コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 teral laminotomy, and 149 to spinous process osteotomy.
2 r, bilateral laminotomy, and spinous process osteotomy.
3 addition, the mice were subjected to a femur osteotomy.
4 on bony healing in a mouse model of femoral osteotomy.
5 greater than the volume required to fill an osteotomy.
6 12-week-old C57BL/6J mice underwent a femur osteotomy.
7 zone of dead and dying osteocytes around the osteotomy.
8 by muscle attachment to the lateral orbital osteotomy.
9 rwent a noncritical-sized transverse femoral osteotomy.
10 ion of the hip and periacetabular rotational osteotomy.
11 al nerve is damaged during preparation of an osteotomy.
12 reated by a specialized drill at the time of osteotomy.
13 me periods (D6, D10, D24, and D38) following osteotomy.
14 ical, (2) angled, (3) step, and (4) sagittal osteotomies.
15 ivalent between fresh extraction sockets and osteotomies.
16 than in CD and temperature variation during osteotomies.
17 advantages of the use of this laser for bone osteotomies.
18 ce gingival tissue or foreign materials into osteotomies?
19 were divided into three groups: (1) femoral osteotomy, (2) femoral osteotomy + stabilization with ex
20 l (no treatment); 2) a positive control (bur osteotomy); 3) CO2 laser at 5 W (860 J/cm2); 4) CO2 lase
22 alone, corticotomy-assisted tooth movement, osteotomy alone, osteotomy-assisted tooth movement, or t
24 indicated in the era of other redirectional osteotomies and if it can delay total hip arthroplasty (
26 options for symptomatic flatfeet may include osteotomies and/or fusions, but similarly high quality c
27 on, particulate bone graft was placed in the osteotomy and appropriately sized osteotomes were used f
29 rophied maxillae were treated with Le Fort I osteotomy and iliac bone grafting to allow for implant-b
31 e loading of implants placed after Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional iliac bone grafting could
33 lgesia in two mouse fracture models (femoral osteotomy) and could, therefore, serve as a potent alter
34 tral membrane, implants were placed into the osteotomies, and primary closure was executed at the sam
36 generated during ultrasonic scaling, implant osteotomy, and restorative procedures by combining rever
39 my-assisted tooth movement, osteotomy alone, osteotomy-assisted tooth movement, or tooth movement alo
41 ation when reducing the number of drills for osteotomy compared to the conventional drilling protocol
42 nd (ii) measurement of the torque during the osteotomies, comparing the new strategy with the convent
45 he animals were subjected to a 2-mm-diameter osteotomy created by conventional drills (drill group) o
46 the histologic healing of bone in rat tibial osteotomy defects created either by a dental bur, CO2 la
47 te long-term healing, from 21 to 63 days, of osteotomy defects in the rat tibia created with the Nd:Y
53 m plate stress was highest with the vertical osteotomy, followed by the angled osteotomy (median diff
58 ies of patients who underwent Periacetabular Osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia was completed.
59 were generated from 59 CT scans (33 operated osteotomy fractures, 26 contralateral intact bones).
60 he sagittal plane for 15 minutes/day) of the osteotomy gap beginning on day 10 after the operation.
61 ical studies analyzing the impact of varying osteotomy geometries are warranted to translate these fi
62 CI, -22.7 to -16.8), and the spinous process osteotomy group had a mean change of -19.9 ODI points (9
66 be speculated that PS and conventional drill osteotomy have similar effects on peri-implant tissues o
67 hese analytical tools with in vivo models of osteotomy healing and implant osseointegration to determ
70 y available drills were then used to produce osteotomies in a patient cohort and in the rat model.
72 well-delimited and smooth walls, whereas the osteotomies in the laser group were irregular and presen
78 osteotomy were evaluated to confirm if this osteotomy is indicated in the era of other redirectional
79 to the sinus floor, apical extension of the osteotomy is significantly limited, and often a staged a
81 the surgical outcome: for each patient, the osteotomy location was varied in a pre-defined range; lo
83 ding, 0 mV/V; 95% CI, -0.004 to 0.005), step osteotomy (mean difference vs angled: incisal loading, 0
84 021 mV/V; 95% CI, 0.016-0.027), and sagittal osteotomy (mean difference vs step: incisal loading, 0.0
85 ghest maximum strain, followed by the angled osteotomy (mean difference vs vertical: incisal loading,
86 molar loading, 91 MPa; 95% CI, 23-189), step osteotomy (median difference vs angled: ipsilateral mola
87 ding, -17; 95% CI, -115 to 83), and sagittal osteotomy (median difference vs step: ipsilateral molar
88 e vertical osteotomy, followed by the angled osteotomy (median difference vs vertical: ipsilateral mo
93 of the abnormal cartilages, transverse wedge osteotomy of the anterior sternum, and internal support
95 domly implanting respective bone matrices in osteotomies on femurs for 14 and 28 days and evaluated b
99 ascertain whether opening-wedge high-tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) corrected pathomechanical abnormaliti
102 dimensional changes compared to SD following osteotomy preparation, predictably maintains BBT and red
104 dure, atraumatic extractions were completed, osteotomies prepared in the ideal orientation, and impla
105 ceptor (AR) blocker propranolol before femur osteotomy prevented bone marrow mobilization of neutroph
110 ect class relates to the size of the defect, osteotomy rate, and functional and aesthetic outcome, an
111 In this study, the traditional vertical osteotomy resulted in less favorable plate stresses in a
113 A bone core was taken in the planned implant osteotomy site and evaluated histomorphometrically to de
114 bone remodeling rates, mitotic activity, and osteotomy site healing in type III bone and high endogen
115 rm objective is to devise methods to improve osteotomy site preparation and, in doing so, facilitate
118 ch tooth replacement would result in a final osteotomy site that would compromise the overall thickne
119 ing the zone of osteocyte death will improve osteotomy site viability, leading to faster new bone for
121 e week after surgery, extraction sockets and osteotomy sites exhibited similar patterns of new bone d
122 PISF) during healing and osseointegration at osteotomy sites prepared either with piezosurgery (PS) o
125 umber of patients, age, gender, surgeon, and osteotomy size were comparable among groups (p = 0.4-0.9
126 zation with external fixator and (3) femoral osteotomy + stabilization with external fixator + system
127 e groups: (1) femoral osteotomy, (2) femoral osteotomy + stabilization with external fixator and (3)
128 d be collected at multiple time points after osteotomy, the fate of the dead alveolar bone was follow
129 For the gingivectomy as well as for the osteotomy, the mean discrepancy was increased in the pre
131 n two types of implant sites for example, an osteotomy versus a fresh extraction socket were compared
135 -CSF application in a mouse model of femoral osteotomy was oppositional to what we were expecting.
143 r premolar teeth were extracted; the implant osteotomies were prepared; and a uniform circumferential
144 he oral cavity; 12 weeks later, in phase II, osteotomies were produced in healed extraction sites, an
146 rm results of modified Steel's triple pelvic osteotomy were evaluated to confirm if this osteotomy is
147 ro-computed tomography on the first-day post osteotomy, which, combined with detailed finite element