ライフサイエンスコーパス: optical diffraction

1 te to exceed the limits imposed by far-field optical diffraction.

2 atial resolution is fundamentally limited by optical diffraction.

3 ned preparations, by electron microscopy and optical diffraction.

4 these platforms has been thus far limited by optical diffraction.

5 ssion electron microscopy, Fourier transform optical diffraction, and computer simulations to be well

6 cence imaging is indeed spatially limited by optical diffraction, and is thus unable to discriminate

7 s of the labeled particles are determined by optical, diffraction, and spectroscopic techniques for q

8 eries of measurements were carried out using optical diffraction, atomic force microscopy, and normal

9 uorescent- or radiolabel-free self-assembled optical diffraction biosensor that utilizes rolling circ

10 ntibody grating alone produces insignificant optical diffraction, but upon immunocapture of cells, th

11 ac muscle and, using electron microscopy and optical diffraction, determined the effect of phosphoryl

12 High-resolution (3.7 A in optical diffraction) electron microscope images have bee

13 The technique overcomes the limits of optical diffraction found in standard fluorescence micro

14 of a target peptide, triggering a change in optical diffraction from a crystalline colloidal array o

15 n, whereas microscopy accuracy requires that optical diffraction from an edge reference matches that

16 asmon resonance imaging (GCSPRI) utilizes an optical diffraction grating embossed on a gold-coated se

17 f diagnostic markers using in situ assembled optical diffraction gratings in combination with immunom

18 opy lacks high spatial resolution due to the optical diffraction limit and difficulty to preserve a h

19 illumination microscopy (SIM) surpasses the optical diffraction limit and offers a two-fold enhancem

20 monitored with a lateral resolution near the optical diffraction limit at an acquisition rate of ~1 H

21 lymer network, labels spaced closer than the optical diffraction limit can be isotropically separated

22 The optical diffraction limit has been the dominant barrier

23 Confocal microscopy at the optical diffraction limit images volumes on the order of

24 gle-molecule fluorescence imaging beyond the optical diffraction limit in 3 dimensions with a wide-fi

25 ural characterization of chromatin below the optical diffraction limit in living cells due to chromat

26 d chromatin structure and dynamics below the optical diffraction limit in living cells.

27 ovide far better spatial resolution than the optical diffraction limit of about half the wavelength o

28 Label-free imaging of living cells below the optical diffraction limit poses great challenges for opt

29 However, the optical diffraction limit prevents attainment of nanosca

30 genesis and LD dimensions, and can break the optical diffraction limit to detect small variation in l

31 The ability to breach the optical diffraction limit to image living cells acoustic

32 aerosol particles with sizes from below the optical diffraction limit to several microns, resolving

33 enables the manipulation of light beyond the optical diffraction limit(1-4) and may therefore confer

34 microscopy can achieve resolution beyond the optical diffraction limit, partially closing the gap bet

35 sights into the membrane structure below the optical diffraction limit, there are certain exceptions

36 s triggered and enlarges the AuNP beyond its optical diffraction limit, thereby making the invisible

37 AFM-IR can study particles smaller than the optical diffraction limit.

38 e microscopy techniques that can surpass the optical diffraction limit.

39 corresponds to a six-fold increase over the optical diffraction limit.

40 al resolution of ~3 mum to 30 mum due to the optical diffraction limit.

41 es is a key ingredient to imaging beyond the optical diffraction limit.

42 l structures provides information beyond the optical diffraction limit.

43 zation of mRNA transport dynamics beyond the optical diffraction limit.

44 luding ultrastructural scales finer than the optical diffraction limit.

45 IR and FDTD simulations, we can overcome the optical diffraction limits and take advantage of the che

46 th spatial resolution far below conventional optical diffraction limits.

47 ng electron microscopy (SEM) and a series of optical diffraction measurements at 633 nm.

48 Optical diffraction measurements of close-packed arrays

49 he utility of these surfaces for biosensing, optical diffraction measurements of the hybridization ad

50 Optical diffraction (OD) patterns and computed power den

51 at larger polar angles, enhancing the first optical diffraction order, which makes the reflected col

52 bility of the crossbridges inferred from the optical diffraction pattern correlated well with the rat

53 tro studies of muscle fibres and analysis of optical diffraction patterns obtained from living muscle

54 optimized toward maximizing the first-order optical diffraction rather than its mechanical stiffness

55 ace' techniques, which are either limited by optical diffraction to approximately 250 nm resolution o

56 We use real-time optical diffraction to monitor the dynamics of self-asse

57 jection structure calculated from measurable optical diffractions to 25 A revealed a pseudo-2-fold sy

58 Here, we introduce Fourier synthesis optical diffraction tomography (FS-ODT), a quantitative

59 Label-free approaches, such as optical diffraction tomography (ODT) and Raman spectrosc

60 c data to produce robust and high-throughput optical diffraction tomography (ODT).

61 Here, we used combined optical diffraction tomography and epi-fluorescence micr

62 el method (FOB microscopy) combining BM with optical diffraction tomography and epifluorescence imagi

63 cal and molecular information provided by 3D optical diffraction tomography and Raman spectroscopy, r

64 Fourier synthesis optical diffraction tomography encodes hundreds of views

65 B) specimens were analyzed using correlative optical diffraction tomography, which can simultaneously

66 Using electron microscopy and optical diffraction, we examined the structure of thick