戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 Neither C3H/HeJ nor C3H/HeOuJ mice exhibited orofacial abscess development or infection dissemination
2 kout mice, which lack T and B cells, develop orofacial abscesses and disseminated infections followin
3    After 21 days, a high incidence (5/10) of orofacial abscesses was observed in SCID mice mono-infec
4 rade viral tracing from muscles that control orofacial actions shows that these premotor nuclei segre
5 us on brainstem circuits that drive rhythmic orofacial actions.
6 t has made possible 3D and 4D examination of orofacial anatomy and function.
7                    The observation of animal orofacial and behavioral reactions has played a fundamen
8 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) to cause recurrent orofacial and genital herpes, respectively.
9 ls affected by BBS due to abnormal embryonic orofacial and tooth development.
10 DMF network is to exert cognitive control of orofacial and vocal acts and, in the language dominant h
11 cient "asymptomatic" vaccine against ocular, orofacial, and genital herpes.
12  dystonia with predominant cervical, bulbar, orofacial, and upper limb involvement.
13                               In addition to orofacial angio-oedema, painless swellings affect periph
14               Harnessing these assays in the orofacial area during gene manipulation should assist in
15 ntifiable behavioral assessment in the mouse orofacial area remains a major bottleneck in uncovering
16 rves collecting sensory information from the orofacial area synapse on second-order neurons in the do
17 n) is involved in the cognitive selection of orofacial, as well as, speech and nonspeech vocal respon
18 l muscles during different types of rhythmic orofacial behavior in macaque monkeys, finding that the
19 emporal relationship between GC activity and orofacial behaviors by performing paired single-neuron a
20 mals perform a multitude of well-coordinated orofacial behaviors such as breathing, sniffing, chewing
21 l principles that have evolved to coordinate orofacial behaviors.
22 nsiently and purposely synchronize different orofacial behaviours.
23 one marrow (BMMSCs), mouse MSCs derived from orofacial bone have not been isolated due to technical d
24                      They have been used for orofacial bone regeneration and autoimmune disease treat
25                               Although human orofacial bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells sho
26 loped techniques to isolate and expand mouse orofacial bone/bone-marrow-derived MSCs (OMSCs) from man
27                    Additional expressions of orofacial cancer pain include distant tumor effects, inv
28                   As a presenting symptom of orofacial cancer, pain is often of low intensity and dia
29 mily; we propose to name this locus "OFC11" (orofacial cleft 11).
30 be born with a congenital heart defect or an orofacial cleft are reviewed in this paper.
31 we reanalyze data from a previously reported orofacial cleft study, to now investigate both fetal and
32                                              Orofacial cleft, low birth weight, preterm delivery, fet
33 aternal topical corticosteroid exposure with orofacial cleft, low birth weight, preterm delivery, fet
34 aternal topical corticosteroid exposure with orofacial cleft, preterm delivery, fetal death, low Apga
35 , can lead to nearly identical phenotypes of orofacial cleft.
36 devastating consequences resulting in severe orofacial clefting and extreme microphthalmia.
37 f multiple ectodermal appendages, as well as orofacial clefting and limb defects.
38 including SET and CCT3, for diseases such as orofacial clefting and micrognathia.
39 e dosage in humans may increase the risk for orofacial clefting and oligodontia.
40 t palate (CL/P) and 19 individuals with both orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis.
41  Mutations in human MSX1 have been linked to orofacial clefting and we show here that Msx1 deficiency
42 an der Woude syndrome, an autosomal dominant orofacial clefting disorder.
43 gion in mice and is a strong candidate as an orofacial clefting gene in humans.
44 get gene Msx1 in families with both forms of orofacial clefting has implicated Bmp signaling in both
45 velopment - the disruption of which leads to orofacial clefting in human patients.
46                                              Orofacial clefting includes several distinct anatomic ma
47                              The etiology of orofacial clefting is multifactorial, including genetic
48                                              Orofacial clefting is the most common congenital craniof
49                   A common syndromic form of orofacial clefting is Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) where
50 c allele manifests an incompletely penetrant orofacial clefting phenotype.
