コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s been published and can be accessed via the original article.
2 not been corrected in the HTML or PDF of the original Article.
3 ondon demonstrated the highest production of original articles.
4 dies and all publication types that were not original articles.
5 Tracer binding data were extracted from the original articles.
6 were either not tested or documented in the original articles.
7 tudies were all performed in humans and were original articles.
8 pture the most important contents within the original articles.
9 ata on imaging tests were based primarily on original articles.
10 ecked the accuracy of the tables against the original articles.
11 disclosing such contributions at the end of original articles.
33 o interpretations different from that of the original article, 3 (8%) showing that different patients
36 13 articles related to the MGBA: 829 (48.4%) original articles, 658(38.4%) reviews, and 226 (13.2%) o
37 lied conclusions different from those of the original article about the types and number of patients
38 n the wrong order in the HTML version of the original article and in the HTML version of the original
41 lbiotools website and validated by reviewing original articles and resources provided by the database
42 by manually examining the references of the original articles and reviews retrieved, and by establis
43 ched from inception through January 2006 for original articles and through November 2005 for systemat
45 However, a calculation error occurred in the original article, and new data about the studies cited h
46 ver agreement analysis were performed on 105 original articles applying two NE scales (Oxford Center
49 iteria (written in English and classified as original articles, case reports, literature reviews, and
51 w, we analyzed 9 meta-analyses, including 88 original articles, covering 21 comorbid health outcomes
52 3, moderate 3, and low 9) that included 282 original articles, covering 22 unique health endpoints a
53 y the best source of this information is the original article describing it, and it is often possible
61 Human Brain." The framework presented in the original article has helped to integrate behavioral, sys
66 by MEDLINE search (1967 to January 1998) for original articles in English using the search terms "hum
67 red first authorship and reported funding of original articles in the surgical literature by gender.
68 nd a sample approach to classroom use of the original article, including discussion questions, are pr
69 anscriptome sequencing data mentioned in the original article is publicly available at the National C
70 of a series of manuscripts subsequent to the original article, members with expertise in the subjects
75 also respond to recent comments made on our original article on this topic, including the contention
76 lyses of some baseline characteristic in the original article, only 4 (3%) subgroup analyses of treat
78 Female first and last authorship rose for original articles (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively)
79 st and last author names were retrieved from original articles published between January 1, 1995, and
80 and reviews were searched for peer-reviewed original articles published from January 1, 2004, throug
81 arching PubMed and African Index Medicus for original articles published in any language between Janu
84 wide systematic search identified only three original articles published in the last 2 years that pro
85 e 100 most frequently cited English-language original articles relevant to glaucoma were identified v
88 his systematic review and meta-analysis were original articles reporting estimates of VE over time ag
89 e were searched in November 2021 to identify original articles reporting procedural complications ass
91 ith a total of 14,312 PMID references to the original articles reporting the interactions, are stored
94 HESIS: Nonstructured review of peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, abstracts, guideline
97 re manually cross-referenced with additional original articles, review articles, correspondence, and
100 ystematic literature review of peer-reviewed original articles studying the ICI efficacy prediction i
102 s of pertinent review articles and pertinent original articles, textbooks, and expert consultation.
106 : The following data were extracted from the original articles: the name of the first author and publ
107 o a significant increase of citations to the original article, thus directly benefiting authors.
110 raduate-level course in conjunction with the original article to promote student learning are also pr
111 number of countries involved, PubMed/Medline original article type, study design, number of disciplin
113 h was conducted in PubMed and Embase for all original articles using the MID concept for skin disorde
114 medical genomic analysis.The authors of the original article were invited to submit a response, but