戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 red to control groups (measured with the BBB open field test).
2 non-responders in the elevated-plus maze and open field test.
3 c knock-out (Hdc KO) mice was assessed in an open field test.
4 ted to the tail suspension test (TST) and an open field test.
5 bic areas signal movement during the TST and open field test.
6 vated plus maze, the light/dark box, and the open field test.
7 , and behavior in the elevated plus-maze and open field test.
8 ion, locomotor activity was studied using an open field test.
9 avioral testing, including a protocol for an open field test.
10 lso was demonstrated to be anxiolytic in the open field test.
11  their heterozygous (Het) littermates in the open field test.
12 mption and decreases distance traveled in an open field test.
13 also reduced threat appraisal behavior in an open field test.
14 ce in the social interaction test and in the open field test.
15 dial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in vivo during open field test.
16    Locomotor activity was measured using the open-field test.
17 -GABAARs increased time in the center in the open-field test.
18 s, 60 min before the tail suspension test or open-field test.
19 e animals were tested in the forced swim and open field tests.
20 tified in all cohorts using the cylinder and open field tests.
21 ted with mouse hyperactivity in homecage and open field tests.
22 levated plus-maze, light-dark box, and novel open field tests.
23 d place preference, pre-pulse inhibition and open-field tests.
24  less exploratory activity during Y-maze and open-field tests.
25  behaviors, tested by elevated plus-maze and open-field tests.
26 like behaviors in the elevated plus maze and open-field tests.
27 rcles for hours on end, both in cages and in open-field tests.
28 eference and increased locomotor activity in open-field testing.
29 assessed via 1) neurologic testing and 2) an open-field test 24 hours after subarachnoid hemorrhage,
30  We discovered significant alterations in an open field test, a novel object recognition test and in
31 s D2Rs, and tested mice of both sexes in the open field test, ABA paradigm, and intraperitoneal gluco
32                                       In the open field tests, activities were not different from con
33 with less anxiety-like behaviors seen in the open field test and elevated plus maze, as well as decre
34 obust anxiety-like behavior (evaluated using open field test and elevated zero maze) was observed in
35 e behaved similarly as wild-type mice in the open field test and in the elevated plus maze test of an
36 Behavioural performance was evaluated by the open field test and the elevated plus maze.
37 ime, ambulatory behavior, and rearing in the open-field test and decreased the number of entrances an
38 motor function tests including the rota-rod, open-field tests and hind-paw footprint analysis.
39                       In both weight-bearing open-field tests and nonweight-bearing swim tests, LM11A
40 ike (measured via the elevated plus maze and open field tests) and depression-like (measured via the
41 eg, posture, bradykinesia) and behaviorally (open field test), and their brains were processed for im
42 reezing time and time spent in the center in open field test, and entries and duration in the novel a
43 anxiety, namely the elevated plus maze test, open field test, and food neophobia test.
44  parameters, decreased voluntary movement in open field testing, and higher modified Rankin Scale sco
45 phenotype in both the elevated plus maze and open field tests, and increased the startle response.
46 ogenic profile in the elevated plus-maze and open field tests, and reduced social exploration of unfa
47 e showed behavioral avoidance of light in an open-field test, and they could discriminate a light sti
48 -like profile (in the elevated zero maze and open field tests), as well as increased responses to lea
49           Locomotor function was assessed by open field testing, balance beam, and rotarod.
50 like behaviors in the elevated plus maze and open field tests but did not differ from control females
51 port that Depdc5cc+ mice were hyperactive in open-field testing but did not display anxiety-like beha
52                                          The open field test can be adapted in several ways: to asses
53 sures of spontaneous movement and gait in an open-field test declined as expected in control lesioned
54 tes, as well as changes in behavioral tests (open field test, elevated plus maze test, chimney test,
55                         Behavior analyses by open field test, elevated plus maze, Reciprocal Social I
56                                           In open field test Hdc KO mice showed impaired exploratory
57 exhibited fewer stereotypic movements in the open field test, higher baseline startle responses in th
58 ation in two key neurobehavioral phenotypes: open field test (hyperactivity) and contextual fear cond
59                                 In automated open-field test, IDUA(-/-) mice showed hypoactivity as e
60 normalities including hyperlocomotion in the open field test, impaired coordination and balance in th
61 5 behavioral assays: cued fear conditioning, open field tests in dark and bright light, direct social
62  comparable to that of wild-type mice in the open-field test, in which, however mSOD1 exhibited incre
63 treated mice decreased central locomotion in open field testing, increased circulating CXCL1, and inc
64 tant mice had a hyperactive phenotype in the open field test, independent of sex, and were more sensi
65 nxiety-like behavior at this timepoint in an open field test, indicating that nest building deficits
66   No psychostimulant effect was shown in the open-field test, indicating that the effects in the tail
67                                          The open field test is a popular rodent test of novelty expl
68 mphetamine-stimulated hyperlocomotion in the open field test, it restored d-amphetamine-disrupted pre
69                                        In an open field test, lesioned rats showed enhanced locomotio
70 re conducted to assess exploratory activity (open field test, light-dark box test) and cognitive func
71                  No changes were observed in open field test measures.
72                                           In open field tests, Mfn2 mutants show severe, age-dependen
73 ce, tumors increased central tendency in the open-field test; microglia depletion did not reverse thi
74         Standard behavioral tests, i.e., the open field test (OFT), the novel object test (NOT), and
75       Such behavior can be assessed with the open field test (OFT), which is a well-established indic
76 , novelty suppressed feeding (NSF) test, and open field test (OFT).
77 omotion and thigmotaxis in repeated bouts of open field test (OFT).
78 nted motor impairment as demonstrated by the open field test, pole test, and rearing behavior.
79 erence testing, reward-omission testing, and open-field testing, respectively.
80                                              Open-field tests reveal that the device implantation doe
81 he elevated plus maze and thigmotaxis in the open field test revealed increased anxiety-like behavior
82                                   Subsequent open-field testing revealed no effects of BLA lesions on
83                                       In the open field test, SERT-/- mice showed reduced vertical ex
84                                              Open-field tests show delayed exploratory activity, redu
85                                          The open field test showed significant differences in all th
86                                              Open-field testing showed no differences in spontaneous
87 he rats exhibited improved motor function as open-field tests showed higher activity scores for runne
88 poactive in a test for exploratory behavior (open-field test), showing markedly reduced locomotion an
89 agonist nor-BNI increased center time in the open field test, suggesting an anxiolytic effect.
90 ed locomotion in both elevated plus-maze and open field tests, suggesting heightened novelty-induced
91 mice developed greater locomotor deficits in open-field tests than wild-type mice following low oral
92 manifested by 4.5-mo-old Naglu-/- mice in an open field test; the hyperactivity that is characteristi
93 , locomotor activity of these animals in the open-field test was not affected by ODN treatments.
94 aze which provides a measure of anxiety, the open field test which provides a measure of anxiety and
95 est phenotypic differences were found in the open field test, which maximizes avoidance behavior.
96 t, measured by asymmetrical rotations in the open field test, which recovered over time.