51 RF6 and RTK signaling pathway genes in human orofacial clefting populations.
52    Mutations in IRF6, TFAP2A and GRHL3 cause orofacial clefting syndromes in humans.
53 umans, mutations in IRF6 cause two mendelian orofacial clefting syndromes, and genetic variation in I
54  tested the hypothesis that individuals with orofacial clefting with or without tooth agenesis have M
55 oding mutations in MSX1 are not the cause of orofacial clefting with or without tooth agenesis in thi
56 ts of children with a specific birth defect, orofacial clefting, and discuss areas for future researc
57 1 has been considered a strong candidate for orofacial clefting, based on mouse expression studies an
58 al morphogenesis is disrupted, the result is orofacial clefting, including cleft lip and cleft palate
59  To dissect the function of Bmp signaling in orofacial clefting, we conditionally inactivated the typ
60 variants identified to date for nonsyndromic orofacial clefting.
61  to understanding the phenotypic spectrum of orofacial clefting.
62 oss, intellectual disability, hematuria, and orofacial clefting.
63 d in ectodermal dysplasia, limb defects, and orofacial clefting.
64 is of both Mendelian and idiopathic forms of orofacial clefting.
65 ntiguous autosomal deletions associated with orofacial clefting.
66  and GRHL3 also contribute risk for isolated orofacial clefting.
67 and SPRY2, also contribute risk for isolated orofacial clefting.
68 hould be considered a candidate for isolated orofacial clefting.
69                                              Orofacial clefts (cleft lip, cleft palate) are among the
70  most serious sub-phenotype of non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFC), which are the most common cran
71 types observed in patients with nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (NSOFCs) are nonsyndromic cleft lip onl
72                                              Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are congenital dysmorphologies o
73  DNMs have not been fully explored regarding orofacial clefts (OFCs), one of the most common human bi
74                                              Orofacial clefts (OFCs), which include non-syndromic cle
75 hat can be caused by maternal smoking (e.g., orofacial clefts and asthma) or adult smoking (e.g., cer
76                                              Orofacial clefts and their management impose a substanti
77 en identified in patients with rare atypical orofacial clefts and with syndromic cleft lip and/or pal
78                                 Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts are a common complex birth defect cause
79                                              Orofacial clefts are among the most common birth defects
80                                              Orofacial clefts are common birth defects with a known g
81                                              Orofacial clefts are common developmental disorders that
82                                              Orofacial clefts are congenital structural anomalies of
83 atogenic origins; the non-syndromic forms of orofacial clefts are more common and are likely due to s
84                                         Most orofacial clefts are nonsyndromic, isolated defects, whi
85                                 Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts are one of the most common birth defect
86                                              Orofacial clefts are well known for their complex etiolo
87 ranslated into human trials that can correct orofacial clefts at earlier stages of development.
88                                              Orofacial clefts have been associated with maternal ciga
89 association studies (GWASs) for nonsyndromic orofacial clefts have identified multiple strongly assoc
90  review describes genes that are involved in orofacial clefts in humans and animal models and explore
91                              The etiology of orofacial clefts is complex, including multiple genetic
92 e occurrence of congenital heart defects and orofacial clefts is reported, we will have additional su
93 he authors investigated whether the risks of orofacial clefts or conotruncal heart defects were influ
94 on plays a prominent role in the etiology of orofacial clefts, a frequent birth malformation.
95 tive system anomalies, 97.6% (95.9-98.6) for orofacial clefts, and 66.2% (61.5-70.5) for nervous syst
96 are diseases, such as ectodermal dysplasias, orofacial clefts, and other craniofacial and dental anom
97    Dysregulation of palatogenesis results in orofacial clefts, which represent the most common struct
98 sCPO) are the most frequent subphenotypes of orofacial clefts.
99 mportant insights into the etiology of human orofacial clefts.
100 abnormalities can result in various forms of orofacial clefts.
101 icillin in pregnancy was not associated with orofacial clefts.
