ライフサイエンスコーパス: ophthalmologist

1 t standard care (face-to-face examination by ophthalmologists).

2 us photography, and teleconsultation with an ophthalmologist.

3 I treatment should immediately be seen by an ophthalmologist.

4 wed to receive further care with their local ophthalmologist.

5 Gonioscopy was performed by a single trained ophthalmologist.

6 ation need to have formal reevaluation by an ophthalmologist.

7 ti-inflammatory drugs and adjudication by an ophthalmologist.

8 and type of SCR, based on examination by an ophthalmologist.

9 ribution of opioid prescriptions written per ophthalmologist.

10 delegate the decision-making process to the ophthalmologist.

11 ion to be transferred by and shared with the ophthalmologist.

12 at the time of their first examination by an ophthalmologist.

13 almic examination was performed by an expert ophthalmologist.

14 r examinations were done by Optometrists and Ophthalmologist.

15 unters indicating the patient was seen by an ophthalmologist.

16 stics associated with the availability of an ophthalmologist.

17 us photography, and teleconsultation with an ophthalmologist.

18 d specialist input from endocrinologists and ophthalmologists.

19 on in the practices of 5 different pediatric ophthalmologists.

20 vendors accounted for 50% of attestations by ophthalmologists.

21 d family physicians and a 20.6% decrease for ophthalmologists.

22 most frequently used EHRs for attestation by ophthalmologists.

23 ns, 0.75 for family physicians, and 0.59 for ophthalmologists.

24 remained significant for all physicians and ophthalmologists.

25 remained significant for all physicians and ophthalmologists.

26 physicians (17.3%) and a 10.0% increase for ophthalmologists.

27 nted 32.8% of the total Medicare payments to ophthalmologists.

28 nt of retinal vein occlusions is provided by ophthalmologists.

29 ; 95% CI, -1026 to -848; P < .001) than male ophthalmologists.

30 cability and the current paucity of APMs for ophthalmologists.

31 are proposed for use by both allergists and ophthalmologists.

32 by review of the entire medical record by 2 ophthalmologists.

33 ere is variability in EHR use patterns among ophthalmologists.

34 ions were qualitatively assessed by 2 masked ophthalmologists.

35 and prescriber rates) for all participating ophthalmologists.

36 al need not only for allergists but also for ophthalmologists.

37 ompared with that of non-retinal specialized ophthalmologists.

38 c-related adverse ocular effects by treating ophthalmologists.

39 made to the gender ratio of board-certified ophthalmologists.

40 er-hours EHR use in a cohort of 139 academic ophthalmologists.

41 ter than the average non-retinal specialized ophthalmologists.

42 el of accuracy, equal or superior to that of ophthalmologists.

43 male speakers exceed ABO estimates of female ophthalmologists.

44 lower accuracy that still surpassed that of ophthalmologists.

45 devices are areas that require management by ophthalmologists.

46 to or better than the average values of all ophthalmologists.

47 e can best complement potential shortages of ophthalmologists.

48 erformed the average non-retinal specialized ophthalmologists.

49 amily history (13/36 subjects) or by another ophthalmologist (1/36 subjects).

50 64 patients with HR from the practices of 2 ophthalmologists, 11 of whom were women with body mass i

51 ogy care provider (NOCP) and confirmed by an ophthalmologist, 13 (7.1%) patients were diagnosed by an

52 ribed the distribution of complaints against ophthalmologists; (2) compared the distribution and rate

53 Ten ophthalmologists (5 general ophthalmologists, 4 retina specialists, 1 retina fellow)

54 Ten ophthalmologists (5 general ophthalmologists, 4 retina s

55 -related ambulatory visits were conducted by ophthalmologists (70.4% [95% CI, 62.2%-77.5%]) even when

56 elegating the decision-making process to the ophthalmologist, 8.3% preferred the autonomous style of

57 Consistently, most ophthalmologists (88%-89%) wrote 10 opioid prescriptions

58 ogist out-earning the 75th-percentile female ophthalmologist across almost all age groups, practice c

59 ification labels, performed similar to three ophthalmologists across four clinically relevant retrosp

60 the locations of primary care clinicians and ophthalmologists across the state, and (3) the travel ti

61 Ophthalmologists across training levels were able to ide

62 I, 0.69-0.70) and were less likely to see an ophthalmologist (adjusted HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.55-0.55).

