コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ssion and function of the full-length 7TM mu-opioid receptor.
2 fficacy-delimited conformations of the kappa opioid receptor.
3 gy of full and partial agonists at the kappa opioid receptor.
4 hich we confirm by locally eliminating the u-Opioid receptor.
5 g of the fundamental signaling mechanisms of opioid receptors.
6 electivity in its actions for KOR over other opioid receptors.
7 uitment) of 22 peptides at each of the three opioid receptors.
8 agonists such as morphine, which acts at mu-opioid receptors.
9 b reveals high selectivity over sigma(2) and opioid receptors.
10 odide demonstrating activation of peripheral opioid receptors.
11 genetic data suggest the importance of delta-opioid receptors.
12 views into the 3-dimensional shapes of all 4 opioid receptors.
13 ons with other receptor systems, notably the opioid receptors.
14 able binding affinity at the u-, delta- or k-opioid receptors.
15 andidate and identified regulation of the mu-opioid receptor 1 gene, Oprm1, as another contributor.
17 This effect was mediated by presynaptic mu-opioid receptor activation of local parvalbumin (PV(+))-
22 ed on our previous report of increased delta opioid receptor activity in Gpr88 null mice, we investig
24 these precursors generates >20 peptides with opioid receptor activity, leading to a long-standing que
25 cological mechanisms, including tramadol (mu-opioid receptor agonism) and tizanidine (alpha2 agonism)
26 mechanism of action is attributed to mild mu-opioid receptor agonism, serotonin and norepinephrine me
28 self-administration of the high-efficacy mu opioid receptor agonist fentanyl and characterized MCAM
34 nce for the psychotomimetic effects of kappa opioid receptor agonists in healthy volunteers and their
35 IH.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Clinically used mu-opioid receptor agonists such as fentanyl can produce hy
36 ervised withdrawal include treatment with mu-opioid receptor agonists, (eg, methadone), partial agoni
38 phosphorylation on the C terminus of the mu-opioid receptor alters acute desensitization and interna
39 viously shown that desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor and interaction with beta-arrestins is c
41 proaches include inhibition of peripheral mu opioid receptors and blockade of downstream signalling m
43 erties emerging from the cellular biology of opioid receptors and discuss potential relevance to ther
44 stem cells (NSCs) in which the expression of opioid receptors and endogenous opioid agonists is low.
45 oncomitant opioid release could downregulate opioid receptors and promote the development of obesity.
46 Moreover, genetic models of G protein-biased opioid receptors and replication of previous knockout ex
48 We describe the interactions between kappa opioid receptors and the dopaminergic pathways that are
49 amic (i.e., pseudoirreversible binding to mu opioid receptors) and not pharmacokinetic factors play a
50 sted peptides are able to activate the three opioid receptors, and many of them exhibit agonist-direc
51 hormones (estrogen and progesterone), delta-opioid receptors, and T cells of the adaptive immune sys
52 washout of DAMGO or by application of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP, suggesting an inhibitor
55 VT administration of OrxA+/-DynA+/-the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (NorBNI)
59 ion of norbinaltorphimine, a selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, in the BLA reduced alcohol c
61 lpiperazines 4 and 5 were reported to be pan opioid receptor antagonists, while 6 was a MOR agonist.
64 ic utility in various addictions where brain opioid receptors are implicated, such as gambling disord
65 der the microscope." SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Opioid receptors are major pharmacological targets, but
68 G, BED patients show widespread losses of mu-opioid receptor availability together with presynaptic d
69 , naltrexamine-acylimidazole (NAI), to label opioid receptors based on a chemical approach termed 'tr
70 eciofoline levels in kratom, we compared the opioid receptor binding activity of speciofoline, mitrag
71 ion in a dose-dependent manner determined by opioid receptor binding and [(35)S] guanosine 5'-3-O-(th
72 esics whose mechanisms do not involve the mu opioid receptor but that have high analgesic potency and
74 is an increased demand for understanding how opioid receptors can be allosterically modulated to guid
75 peroxiredoxin 6 (PRDX6) is recruited to the opioid receptor complex by c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)
77 ich depends on subregional differences in mu-opioid receptor coupling to the downstream cAMP/PKA intr
78 ogenous opioids is due to the efficacy of mu-opioid receptor coupling to the downstream cAMP/PKA intr
80 the mu opioid receptor (muOR) and the delta opioid receptor (deltaOR) heteromer as a credible novel
82 phorylation as key step that drives acute mu-opioid receptor desensitization and long-term tolerance.
