戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 dose) or a high dose (2.5 times the previous oral dose).
2 erences in study design (e.g., injection vs. oral dosing).
3 te of protection) within 10 days of a single oral dose.
4 ts and cynomolgus monkeys following a single oral dose.
5 ticles (160 individual components) targeting oral dose.
6 ribution of reserpine at 2 h post a 20 mg/kg oral dose.
7 SF Abeta(42) in rats treated with a 30 mg/kg oral dose.
8  be precisely modified in situ with a single oral dose.
9 of 4az for >72 h following a single 10 mg/kg oral dose.
10 uito-killing drug for 10 days after a single oral dose.
11 gh free exposure in mouse following moderate oral doses.
12 ies generally exhibited good efficacy at low oral doses.
13 each cured 3/4 mice with four daily 25 mg/kg oral doses.
14 acitidine exposure increased with escalating oral doses.
15 cid (PFOA), but seen as the result of higher oral doses.
16 m-infected mice, providing a cure after four oral doses.
17  tumor growth inhibition at 50 mg/kg QD upon oral dosing.
18  achieved good pharmacokinetics in dogs with oral dosing.
19 tagonism in several in vivo models following oral dosing.
20 e demonstrated exposure in animals following oral dosing.
21 idence for tumor growth inhibition following oral dosing.
22  amyloid-beta (Abeta) in the CNS after acute oral dosing.
23 potency and good brain penetration following oral dosing.
24 nflammatory and neuropathic pain models upon oral dosing.
25 xposure in rat pharmacokinetic studies after oral dosing.
26 y improved by administration of TTT-3002 via oral dosing.
27 th vaginal dosing and only 19% of women with oral dosing.
28 d in vivo bioavailability after either iv or oral dosing.
29 om the androgenic activity on prostate after oral dosing.
30     The same effect could not be achieved by oral dosing.
31 ta-amyloid peptides in mouse brain following oral dosing.
32 e (Abeta) levels in wild-type rats following oral dosing.
33  compounds with prolonged exposure following oral dosing.
34 s dose dependent and supported twice per day oral dosing.
35 r activity, and rat liver exposure following oral dosing.
36 active triphosphate species following single oral dosing.
37 vage fluid in allergen-challenged mice after oral dosing.
38                RO4929097 is active following oral dosing.
39 n a lymphoma xenograft mouse model following oral dosing.
40  and occurring at concentrations relevant to oral dosing.
41 serum RBP4 levels by >80% in mice upon acute oral dosing.
42 wing for clinically relevant exposures after oral dosing.
43 d total cholesterol levels in rats following oral dosing.
44  for its use is sparse and limited to use of oral dosing.
45  show robust in vivo target engagement after oral dosing.
46 onstrated anticoagulant effects at 2 h after oral dosing (100 mg.kg(-1)), with a significant 43% prol
47 ction of brain Abeta was 40-50%, 1.5 h after oral dosing (100 mumol/kg).
48   Single doses (0.25 to 100 mg) and repeated oral doses (2.5 to 20 mg for 10 days) of BIA 10-2474 had
49 d 15 healthy women (controls) given a single oral dose (20 mg or 200 mg) of the CRF-R1 antagonist or
50 vax malaria received artefenomel in a single oral dose (200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, or 1200 mg).
51                      In rat models, a single oral dose (200 mug/kg) of EL-CSG showed a relative oral
52 lthy volunteers received 2 escalating single oral doses (35-1500 mg) of PNU-100480 or placebo.
53 and one following administration of a single oral dose (60 mg) of methylphenidate.
54  was also curative in this model in a single oral dose (80 mg/kg).
55 man pharmacokinetics suitable for once a day oral dosing, achieved its pharmacodynamic target for PAR
56 s, mice were given 5 transdermal doses and 5 oral doses administered alternatively, beginning with tr
57 on of their antimalarial efficacy via single oral dose administration in two 60-day survival studies
58 d circulating reticulocytes following single oral dose administration, while 4-week q.d. po administr
59                        Relationships between oral dose and biomarker concentrations were assessed usi
60 file was sustained up to 24 h after a single oral dose and did not impair the functions of the immune
61 ixaban differ from warfarin with their fixed oral dose and no requirement for routine monitoring.