63 Among 317 ophthalmologists administering predominantly ranibizumab

64 ist, 13 (7.1%) patients were diagnosed by an ophthalmologist alone, and 6 (3.3%) patients were diagno

65 5%) ophthalmologists were women, and of 1204 ophthalmologists analyzed for industry payments, 176 (4.

66 We sought collaborations with ophthalmologists, anatomists, physiologists, physicists,

67 re 1150 eyes that received LTP (83.1%) by an ophthalmologist and 234 eyes (16.9%) that had the proced

68 Included patients were evaluated by an ophthalmologist and a rheumatologist following a predefi

69 they had a diagnosis of glaucoma from their ophthalmologist and if they had greater than or equal to

70 Search terms included ophthalmology or ophthalmologist and malpractice anywhere in the retrieve

71 The main outcomes were ophthalmologist and optometrist density, as defined as t

72 num-garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy-providing ophthalmologist and optometrist in Oklahoma by calculati

73 -service Medicare beneficiaries and Oklahoma ophthalmologist and optometrist laser capsulotomy provid

74 her YAG laser capsulotomy-providing Oklahoma ophthalmologist and optometrist.

75 rity of 74.3% patients preferred SDM between ophthalmologist and patient, 17.4% patients wanted ODM,

76 a multi-disciplinary setting involving both ophthalmologist and radiologists, since the field of ocu

77 ulation lives within a 30-minute drive of an ophthalmologist and within 15 minutes of an optometrist.

78 In 2014, 90 (57%) of 157 Oklahoma ophthalmologists and 65 (13%) of 506 Oklahoma optometris

79 ubspecialty patient care and the training of ophthalmologists and allied personnel, Magrabi ICO Camer

80 es and 7 training courses were conducted for ophthalmologists and allied personnel.

81 At a rhMMP-9 volume of 20 mul (>= 25 ng/ml), ophthalmologists and densitometry identified almost all

82 gularly scheduled diagnostic examinations by ophthalmologists and digital imaging by trained imagers

83 ermine the opioid prescribing patterns among ophthalmologists and elucidate their role in the prescri

84 ayment and attestation data were created for ophthalmologists and for other specialties.

85 ter diagnosis using a joint approach between ophthalmologists and neurosurgeons.

86 nce of undiagnosed AMD was not different for ophthalmologists and optometrists (age adjusted OR, 0.99

87 e of joint management of cataract surgery by ophthalmologists and optometrists among FFS Medicare Par

88 oint management rates of cataract surgery by ophthalmologists and optometrists were calculated for ea

89 ited States, the addresses of all practicing ophthalmologists and optometrists were obtained from the

90 tify the office street addresses of Oklahoma ophthalmologists and optometrists who submitted claims t

91 is one of the most commonly used methods by ophthalmologists and optometrists.

92 The treating ophthalmologists and participants were not masked.

93 systematic review was initiated to enlighten ophthalmologists and patients in the use of original and

94 Network sites by zip code and the density of ophthalmologists and primary care clinicians by zip code

95 nt of rigorous standards for the training of ophthalmologists and pushed for the advancement of excel

96 infrequent given the large number of insured ophthalmologists and the large number of surgical cases

97 and by diagnosing provider (optometrist vs. ophthalmologist) and evaluated likelihood of steroids tr

98 fants had at least 1 follow-up visit with an ophthalmologist, and the median follow-up time from pseu

99 Images were read by 3 masked neuro-ophthalmologists, and the final image interpretation was

100 Ophthalmologists are in the high-risk category for COVID

101 eptability; proportions requiring subsequent ophthalmologist assessment, unable to undergo imaging, a

102 Participants preferred ophthalmologists' assessments; in their absence, they pr

103 using examinations by a pediatric or general ophthalmologist at least every year.

