ライフサイエンスコーパス: operative time

1 s or hernia repairs, hernia defect size, and operative time.

2 ction, without a substantial increase in the operative time.

3 ltifactorial but may be related to prolonged operative time.

4 GD rate, test performance, success rate, and operative time.

5 Cataract was removed at the same operative time.

6 erator benefits, and potential advantages in operative time.

7 rence of inguinal hernia, complications, and operative time.

8 on of fundoplication, time to discharge, and operative time.

9 ffective in decreasing MAO and required more operative time.

10 , manual anastomosis, and prolonged perineal operative time.

11 and increase mental focus without extending operative time.

12 ly obese patients and adds little additional operative time.

13 ion modeling, adjusting for risk factors and operative time.

14 ative sepsis, wound class III/IV, and longer operative time.

15 ons have better patient outcomes and shorter operative times.

16 patients with favorable results and shorter operative times.

17 s performed extracorporeally due to improved operative times.

18 nsfusions, but at the same time have shorter operative times.

19 s (R0-resection, lymph nodes harvested), and operative times.

20 ique made it easier to perform and decreased operative times.

21 the disadvantage of significantly increased operative times.

22 ex 40 kg/m or higher (OR = 1.81, P = 0.015), operative time 120 minutes or more (OR = 1.69, P = 0.027

23 Operative time (135 +/- 45 min vs. 133 +/- 56 min; P = 0

24 Median operative time (149 vs 120 min, P < 0.001) and mean hosp

25 stases (70%, 82%, 89%, P < 0.001) and median operative time (180, 175, 225 minutes, P < 0.001).

26 loss (150 mL versus 250 mL, P = 0.034), and operative time (187 minutes versus 211 minutes, P = 0.02

27 50 mL (IQR: 50-350); P <0.001] and a shorter operative time (188 min (IQR: 140-270) vs 222 min (IQR:

28 oscopic colectomy patients had a longer mean operative time (195 +/- 76 vs. 178 +/- 80 minutes; P < 0

29 assisted technique significantly reduced the operative time (2.02+/-0.44 vs. 3.12+/-0.36 hr, P<0.05)

30 paroscopic surgery was correlated to shorter operative time (214 vs 324 minutes; P < 0.001).

31 positive margin rates (8% vs. 7%, P = 0.8), operative times (216 vs. 230 minutes, P = 0.3), or leak

32 Operative time (219 minutes for LH vs 198 minutes for OH

33 tistically significant differences in median operative time (263 minutes), intraoperative blood loss

34 edian blood loss 350 mL (IQR = 200-700), and operative time 375 minutes (IQR = 320-431).

35 FOLFIRINOX resulted in significantly longer operative times (393 vs 300 minutes) and blood loss (600

36 Median results are as follows: operative time 4.5 hr, warm ischemia time 25 min, and bl

37 d a similar complication rate (30% vs. 29%), operative time (4.6 vs. 5.1 hours), and intraoperative b

38 NASH patients had significantly longer operative times (402 vs 322 minutes; P < 0.001), operati

39 tive rates (2.3 vs 12.2%, P = 0.001), longer operative time (427 vs 311 minutes, P = 0.001), and incr

40 o discharge (96, 36%), blood loss (85, 32%), operative time (79, 30%) and blood pressure (74, 28%).

41 red favorably with standard open techniques: operative times (99 vs. 182 minutes), blood loss (102 vs

42 There was no difference in median operative time (A/R: 280 minutes, BR: 282 minutes; P = .

43 ortion, less ecchymosis and edema, decreased operative times, a shortened recovery period, and improv

44 No differences were found in operative time, accidental parathyroidectomy, parathyroi

45 fter 40 cases (27.5% vs 14.4%; P = .04), and operative time after 80 cases (581 minutes vs 417 minute

46 Average operative time and blood loss were 169 minutes (range, 6

47 Mean operative time and blood loss were 425 minutes and 232 m

48 e of robotics for these procedures increases operative time and cost, but decreases estimated blood l

49 Increased operative time and decreased donor liver-to-recipient bo

50 Operative time and direct institutional cost seem in fav

51 fferences in operative parameters, including operative time and estimated blood loss, were reported b

52 Ob group showed longer operative time and higher blood losses.

53 cipating resident was associated with longer operative time and higher postoperative complications ra

54 rathyroidism while simultaneously decreasing operative time and hospital stays.

55 sidewall may increase the risk of prolonged operative time and incidental ureteral injury.