62 .4% after administration of 100 mg/kg single oral dose and prolonged mice survival by an average of 1
63 stently positive linear relationship between oral dose and urinary concentration was observed (R2 > 0
64 ty compared with clopidogrel before the next oral dose and, although platelet reactivity was lower wi
65                  With 300-400 mg twice-daily oral doses and 200-300 mg twice-daily intravenous doses,
66 t exposure protocols were used: single daily oral doses and continuous exposure via subdermal implant
67 awley rats highlighted a good exposure after oral dosing and a minimum brain penetration.
68                                              Oral dosing and brain activity of 5b were established in
69 nce therapy given its convenient once-weekly oral dosing and low toxicity profile.
70 vity vs S1P3 receptors, efficacy at <1 mg/kg oral doses, and developability properties suitable for p
71  Abeta levels in rat CSF and brain following oral dosing, and compound 37 exhibited an improved cardi
72    GLPG0634 was well exposed in rodents upon oral dosing, and exposure levels correlated with repress
73 strated in vivo tumor growth inhibition upon oral dosing, and was selected for preclinical evaluation
74  significantly CSF Abeta40 and 42 in rats at oral doses as low as 1 mg/kg.
75 iting Mer phosphorylation in vivo, following oral dosing as demonstrated by pharmaco-dynamic (PD) stu
76 n July 2014 and is recommended to infants as oral doses at ages 6 and 10 weeks.
77 ion, and elicited 100% animal survival after oral dosing at 25 mg/kg b.i.d. for 5 and 15 days.
78 nic exposure and low systemic exposure after oral dosing at 25 mg/kg in mouse.
79 antly reduced proteoglycan release following oral dosing at 30 mg/kg (75% inhibition, p < 0.05) and a
80 drogenic activity on ventral prostate, after oral dosing at 30 mg/kg.
81 i infected mice in 3/6 derivatives following oral dosing at 4 x 30 mg/kg, with microsomal metabolic s
82                                           An oral dose, at 200mg/kg/day, resulted in significant decl
83 asured in the fasted state with high and low oral doses, before and after parenteral replenishment of
84 TAT phosphorylation in colonic explants post-oral dose but low systemic exposure and no measurable sy
85 study, compound 9t was brain-penetrant after oral dosing, but exposure was limited by high plasma cle
86 t radioprotection in mice at single nontoxic oral dose by a dose-reduction factor of 1.28.
87 rd-trimester fetuses exposed to single daily oral doses during the time of follicle formation reveale
88 imus was administered alone as a single 2-mg oral dose, followed by a minimum 14-day washout period,
89 ne was administered alone as a single 100-mg oral dose, followed by a minimum 8-day washout period, a
90 ous hydrocortisone equivalent to presurgical oral dosing, followed by taper).
91               We aimed to examine a range of oral doses for safety, tolerability, and efficacy for th
92 ablished T. cruzi infection after once daily oral dosing for 20 days at 20 mg/kg 6 and 10 mg/kg (S)-7
93  and reverse toxicokinetics, to obtain human oral dose hazard values that are similar to published ma
94 as protect at-risk populations with a single oral dose, highlighting the strength of diversity-orient
95 f B16 melanoma tumors in mice at a tolerated oral dose in a T cell-dependent manner but had little ef
96 ned with high potency led to a predicted low oral dose in humans.
97 ed with high potency, led to a predicted low oral dose in humans.
98 ntrolled, randomized trial evaluating single oral doses in healthy adult males.
99 d 34 showed improved glucose tolerance after oral dosing in an oral glucose tolerance test.
100 issolution rate-limited absorption following oral dosing in humans.
101 tional downstream effector (p70S6) following oral dosing in mice.
102 hed that 13-d had properties compatible with oral dosing in mouse models of disease (Fpo 49%).
103 rtually undetectable levels after once daily oral dosing in mouse models of T. cruzi infection.
104                                    Following oral dosing in rats for 7 days, salbutamol and triflusal
105                                         Upon oral dosing in rats, CAGE increased peak blood concentra
106 d compared to in vivo performance, following oral dosing in rats.
107 essfully reducing brain Htt levels following oral dosing in rats.
108 ions displayed sustained plasma levels after oral dosing in rodents leading to efficacy in the P. fal
109                 A high drug exposure NOEL on oral dosing in the rat suggested that a high therapeutic
110 calcium ionophore-stimulated rat model after oral dosing (in vivo, IC(50,free) = 34 nM).
111 The pharmacokinetics of 6 following a single oral dose indicated that the prodrug was rapidly absorbe
112 t target engagement in mouse liver following oral dosing, leading to improved lipid metabolism and in
113 dels of type 2 diabetes revealed that single oral doses lowered hyperglycemia within 60 min, enhanced
114 ellent solubility at low pH, suggesting that oral dosing may be possible.