104 ents referred for in-person evaluation by an ophthalmologist because of fundus photography findings a

105 started on HCQ who were seen by a NorthShore ophthalmologist between the years 2009 and 2016.

106 Of the total drug payments to ophthalmologists, biologic anti-VEGF agents ranibizumab

107 Patients were examined by an ophthalmologist blinded to the study group every 4 days

108 nts a curated set of ethical dilemmas facing ophthalmologists both during and following the pandemic.

109 remained significant for all physicians and ophthalmologists but were no longer significant for fami

110 ROUTINE (only diagnostic examinations by an ophthalmologist), CHOP-ROP (birth weight and gestational

111 fied based on how they first presented to an ophthalmologist: Clinical cases were referred by their g

112 In 2012, the average female ophthalmologist collected $0.58 (95% CI, $0.54-$0.62; P

113 for age, geography, and subspecialty, women ophthalmologists collected 42% less as compared to male

114 Pediatric rheumatologists and ophthalmologists collected clinical and laboratory data.

115 Ophthalmologists commonly perform glaucoma surgery to tr

116 < .001) for every dollar collected by a male ophthalmologist; comparing the medians, women collected

117 Of the 1357 recipients, 130 (9.6%) ophthalmologists completed the survey.

118 In the open group, the ophthalmologist could order any type of investigation.

119 reviewed for all malpractice litigation with ophthalmologist defendants in the United States between

120 ember 31, 2016, among 27 stable departmental ophthalmologists (defined as attending ophthalmologists

121 ensity by 2.26%, they still had a lower mean ophthalmologist density (0.58/100,000 individuals) compa

122 unties experienced a mean annual increase in ophthalmologist density by 2.26%, they still had a lower

123 From 1995 to 2017, the national ophthalmologist density decreased from 6.30 to 5.68 opht

124 rs for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by sex and how disparity relate

125 The study outcomes were time spent by ophthalmologists directly with patients on EHR use, conv

126 3 dosing regimens for 2 years and was at the ophthalmologists' discretion thereafter.

127 A study in 2011 suggested that many ophthalmologists do not understand non-Snellen formats,

128 sified using a validated questionnaire in an ophthalmologist-dominant decision-making (ODM), shared d

129 ivity, as well as greater need for visits to ophthalmologists during the prior year.

130 Female ophthalmologists earn significantly less than their male

131 ially diagnosed with acute conjunctivitis by ophthalmologists, enrollees had considerably higher odds

132 te feedback by graders, maintaining periodic ophthalmologist evaluations.

133 44; range, 34-73 years]) the mean (SD) total ophthalmologist examination time was 11.2 (6.3) minutes

134 All of the ophthalmologists' examination times remained the same be

135 non-quantitative examinations and individual ophthalmologists' experiences.

136 Referral of eyes with DR to an ophthalmologist for further evaluation and treatment wou

137 bility, which cases should be referred to an ophthalmologist for further evaluation and treatment.

138 itals where they were clinically assessed by ophthalmologist for presence of eye diseases.

139 ed to measure the length of time required by ophthalmologists for EHR use.

140 xamination as well as total time required by ophthalmologists for EHR use.

141 or the time-motion analysis and 12 attending ophthalmologists for the survey.

142 condition with sterile 21 gauge needle by an ophthalmologist from patients suspected of microbial ker

143 convenience sample consisted of 7 attending ophthalmologists from 6 subspecialties observed during 4

144 e review of the CMS database for payments to ophthalmologists from January 1, 2012, through December

145 iplinary medical team, including a pediatric ophthalmologist, from Fernandes Figueira Institute, a Mi

146 ed proportions of patient and clinician (ie, ophthalmologists, general practitioners, and specialty p

147 Nevertheless, a small number of ophthalmologists generated a disproportionate number of

148 based on (1) the Rotterdam criteria and (2) ophthalmologist grading of optic disc photographs for ch

149 viders per 100,000 individuals, the ratio of ophthalmologists >=55 years of age to those <55 years of

