戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d rapidly developing publishing trends (e.g. open science).
2  growing, reflecting a positive shift toward open science.
3 ostering interdisciplinary collaborations in open science.
4 the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science.
5 process becomes a Constitutional mandate for open science.
6 igating the role of supervisors in promoting open science.
7 d also be encouraged within the framework of open science.
8                                 Why practice open science?
9              Genomic research led the way in open science, a tradition continued by genome-wide assoc
10                           Here we present an open science adversarial collaboration directly juxtapos
11               Open data is a vital pillar of open science and a key enabler for reproducibility, data
12                                              Open science and biosecurity experts have an important r
13  For this dangerous subset of research, both open science and biosecurity goals may be achieved by us
14                          With an emphasis on open science and collaboration, we have assembled a rese
15 ndings across species and techniques through open science and collaborations is essential to comprehe
16 cipation through new membership will advance open science and data sharing and, in turn, drive innova
17 e and patient populations, thus accelerating open science and democratizing AI for medicine.
18 es, and from proprietary, competitive R&D to open science and financing for the common good that supp
19  novel drugs and drug combinations, and that open science and rapid sharing of research results are c
20 ral frames, and women's participation in the open science and reproducibility literatures (n = 2,926
21            Network analyses suggest that the open science and reproducibility literatures are emergin
22 Science;" "Standards and Interoperability;" "Open Science and Reproducibility;" "Translational Bioinf
23 logy is collaboration between the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange and the results of the
24 gy is a collaboration between the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange and the results of the
25 gy is a collaboration between the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange and the results of the
26 gy is a collaboration between the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange, and the results of th
27 logy is collaboration between the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange, and the results of th
28 gy is a collaboration between the Center for Open Science and Science Exchange, and the results of th
29 matics problems; and approaches that promote open science and sharing of data, results, and software.
30 rom a misinterpretation of the principles of open science and that both considerations can be address
31                                  The rise of open science and the absence of a global dedicated data
32 ions in CPM research, science dissemination, open science, and education.
33 al effort is dedicated to rapid progress and open science, and in the past decade it has delivered an
34 by a multi-country consortium that adopts an open science approach to achieve this goal.
35                               Our innovative Open Science approach to BSMs image analysis revealed ho
36                  In this work, we adopted an open science approach to develop a series of potent type
37                                We adopted an open science approach to develop a series of potent, sel
38 arent and collaborative research by using an open science approach, sharing both raw data and stimuli
39 omes to identify preferable methods using an open science approach.
40                              Benefits of the open-science approach include recruitment of multidiscip
41  drug screening data, paving the way for new open science approaches to early-stage drug discovery.
42 abase known for its collaborative nature and open science approaches.
43 bility in neuroscience through collaborative open-science approaches.
44                            Collaboration and open science are pivotal to the success of WikiPathways.
45 vements to support teams, collaboration, and open science are urgently needed.
46              Reproducibility is essential to open science, as there is limited relevance for findings
47                          Here, we reflect on open science at the journal and discuss how and why we s
48                                           As open science becomes widespread, we must consider its im
49 nizes publishing to align with the ideals of open science by making it transparent, reproducible, imm
50 ines computational requirements and promotes open science by simplifying the re-analysis and downstre
51 but motivating researchers to participate in open science can be challenging.
52                             A paper from the Open Science Collaboration attempting to replicate 100 p
53 lbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Ps
54 tion of research, a practice promoted by the open science community, provides an opportunity for achi
55                          The modern canon of open science consists of five "schools of thought" that
56 ure, and speculates about what the future of open science could look like.
57 t the results of the COVID Moonshot, a fully open-science, crowdsourced, and structure-enabled drug d
58 riptomic and histological data from the NASA Open Science Data Repository (OSDR).
59  Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Open Science Data Repository (OSDR).
60 is working groups and training programs, the open science data repository promotes widespread engagem
61 a Archive with GeneLab to establish the NASA Open Science Data Repository significantly enhanced acce
62       The guide covers three major topics in open science (data, code, and publications) and offers p
63                                              Open science describes the practice of carrying out scie
64 teams from 78 countries in community-driven, open-science development of machine learning models.