115                          Comparison with the oral doses obtained when flies were fed an IMI-sucrose m
116  the second night, 1 group received a single oral dose of 0.25mg pramipexole, whereas a second group
117 iod, all of the subjects received a one-time oral dose of 0.5 mg trans-resveratrol/kg body weight in
118 le, whereas a second group received a single oral dose of 0.5mg clonazepam, and the remaining patient
119 nd demonstrated 50% receptor occupancy at an oral dose of 0.8 mg/kg in rats and an intravenous dose o
120 ompound 18 proved to be useful, which at low oral dose of 1 (mg/kg)/day body weight increased bone ma
121 olesteryl ester (CE) transfer activity at an oral dose of 1 mg/kg in human CETP/apoB-100 dual transge
122                                       Single oral dose of 10 mg of dexamethasone (n = 293) or identic
123 plasma viral loads were administered a daily oral dose of 10 mg/kg for 35 days.
124 In healthy adults (n=4), 2 hr after a single oral dose of 10-mg TAC, the p38 MAPK activation was inhi
125 We then administered either cortisol (single oral dose of 100 mg hydrocortisone, N = 34) or testoster
126  randomly assigned to receive either a bolus oral dose of 100,000 IU cholecalciferol followed by 4000
127 ned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a once-daily oral dose of 1500 mg of voxelotor, 900 mg of voxelotor,
128 mpare the antisecretory response to a single oral dose of 20 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg omeprazole and pla
129 ndomly assigned to receive either an initial oral dose of 200 000 IU (5.0 mg) colecalciferol (vitamin
130 , participants were randomized to an initial oral dose of 200 000 IU vitamin D3 followed by 100 000 I
131 , participants were randomized to an initial oral dose of 200,000 IU vitamin D3 followed by 100,000 I
132                    All children received one oral dose of 30 mg/kg azithromycin.
133 asmodium berghei-infected mice with a single oral dose of 30 mg/kg.
134 were screened for their response to a single oral dose of 325-mg immediate release or enteric coated
135 rated male Holstein calves received a single oral dose of 35 g of IH to achieve a target dose of 5.4
136           Each participant consumed a single oral dose of 35 mg (13)C-EPA and its metabolism was foll
137 omparison of DPS and plasma was made (single oral dose of 37.5 mg of paroxetine).
138 ce, compound 4 was completely curative at an oral dose of 4 x 10 mg/kg.
139 vival days of 12 and 14, respectively, at an oral dose of 4 x 50 mg/kg.
140 ere performed, each with the use of a single oral dose of 40 mg (13)C-DHA.
141                                 Following an oral dose of 40 mg/kg/day for 30 days, quinacrine concen
142 ministration of a standard treatment (single oral dose of 400 mg albendazole).
143                       One group was given an oral dose of 45 mg zinc/d as a gluconate for 6 mo.
144 rticipants in both groups in a daily divided oral dose of 45 mg/m(2) until remission, or until day 60
145 lation (TMS) to test the effects of a single oral dose of 50 and 100 mg of S44819 on electromyographi
146 8 d, the same participants consumed a single oral dose of 50 mg (13)C-AA and its metabolism was follo
147 nced 2 h (peak plasma levels) after a single oral dose of 600 mg CBD or placebo.
148 n metastatic melanoma patients treated at an oral dose of 960 mg twice daily.
149                                     A single oral dose of [(14)C]metformin was administered to C57BL/
150                               A prophylactic oral dose of a FimH small-molecular-weight antagonist (Z
151        In this approach, patients receive an oral dose of a fluorescent contrast agent and a fibre-op
152                                   However, 1 oral dose of a small-molecular-weight compound that inhi
153 eriment 1, we tested the effects of a single oral dose of alprazolam (a classical benzodiazepine acti
154  and PCR conversion to HD negative, a single oral dose of azithromycin is efficacious for the treatme
155 302 of 16,092 residents (82.7%) received one oral dose of azithromycin.