150 Ophthalmologists had significantly fewer complaints per

151 the last 2 decades, the national density of ophthalmologists has decreased and the workforce has age

152 Ophthalmologists have limited time with patients during

153 ding center (RC) from the visit in which the ophthalmologist identified progression to CNV (n = 82 ey

154 Ophthalmologists identified HE on color images in the st

155 ive assessment of carotenoid status can help ophthalmologists identify the patients most likely to be

156 ted with the preferred role of the attending ophthalmologist in the decision-making processes before

157 he CMS was disparate between male and female ophthalmologists in 2012 and 2013 because of the submiss

158 s were similar when comparing female vs male ophthalmologists in 2013 (P < .001).

159 e entire $1.9 billion in drug reimbursements ophthalmologists in 2013.

160 lgorithm's performance was tested against 10 ophthalmologists in a prospective clinic-based dataset w

161 Facilities (MTFs), reflecting the absence of ophthalmologists in most deployed United Kingdom MTFs.

162 reement in ROP from clinical examinations by ophthalmologists in other studies.

163 n and median CMS payments to male and female ophthalmologists in outpatient, non-facility-based setti

164 as to gauge the confidence and experience of ophthalmologists in Scotland in managing these patients.

165 ropositivity in ocular patients should alert ophthalmologists in Sri Lanka to include toxocariasis in

166 ostsurgical pain management education to all ophthalmologists in the department, including trainees.

167 mic events can serve as a valuable guide for ophthalmologists in the management and appropriate refer

168 Among the 27 ophthalmologists in this study (10 women and 17 men; mea

169 e a lower number of visits (and patients for ophthalmologists) in each succeeding recent birth cohort

170 s a lower number of visits (and patients for ophthalmologists) in each succeeding recent birth cohort

171 tragrader agreement for ROP diagnosis by the ophthalmologists-in-training during the pretest and post

172 mpetency in ROP diagnosis and management for ophthalmologists-in-training from middle-income nations.

173 tency in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) by ophthalmologists-in-training in Mexico.

174 improving the diagnostic accuracy of ROP by ophthalmologists-in-training in Mexico.

175 The ratio of older to younger ophthalmologists increased from 0.37 in 1995 to 0.82 in

176 This information may give pediatric ophthalmologists insight into the situations and conditi

177 er, after 20 min, more than half of the nine ophthalmologists interpreted a positive result.

178 pt-source optical coherence tomography helps ophthalmologist investigate the angle structure and the

179 Regular examination by an ophthalmologist is essential, especially in screening fo

180 Given the rising ratio of optometrists to ophthalmologists, it is of interest for future work to d

181 An ophthalmologist-level DL model was built here to accurat

182 entify epiretinal membrane (ERM) in OCT with ophthalmologist-level performance.

183 patient race (non-White), Northeast region, ophthalmologist <= 40 years of age, and low surgical vol

184 6 months of the testing date by a pediatric ophthalmologist masked to the Spot results.

185 unduscopic examinations were performed by an ophthalmologist, masked to the results of the CT scan, t

186 Since many US ophthalmologists may not comprehend non-Snellen formats

187 tor agent, usually after several injections, ophthalmologists may switch to another anti-vascular end

188 ies who received a laser capsulotomy from an ophthalmologist (median, 39 miles; interquartile range [

189 25 miles; P = 0.93) or in driving time to an ophthalmologist (median, 47 minutes; IQR, 19-110 minutes

190 Among the 7 attending ophthalmologists observed (6 men and 1 woman), mean +/-

191 who failed the screening were examined by an ophthalmologist on the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic.

192 four board-certified non-retinal specialized ophthalmologists on the testing dataset were compared wi

193 neficiary demographics, Medicare payments to ophthalmologists, ophthalmic medical services provided,

194 er for all in need and a training center for ophthalmologists, ophthalmology subspecialists, and alli

195 capsulotomy whether performed by an Oklahoma ophthalmologist or optometrist as determined by calculat

196 ensive eye examination by a primary eye care ophthalmologist or optometrist were enrolled from May 1,

197 tes diagnosis to first eye examination by an ophthalmologist or optometrist.