65  (monarchinitiative.org) is a collaborative, open science effort that aims to semantically integrate
66                                       Recent open science efforts to improve rigor and reliability ha
67 velopment and integration with other ongoing open science efforts.
68                                              Open science entails the sharing of more than mere facts
69 es has become increasingly challenging in an open science environment that promotes unrestricted acce
70 per workflow showcases the benefits of doing open science for phylogenetics, encouraging researchers
71 ence-based study with protocol registered on Open Science Framework (digital object identifier: 10.17
72 Systematic Review [protocol] registered with Open Science Framework (OSF).
73 s and benchmarking results are hosted on the Open Science Framework at
74  protocol for this study can be found on the Open Science Framework at .
75                                              Open Science Framework doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/7SX8U.
76              This study is registered in the Open Science Framework online public database, registrat
77              The study was registered on the Open Science Framework platform.
78 structure, Wanfang, medRxiv (preprints), and Open Science Framework Preprints (preprint server aggreg
79  The study protocol was preregistered in the Open Science Framework Registries.
80  in-person with different people are limited.Open Science Framework repository: .
81         We followed a protocol registered on Open Science Framework to include studies that examined
82 everyone to consult and contribute to on the Open Science Framework website.
83                    In a preregistered study (Open Science Framework), we examined how this interactio
84 a Big Team Science large-scale collaborative open science framework, to pool efforts and resources of
85  and 2000 datasets from Zenodo, Figshare and Open Science Framework.
86                                              Open Science Framework.
87                       Protocol registration: Open Science Framework.
88 ed, and the study protocol was registered on Open Science Framework.
89 basic science study was preregistered in the Open Science Framework.
90  the protocol The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework.
91  present systematic review was registered in Open Science Framework.
92 protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework.
93           The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework.
94               The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework.
95             The study is registered with the Open Science Framework.
96     The study protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework.
97                           Protocol registry: Open Science Framework:
98                                 We find that open science has a more connected, collaborative structu
99                                              Open Science has changed research by making data accessi
100                          Conversations about open science have reached the mainstream, yet many open
101 promoting transparency, reproducibility, and open science in basic biomedical research.
102 ures have adopted different cultural frames: open science includes more explicitly communal and proso
103 artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine, open science including efforts for data and model reposi
104 mmunity to ask for their contributions to an open science initiative.
105 Essay provides an overview of a selection of open science initiatives from the past 2 decades, focusi
106                         The movement towards open science is a consequence of seemingly pervasive fai
107                                              Open Science is encouraged by the European Union and man
108                                  Support for open science is growing, but motivating researchers to p
109                                              Open science is key to PLOS Biology's mission, both in i
110                     One unexpected aspect of open science is the role it has played in uplifting the
111 hnology, data infrastructure, statistics and open science, macrogenetics addresses core evolutionary
112                       MESA is grounded in an open science model that continues to be a beacon for col
113                     Following the successful open-science model of drug validity testing through "cli
114 the prominent strategies associated with the open science movement (e.g., making data publicly availa
115                                          The open science movement is transforming scientific practic
116 dated period coincides with the contemporary open science movement.
117                         The ABCD study is an open-science, multisite study following up more than 11
118                                 The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over
119 e research practices; transparent reporting; open science (open research); valuing a diversity of typ
120 mentally incompatible with the principles of open science, or technically challenging to implement in
121 , and women's participation is increasing in open science over time and decreasing in reproducibility
122 are major obstacles to the early adoption of open science, overall open science practices should bene
123                                          Its open science philosophy preconizes the rapid, seamless s
124 harmaceutical sector, would be managed as an open science platform.
125 led wheat blast and stress the importance of open-science platforms and crowdsourced community respon
126 c investments, improved global coordination, open science policies and stronger, more equitable inter
127                         To be successful, an open science policy must clearly lay out expectations, b
128 e and Hospital during the development of its open science policy.
129 reproducible science, the building blocks of open science practice that are common across many discip
130 d that one should be more likely to identify open science practices (here publishing open access and
131 on; and (3) making reproducible research and open science practices an integral part of a future rese
132     Here, we examine the interaction between open science practices and biosecurity and biosafety to
133 oward, use of, and perceived norms regarding open science practices from a sample of authors publishe
134                    Reproducible research and open science practices have the potential to accelerate
135 ur sample appear to underestimate the use of open science practices in their field.