56 invasive to the conventional group, although operative time and ischemia time was higher in minimally

57 The learning curve is evident: operative time and leaks decreased with experience and i

58 Median operative time and length of in-hospital stay were 95 mi

59 f unresectable disease significantly reduced operative time and length of stay compared with patients

60 Operative time and length of stay in the intensive care

61 ata indicated general improvement trends for operative time and length of stay, alongside higher-than

62 Operative time and postoperative complications were simi

63 eoperative organ dysfunction, blood loss, or operative time and postoperative organ dysfunction or mo

64 To evaluate the relationship between operative time and progressive number of procedures, a l

65 DCD LT, measures were taken to minimize CIT, operative time and recipient WIT along with the use of t

66 Secondary outcome parameters were operative time and textbook outcome ("optimal outcome").

67 significantly increased phacoemulsification operative times and costs during the first half, but not

68 Ranges of operative times and estimated blood losses were 83 to 22

69 nefits of this technique outweigh its longer operative times and higher costs.

70 ng comorbidities, was associated with longer operative times and higher rates of conversion to open p

71 tages of increased patient comfort decreased operative times and improved postoperative astigmatism.

72 Prolonged cold ischemic and operative times and multiple or peripheral strictures pr

73 ho underwent endoscopic biopsy had decreased operative times and shorter hospitalizations.

74 roach enables patients to experience shorter operative times and the benefits of laparoscopy, includi

75 odels of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (80-90 min operative time) and sleeve gastrectomy (30-45 min operat

76 en PTSD and intra-operative analgesia, intra-operative time, and anesthesia type for cataract surgery

77 High blood loss, long operative time, and arterial resections were independent

78 groups for age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, and blood loss.

79 nts, 30-day reoperation, 30-day readmission, operative time, and hospital stay.

80 transplants, shorter cold ischemic time and operative time, and less intraoperative transfusion requ

81 an increase (P>0.3) in total ischemia time, operative time, and packed red blood cells requirement b

82 nfection, intra-abdominal abscess formation, operative time, and postoperative hospital stay.

83 ed advantages of minimal dissection, shorter operative time, and use in ambulatory settings, compares

84 (intrinsic cardiac risk, pain score, median operative time, and work relative value units) to devise

85 is a safe and effective strategy, decreasing operative times, and allograft ischemic times, whereas o

86 s, but a standard lesion set, improvement in operative times, and long-term results still need to be

87 ), minimum required endoillumination levels, operative times, and surgeon "ease of use" of the viewin

88 rder reported higher pain scores, had longer operative times, and were more likely to have received a

89 s correlated with higher pain scores, longer operative times, and with having received a retrobulbar

90 sing a mathematical cost model incorporating operative time, anesthesia fees, consumables, and capita

91 Mean operative times as well as total hospital charges were s

92 Those in the "shave" group had a longer operative time at the initial surgery (median 76 vs 66 m

93 ality, complications, harvested lymph nodes, operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were compa

94 Operative time, blood loss, and length of stay have drop

95 perative chemoradiation results in increased operative time, blood loss, and pelvic abscess formation

96 Operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hematocrit

97 Average operative time, blood loss, ICU stay and overall length

98 nor sex, related versus nonrelated donation, operative time, blood loss, length of stay, time out of

99 Other parameters, such as operative time, blood loss, postoperative renal function

100 nt differences in outcome parameters such as operative time, blood use, ventilation days, length of s

101 Study variables included operative times, blood loss, hospital stay, graft functi

102 tcome measures include operative techniques, operative times, blood loss, length of stay, conversion

103 open procedure was associated with a reduced operative time but increased donor length of stay in the

104 ere was no significant difference in overall operative time, but macular peel time was significantly

105 operative time, complications, postoperative gastro-esop

106 nificant differences in the morbidity rates, operative time, conversion rates, and postoperative reco

107 Secondary outcome measurements included operative time, conversion rates, morbidity rates, activ

108 e, indication, body mass index, breast size, operative time, conversion to open surgery, systemic com

109 Operative time, conversion to open, blood loss, and clin

110 gth of stay and secondary endpoints included operative time, conversion, complications and postoperat

111 Median operative time declined with operative experience (P<0.0

112 After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.00

113 tcome increased from 28% to 53% and the mean operative time decreased from 344 minutes to 270 minutes

114 The operative time decreased significantly from 234 +/- 77 m

115 The median operative time decreased significantly over the decades,

116 Operative time decreased with the progressive increase o

117 Operative times decreased (P < 0.05) and fewer transfusi

118 al and partial nephrectomies have equivalent operative time, decreased blood loss, superior recovery,

119 Operative time, doses of narcotics, surgical difficultly

120 ssection would lead to substantial saving in operative time during pancreatic resection.