198 ciated with 1466 clinical locations and 2146 ophthalmologists or optometrists were acquired by 29 PE-

199 1 white [94.9%]) seen by 31 primary eye care ophthalmologists or optometrists.

200 results of a detailed clinical assessment by ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, dermatologists, and

201 male ophthalmologists, with the median male ophthalmologist out-earning the 75th-percentile female o

202 nce standard of the majority decision of the ophthalmologist panel.

203 mologist density decreased from 6.30 to 5.68 ophthalmologists per 100,000 individuals.

204 s consisted of total time spent by attending ophthalmologists per patient and time spent on documenta

205 tion included retina specialists, defined as ophthalmologists performing either intravitreal anti-vas

206 Ophthalmologists performing inpatient examinations shoul

207 eening utilising photographic studies by non-ophthalmologist personnel in low and middle-income count

208 of opioid prescriptions written annually by ophthalmologists; prescriber rates compared with all pre

209 different specialties, including allergists, ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, rhinologists,

210 hed literature, 81 global experts (including ophthalmologists, pulmonologists, and infectious disease

211 o consultant members of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) and collected electronica

212 A total of 3207 ophthalmologists received 13 449 payments totaling $4 45

213 As 7% of ophthalmologists received 90% of payments, the Gini inde

214 Female ophthalmologists received a mean initial SWB that was $3

215 Across the 6 years of the program, ophthalmologists received an average of $17 942 in incen

216 roads for the 25 508 optometrists and 17 071 ophthalmologists registered with the CMS.

217 a sexual harassment prevalence of 59% among ophthalmologists responding through the Women in Ophthal

218 d a computer simulation model of 1 pediatric ophthalmologist's clinic using EHR timestamp data, which

219 Compared with the ophthalmologist's examination, the Spot had an overall s

220 Unfortunately, an ophthalmologist's interpretation is practically difficul

221 An Ophthalmologist's interpretation of MSI images is common

222 monstrates some of the barriers that prevent ophthalmologist's performing ISBCS in the UK.

223 Compared with men, women ophthalmologists see fewer patients and have lower Medic

224 Phenotypical characteristics could help ophthalmologists select patients for additional genetic

225 or regular ophthalmological examinations and ophthalmologists should alert patients with glaucoma to

226 Ophthalmologists should be aware of the ophthalmic manif

227 Ophthalmologists should be aware of the systemic and ocu

228 Ophthalmologists should be aware that patients receiving

229 Ophthalmologists should consider evaluating tear osmolar

230 Therefore, ophthalmologists should consider genetic testing in pati

231 Based on the current evidence, ophthalmologists should consider measures that include s

232 Ophthalmologists should encourage early management of OS

233 Ophthalmologists should maintain a high index of suspici

234 Ophthalmologists should take into consideration that cum

235 Ophthalmologists should use evidence-based practices and

236 In general, ophthalmologists show discretion in their opioid prescri

237 the new scheduling template, all 5 pediatric ophthalmologists showed statistically significant improv

238 ated substantially superior performance to 4 ophthalmologists, showing a higher kappa value of 0.471

239 model demonstrated superior performance to 4 ophthalmologists, showing a higher kappa value of 0.789

240 The typical ophthalmologist spent 3.7 hours using the EHR for a full

241 en collections and work product, with female ophthalmologists submitting fewer charges to Medicare in

242 In the peak year of participation, 51.6% of ophthalmologists successfully attested to MU, compared w

243 ption of electronic health records (EHRs) by ophthalmologists, there are widespread concerns about th

244 mong the subset of beneficiaries who did see ophthalmologists, those with diagnosed dementia were als

245 To examine ophthalmologist time requirements for EHR use.

246 Mean (SD) total ophthalmologist time spent using the EHR was 10.8 (5.0)

247 It has become routine to expect an ophthalmologist to be involved in many levels of care fo

248 oing social distancing practices compel many ophthalmologists to consider virtualizing services.