84 rder to resolve the interactome of the delta-opioid receptor (DOPr) in its native in vivo environment
85 ioids from the inflamed colon activate delta-opioid receptors (DOPr) in endosomes of nociceptors.
88 long-acting, bifunctional MOR agonist/delta-opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist analgesic devoid of tol
89 es of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist/delta-opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist bicyclic core peptidomi
90 es of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist/delta-opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist ligands to serve as pot
93 pioid receptor (MOR) agonist and delta/kappa opioid receptor (DOR/KOR) antagonist with potent antinoc
94 Enkephalins, endogenous ligands for delta opioid receptors (DORs), are highly enriched in the nucl
95 exposure, involvement of the dynorphin/kappa opioid receptor (DYN/KOR) system in binge-like drinking
97 ces in understanding the cellular biology of opioid receptors, emphasizing particular topics discusse
99 re work will identify the nature of these mu opioid receptor-expressing neurons throughout reward-ave
100 lthough differences in stress reactivity and opioid receptor expression occurred, overall they were r
102 ioid peptide (NOP) receptor, a member of the opioid receptor family, are under active investigation a
104 these studies conducted systemic analyses of opioid receptor function, often generalizing findings fr
106 Extensive 3' alternative splicing of the mu opioid receptor gene OPRM1 creates multiple C-terminal s
108 x transmembrane (TM) domains of the mouse mu-opioid receptor gene, in enhancing expression of the ful
111 linear mRNAs (linRNA), mouse, rat, and human opioid receptor genes generate exonic circRNA isoforms.
113 own substantially in recent years and the mu-opioid receptor has been one of the most intensively stu
114 rs of G protein-coupled receptors, including opioid receptors, have been proposed as possible therape
115 w different opioids affect signaling through opioid receptors; how opioid receptors modulate circuitr
116 First, Dbx1 preBotC neurons express kappa-opioid receptors in addition to mu-opioid receptors that
119 rate thought to be caused by stimulation of opioid receptors in the inspiratory-generating regions o
120 naloxone, suggesting the participation of mu-opioid receptors in the reinforcing properties of sufent
121 t of GPR88 co-expression on the signaling of opioid receptors in vitro and revealed that GPR88 inhibi
125 or sufentanil when given the preferential mu-opioid receptor inverse agonist naloxone, suggesting the
126 rom clinical studies for dynorphin and kappa opioid receptor involvement in the pathology of both the
127 systemic side effects, targeting peripheral opioid receptors is an attractive alternative treatment
128 Identifying neurons that have functional opioid receptors is fundamental for the understanding of
129 wed good affinity and selectivity for the mu-opioid receptor (K(I) of 59.2 nM, EC(50) of 12.9 nM, E(M
130 or insula with a downregulation of the kappa opioid receptor (Kappa), as well as decreased DNA methyl
134 promoted phosphorylation of the mouse kappa opioid receptor (KOPR) at residues S356, T357, T363, and
136 pherally active, potent, and selective kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists comprising the ethylenedi
139 rk has established a role for both the Kappa Opioid Receptor (KOR) and its endogenous ligand dynorphi
140 il approach evaluated the potential of kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonism for treating anhedonia
143 anhedonia, 8 weeks of treatment with a kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist resulted in significant
146 al member of the receptor-inactivating kappa opioid receptor (KOR) antagonists, norbinaltorphimine (n
147 Our goal was to investigate changes in kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) availability in the human brain us
148 We evaluated the occupancy of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) by naltrexone measured with [(11)C
149 regions of the NAc, activation of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) decreases the reinforcing properti
151 investigated the potential role of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) in the therapeutic effect of naltr
