戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells.
2 pha mRNA and release of TNF-alpha protein in ovarian cancer cells.
3 ociated neovasculature and on the surface of ovarian cancer cells.
4 n resulted in reduced SHMT1 transcription in ovarian cancer cells.
5 cid, risedronate and GGTI-2133 in a panel of ovarian cancer cells.
6 r with ERalpha/ERbeta-expressing SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cells.
7  active Rac1 leads to EMT in epithelial-like ovarian cancer cells.
8 lass I and class II molecules exclusively on ovarian cancer cells.
9  activates the IGF1R/STAT3 signaling axis in ovarian cancer cells.
10 signaling mechanisms of MAGEA1 in breast and ovarian cancer cells.
11 anti-proliferative activities were tested in ovarian cancer cells.
12 nchymal traits displayed by mesenchymal-like ovarian cancer cells.
13 is essential to stem-like characteristics in ovarian cancer cells.
14  entry, shows efficacy against PTX-resistant ovarian cancer cells.
15 and inducing a metabolic shift in metastatic ovarian cancer cells.
16 f PI3K involved in lamellipodia formation of ovarian cancer cells.
17 l cancer cells, including platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells.
18 s) and fibroblasts (CAFs) than in those from ovarian cancer cells.
19  and altered gene expression in prostate and ovarian cancer cells.
20  HIF-1alpha, which promotes proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.
21 increasing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in ovarian cancer cells.
22 ynergistic antiproliferative effects against ovarian cancer cells.
23 2 in the regulation of TGF-beta signaling in ovarian cancer cells.
24 ing feature underlying the aggressiveness of ovarian cancer cells.
25 ignaling and suppressed stemness features of ovarian cancer cells.
26 t cell proliferation and induce apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells.
27 paB and STAT, and reduces EGFR expression in ovarian cancer cells.
28 vity of cisplatin against the drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells.
29  of action of compound 1 in A2780 epithelial ovarian cancer cells.
30 ely associated with paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells.
31 ne sets regulated by miR-200 in both OSE and ovarian cancer cells.
32 ibit the growth of a stem-like population of ovarian cancer cells.
33  EGFR pathway in high-grade serous and other ovarian cancer cells.
34 novo lipogenesis, results in robust death of ovarian cancer cells.
35 nsitivity in low-grade and high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells.
36  progression, and induces apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells.
37  and synergistically to induce cell death in ovarian cancer cells.
38 activity of cisplatin against drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells.
39 GLS-expressing but not in low GLS-expressing ovarian cancer cells.
40 f drug-resistant ERalpha-positive breast and ovarian cancer cells.
41 interaction between DDB2 and NEDD4L in human ovarian cancer cells.
42 increases the IL-8 expression and release in ovarian cancer cells.
43 isense gene silencing effects in A2780 human ovarian cancer cells.
44 eased HIF, cell migration, and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells.
45 an important role in cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells.
46  synergistically decrease the growth rate of ovarian cancer cells.
47 e a vital biomarker overexpressed in primary ovarian cancer cells.
48 inflammatory mediators in response to LPA in ovarian cancer cells.
49 n for visualization and diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer cells.
50 ion enhanced the CDDP sensitivity of hypoxic ovarian cancer cells.
51 ownregulation of p-Drp1 (Ser637) and Mfn1 in ovarian cancer cells.
52 le for the transactivation of EGFR by LPA in ovarian cancer cells.
53 tokines that stimulate glycogen breakdown in ovarian cancer cells.
54 p in monounsaturated fatty acid synthesis in ovarian cancer cells.
55 to disrupt peritoneal spread and adhesion of ovarian cancer cells.
56 uced apoptosis, and reduced proliferation of ovarian cancer cells.
57  cell death, dramatically inhibits growth of ovarian cancer cells.
58 sitivity to cisplatin (CDDP) was examined in ovarian cancer cells.
59 mitochondrial fission and CDDP resistance in ovarian cancer cells.
60 plex is critical for sustained EMT traits of ovarian cancer cells.
61 d in vitro against both multiple myeloma and ovarian cancer cells.