102 rnal smoking is a recognized risk factor for orofacial clefts.
103  provide evidence that multivitamins prevent orofacial clefts.
104 e occurrence of congenital heart defects and orofacial clefts.
105 ractions that constitute the many factors of orofacial clefts.
106 f known genetic alternations associated with orofacial clefts; so, it is not surprising that CL/P is
107                   Here, we aimed to identify orofacial conditions that can serve as potential risk ma
108 he trigeminal transition zone in response to orofacial deep injury.
109 n zone plays an important role in processing orofacial deep input.
110 ar nucleus involved in central processing of orofacial deep noxious input.
111 totopically organized nociceptive responses, orofacial deep tissue injury also is coupled to somatovi
112     The Vi/Vc-RVM pathway is activated after orofacial deep tissue injury and plays a critical role i
113 gration and descending pain modulation after orofacial deep tissue injury.
114 geminal Vi/Vc transition zone in response to orofacial deep tissue injury.
115 mmation of the masseter muscle, an injury of orofacial deep tissue, results in a widespread change in
116 athways by directly comparing the effects of orofacial deep vs. cutaneous tissue inflammation on brai
117 ate that haploinsufficiency of IRF6 disrupts orofacial development and are consistent with dominant-n
118                    Mutations in IRF6 disrupt orofacial development and cause cleft palate in humans.
119 or the spatial patterning of bone, cartilage orofacial development and, in mammals, teeth.
120 ical abnormalities were related to brain and orofacial development, consistent with the known roles o
121 ew their contribution to normal and abnormal orofacial development.
122 2, encode transcription factors critical for orofacial development.
123 romes, each affecting a protein critical for orofacial development.
124 al adhesions at a critical time point during orofacial development.
125 es the use of mouse models to study and cure orofacial diseases.
126 upregulation of neurotransmitters within the orofacial division of the trigeminal ganglia and in deve
127 athway distribution may correlate with acute orofacial dysfunction with spared pathways contributing
128 n being pyrexia (16 [16%] of 101 events) and orofacial dyskinesia (ten [10%]).
129 lycol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO) also stimulated orofacial dyskinesia when infused into the globus pallid
130 hin-1 in the globus pallidus of rats induced orofacial dyskinesia.
131  exhibited limb and truncal stereotypies and orofacial dyskinesias upon weaning sedation.
132 l movements, including myoclonus, tongue and orofacial dyskinesias, and opsoclonus.
133 cortex and is involved in the development of orofacial dyskinesias, involuntary chewing-like movement
134 mpromised Kv3 channel function and VLS-based orofacial dyskinesias.
135             Identified FOXP2 mutations cause orofacial dyspraxia accompanied by abnormalities in cort
136 use a severe form of language impairment and orofacial dyspraxia, while single-nucleotide polymorphis
137  multiple system atrophy (red flag features: orofacial dystonia, disproportionate antecollis, camptoc
138 lapping Irf6 and Esrp1/2 expression in mouse orofacial epithelium.
139 ditioning and affective hedonic and aversive orofacial expressions of taste-elicited "liking" and "di
140 sal, as well as in nuclei that contribute to orofacial function and mastication, including the facial
141 most distressing symptom, leading to loss of orofacial function and poor quality of life.
142  most painful cancers, which interferes with orofacial function including talking and eating.
143 aw time in a dolognawmeter indicates reduced orofacial function.
144     Mastication is one of the most important orofacial functions.
145 ly from a gingival inflammation to grotesque orofacial gangrene.
146    We present a case study of a paradigmatic orofacial "gesture," namely tongue protrusion and retrac
147     According to Keven & Akins (K&A), infant orofacial gestures may not reflect imitative responses.
148 ry and plays a critical role in facilitating orofacial hyperalgesia.
149                               CCI-ION caused orofacial hypersensitivity that correlated with Cavalpha
150 e oligodeoxynucleotides led to a reversal of orofacial hypersensitivity, supporting an important role
151 m underlying trigeminal nerve injury-induced orofacial hypersensitivity, we used a rat model of chron
152 pelling alternative to the case for neonatal orofacial imitation, offered by Meltzoff and Moore.