121 e that the rapid en bloc technique decreases operative time during the donor operation.

122 Operative times earlier in the year did not vary from th

123 , whereas the main disadvantage involves the operative times early in the learning curve.

124 Patients benefit with decreased operative time, edema, ecchymosis, and recovery times.

125 nt observations were made over 39.8 hours of operative time, enabling the identification of 79 distin

126 The operative time, estimated blood loss, and rate of pelvic

127 Operative time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion re

128 Main outcome measures included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital

129 There was no effect of age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative comp

130 A significant reduction was observed in mean operative time following the introduction of each interv

131 The average operative time for all cases with 2 assistants (both PGY

132 resident level was associated with increased operative time for both open and laparoscopic repair.

133 ted as an independent risk factor for longer operative time for both techniques; multiple arteries si

134 Median operative time for PD was 227 minutes (105 to 462) and D

135 these skills in the operating room; however, operative time for residents has decreased with duty hou

136 Mean operative time for the 2 most common procedures was 529

137 While operative time for the control group and the experimenta

138 Operative time for the laparoscopic group was longer (10

139 tes after FPTX in conjunction with decreased operative times for OPTX have led some groups to abandon

140 Operative times for SPLC were greater than CLC (88.5 min

141 There was no significant difference in operative times for this group of patients, but there wa

142 IPM increased operative time from 34 to 60 minutes (P < 0.0001).

143 nated wounds (OR = 2.1 [95% CI, 1.24-3.55]), operative time >/=2 hours (OR = 1.75 [95% CI, 1.01-3.04]

144 , postoperative hospital stay >/=3 days, and operative time >/=3 hours.

145 Five factors predicted reintervention: operative time >=3.0 hours, aneurysm diameter >=6.0 cm,

146 ics for 344 degrees -viewing and a prolonged operative time has been recently developed for Crohn's d

147 these patients, its complexity and increased operative time has precluded widespread application.

148 A simulation-based ML curriculum decreased operative time, improved trainee performance, and decrea

149 The mean operative time in conv-LRYGB was significantly longer in

150 s; multiple arteries significantly prolonged operative time in LDN, whereas RDN was longer in right k

151 Operative time in strabismus surgery increased with PGY3

152 The CUSUM analysis showed an increase in operative time in the first period, a stable duration in

153 The mean operative time in the radical group was 6.4 hours, compa

154 The mean operative time in the radical group was 6.8 hours, compa

155 The mean operative time in the right nephrectomy group was signif

156 ent of resection, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, incidence and grade of complications, an

157 re costly than LP (2.7 times), due to longer operative time, increased consumables costs, and depreci

158 Additionally, the late group had longer operative times, increased need for postoperative percut

159 e of ipsilateral and contralateral stenosis, operative time, intraoperative EEG slowing, history of p

160 t per PGY3 assistant per year for additional operative time is $3141.95.

161 Operative outcomes included operative time, islet isolation time, warm ischemia time

162 Demographic data, operative time, length of stay, patient controlled analg

163 There were no differences in operative time, length of stay, perioperative mortality,

164 The main outcome measures were total operative time, macular peel time, surgeon rating of vie

165 There was no difference in operative time, margin positivity, incidence of postoper

166 Operative time (mean +/- standard error of the mean) for

167 e were not significant differences for total operative time (mean 6.0+/-0.17 vs. 6.3+/-0.25 hr, P=1.0

168 red with OPD, RPD was associated with longer operative times [mean difference = 75.4 minutes, 95% con

169 The mean operative time, mean blood loss, and rate of conversion

170 tions, despite having a significantly longer operative time (median, 204 v 130 minutes, respectively;

171 botic liver surgery had significantly longer operative times (median: 253 vs 199 minutes) and overall

172 has and will lead to further improvements in operative times, morbidity rates, and functional results

173 -7.08); male gender (OR 2.08, CI 1.36-3.19); operative time more than 3 hours (OR 1.86, CI 1.07-3.24)

174 2.851, 95% CI: 2.067-3.935; P < 0.001), and operative time more than 6 hours (HR: 1.510, 95% CI: 1.1

175 Complex cases had longer operative times, more sedation, and higher pain scores.

176 nonoverlapping surgery (NO) with respect to operative time, mortality, readmissions, and complicatio

177 One-way sensitivity analysis showed that LP operative time must increase to almost 6.5 hours for it

178 ritoneal approach has been shown to decrease operative times, narcotic need and permit quicker return

179 Only shorter operative time (odds ratio [OR]-0.14, P = 0.004) and inp

180 dds ratio, 2.549; 95% CI, 1.464-4.440), long operative time (odds ratio, 1.601; 95% CI, 1.186-2.160),

181 rnia during 2 years, with an additional mean operative time of 16 minutes.

