コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 t been previously discussed in other reviews on this topic.
2 ioritized development of clinical guidelines on this topic.
3 en the European and US scientific statements on this topic.
4 provide an overview of the recent literature on this topic.
5 ces from select research and review articles on this topic.
6 No previous meta-analysis has been reported on this topic.
7 re is little experimental or conceptual data on this topic.
8 rway may clarify the many existing questions on this topic.
9 ents are needed to improve our understanding on this topic.
10 rize past and current work in our laboratory on this topic.
11 provides a critical review of the literature on this topic.
12 articular reference to what is already known on this topic.
13 there has been a rapid expansion of studies on this topic.
14 some highlights of recent empirical studies on this topic.
15 e recent trials have attempted to shed light on this topic.
16 re limited data from non-Western populations on this topic.
17 his review highlights several recent studies on this topic.
18 rian settings can contribute to the evidence on this topic.
19 a growing body of epidemiological literature on this topic.
20 Their study is unlikely to be the last word on this topic.
21 resulting in an educational position article on this topic.
22 eflected in the large number of publications on this topic.
23 iew summarizes the results of recent studies on this topic.
24 rther discussion despite much published work on this topic.
25 nal MC1R, thereby incrementing our knowledge on this topic.
26 similar to the general population literature on this topic.
27 ent clinical trials provide more information on this topic.
28 tent of stimulating additional investigation on this topic.
29 adults and updates the 1996 recommendations on this topic.
30 and updates the 1996 USPSTF recommendations on this topic.
31 diabetes mellitus and review the literature on this topic.
32 ough recent studies have begun to shed light on this topic.
33 cted based on the large amount of literature on this topic.
34 or hypothesis generation for future research on this topic.
35 of numerous authors who sporadically publish on this topic.
36 , we will also review the existing knowledge on this topic.
37 evidence suggested a need for future studies on this topic.
38 Western-centricity is an emergent literature on this topic.
39 orld evidence from routine clinical practice on this topic.
40 provided by the authors of previous studies on this topic.
41 aused by cannabis, there is limited evidence on this topic.
42 and a wealth of avenues for future research on this topic.
43 more centers could provide clearer guidance on this topic.
44 to date, no conclusive evidence is available on this topic.
45 onal geometry to provide a novel perspective on this topic.
46 ell as an extensive review of the literature on this topic.
47 lthcare workers will further raise awareness on this topic.
48 o identify future priority areas of research on this topic.
49 outcomes should be chosen in future research on this topic.
50 ings highlight the need for further research on this topic.
51 ouse model that allows direct investigations on this topic.
52 carried out, therefore limiting the evidence on this topic.
53 esents an update to the KDIGO 2012 guideline on this topic.
54 sfactory performance for prediction purposes on this topic.
55 STF has not previously made a recommendation on this topic.
56 Association prioritized clinical guidelines on this topic.
57 in this patient and summarize the literature on this topic.
58 social and biological sciences are equivocal on this topic.
59 ign of CDC reactions and inspires more ideas on this topic.
60 , which may improve further research studies on this topic.
61 MIEC materials warrant systematic guidelines on this topic.
62 usly proposed in the widely cited literature on this topic.
63 have failed to produce clear-cut conclusions on this topic.
64 o point the way forward for further research on this topic.
65 ystematic review of the published literature on this topic.
66 recently published an updated recommendation on this topic.
67 s; we are not aware of any previous research on this topic.
68 join the small but growing body of research on this topic.
69 on dietary conditions used in mouse studies on this topic.
70 d provide a review of the current literature on this topic.
71 erstand previously contradicting experiments on this topic.
72 e on HGIs and discuss the future of research on this topic.
73 omes should be considered for future studies on this topic.
74 e stimulus reconcile much of the controversy on this topic.
76 While commentaries continue to proliferate on this topic, actual empirical research remains relativ
80 ut there is a dearth of longitudinal studies on this topic and a paucity of studies that have investi
81 of the rapidly expanding body of literature on this topic and argue that gold nanotechnology-enabled
84 ich we reviewed the epidemiologic literature on this topic and explored causal inference, bias, and h
88 s in healthy, by reviewing the relevant work on this topic and performing complementary analyses, in
90 the literature that shape current dialogues on this topic and provide implications for patient care.
91 Edward Jackson published an extensive review on this topic and reported a variety of modalities used
92 This review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic and reveals its application for the develo
93 ne previous meta-analysis has been published on this topic and supported an association between IL-1
94 erform a systematic review of the literature on this topic and to determine the association between t
96 we review the available scientific evidence on this topic, and present our centre's experience of el
97 esult of two separate international meetings on this topic, and provides recommendations for future a
98 ines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patient
99 t pathologists have a low level of agreement on this topic, and the terms "gastric atrophy" and "atro
100 ge, this is the largest study ever conducted on this topic, and using the best possible comprehensive
101 ynthesis highlights a deficit of information on this topic, and we outline a vision for future resear
118 oject is a unique addition to the literature on this topic as it not only outlines the recently publi
119 point supported by the cumulative literature on this topic as well as by emerging molecular data.