62                       In the patient derived ovarian cancer cells, a similar correlation was observed
63 tored early tumor growth of engineered human ovarian cancer cells (A2780) implanted orthotopically in
64 nti-proliferative effect on human epithelial ovarian cancer cells, A2780/WT and A2780/PTX(R), induced
65 tified Nectin-4 shedding from the surface of ovarian cancer cells after stimulation with lysophosphat
66 uld effectively inhibit the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and induce cell apoptosis.
67 rate that metastasis-associated behaviors of ovarian cancer cells and MCAs are influenced by cellular
68 d platinum-sensitive and platinum- resistant ovarian cancer cells and ovarian cancer stem cells and (
69                         NETs, in turn, bound ovarian cancer cells and promoted metastasis.
70  omental niche conducive for implantation of ovarian cancer cells and raise the possibility that bloc
71 9), which is upregulated in human breast and ovarian cancer cells and released from apoptotic tumor c
72  underlying the reciprocal interplay between ovarian cancer cells and surrounding stromal cell types
73  a synthetic lethal manner in ARID1A-mutated ovarian cancer cells and that ARID1A mutational status c
74 te the highly orchestrated crosstalk between ovarian cancer cells and various cancer-associated strom
75  AMG655 with Apo2L/TRAIL extended to primary ovarian cancer cells and was further enhanced by combina
76  target genes IL8 and HIF1A in immune cells, ovarian cancer cells, and endothelial cells.
77 nd migration in PAK1-amplified/overexpressed ovarian cancer cells, and has no effect in cell that lac
78 stasis activate the wild type p53 pathway in ovarian cancer cells, and OGA inhibition has the potenti
79                                        Using ovarian cancer cells as a model, we show that mitochondr
80 silenced, HR+, CARM1-high, high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells become PARPi sensitive, undergo mit
81           Notably, reintroduction of CIB2 in ovarian cancer cells blocked plasma membrane localizatio
82 uppressed the outgrowth of cisplatin-treated ovarian cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo Combinati
83 tly labeled hormones to alphavbeta3-positive ovarian cancer cells but not to integrin-negative cells.
84 l that EMT can be induced in epithelial-like ovarian cancer cells by co-expressing constitutively act
85 we explore the impact of VEPH1 expression in ovarian cancer cells by gene-expression profiling.
86 y controls caspase-2-dependent cell death of ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting mTOR, placing mTOR as
87  that miR-450a acts as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer cells by modulating targets associated wi
88 ial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human ovarian cancer cells by overexpression of key transcript
89 ivity can be restored in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells by targeting the chromatin-associat
90 tential of Lyso-Gal for detection of primary ovarian cancer cells by using beta-gal as the biomarker.
91 t that the malignant phenotype of metastatic ovarian cancer cells can be altered by miR21 delivered b
92 , these results show that targeting FABP4 in ovarian cancer cells can inhibit their ability to adapt
93  find that ARID1B knockdown in ARID1A mutant ovarian cancer cells causes similar loss of enhancer arc
94 depletion, led to metabolic reprogramming of ovarian cancer cells, causing decreased mitochondrial re
95 the critical regulator of lipid responses in ovarian cancer cells cocultured with adipocytes.
96 bition of cell proliferation was observed in ovarian cancer cells compared to CHOK1.
97 is study, we observed high HuR expression in ovarian cancer cells compared with ovarian primary cells
98 signaling events that underlie metastasis in ovarian cancer cells, consistent with a prometastatic ro
99 f the MYC oncogene in tumor cells, including ovarian cancer cells, correlates with poor responses to
100 evel is extremely low in cisplatin resistant ovarian cancer cells, correlating with higher levels of
101             In vitro treatment of breast and ovarian cancer cell cultures in aqueous media by tamoxif
102 2133 (IC50 > 25 muM) inhibited the growth of ovarian cancer cell cultures.
103                            Silencing GPAM in ovarian cancer cells decreased cell migration and reduce
104 approved noncancer drugs to selectively kill ovarian cancer cells derived from patients with chemothe
105 d expression transiently increased following ovarian cancer cell detachment and in tumor cells derive
106 lating ST6Gal-I expression in pancreatic and ovarian cancer cells directly altered CSC spheroid growt
107                                              Ovarian cancer cells disseminate readily within the peri
108 ignificantly inhibited NE- and hTERT-induced ovarian cancer cell EMT and invasion.
