alterations in

70 Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides nutritional support for pregnant and postpartum women an

71 and to provide optimal exercise training and nutritional support for the modern warfighter.

72 3) What is the optimal mode and timing of nutritional support for the patient with SAP?

73 eceive either ReFerm(R) (n = 28) or standard nutritional support (Fresubin(R), n = 28) for 24 weeks.

74 eratolysis, possibly because of impedance of nutritional support from the aqueous humor.

75 nsion, pressor and steroid use, and variable nutritional support further complicates their management

76 In the intervention group, individualised nutritional support goals were defined by specialist die

77 e prospectively randomized into one of three nutritional support groups after surgery: 10 patients re

78 l support, compared with those not receiving nutritional support, had a lower in-hospital mortality r

79 Therefore, nutritional support has gained increasing interest in cr

80 -size-fits-all approach to the components of nutritional support has not proven beneficial.

81 Standard nutritional support has not significantly altered outcom

82 are increasingly used in patients receiving nutritional support; however, some case reports and tria

83 Adequate nutritional support in children after cardiac surgery is

84 and authorities regarding the usefulness of nutritional support in clinical practice.

85 sociated with the route of delivery of early nutritional support in critically ill adults.

86 e most effective route for delivery of early nutritional support in critically ill adults.

87 of early compared with delayed beginnings of nutritional support in critically ill obese patients are

88 ement is challenging in patients who require nutritional support in hospital.

89 rove glycaemic control in patients receiving nutritional support in hospital.

90 led trials (RCTs) to clarify the efficacy of nutritional support in improving intake, anthropometric

91 ssessment and introduction of individualised nutritional support in patients at risk.

92 Nutritional support in patients with cancer aims at impr

93 ral nutrition can be safely administered for nutritional support in pediatric patients undergoing eit

94 in combination with antibiotic coverage and nutritional support in the form of early enteral tube fe

95 m a recent trial of an intervention in which nutritional support in the form of food baskets was prov

96 The efficacy of nutritional support in the management of malnutrition in

97 Patient demographics, nutritional support, incidence of sepsis, inhalation inj

98 Receiving nutritional support, including dietary advice, oral nutr

99 supportive care including oral pain control, nutritional support, infection treatment and control of

100 the enteral route to a delivery route, with nutritional support initiated within 36 hours after admi

101 ensive care unit (ICU), affected the time of nutritional support initiation.

102 cident tuberculosis in India), providing the nutritional support intervention could prevent 361 200 (

103 e possible effect modification regarding the nutritional support intervention.

104 Nutritional support is a crucial component of critical c

105 ure of the liver to appropriately adapt when nutritional support is administered.

106 Whether use of nutritional support is also effective in improving clini

107 Nutritional support is an essential component of the man

108 Importantly, although nutritional support is crucial, it might not be sufficie

109 Goal-directed nutritional support is essential to improving morbidity

110 -threatening disease for which adequate oral nutritional support is recommended.

111 For alcoholic hepatitis, nutritional support is the mainstay of treatment; steroi

112 With appropriate nutritional support, lambs on the system demonstrate nor

113 toring in severe traumatic brain injury, and nutritional support <48 hours of intensive care unit adm

114 tematic review and meta-analysis showed that nutritional support, mainly in the form of ONS, improves

115 bowel disease, including initial evaluation, nutritional support, medical and surgical intervention,

116 arm, and cutaneous toxicity and the need for nutritional support more frequent in the CTX arm.

117 Outcomes included respiratory and nutritional support needs, motor function, and unsatisfa

118 n mean total protein and energy intakes with nutritional support of 14.8 g and 236 kcal daily.

119 The optimal nutritional support of critically ill patients should be

120 o manufacture solutions used for intravenous nutritional support of hospitalized and ambulatory patie

121 zed controlled, multicenter, Effect of Early Nutritional Support on Frailty, Functional Outcome, and

122 nitiated, open-label EFFORT (Effect of early nutritional support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes and

123 in patients included in the Effect of Early Nutritional Support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and

124 The Effect of early nutritional support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and

125 er, there was no difference in the effect of nutritional support on mortality among female and male p

126 ose of this trial was to study the effect of nutritional support on mortality in patients hospitalize

127 ependent) but apparently receives sufficient nutritional support only from tumor tissue.

128 Conventional nutritional support only partially ameliorates this proc

129 of choice for patients in need of long-term nutritional support or gastric decompression.