153 steolytic gingival infection that results in orofacial implant failures.
154                                    Following orofacial infection, HSV establishes latency in innervat
155  are rapidly upregulated in TG neurons after orofacial inflammation and increase the capacity of TG n
156                                              Orofacial inflammation is associated with prostaglandin
157 g the turpentine-induced model of unilateral orofacial inflammation we also show that both the basal
158                                              Orofacial injury activates two distinct regions in the s
159 To understand the functional significance of orofacial injury-induced neuronal activation, this study
160 dalis (Vi/Vc) transition zone in response to orofacial injury.
161 ecifically related to the processing of deep orofacial input.
162     But sucrose taste fails to elicit higher orofacial "liking" reactions from mutant mice in an affe
163 clude that neighboring projection neurons in orofacial MCtx form parallel pathways to distinct pools
164 uced a significant reduction in hind paw and orofacial mechanical withdrawal thresholds as a surrogat
165 , hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate; OMSC, orofacial mesenchymal stem cell; OVX, ovariectomized.
166                                          The orofacial modules in lateral cortex resemble similar mod
167 or the imaging and reconstruction of dynamic orofacial morphology by use of 3D and four-dimensional (
168 mon relay pool for relaying JMSA to multiple orofacial motoneurons.
169  measure intercortical coherence between the orofacial motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) areas of c
170 ucleus accumbens and substantia innominata), orofacial motor control (retrorubral area), thalamocorti
171                            How do neurons in orofacial motor cortex (MCtx) orchestrate behaviors?
172  columns in the prospective Broca's area and orofacial motor cortex.
173                               We identify an orofacial motor cortical region and, via a series of per
174  white matter injury is often accompanied by orofacial motor dysfunction, but little is known about t
175 self-initiated vocal production and nonvocal orofacial motor movement, we identified a subpopulation
176 t from other nonvocal motor activity such as orofacial motor movement.
177 t JMSA may coordinate activities of multiple orofacial motor nuclei, including Vmo, VII, XII and Amb
178  tractography efforts to localize descending orofacial motor pathways.
179 that generate and coordinate these and other orofacial motor patterns remain largely uncharacterized.
180 n of the parietal lobe; and (ii) a mosaic of orofacial motor programs located in the anterior and cen
181 unction with spared pathways contributing to orofacial motor recovery.
182 lei, the neuroendocrine system, and midbrain orofacial motor-related regions.
183 s: cerebral nuclei, behavior control column, orofacial motor-related, humorosensory/thirst-related, b
184 roduce novel sounds by configuring different orofacial movement patterns and these sounds are used in
185 r suppressed by vocal production, but not by orofacial movement.
186 as activated by vocal production, but not by orofacial movement.
187 iculations of varying complexity, non-speech orofacial movements and speech listening, in a cohort of
188 imed to contrast brachiomanual gestures with orofacial movements and vocalizations in the natural com
189 gion of the motor cortex where the mouth and orofacial movements are controlled.
190 ntral pattern generator circuits controlling orofacial movements are located.
191 ns these findings may assist in interpreting orofacial movements evoked during deep brain stimulation
192 n two phases: (1) from the onset of isolated orofacial movements in utero to the postnatal mastery of
193 an spiking hundreds of milliseconds prior to orofacial movements linked to sound presentation and rew
194 y relative to the other, such as when visual orofacial movements precede a vocalization.
195  function control skilled forelimb behavior, orofacial movements, and locomotion.
196 tion of regions for motor control, including orofacial movements, in the primate brain.
197                Whisking involves coordinated orofacial movements, so mechanoreceptors innervating fac
198 imb cortex evoked shoulder stump, trunk, and orofacial movements, whereas stimulation in the deeffere
199 ticostriatal circuitry controlling voluntary orofacial movements.
200 isorder involving difficulties in sequencing orofacial movements.