109  active Rac1, we conclude that Rac1 sustains ovarian cancer cell EMT through simultaneous activation
110              In functional investigations in ovarian cancer cells, engineered upregulation of certain
111 ression of hTERT induced expression of Slug, ovarian cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (E
112 as localized predominantly in the nucleus of ovarian cancer cells examined, contrasting with plasma m
113 rthermore, in an ex vivo colonization assay, ovarian cancer cells exhibited increased adhesion to mes
114  we showed that acquired cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells expressed high levels of MKP-1 and
115 the tumor growth and migratory phenotypes of ovarian cancer cells expressing SHMT1 shRNAs.
116 tes binding to its cognate receptor CCR-2 on ovarian cancer cells facilitates migration and omental m
117 pes of ovarian cancer and that SCD1 protects ovarian cancer cells from cell death.
118                                      Primary ovarian cancer cells from patient ascites or solid tumor
119 ibitor TMI-1 or by shRNA knockdown prevented ovarian cancer cells from releasing TNF-alpha protein in
120 olecular signature of the primary epithelial ovarian cancer cells from which they are derived.
121      In contrast, silencing of LNK decreased ovarian cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo.
122 ellular internalization and stability of the ovarian cancer cell growth inhibitor peptide, LSCQLYQR (
123 in vitro inhibitor of PTP4A3 and human A2780 ovarian cancer cell growth was reduced.
124 screen to identify gene pairs that inhibited ovarian cancer cell growth when they were targeted.
125                  Highly selective imaging of ovarian cancer cells has been achieved upon incubation w
126                Cytotoxicity was studied with ovarian cancer cells having high (SKOV-3), intermediate
127 y against cisplatin-resistant A2780Cis human ovarian cancer cells (IC50 74 muM, blue light) with a ph
128                                In the serous ovarian cancer cells (IGROV and OVCAR-3), shPKCiota decr
129 aneously implanted cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells in athymic nude mice.
130 ates all three arms of the UPR in breast and ovarian cancer cells in culture and in a mouse xenograft
131 etastasis of ovarian cancer, and survival of ovarian cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity as nonadhe
132 ficantly decreased migration and invasion in ovarian cancer cells in the presence of NE and decreased
133 well as invasion and migration capacities of ovarian cancer cells in vitro Administration of miR-6126
134 against folate receptor 1 (FOLR1)-expressing ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo Unlike convent
135  in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells and MA148 ovarian cancer cells in vitro.
136          TGFbeta reduces MHC-I expression in ovarian cancer cells in vitro.
137 pithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of ovarian cancer cells in vivo, STAT4 failed to induce EMT
138 more, loss of FER impaired the metastasis of ovarian cancer cells in vivo.
139 in vitro PTX efficacy in ID8-VEGF epithelial ovarian cancer cells, in vivo studies were performed upo
140 lar biological responses on c-MET-expressing ovarian cancer cells including increase of cell prolifer
141 ted the secretion of several chemokines from ovarian cancer cells, including CXCL1, CXCL2 and CXCL8.
142 we systematically assessed in vivo growth of ovarian cancer cells, including six validated HGSC cell
143 GB3 attenuates cisplatin resistance in human ovarian cancer cells, increasing tumor cell sensitivity
144 or caspase-2 is required for robust death of ovarian cancer cells induced by FASN inhibitors.
145 on of GAB2 by inducible small hairpin RNA in ovarian cancer cells inhibited tumor cell proliferation,
146 hormone-dependent, cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cells, inhibiting IDO by transcriptional
147 TLN1 suppresses lactotransferrin's effect on ovarian cancer cell invasion potential and proliferation
148 ing of hTERT expression abrogated NE-induced ovarian cancer cell invasion, EMT and Slug expression.
149                   Suppressing KDM4B inhibits ovarian cancer cell invasion, migration and spheroid for
150 ipt and protein expression, and subsequently ovarian cancer cell invasion.
151 namido ethyleneamine complexes towards human ovarian cancer cells is enhanced by up to 50 x in the pr
152 n-125, which is found on the surface of many ovarian cancer cells is known to be a gold standard clin
153                       Uncontrolled growth of ovarian cancer cells is the fifth leading cause of femal
154 motifs were identified and validated from an ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR-3).