182 Total operative time of 195 and 258 min, estimated blood loss

183 s beyond the learning curve) included a mean operative time of 417 minutes, median estimated blood lo

184 d 173 cases with a PGY5 assistant an average operative time of 59.0 minutes (SD, 14.7); the differenc

185 sts) score greater than 2, flap failure, and operative time of 6 hours or longer.

186 e 200 cases with a PGY3 assistant an average operative time of 62.5 minutes (standard deviation [SD],

187 by height in meters squared) of 31, and mean operative time of 65 minutes.

188 Primary stratification was by operative time of day (night, 7 PM-7 AM; day, 7 AM-7 PM)

189 there was no significant association between operative time of day and survival up to 1 year after or

190 The operative time of primary parathyroidectomy was reduced

191 ltiorgan or vascular resection, and elevated operative time, of which 38.7% of the relative impact wa

192 m prostate-specific antigen, blood loss, and operative time, only gland volume was significantly and

193 oscopic assisted (HAL)], conversions (Conv), operative time (OR time), pathology (benign vs. malignan

194 Resource variables were operative time (OT), intraoperative transfusion, length

195 The main outcome variables were operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and complicat

196 The expected reductions in operative time over the attending surgeon's career and t

197 ificantly higher and blood loss (p < 0.001), operative time (p < 0.001), intensive care unit days (p

198 for deep SSIs were bile leak (P < 0.001) and operative time (P < 0.001).

199 All 3 LDN modalities required a longer operative time (P < 0.001); robot-assisted-LDN took sign

200 ascular invasion, extent of hepatectomy, and operative time (P < 0.01).

201 significantly associated with an increase in operative time (P = 0.003).

202 d segmentectomy were associated with shorter operative time (P = 0.029), more numbers of lymph nodes

203 l trials were considered, there were shorter operative times (P = 0.002) for the open group but nonsi

204 nterior wound location (p<0.001) and shorter operative times (p<0.001).

205 ve complications (infection and recurrence), operative time, patient satisfaction, and intraoperative

206 Despite a longer operative time, patients undergoing laparoscopic GBP ben

207 Baseline operative time, performance, and demographics were simil

208 Operative time, performance, and patient outcomes adjust

209 n of the device at postoperative chest film, operative time, postoperative complications, and length

210 Transfusion requirement, operative time, postoperative length of stay, and overal

211 the use of tumescent anesthesia to decrease operative time, postoperative morbidity, and recovery ti

212 rioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, postoperative nausea, length of hospital

213 Operative times ranged from 53 to 126 minutes (mean, 72.

214 pic approach to appendectomy produces longer operative times resulting in greater charges.

215 s included intraoperative blood transfusion, operative time, return to the operating room, and the nu

216 rience, patient demographics, comorbidities, operative time, Roux limb pathway, intraoperative steroi

217 56; 95% CI 1.17-5.62; P=0.019) and increased operative time (RR 1.19 [1-hr increase]; 95% CI 1.03-1.3

218 enalectomy, after which conversion rates and operative times significantly decrease, is more than 20

219 Operative times (SIS 202 minutes vs. 1 degrees 183 minut

220 patients undergoing LPJ alone had a shorter operative time, slightly less transfusion requirement, s

221 eam familiarity contributed to reductions in operative time, suggesting potential benefits to maintai

222 y and individual PGY3 but not PGY5 assistant operative times suggests that efficiency in strabismus s

223 the financial and ethical concerns of using operative time to teach basic skills.

224 ephrectomy, single-port patients had similar operative times to cross clamp (2.8 vs 2.6 hours; P = 0.

225 Overall, mean total operative time (TOT) for all patients (n = 95) was 88.63

226 No significant difference was seen in the operative time, total hospital stay, flap loss, re-explo

227 Operative time, total time in the operating room, operat

228 tive calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, operative time, total time in the operating room, time i

229 2 vs. LA: 23.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, P = 0.96) mean operative time (TVA: 44.4 +/- 4.5 minutes vs. LA: 39.8 +

230 re is a learning curve to the procedure with operative times varying between 30 and 120 min.