201 C pathway in the Vc is involved in mediating orofacial muscle hypersensitivity under acute inflammato
202 g to overcontraction of the hands, feet, and orofacial muscles and other joints of the body.
203 ary motor cortical region that represent the orofacial musculature.
204 ance imaging, we found that individuals with orofacial neuropathic pain have increased infra-slow osc
205  this study, we report that individuals with orofacial neuropathic pain show altered functional conne
206 alpha2delta1 up-regulation may contribute to orofacial neuropathic pain states through abnormal excit
207                                              Orofacial neuropathic pain was associated with significa
208  trigeminal nucleus in subjects with chronic orofacial neuropathic pain.
209 nerves may contribute to the pathogenesis of orofacial neuropathic pain.
210 l connectivity with the region that receives orofacial nociceptor afferents, the spinal trigeminal nu
211 en different types of motor actions: manual, orofacial, nonspeech vocal, and speech vocal actions.
212              To provide a description of the orofacial nuclei of the adult mouse and to ascertain the
213 showed no systemic clinical signs (skeletal, orofacial, or auditory) usually associated with Stickler
214              These data suggest that OXT via orofacial OXTR may play a peripheral role to modulate se
215  questionnaire from a case-control cohort of orofacial pain (n = 1,607).
216 are costs of those suffering from persistent orofacial pain (POFP).
217 r-year follow-up, of whom 229 (54%) reported orofacial pain and 195 (46%) did not report such pain.
218 mmation comprises a highly prevalent type of orofacial pain and is mediated by the generation of endo
219 on of arthritis prevented the development of orofacial pain and joint dysfunction, and reduced the de
220 ase of the joint that can produce persistent orofacial pain as well as functional and structural chan
221 espread body pain, and taking medication for orofacial pain at baseline.
222 e clinical presentation of cancer-associated orofacial pain at various stages: initial diagnosis, dur
223 tion, and it affects numerous aspects of the orofacial pain experience, including pain intensity, pai
224   We aimed to describe the natural course of orofacial pain in a general population sample over a fou
225                                              Orofacial pain is often persistent, but it is not clear
226                  MC1R variants may influence orofacial pain perception and, in turn, predispose indiv
227 ting an important role of Cavalpha2delta1 in orofacial pain processing.
228 and female patients with chronic neuropathic orofacial pain show increased functional connectivity be
229 he overall analysis indicates that rats with orofacial pain states had increased numbers and decrease
230 pathways, contributing to the development of orofacial pain states.
231                                   Persistent orofacial pain was associated with females, older age, p
232  regulation, particularly among persons with orofacial pain who also have high levels of PTSD symptom
233 nd pain-related functioning in patients with orofacial pain, a retrospective review was conducted of
234  separately investigated inflammation-driven orofacial pain, acute activity of the trigeminal nerve,
235 ooth agenesis, cancers of the head and neck, orofacial pain, temporomandibular disorders, and craniof
236 ation in pain chronification, especially for orofacial pain.
237 hogenesis of chronic pain, including chronic orofacial pain.
238 dentification and treatment of patients with orofacial pain.
239 pation rate 74%), of whom 646 (26%) reported orofacial pain.
240 f smoking cessation efforts in patients with orofacial pain.
241 croglial signaling in chronic trigeminal and orofacial pain.
242                 In 2006, the OPPERA project (Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessme
243                        We used data from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessme
244                           Data were from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessme
245 eletion of Panx1 in a mouse model of chronic orofacial pain; in this model, trigeminal ganglion Panx1
246                                         Thus orofacial parafunctional habits may influence brain circ
247         Other persistent adverse events were orofacial paresthesia (4 events [20%]), finger paresthes
248                                          The orofacial part was immersed in the bath throughout scann
249 ew these advances in relation to somatic and orofacial persistent pain conditions.
250 S; OMIM 119500) is a disorder with a similar orofacial phenotype that also includes skin and genital
251 ity and whether these changes differ between orofacial primary motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) co
252 f a Wnt signaling reporter is blocked in the orofacial primordia by Lrp6 deletion in mice.