155               Following infection of a human ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR3) with a recombinant low
156 ration/survival of both an established human ovarian cancer cell line (OVCAR8) and a subset of primar
157 ising antiproliferative effects in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and the human squamous ca
158                      RNA-seq analysis of the ovarian cancer cell line A2780 revealed that overexpress
159 ts and HDAC inhibitory activity in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, the human squamous carci
160 NVs) as small as 30 kb in single cells of an ovarian cancer cell line and as small as 9 Mb in two hig
161    In vitro chemotherapy treatment increased ovarian cancer cell line capacity to activate prosurviva
162 pic implantation of the human drug-resistant ovarian cancer cell line HeyA8-MDR, followed by porous s
163 atin's ability to induce tumor cell death in ovarian cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo.
164 tors PP242 or rapamycin-sensitized DOV13, an ovarian cancer cell line incapable of inducing REDD1, to
165         MDR1 inhibition in a fusion positive ovarian cancer cell line increased sensitivity to paclit
166 d colorectal cancer cells and the unexplored ovarian cancer cell line NIH:OVCAR-3, with respective PN
167 ne fusions missed by other algorithms in the ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR3.
168  studies performed in uMUC1-expressing human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3/Luc and control uMUC1(low
169                      Using an UNG2-deficient ovarian cancer cell line that is hypersensitive to floxu
170 er agents, we developed and characterized an ovarian cancer cell line that is resistant to a previous
171                          This TRIP-resistant ovarian cancer cell line, A2780TR, was found to be 9 tim
172  multi-isoform genes in a stem cell line, an ovarian cancer cell line, and a breast cancer cell line
173  vaccine using whole cell lysate of a murine ovarian cancer cell line, ID8 was prepared by spray dryi
174                                  As such, an ovarian cancer cell line, OV-90, was cultured in adheren
175 el supported by in vitro experiments with an ovarian cancer cell line.
176 tive to TRIP compared to the wild-type A2780 ovarian cancer cell line.
177 cell death and DNA damage was studied in two ovarian cancer cell lines (OVCAR3 and A2780), normal ham
178 tumor effect of ferroptosis inducers in both ovarian cancer cell lines and a mouse orthotopic xenogra
179 ent-derived xenografts and high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines and discover clone-specific dy
180               Here, we show that a subset of ovarian cancer cell lines and ex vivo models derived fro
181 (Pol eta) in ovarian CSCs isolated from both ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumors, indicating
182 ow that MICU1 is overexpressed in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines and that MICU1 overexpression
183 and quantitative (phospho-)proteomes of five ovarian cancer cell lines and the global cancer genome r
184           CDK9 was highly expressed in human ovarian cancer cell lines and was also elevated in metas
185                                  Using human ovarian cancer cell lines as well as malignant epithelia
186 tivity against sensitive and resistant A2780 ovarian cancer cell lines but is only marginally active
187               The bioenergetics phenotype of ovarian cancer cell lines correlated with functional phe
188            We generated several novel murine ovarian cancer cell lines derived from the ovarian surfa
189 MGCR), was found to be over-expressed in all ovarian cancer cell lines examined and upregulated by mu
190 portantly, we found that cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines exhibit lower levels of MOAP-1
191 in the peritoneal cavity, whereas aggressive ovarian cancer cell lines failed to form tumors or metas
192 as shown that many of the most commonly used ovarian cancer cell lines have been mischaracterised, le
193                   In this study, we cultured ovarian cancer cell lines in adherent and nonadherent co
194  the proliferation of a subset of clear cell ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro.
195  spheroids compared to monolayer cultures of ovarian cancer cell lines or primary cells.
196 ated that the levels of FER were elevated in ovarian cancer cell lines relative to those in immortali
197 wn-regulation of HS6ST-1 or HS6ST-2 in human ovarian cancer cell lines results in 30-50% reduction in
198 ing of 13 established and 12 patient derived ovarian cancer cell lines revealed significant bioenerge
199 itro chemotherapy response across a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines revealed that increased IGF-1R
200                   Here, we use 10 epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines to investigate 2D migration, c
201 s9-mediated deletion of DAB2IP in epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines upregulated expression of stem
202 ncing of HSulf-1 in OV202 and TOV2223 cells (ovarian cancer cell lines) resulted in increased lipid d
203               These loops operate in several ovarian cancer cell lines, and BRCA1-IRIS silencing or i
204 port the integrated proteomic analysis of 26 ovarian cancer cell lines, HGSOC tumours, immortalized o
205 etween PKCiota and cyclin E in a panel of 19 ovarian cancer cell lines.