249 s of pediatric malpractice litigation allows ophthalmologists to gain insight into how to best care f

250 We compared the ability of ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in

251 tent of unsolicited patient complaints about ophthalmologists to identify significant risk factors fo

252 s to examine the attitudes and beliefs of UK ophthalmologists towards ISBCS, explore their reasons to

253 Ophthalmologists underwent manual time-motion observatio

254 Performance was compared with 4 ophthalmologists using a random subset from the full tes

255 CA was assessed by ophthalmologists using slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

256 -VEGF) agent-associated industry payments to ophthalmologists using the Centers for Medicare and Medi

257 der during the study period and 55.4% saw an ophthalmologist versus 86.7% and 74.0% of beneficiaries,

258 ns were similar for patients diagnosed by an ophthalmologist versus optometrist.

259 1.71 per 10 years, P < 0.001) for outpatient ophthalmologist visits compared with patients without SL

260 y and prevalence of ophthalmic disorders for ophthalmologist visits in adult patients with SLE and to

261 s, patients made a mean of 8.1 (range, 1-39) ophthalmologist visits, received a mean of 6.0 (range, 1

262 The presence of an ophthalmologist was significantly associated with a grea

263 Medicare Part B reimbursement for ophthalmologists was primarily driven by use of anti-vas

264 driving times to the nearest optometrist and ophthalmologist were 2.91 and 4.52 minutes, respectively

265 f age) in the practice of a single pediatric ophthalmologist were eligible.

266 of opioid prescriptions written annually per ophthalmologist were located in the southern United Stat

267 s to and the number of charges by individual ophthalmologists were analyzed.

268 somewhat uniformly across the state, whereas ophthalmologists were concentrated around urban centers.

269 A total of 1382 ophthalmologists were matched in both databases.

270 gible professionals attesting to MU of EHRs. Ophthalmologists were more likely to remain in the progr

271 In 2013, 4167 of 19615 ophthalmologists were women (21.2%).

272 In 2013, 4164 of 21380 (19.5%) ophthalmologists were women, and of 1204 ophthalmologist

273 In 2014, 4352 of 21531 (20.2%) of ophthalmologists were women.

274 The United States routinely deployed ophthalmologists, whereas the United Kingdom did not.

275 trends in use of glaucoma surgeries between ophthalmologists who could be characterized as glaucoma

276 Ophthalmologists who currently prescribe eplerenone for

277 Ophthalmologists who did not have a standard clinical pr

278 Many ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bev

279 We identified ophthalmologists who predominantly (>=80%) administered

280 Corresponding numbers among the 909 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizu

281 Findings were reversed among 1041 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizu

282 Among the 145 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered ranibizu

283 Ophthalmologists who prescribe anti-VEGF injections for

284 Ophthalmologists who received aflibercept or ranibizumab

285 . residency program directors and practicing ophthalmologists who recently completed residency traini

286 ental ophthalmologists (defined as attending ophthalmologists who worked at the study institution for

287 Ophthalmologists will likely use the MIPS system; howeve

288 xaminations and treatments were completed by ophthalmologists with expertise in ROP.

289 .3 to 1.0) of EHR use time per encounter for ophthalmologists with high mean billing levels (adjusted

290 Five patients (6%) presented to ophthalmologists with ocular surface signs related to XP

291 ness of Part 4 of this activity in assisting ophthalmologists with quality improvement in their pract

292 oth years, women were underrepresented among ophthalmologists with the highest collections.

293 omparing those who were initially treated by ophthalmologists with those initially treated by optomet

294 bution and rates of patient complaints about ophthalmologists with those of nonophthalmic surgeons an

295 gists collected 42% less as compared to male ophthalmologists, with the median male ophthalmologist o

296 nt of ML models for the prediction of PVR by ophthalmologists without coding experience is feasible.

297 Two ophthalmologists without coding experience used an inter

298 ict proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) by ophthalmologists without coding experience using automat

299 On average, ophthalmologists wrote 7 opioid prescriptions per year (

300 Approximately 1% (0.94%-1.03%) of ophthalmologists wrote more than 100 prescriptions per y