253 in BMP signaling within developing limbs and orofacial primordia regulate proliferation and different
254 the mutants, which prevents the outgrowth of orofacial primordia, especially in the fusion site.
255 ateral subfield of the striatum (VLS) is the orofacial projection field of the sensorimotor cortex an
256 ary and partially overlapping regions of the orofacial prominences that fate mapping revealed contrib
257               We mapped changes in affective orofacial reactions of "liking"/"disliking" elicited by
258 nt in controlling the timing of stereotyped, orofacial reactions to aversive tastants during consumpt
259 s in hedonic "liking" (assessed by affective orofacial reactions to sucrose taste) versus "wanting" (
260 ctions are known to enhance positive hedonic orofacial reactions to the taste of sucrose ('liking' re
261 cted the nociceptive neurons innervating the orofacial region by causing increased expression of infl
262                                          The orofacial region is a major focus of chronic neuropathic
263 Aergic projections to the deep layers of the orofacial region of the lateral tectum (superior collicu
264 ory of the corticobulbar projection from the orofacial region of the primary (M1), ventrolateral (LPM
265 is expressed in the developing bones and the orofacial region.
266 llowing nerve injury and inflammation in the orofacial region.
267 ynamic peaks were detected in the homuncular orofacial region: the first peak during the nonpainful p
268 ts revealed a dramatic reorganization of the orofacial representation in SI.
269 , and delayed somatosensory input related to orofacial responses (more than approximately 1.0 sec).
270 lavored saccharin solution elicited aversive orofacial responses that predicted early-session cocaine
271          In contrast to studies that analyze orofacial responses, we found that lick cluster size was
272      Rats produce robust, highly distinctive orofacial rhythms in response to taste stimuli-responses
273 d taste-specific (i.e., consumption-related) orofacial rhythms.
274  that governs the selection of taste-induced orofacial rhythms.
275 midbrain and brainstem targets implicated in orofacial sensorimotor control, and consist of a mix of
276 t to multiple brainstem nuclei implicated in orofacial sensorimotor control.
277                                          The orofacial sensorimotor cortex is known to play a role in
278 of each breath initiates a "snapshot" of the orofacial sensory environment.
279 uggest, particularly for the case of primate orofacial signals, that they derive by ritualization of
280 l factors may lead to abnormal growth of the orofacial skeleton, affecting the overall structure of t
281 opmental syndromes that are characterized by orofacial, skin and genital abnormalities result when th
282  infections, trauma, or tumor resection, how orofacial stem/progenitor cells contribute to tissue dev
283 s the current status of our understanding of orofacial stem/progenitor cells, identifies gaps in our
284                                              Orofacial stereotypies are critical to optimizing food r
285                                  If correct, orofacial stereotypies are crucial to the maturation of
286                                   Like other orofacial stereotypies, TP/R emerges in the first phase
287         To avoid deformation of the delicate orofacial structures, a water bath with an acoustic wind
288 esponsive to tactile inputs from surrounding orofacial structures, including the contralateral upper
289 hy; this possibility should be considered in orofacial surgery management.
290 nts developed severe toxic keratopathy after orofacial surgery on the left side with general anesthes
291 of comorbid health conditions and nonpainful orofacial symptoms.
292 rgone oral radiography and presented with no orofacial syndromes or defects.
293                                    The human orofacial system is richly endowed with low-threshold, s
294 he primary somatosensory cortex may underlie orofacial tactile sensitivity issues and sensorimotor st
295 ematically examine the effects of persistent orofacial tissue injury on prolonged neuronal activation
296 ulated in response to RARgamma inhibition in orofacial tissue, and uncovered homeobox genes lhx8 and
297                                              Orofacial tissues constantly receive mechanical forces a
298                                    Postnatal orofacial tissues harbor rare cells that exhibit stem ce
299 subclass of nociceptors and is found in many orofacial tissues, including dental pulp.
300 a and ectopic pain originating from adjacent orofacial tissues.
301 aired Hh signaling in skeletal, cardiac, and orofacial tissues.

 
Page Top