206 e of origin and histopathology of epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines.
207  either overexpressed or silenced in several ovarian cancer cell lines.
208  as induced by Wee1 inhibition in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines.
209 ormal ovary and tumor samples and epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines.
210 igen presentation complex in human and mouse ovarian cancer cell lines.
211 AR-3, SKOV-3, and TYKNu) and one mouse (ID8) ovarian cancer cell lines.
212  viability, characteristics of less invasive ovarian cancer cell lines.
213 ns in BRCA1 from samples of human breast and ovarian cancer cell lines.
214 istant cell lines were established using two ovarian cancer cell lines: SKOV3ip1 and HeyA8.
215 the growth, survival or apoptosis in several ovarian cancer cells lines.
216                          Here we report that ovarian cancer cells manifest a spectrum of tumorigenic
217           PET imaging of CA125 expression by ovarian cancer cells may enhance the evaluation of the e
218 ination with anti-PD-L1, in two novel murine ovarian cancer cell models.
219 tor) reduced growth and peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer cells more effectively than either single
220 ling pathways mediate the effect of MFAP5 on ovarian cancer cell motility and invasion potential.
221 TSC2 RNAi protected FASN inhibitor-sensitive ovarian cancer cells (OVCA420 cells) from orlistat-induc
222 monstrate that antiproliferative activity in ovarian cancer cells (OVCAR8) depends on CDK2 degradatio
223                                              Ovarian cancer cells overexpressing GAB2 are dependent o
224 ry epithelial cells and clonogenic growth of ovarian cancer cells overexpressing GAB2.
225                          Here we report that ovarian cancer cells overexpressing glutaminase (GLS), a
226 fferentiation capacity of four heterogeneous ovarian cancer cell populations defined by the expressio
227                 We demonstrated that ALDH(+) ovarian cancer cells possess multiple stem cell characte
228 mones as potent alphavbeta3-ligands, driving ovarian cancer cell proliferation and suggest that disru
229  expression, ultimately mediating FSH-driven ovarian cancer cell proliferation.
230                    Overexpression of SIK2 in ovarian cancer cells promotes abdominal metastasis while
231 dings suggest that overexpression of GAB2 in ovarian cancer cells promotes tumor growth and angiogene
232 growth and metastasis, specifically blocking ovarian cancer cell recruitment to the ovary.
233 iated knockout of FABP4 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells reduced metastatic tumor burden in
234 re, we show that disabling CDK12 function in ovarian cancer cells reduces BRCA1 levels, disrupts HR r
235 nisms that govern this metastatic process in ovarian cancer cells remain poorly understood.
236 wever, molecular mechanism sustaining EMT of ovarian cancer cells remains elusive.
237 s study describes the mechanism exhibited by ovarian cancer cells required for adherent cell transiti
238 parib) while overexpression of USP13 renders ovarian cancer cells resistant to chemotherapy.
239 ntiproliferative behavior against epithelial ovarian cancer cells resistant to cisplatin.
240 diminish nuclear accumulation of platinum in ovarian cancer cells, resulting in resistance to platinu
241                                              Ovarian cancer cells retained intrinsic sensitivity to p
242                                        Thus, ovarian cancer cells seem to display heterogeneity in us
243 ivo models we show that secondary epithelial ovarian cancer cells (sEOC) do not fully reacquire the m
244 e effects of dual IGF-1R/ErbB3 inhibition on ovarian cancer cell signaling, growth, and in vivo effic
245            RNAi-mediated silencing of HuR in ovarian cancer cells significantly decreased cell prolif
246  lysosomal beta-gal detection and imaging in ovarian cancer cells (SKOV-3 cells).
247  combination index analysis studies in human ovarian cancer cells (SKOV-3) and rat cardiomyocytes (H9
248 platform for the automated quantification of ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3) from whole blood is reporte
249           Inhibition of CDK9 also suppressed ovarian cancer cell spheroid growth, clonogenicity forma
250                                     Invasive ovarian cancer cells spontaneously formed protrusions, s
251               In conclusion, CA-MSC activate ovarian cancer cell STAT3 signaling via IL6 and LIF and
252 line (OVCAR8) and a subset of primary serous ovarian cancer cell strains (DFs).
253 me-dependent manner, with greater effects in ovarian cancer cells than in breast cancer cells.