136 s they can promote reproducible research and open science practices in their institutions.
137 ent that the reported lifetime prevalence of open science practices increased from 49% in 2010 to 87%
138 chers to integrate reproducible research and open science practices into their daily work.
139  the early adoption of open science, overall open science practices should benefit both the ECR and i
140 cience have reached the mainstream, yet many open science practices such as data sharing remain uncom
141                                              Open science practices such as posting data or code and
142                 To address these challenges, open science practices such as sharing data, code, and m
143 sed by research teams to proudly display the open science practices that were used to generate eviden
144                   To reach consensus on what open science practices to monitor at biomedical research
145                             This core set of open science practices will form the foundation for inst
146        Here, we assess some shifts away from open science practices with the aim of stimulating a dis
147  online survey evaluating a set of potential open science practices, and for round 3, we hosted two h
148 , fostering community integration, promoting open science practices, and providing structured yet fle
149                          In order to monitor open science practices, they first need to be well defin
150 m the perspective of ECRs for moving towards open science practices, which we believe scientists and
151 largely on reproducibility/replicability and open science practices.
152 ues in bioinformatics research and promoting open science practices.
153 mately, participants reached consensus on 19 open science practices.
154 used a particular practice at least once) of open science practices.
155 to establish sustainable, collaborative, and open science practices.
156 d other researchers and will be committed to open-science practices.
157              We demonstrate how adherence to Open Science principles is key to the OTN community and
158  those who are comparatively new to applying open science principles to their computational work.
159 naging biomedical risks is the commitment to open science principles, which ensure that data are find
160     Here, we outline how the adoption of key Open Science principles-open data, open source and open
161  into open scientific research and commit to Open Science principles.
162 nalyses, and publish data in accordance with open science principles.
163 ions, data protection, and the necessity for open science principles.
164                                          The Open Science Prize was established with the following fi
165 he Developing Human Connectome Project is an Open Science project that provides the first large sampl
166 science, what processes are needed to follow open science protocols while upholding Indigenous People
167                                   Center for Open Science Real World Evidence Registry.
168 tly into Antarctic practices, in relation to open science, reducing operational greenhouse gas footpr
169 ural Genomics Consortium is an international open science research organization with a focus on accel
170  norms across Earth science institutions and open science research.
171 the framework of a twin/sibling design, this open science resource provides the basis for delineating
172 avioural and epidemiological variables as an open science resource.
173         The Simons Sleep Project (SSP) is an open-science resource designed to accelerate digital hea
174 mentary to metabolomics protocols, relies on open science resources, and can be scaled to support lar
175 us on reproducibility are contributing to an open science revolution in neuroscience.
176 ators, researchers, specialists in dedicated open science roles, and librarians.
177                Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessm
178                Notable changes include a new open science section, additional emphasis on the assessm
179                Notable changes include a new open-science section, additional emphasis on the assessm
180 ata protection requirements and the need for open science, so as to promote international collaborati
181 n act in concert with familiar principles of open science, such as findable, accessible, interoperabl
182 o foster the implementation of principles of Open Science, such as reproducibility and traceability.
183                      Arguments in support of open science tend to focus on confirmatory research prac
184                                   To support Open Science, the chemical HSD17B13 probe BI-3231 will b
185 ontent analysis, we explore attitudes toward open science, the motivations and disincentives to parti
186 to the simultaneous increasing popularity of open science, these state-of-the-art datasets are more a
187  candidates spearhead initiatives to promote open science, this study adds value by investigating the
188 nternational collaboration, data sharing and open science to accelerate discovery in neurodegeneratio
189 he chemical space coverage and, supported by open-science tools and resources, evaluated urinary chem
190  17.12, p < .001) and greater agreement with open science values (Wave 1: t(47) = 3.56, p < .001, Wav
191 s most learners reported high agreement with open science values at pretest.
192                           The improvement in open science values was more moderate and was significan
193 atus author positions (first or last) within open science (vs.
194                                   To promote open science, we are making all scripts and the trained
195                   In the age of big data and open science, what processes are needed to follow open s
196 ophy of open source software development and open science within the biological research community.
197 cologists and transforming towards radically open science workflows.
198  level of agreement with important tenets of open science would increase over the course of the progr

 
Page Top