130 or prolonged mechanical ventilation, type of nutritional support, or use of dopamine.

131 ences in need for postoperative (par)enteral nutritional support, other complications, hospital morta

132 e indicates that the provision of adjunctive nutritional support (parenteral or enteral nutrition, or

133 minimisation schedule (stratified by type of nutritional support [parenteral nutrition on or off] and

134 RS score showed no difference in response to nutritional support, patients with high adapted NRS show

135 recurrent symptoms, differential diagnosis, nutritional support, potential therapeutic options, and

136 rategy involved early drainage of sepsis and nutritional support prior to elective ECF repair, with s

137 of drainage of acute sepsis, maintenance of nutritional support prior to surgery, and selective use

138 line treatments for eating disorders include nutritional support, psychotherapy, and pharmacotherapy.

139 -line treatments of eating disorders include nutritional support, psychotherapy, and pharmacotherapy.

140 eral approach remains an important method of nutritional support: recent data help to ensure its safe

141 With nutritional support recently emerging as a vital step in

142 ure at high nutritional risk, individualized nutritional support reduced the risk for mortality and m

143 on without nutrition support, individualized nutritional support reduced the risk of mortality and im

144 Guidelines recommend an early nutritional support, regardless of the previous nutritio

145 appropriately designed mixed fuel system of nutritional support replete in protein does not quell th

146 This neglect of skin grafting and nutritional support resulted in critically ill children

147 Data indicate that despite adequate nutritional support, severe thermal injury leads to decr

148 arginine monotherapy in the context of full nutritional support should be carried out so as to defin

149 mature infants might be reduced by improving nutritional support, specifically targeting lipids and t

150 Insufficient nutritional support still remains a widespread problem d

151 patients compared with those receiving other nutritional support strategies.

152 ital admission followed by an individualized nutritional support strategy in this vulnerable patient

153 ficial treatments, for example, provision of nutritional support; surrogate and survivor satisfaction

154 tation of vital signs, early rehabilitation, nutritional support), the most common types of injuries

155 e safety of probiotics in patients receiving nutritional support through a systematic review of case

156 Further research is needed to define optimal nutritional support throughout the intensive care unit s

157 Nutritional support to increase energy, calcium intake,

158 k production, providing essential immune and nutritional support to offspring and supplying dairy pro

159 randomized to protocol-guided individualized nutritional support to reach energy, protein, and micron

160 eceive either protocol-guided individualised nutritional support to reach protein and caloric goals (

161 pothesis that protocol-guided individualised nutritional support to reach protein and caloric goals r

162 y altering the larval gut microbiota and its nutritional support to the host.

163 ed controlled trial comparing individualized nutritional support to usual care.

164 health worker, directly observed treatment, nutritional support, transportation stipends, and other

165 Continued progress in the areas of optimal nutritional support, understanding the implications of a

166 Most moderate-to-late-preterm infants need nutritional support until they are feeding exclusively o

167 A consisted of 14 patients who were provided nutritional support using total parenteral nutrition.

168 ents treated with gene therapy (9%) required nutritional support vs 5 of 10 (50%) treated with nusine

169 These findings suggest that nutritional support was associated with reduced mortalit

170 s per status epilepticus day, and increasing nutritional support was associated with ventilator-assoc

171 The initiation of nutritional support was delayed in obese ICU patients.

172 ls were defined by specialist dietitians and nutritional support was initiated no later than 48 h aft

173 Individualized nutritional support was most effective in reducing morta

174 In our program, in which nutritional support was provided to potential recipients

175 Nutritional support was provided to rats for 7 days by o

176 nutrition, 34 967 patients (30.6%) receiving nutritional support were 1:1 propensity score matched to

177 In addition, patients receiving nutritional support were less frequently discharged to a

178 Neither canned supplements nor nutritional support were used effectively.

179 ions may lead to underfeeding and inadequate nutritional support with a direct effect on patient outc

180 plasma GSH and TNF-alpha levels by adequate nutritional support with adjuvant rhGH during the postin

181 ully quantify clinical benefits and optimize nutritional support with FOSL-HN should be undertaken.

182 Overall, nutritional support with high calories and protein was a

183 Nutritional support with sodium and water supplementatio

184 l inpatients Trial) comparing individualized nutritional support with usual care nutrition in medical

185 which compared the effects of individualized nutritional support with usual hospital food in medical

186 , a combination of antimicrobial agents, and nutritional support, with or without drainage of the inf