231 Participant teams were compensated for lost operative time via malpractice premium discounts, contin

232 Surgical demographics included operative time, warm ischemia time, and estimated blood

233 Operative time was 101 +/- 29 minutes, with 95% (109/115

234 Mean operative time was 123 minutes (range, 80-360 minutes),

235 he mean weight was 2.6 kg (+/-0.5), the mean operative time was 129.9 minutes (+/-55.5), the mean day

236 Mean operative time was 135 minutes (range, 49-295 minutes),

237 The mean operative time was 153 (SD = 38) minutes for teams with

238 Median operative time was 159 (54) minutes, warm ischemia time

239 The median operative time was 179 minutes.

240 Mean operative time was 190 min and mean estimated blood loss

241 The overall mean operative time was 2.8 hours and the mean postoperative

242 Mean operative time was 216 +/- 57 minutes, mean postoperativ

243 The mean operative time was 223.8 and 175.7 min (P=0.07) and the

244 Mean operative time was 252.9 +/- 55.7 minutes, estimated blo

245 Mean operative time was 266.0 min, mean hospital stay was 3.2

246 Mean operative time was 3.7 hours, and mean postoperative len

247 The total operative time was 318 minutes with an estimated blood l

248 The average operative time was 338 minutes.

249 The median operative time was 360 minutes (210-510).

250 Mean operative time was 38.7 +/- 14.9 minutes with suction on

251 ll units transfused was zero, and the median operative time was 4.3 hours.

252 Total operative time was 430 minutes (393-480), cold and warm

253 Mean (SD) operative time was 493 (78) minutes, islet isolation tim

254 Also, the mean operative time was 5 minutes longer for the single site

255 ed cells transfused was zero, and the median operative time was 7 hours.

256 However, the mean operative time was 7.4 hours in the reoperative group, s

257 Mean total operative time was 7.5 hr.

258 The average operative time was 7.6 hours, with 15% of patients requi

259 With piggyback, the average operative time was 8.6+/-1.9 hr, median amount of blood

260 Mean operative time was 83 minutes (49-140 minutes).

261 Median operative time was comparable in IIA versus EIA group {1

262 Operative time was independently associated with the ope

263 The mean operative time was less for LSG than for LRYGB (87 +/- 5

264 ter MIDP (150 vs 400 mL; P < 0.001), whereas operative time was longer (217 vs 179 minutes; P = 0.005

265 Robotic operative time was longer compared with open, laparoscop

266 Laparoscopic operative time was longer compared with open.

267 However, operative time was longer during laparoscopy.

268 Mean operative time was longer for laparoscopic GBP than for

269 Median operative time was longer for the LAP-IPAA group (333 mi

270 Operative time was longer in the RES group [mean (SD) 12

271 Mean (SD) operative time was lower in the hysteropexy group vs the

272 Operative time was not associated with an increased pain

273 Operative time was not significantly longer in the lapar

274 A significant decrease in blood loss and operative time was noted.

275 A CUSUM analysis of the operative time was performed to evaluate improvements of

276 The influence of these factors on operative time was quantified along with patient age, vo

277 The mean operative time was significantly decreased in the Rosset

278 Operative time was significantly longer for laparoscopic

279 Operative time was significantly longer in ObD 151+/-30

280 Mean (SD) operative time was significantly longer in the minimally

281 Mean operative time was significantly shorter for group III c

282 No statistically significant variation in operative times was demonstrated when comparing cases wi

283 Continuous improvement in operative times was observed over the course of the expe

284 MIPD was associated with prolonged operative times [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 74 min

285 ngs, resectability rate, length of stay, and operative time were analyzed.

286 greater than 2, flap failure, and prolonged operative time were associated with increased risk of SS

287 rates of recurrence, complications and mean operative time were compared.

288 The mean operative times were 214.46 +/- 84.33 min and 250.55 +/-

289 Estimated blood loss was higher and operative times were longer during OLP.

290 Operative times were longer for HALDN (3.4+/-0.7 vs. 3.0

291 Although operative times were longer in the RAR group, estimated

292 Mean operative times were shorter (123, 147 and 145 minutes;

293 Operative times were significantly different for individ

294 Operative times were significantly longer for LPD {MD [9

295 risk factors (cross-clamp time, blood loss, operative time) were assessed and compared with postoper

296 tive time) and sleeve gastrectomy (30-45 min operative time), which, to a high degree, resembles oper

297 ion as intracorporeal diversion takes a long operative time with associated morbidity and complicatio

298 st and last halves of the academic year, but operative times within individual quarters of the academ

299 LDG was associated with longer operative times (WMD 48.3 minutes; P < 0.001) and lower

300 s with minimal manipulation and within intra-operative time would provide significant advantages for