154 se (JNK) by the G(i/o) protein-coupled kappa opioid receptor (KOR), mu opioid, and D2 dopamine recept
155 d that this effect is dependent on the kappa opioid receptor (KOR), specifically in the lateral hypot
157 : dopamine, mu-opioid receptors (MOR), kappa opioid receptors (KOR), and brain-derived neurotrophic f
158 tion of expression and the function of kappa opioid receptors (KORs) and its endogenous ligand dynorp
160 e dynorphin, which acts at presynaptic kappa-opioid receptors (KORs) on dopaminergic afferents and ca
162 e current status of established and novel mu-opioid-receptor ligands that are proposed to be biased l
164 stic begs one to question whether peripheral opioid receptors maintain anatomically unique roles, and
165 a high priority in medical sciences, but mu-opioid receptors mediate both the analgesic and addictiv
166 ence for the important role of nociceptor mu-opioid receptor-mediated calcium signaling and periphera
167 s research has demonstrated a role for kappa opioid receptor-mediated signaling in escalated alcohol
171 The idea that biased agonists at the mu-opioid receptor might provide a therapeutic advantage in
172 Of the five 6TM variants in mouse, mouse mu-opioid receptor (mMOR)-1G is abundant and conserved from
173 udy establishes a novel function of mouse mu-opioid receptor (mMOR)-1G, a truncated splice variant wi
175 fect signaling through opioid receptors; how opioid receptors modulate circuitry involved in processe
176 e tyrosine kinase, c-Src, participates in mu opioid receptor (MOP) mediated inhibition in sensory neu
180 e 14-position of the morphinan as a mixed mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist and delta/kappa opioid rec
182 We have previously reported a series of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist/delta-opioid receptor (DOR
183 verted a metabolically unstable series of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist/delta-opioid receptor (DOR
188 there was no difference in the ability of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists to inhibit sIPSCs in POMC
190 ral modification of previously identified mu opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist NAN, a 6alpha-N-7'-indo
191 Nasal spray formulations of naloxone, a mu-opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist, are currently used for
194 veloping alcohol dependence (AD) and high mu-opioid receptor (MOR) availability in early abstinence i
195 cent advancements in our understanding of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) function and regulation and the ro
196 report convergent evidence for decreased mu-opioid receptor (MOR) function in the female rat LC.
198 rs1799971) gene variant encoding the N40D u-opioid receptor (MOR) has been associated with dependenc
199 the regulation and internalization of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) have been linked to the severity o
203 in 2 [EM2; the highly specific endogenous mu-opioid receptor (MOR) ligand] induces antinociception th
204 is study describes signaling diversity of mu opioid receptor (MOR) ligands in terms of logistic and o
207 ylation of sites on the C terminus of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) results in the induction of acute
209 ce was thought to occur by termination of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling via desensitization and
213 igand bias downstream of activation of the u-opioid receptor (MOR) toward G protein signaling and awa
214 nique opioid analgesic that activates the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) without efficiently promoting its
215 imary brain target of opioid drugs is the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), encoded by the OPRM1 gene, which
217 Based on studies using mutations of the u-opioid receptor (MOR), phosphorylation of multiple sites
218 ivate a potassium conductance through the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), suggesting for the first time tha
221 red from opioid-primed rats, it induced a mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-dependent increase in [Ca(2+)](i)
228 t position 6 that emerged as potent mu/delta opioid receptor (MOR/DOR) agonists with peripheral antin
230 f acute physical exercise on the cerebral mu-opioid receptors (MOR) of 22 healthy recreationally acti