156                 In contrast, only 77% of the oral dose of BPA was absorbed and underwent an extensive
157                      The effects of a single oral dose of cis-N-methyl-N-(6-methoxy-1-phenyl-1,2,3,4-
158                                     A single oral dose of compound 11a resulted in a significant redu
159                                           An oral dose of CsA was administered to 24 healthy voluntee
160 ubsequent coadministration of a single 10-mg oral dose of cyclosporine with either a single dose of t
161 C]CIMBI-36 PET scans before and 3 h after an oral dose of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg).
162 ntanil PET before and 3 hours after a single oral dose of d-amphetamine (either a "high" dose, .5 mg/
163                 Humans treated with a single oral dose of DADMe-ImmH in phase 1 clinical trials exhib
164 one before and one 3 h following a 0.5 mg/kg oral dose of dexamphetamine to measure baseline MOR avai
165 ry duct-ligated (BDL) rats received a single oral dose of droxidopa (25-50 mg/kg) or vehicle and hemo
166 Gold In-Tube assay (QFT) to receive a weekly oral dose of either 14,000 IU of vitamin D(3) or placebo
167 th fMRI twice, one month apart, following an oral dose of either delta-9-THC (10 mg) or placebo, whil
168 diet) and treated on postnatal day 4 with an oral dose of either VA (6 mug retinyl palmitate/g body w
169               This trial shows that a single oral dose of encapsulated glutamine can promote increase
170                           Following a single oral dose of gefitinib (50 or 150 mg/kg), tumors were pr
171 ants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to a once-daily oral dose of GSK1278863 (0.5 mg, 2 mg, or 5 mg) or contr
172 nal receptor binding (VT) following a single oral dose of GSK598809 (60 mg) were consistent with thos
173      Participants were treated with a single oral dose of IDA (ivermectin, 200 mug/kg; diethylcarbama
174        A time course simulation following an oral dose of iron was compared to a clinical time course
175 onsecutive dosing panels, receiving a single oral dose of islatravir (0.5-30 mg).
176 s 4-6 h after the administration of a single oral dose of JNJ-54175446 (dose range, 5-300 mg).
177                  Animals were given a single oral dose of KBrO(3) (100mg/kg body weight) and sacrific
178                  The renal effects of single oral dose of KBrO(3) appeared to be reversible; maximum
179 thy participants were randomised to a single oral dose of losartan (50 mg) or placebo, 1 h before bei
180 ed the efficacy and safety of a single daily oral dose of moxifloxacin with oral combination therapy
181 ting the pharmacodynamic effects of a single oral dose of NDI-010976 on hepatic DNL in overweight and
182 etics and function before and after a single oral dose of nicotinic acid using cardiac MRI to demonst
183 ) can rise as much as 2.7-fold with a single oral dose of NR in a pilot study of one individual, and
184 ehavioural impact of informing smokers their oral dose of NRT is tailored to analysis of DNA.
185                      Informing smokers their oral dose of NRT was tailored to genotype not phenotype
186                       At a much lower single oral dose of only 54 mg/kg combined with 13 mg/kg of mef
187                      Upon receiving a single oral dose of only 6 mg/kg of the monomeric trioxane 12c
188 time course of 25 h after intake of a single oral dose of phentermine.
189 betic fatty (ZDF) rats 45 min after a single oral dose of pioglitazone (30 mg/kg).
190 ed, and the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a 30-mg oral dose of PQ was measured in 45 volunteers.
191                                     A single oral dose of propranolol (40 mg) significantly increased
192 Subsequent evaluation revealed that a single oral dose of purified, soluble CFA/I fimbriae protected
193 cacy documented 10 days and 3 months after 1 oral dose of PXVX0200 supports further development as a
194                         Remarkably, a single oral dose of SAR405838 is sufficient to achieve complete
195 bolism in humans and mice following a single oral dose of saturated fat.
196                          Meanwhile, a single oral dose of shizukaol F reduced gluconeogenesis in C57B
197  fraction, 60 +/- 14%) who received a single oral dose of sildenafil (40 or 80 mg).
198 ntral macula at 1 and 3 hours after a 100 mg oral dose of sildenafil citrate.
199 n healthy volunteers in response to a single oral dose of sitagliptin.
200 sign and all participants ingested either an oral dose of synthetic THC (n=41) or placebo (n=37) befo
201                                     A single oral dose of tafenoquine leads to high efficacy against
202                                           An oral dose of TD or GP of SM was administrated to subject
203 afety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 oral dose of the CCR2 inhibitor PF-04136309 in combinati
204 ch visit they received either a single 20-mg oral dose of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
205 o treatment groups who received at least one oral dose of tosedostat.