254            REDD1 induction is compromised in ovarian cancer cells that do not respond to FASN inhibit
255 gulation of metastasis-associated behaviors, ovarian cancer cells that express low endogenous levels
256                                           In ovarian cancer cells that have developed acquired cispla
257 s and reverses multi-drug resistance against ovarian cancer cells through downregulation of survivin.
258 light, the prodrug effectively killed SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells through the combined effects of PDT
259 chymal transition is required for epithelial ovarian cancer cells to acquire metastatic potential, th
260 1 depletion and NNMT upregulation sensitized ovarian cancer cells to agents that inhibit mitochondria
261 loss of Pak1 function causes 11q13-amplified ovarian cancer cells to arrest in the G2/M phase of the
262 apeutics, expression of CIB2 also sensitized ovarian cancer cells to carboplatin.
263     Depleting or inhibiting USP13 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin and PARP inhibitor (ol
264 ance (MDR) genes and resensitizing resistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin treatment.
265 cumulation and sensitized HE4-overexpressing ovarian cancer cells to fulvestrant and tamoxifen.
266                  Adipocytes are critical for ovarian cancer cells to home to the omentum, but the met
267          To evaluate whether the response of ovarian cancer cells to pitavastatin is potentiated by f
268 how inhibiting DNA methylation can sensitize ovarian cancer cells to platinum drugs, in large part by
269 on of lysyl oxidase (LOX) in mesothelial and ovarian cancer cells to promote collagen crosslinking an
270 itaxel (PTX) and doxorubicin (DOX) resistant ovarian cancer cells to PTX and DOX by inhibiting surviv
271 ition promoted oncogenic behavior by leading ovarian cancer cells to release more exosomes.
272 sduction and increases the responsiveness of ovarian cancer cells to TGF-beta-induced growth inhibiti
273  RCP was sufficient to enhance metastasis of ovarian cancer cells to the lung.
274 e in vivo hTERT expression and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells to the lung.
275 d differences in the resistance responses of ovarian cancer cells to TRIP and conventional drugs.
276 1 transfection increased CDDP sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells under hypoxia.
277 indicate that OvCa429 and SKOV3ip epithelial ovarian cancer cells undergo similar morphological and c
278 ectivity of organo-Os complex FY26 for human ovarian cancer cells versus normal lung fibroblasts to 6
279  from both chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells via exosomes.
280 tes underwent selective internalization into ovarian cancer cells via PRLR-mediated endocytosis.
281                          PIK3R1 loss renders ovarian cancer cells vulnerable to inhibition of AKT or
282  Therapeutically, p85beta expression renders ovarian cancer cells vulnerable to inhibitors of AXL, p1
283 nduced reduction in E-cadherin expression in ovarian cancer cells was mediated by C3a and is Kruppel-
284                    Downregulation of ACP6 in ovarian cancer cells was necessary and sufficient to sup
285  detection in serum samples and measuring of ovarian-cancer cells was also investigated.
286  cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin resistant ovarian cancer cells, was observed.
287                    FZD7(+) platinum-tolerant ovarian cancer cells were more sensitive and underwent f
288 st of mesenchymal traits in mesenchymal-like ovarian cancer cells, whereas expressing constitutively
289 its clonal growth, migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells, whereas silencing in vivo inhibits
290 is and suppressing migration and invasion in ovarian cancer cells, which indicates its therapeutic po
291 rogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) activation in ovarian cancer cells, which was suppressed by 1alpha,25-
292                             Co-incubation of ovarian cancer cells with ascites fluid significantly in
293  the activities of Erk and Src are higher in ovarian cancer cells with constitutively active Rac1, we
294 hibition in suppressing clonogenic growth of ovarian cancer cells with GAB2 overexpression.
295                           Here, we show that ovarian cancer cells with higher level of NADP(+), an NA
296 rt-chain C6-ceramide decreased the number of ovarian cancer cells with PI3KC2beta-driven lamellipodia
297                         Using pancreatic and ovarian cancer cells with ST6Gal-I knockdown or overexpr
298 ic activity of MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutant ovarian cancer cells, with reciprocal downregulation of
299 evealed the presence of grossly metastasized ovarian cancer cells within the lymphoid tissues.
300 n and cell death whose modulation might kill ovarian cancer cells without the attendant side effects.

 
Page Top