231 to be key players in addiction: dopamine, mu-opioid receptors (MOR), kappa opioid receptors (KOR), an
235 ect was associated with the activation of mu-opioid receptors (MORs) and an increase in beta-endorphi
244 genetic manipulations to alter or remove mu-opioid receptors (MORs) with anatomic and cell type spec
247 be mediated by simultaneous activation of mu-opioid receptors (MORs, encoded by the Oprm1 gene) at mu
248 258747 blocked the internalization of the mu-opioid receptor most efficaciously because it has the ab
249 rstanding the activation mechanism of the mu-opioid receptor (mu-OR) and its selective coupling to th
250 is generally thought that the three types of opioid receptors (mu, delta, kappa) are activated by end
252 medullary slices from neonatal mice, the mu-opioid receptor (muOR) agonist DAMGO slowed burstlet gen
253 de-based opioid derivatives targeting the mu opioid receptor (muOR) and the delta opioid receptor (de
255 perdinylindoles were developed as nociceptin opioid receptor (NOP) partial agonists to explore a phar
256 aminergic neurons in the VTA by acting on mu-opioid receptors on RMTg neurons and their terminals ins
257 Furthermore, pharmacological blockade of mu opioid receptor or Toll-like receptors complex failed to
261 injury, and their cognate G protein-coupled opioid receptors (ORs) are expressed on immune cells.
263 ulation of agonist and antagonist binding to opioid receptors (ORs) by sodium (Na+) has been known fo
265 al raphe nucleus (DRN), with differential mu-opioid receptor regulation, each targeting different pos
267 constraining aromatic residues in the kappa opioid receptor selective antagonist arodyn (Ac[Phe(1,2,
268 se findings establish an important aspect of opioid receptor signaling and suggest that ROS induction
273 e and hyperalgesia are complex, involving mu opioid receptor signalling pathways that offer opportuni
275 irability of G protein-biased agonists at mu-opioid receptor substantiated by what we know of the phy
276 ition of KOR, but not of the delta or the mu opioid receptor subtypes, fully blocked CR-induced hypot
277 nagement; however, the often-forgotten delta opioid receptor system has been identified as a novel th
278 t is well known that activation of the kappa opioid receptor system modulates negative affect and dys
279 innovative experimental data indicates that opioid receptor systems are differentially modulated dep
280 na speciosa (kratom), had higher affinity at opioid receptors than at adrenergic receptors while the
281 hadone-specific active conformation of the u-opioid receptor that has thus far eluded experimental st
282 ly restricted and selective agonist of kappa opioid receptors that are considered to be important in
283 ess kappa-opioid receptors in addition to mu-opioid receptors that heretofore have been associated wi
284 gulates the endosomal localization of the mu opioid receptor, the primary target of opioid analgesics
285 atosensory neurons is tightly regulated by u-opioid receptors through the signaling of Gbetagamma pro
286 pioid agonists that preferentially act at mu-opioid receptors to activate G protein signaling over be
288 r in vivo (in animals), using antagonists of opioid receptors to infer endogenous peptide activity, a
289 nd drug cravings, despite acting on the same opioid receptors triggered by classic opioids-in particu
290 of these peptides binds to all three of the opioid receptor types (mu, delta, or kappa), albeit with
292 g mouse TRPC4beta and the G(i/o) -coupled mu opioid receptor, we investigated the role of intracellul
294 d a view into the molecular movements of the opioid receptors, which itself gives rise to the complex
295 is is consistent with nalmefene's actions on opioid receptors, which modulate the mesolimbic dopamine
296 atory factor 1, CXCR3, alpha (1)-AR, and the opioid receptors, which results in differential signalin
297 function as partial agonists of the human u-opioid receptor, while speciofoline does not exhibit mea
298 etermined entirely by heteromerization of mu-opioid receptors with galanin Gal1 receptors, rendering
299 opioidergic mechanisms, as antagonism of mu-opioid receptors with systemically-administered naltrexo
300 is that a G protein-biased agonist at the mu-opioid receptor would be an effective analgesic without