206 ld, were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive 1 oral dose of vaccine (approximately 5 x 10(8) colony-for
207 1:1) participants to receive either a single oral dose of vaccine or placebo.
208 y assigned (ratio 1:1) to receive either one oral dose of vitamin A (50,000 IU) or placebo immediatel
209 hy volunteers, supplementation with a single oral dose of vitamin D (100,000 IU vitamin D2) increased
210 netic approach in 40 volunteers who received oral doses of 0.5 mg digoxin.
211                                              Oral doses of 0.5 or 2.0 g SRT2104 or matching placebo w
212  moderate activity when administered as four oral doses of 100 mg kg(-1).
213 ties (October 2012-July 2013) compared daily oral doses of 100 mg of pritelivir with 500 mg of valacy
214 namic studies in APP51/16 transgenic mice at oral doses of 180 mumol/kg demonstrated significant redu
215 t with diet-induced obesity following single oral doses of 3 and 10 mg/kg.
216  Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive oral doses of 3 mg of macitentan, 10 mg of macitentan, o
217 3 log viral load reduction in monotherapy at oral doses of 3 mg or greater with once-daily dosing in
218 etermine whether the 25(OH)D response to six oral doses of 3 mg vitamin D(3), administered over 1 yea
219 ents were allocated to receive six 2-monthly oral doses of 3 mg vitamin D3 or placebo over 1 year in
220 (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) at once daily oral doses of 50 mg or higher given for 2 weeks.
221 re randomly assigned (3:1) to receive single oral doses of ABI-H0731 (100, 300, 600, or 1000 mg) or m
222                        Participants received oral doses of abiraterone acetate (1000 mg daily) and pr
223 althy adults, physicians tend to assume that oral doses of acetaminophen will be completely absorbed
224                      We administered various oral doses of alectinib (300-900 mg twice a day) during
225 atio to receive either two directly observed oral doses of cholecalciferol (300,000 IU) or matching p
226 cted patients after administration of single oral doses of DCV.
227 re assigned to cohorts to receive escalating oral doses of decitabine and cedazuridine.
228                            Patients received oral doses of enasidenib at 60-300 mg per day in repeate
229 ere at least 90 cm in height received single oral doses of ivermectin (150-200 mug/kg) and albendazol
230 ject Monte Carlo experiments to identify the oral doses of linezolid, moxifloxacin, and faropenem tha
231 u(1 + 2) were observed in patients receiving oral doses of MTX, whereas higher concentrations of MTXG
232 ment-resistant major depression received two oral doses of psilocybin (10 mg and 25 mg, 7 days apart)
233            We conducted a phase 2 trial of 2 oral doses of solithromycin (1200 and 1000 mg) for treat
234             The effects on behavior of daily oral doses of sulforaphane (50-150 micromol) for 18 wk,
235 ious treatment status, to receive once-daily oral doses of tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or tenofovir d
236         Remarkably, pretreatment with just 2 oral doses of the BTKi acalabrutinib completely prevente
237 lymphopoietin (TSLP) and antigen to repeated oral doses of the same antigen induced acute diarrhea an
238 dent study examined the relationship between oral doses of three widely used personal care product in
239 ~TLZ conjugate was as effective as ~30 daily oral doses of TLZ in growth suppression of homologous re
240 HV-infected woodchucks received eight weekly oral doses of vehicle, 1 mg/kg GS-9688, or 3 mg/kg GS-96
241 al study NP22657 (BRIM-2), patients received oral doses of vemurafenib (960 mg twice per day).
242                                              Oral dosing of 2 or 4 yielded a dose-dependent decrease
243  mRNA induction (2.7-fold over vehicle) upon oral dosing of 27 at 300 mg/kg.
244 ood lymphocyte count for at least 24 h after oral dosing of 3 mg/kg.
245 reductions in lumbar CSF were measured after oral dosing of 30 or 90 mg of LY2811376.
246                                              Oral dosing of 3S,3aR-27d (PF-3882845) in the Dahl salt
247                                              Oral dosing of compound 2 to mice resulted in a dose-dep
248 t numerous studies showed efficacy following oral dosing of cordycepin, we found that intact cordycep
249                                  Twice-daily oral dosing of delamanid at 30 mg kg(-1) for 5 days resu
250 , photodynamic therapy, topical dorzolamide, oral dosing of eplerenone or acetazolamide, or some comb
251                                              Oral dosing of EZM2302 demonstrates dose-dependent in vi
252                                              Oral dosing of GLPG0634 in a therapeutic set-up in a col
253 xide (2H2O), whereas egg was labeled through oral dosing of hens with a uniformly 2H-labeled amino ac
254 pendent inhibition in wild-type mice through oral dosing of JNJ-54271074.