120 scope of this review is to provide an update on this topic as well as to discuss future directions in
121 In this review, we return to seminal works on this topic before summarizing the changes that mass i
123 n interesting new study now sheds some light on this topic by examining the role of tropomyosin in st
126 e believe that a comprehensive understanding on this topic could significantly contribute towards the
128 though the articles that have been published on this topic did not consider patient-reported outcomes
129 eviews and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on this topic do not allow authors to answer those quest
134 erous additional studies have been published on this topic, focusing on differential diagnosis, predi
135 s findings suggest a need for more education on this topic for ophthalmologists to be able to protect
137 dence review evaluating literature published on this topic from 1966 through April 2010 that was iden
138 e review evaluating the published literature on this topic from 1985 through November 2011 that was i
142 There is a surprising paucity of literature on this topic, given the millions that have undergone LA
144 sphorylation state; surprising little effort on this topic has been expended in computational studies
148 al understanding.(1)(,)(6-10) Prior research on this topic has been restricted to theoretical work an
166 cats worldwide, historical research efforts on this topic have been hampered by the belief that cats
172 ecent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on this topic have had limited success due to methodolog
174 Observations: Although no specific studies on this topic have led to formal recommendations, we sug
176 ospital to home are unclear; earlier reviews on this topic have often conflated telemonitoring progra
184 Given the scarcity of comprehensive works on this topic, here we performed a systematic review of
189 Although there has been increased focus on this topic in recent years, many gaps in our knowledg
190 phrenia, with over 30 new articles published on this topic in the last 12 months, compared with 11 th
193 despite the wealth of information published on this topic in the past few years, some of the most fu
195 been synthesized since the previous reviews on this topic in this journal, the field has seen signif
197 st-transcriptional gene regulation, research on this topic in wheat, a vital agricultural crop, remai
199 s and qualitative research recently emerging on this topic, in order to now provide a multi-dimension
200 Noteworthy publications from the past year on this topic include new guidelines for the interpretat
202 at the numbers of peer-reviewed publications on this topic increase during and immediately after rece
203 findings from key EWASs previously conducted on this topic; interpret results from recent studies; an
205 ly idiosyncratic, a wealth of basic research on this topic is enabling the identification of general
208 ated claims in patient and public perception on this topic is highly relevant and must be carefully c
220 he use of laparoscopy; however, the evidence on this topic is scant and recommendations are based on
224 s modification, indicating that further work on this topic is still required, the developed predictor
227 a." In the 7 years since the first symposium on this topic, major advances have been made in our unde
229 essing this challenge will require alignment on this topic, not just by microbiologists but also by p
233 y large body of literature that has appeared on this topic over the last decade in an attempt to prov
234 The review not only highlights publications on this topic over the past 12-18 months but also refers
235 A prominent guiding framework for research on this topic over the past three decades has been the m
238 espite the vast amount of retrospective data on this topic, physicians generally have been unsure how
242 ing of the number of annual articles focused on this topic published in the Journal of Allergy and Cl
243 bMed database search for relevant literature on this topic published within the last 15 years was con
245 llustrate recent discoveries that shed light on this topic, relying when necessary on data from relat
252 nd the dramatic growth of heterogeneous data on this topic, such promise has encountered unprecedente
257 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1946
258 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1966
259 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE, EMBA
260 s guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified using MEDLINE, the Coc
261 some of the many exciting talks and posters on this topic that were presented at the third Molecular
266 cause there have been several recent reviews on this topic, the present review takes a broader perspe
267 Despite a large number of articles published on this topic, there is no single predictive rule that c
268 h not complete, owing to the vast literature on this topic, they revealed opportunities for the immed
271 ountries that are mainly supporting research on this topic through the development of epidemiological
274 O) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary
275 ld, there still lacks a comprehensive review on this topic to summarize past achievements, synthesize
278 nally, we propose future research directions on this topic, underscore the need for more work in a gl
281 itically explored the most recent literature on this topic using PubMed and Medline and examining the
293 issue and in the systematic evidence review on this topic, which can be obtained through the USPSTF
294 SPSTF recommendation and rationale statement on this topic, which includes a brief review of the supp
295 d reinforce a previous publication in Nature on this topic, which was retracted after an inadvertent
298 onale of this review is to present an update on this topic with focus on long-term consequences of in
299 ion aims to provide a comprehensive overview on this topic with practice points for healthcare profes
300 designs), does not provide clear conclusions on this topic yet provides important insights for future