255                      In a mouse PK/PD model, oral dosing of lead compound 2 demonstrated dose-depende
256                                   Once daily oral dosing of LY2940094 at 40 mg for 8 weeks vs placebo
257                                              Oral dosing of PRCL-02 was well tolerated and resulted i
258                           In addition, after oral dosing of several phosphoramidate derivatives of co
259                    In vivo PCSK9 lowering by oral dosing of the candidate prodrug and quantification
260                                              Oral dosing of these compounds in diabetic mice induces
261 ransplant model is significantly improved by oral dosing of TTT-3002.
262                 The effects of a lethal APAP oral dose on methemoglobin (MetHb, non-oxygen carrying f
263 , respectively, thus providing an attractive oral dosing option that does not require routine laborat
264 w dose (equivalent to the patient's previous oral dose) or a high dose (2.5 times the previous oral d
265 ids intravenously for 1 week then a tapering oral dose over 8 weeks.
266 vaginal dosing were 56-fold lower than after oral dosing (p<0.001).
267  >/=130-fold higher with vaginal compared to oral dosing (p<0.001).
268 and theoretically greater PrEP efficacy than oral dosing; randomized topical dosing PrEP trials to th
269 dipose, and in cynomolgus monkeys a 10 mg/kg oral dose reduced cortisol production by 85% following a
270 ange, 11.3 to 37.6), supporting a once-daily oral dosing regimen.
271                                              Oral dosing renders blood stage parasitaemia undetectabl
272 mately 100- and 40-fold lower than after TFV oral dosing, respectively).
273 a broad range of plasma concentrations after oral dosing resulted from small structural changes to th
274 ersion to an acetate prodrug 25b, which upon oral dosing resulted in an improved pharmacokinetic prof
275 a of the control group treated with the same oral dose rose to higher levels for 6-7 hours but then d
276 harmacokinetics (DMPK) properties and, after oral dosing, showed pharmacodynamic knockdown of phospho
277               Adding a glucose tracer to the oral dose significantly enhances the assessment of insul
278 n uninflamed prostate following a single 3-g oral dose, such that it may be a potential option for pr
279 e against both stages in vivo, with a single oral dose sufficient to clear liver stage infection.
280 -dose for acute treatment of migraine at all oral doses tested.
281 al blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following oral dosing, TFV-DP levels in vaginal lymphocytes decrea
282                               After a single oral dose, the mean +/- SD maximal concentration of thia
283    In order to obtain a more stable form for oral dosing, the sulfhydryl group in conjugate 1 was con
284 w compounds administered at single 100 mg/kg oral doses to F. hepatica infected rats, 8 had statistic
285  the importance of carefully considering the oral dose used in animal experiments and provides useful
286                                  Compared to oral dosing, vaginal dosing achieved much lower serum co
287   The data indicated that almost all the BPS oral dose was absorbed and transported into the liver wh
288 ls, while decreased phosphoproteins after 7d oral dosing was consistent with V565-TNFalpha engagement
289 gnalling proteins in biopsies taken after 7d oral dosing was decreased by approximately 50%.
290 y with good overall drug-like properties for oral dosing, was well tolerated across preclinical speci
291 sly on day 1 and were permitted to switch to oral dosing when clinically indicated.
292  and pharmacokinetic parameters suitable for oral dosing, which led to the discovery of (2R)-1-[4-(4-
293 cy and a pharmacokinetic profile amenable to oral dosing while controlling CYP450 and hERG inhibitory
294             The antiviral efficacy of weekly oral dosing with 3 mg/kg GS-9688 was confirmed in a seco
295 icipants were assigned to receive 3 weeks of oral dosing with placebo or fluoxetine, 40 mg per day.
296 (HFD) to mice for 10 weeks, followed by five oral dosing with purified AHC or ovalbumin on alternate
297                                    Moreover, oral dosing with the Mnk inhibitor significantly suppres
298                                              Oral dosing with Wy14643 similarly induced Hilpda mRNA l
299 SK2801 had reasonable in vivo exposure after oral dosing, with modest clearance and reasonable plasma
300 duced CBF (using indomethacin [1.2 mg kg(-1) oral dose]) would impair cognition in young (n = 13; 25

 
Page Top