コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ostate cancer mortality) and minimize costs (overtreatment).
2 tment threshold that is safe but also avoids overtreatment.
3 t outputs, but may significantly reduce NMFI overtreatment.
4 with moderate-dose statins while minimizing overtreatment.
5 carcinoma is not accurate enough to prevent overtreatment.
6 come symptomatic (overdiagnosis), leading to overtreatment.
7 apy decisions to improve outcomes and reduce overtreatment.
8 tantial potential risk for overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
9 ears to reduce the risk of PCSM with minimal overtreatment.
10 lives, there are growing concerns regarding overtreatment.
11 dard for confirming pCR-B, may be considered overtreatment.
12 lacing the public at risk of overtesting and overtreatment.
13 native therapy or who may be spared possible overtreatment.
14 ed, which could lead to delayed diagnosis or overtreatment.
15 lation may cause significant harm, including overtreatment.
16 w to balance the risks of undertreatment and overtreatment.
17 result in relatively high levels (~ 75%) of overtreatment.
18 iewed as a major driver of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
19 til after multidisciplinary input may reduce overtreatment.
20 antibiotics must be weighed against risks of overtreatment.
21 dissection (ALND) may result in significant overtreatment.
22 , it leads to high rates of misdiagnosis and overtreatment.
23 potential harms, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
24 pt to new concepts to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment.
25 d no diagnostic benefit and may even lead to overtreatment.
26 atients with advanced cancer could result in overtreatment.
27 disease, and careful surveillance may avoid overtreatment.
28 tive value, which leads to overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
29 characterize the balancing measure of sepsis overtreatment.
30 isk subgroup was characterized to help avoid overtreatment.
31 imize TUS use and mitigate overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
32 ed for more shared decision making to reduce overtreatment.
33 cancer patients, particularly by preventing overtreatment.
34 issue mass after trauma to avoid unnecessary overtreatment.
35 for ongoing clinical efforts to reduce DCIS overtreatment.
36 lance and reduce prevalent overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
37 to follow-up but would result in substantial overtreatment.
38 and avoids the pitfall of undertreatment and overtreatment.
39 R metric for clinical surveillance of sepsis overtreatment.
40 ion-making, which can decrease the extent of overtreatment.
41 criteria and outcomes associated with sepsis overtreatment.
42 therefore all HGAIN is treated, resulting in overtreatment.
43 gular adjustments to avoid undertreatment or overtreatment.
44 tion about CPM is needed to reduce potential overtreatment.
45 identify indolent tumors are needed to avoid overtreatment.
46 ates of re-excision, radical resections, and overtreatment.
47 gement and ultimately increasing the risk of overtreatment.
48 ent infections while simultaneously limiting overtreatment.
49 e effects, and the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
50 has led to concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
51 y minimizing the inconveniences and costs of overtreatment.
52 d by screening, leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
53 ncer has raised concerns about potential for overtreatment.
54 ticularly in women living with HIV, leads to overtreatment.
55 overdiagnosis and, if unrecognised, possible overtreatment.
56 ve malaria treatment without increasing NMFI overtreatment.
57 entify LNM-positive patients to prevent such overtreatments.
58 d with prostate cancer screening, other than overtreatment?
60 rapid investigation to minimize the risk of overtreatment and antibiotic-associated harms for patien
61 have serious negative consequences including overtreatment and associated complications, financial to
62 erplasia include avoidance of glucocorticoid overtreatment and control of sex hormone imbalances.
63 of (18)F-FET PET has the potential to avoid overtreatment and corresponding costs, as well as unnece
65 ions have motivated lingering concerns about overtreatment and failure to involve women in treatment
66 se with heightened perception are at risk of overtreatment and iatrogenic adverse effects with reliev
67 state cancers (CaP) is important to decrease overtreatment and increase survival for men with the agg
70 We quantified the incidence of antibiotic overtreatment and possible antibiotic-associated harms a
71 decision making is fundamental to preventing overtreatment and promoting high-value, individualized p
72 IS, including active surveillance, to reduce overtreatment and provide patients with more personalize
73 tial sepsis patients revealed a high rate of overtreatment and provides a useful tool to inform sepsi
76 to the individual patient to avoid not only overtreatment and treatment-related sequelae but also un
77 ble therapy for individuals and avoidance of overtreatment and undertreatment of patients with conven
78 bserver variability in grading can result in overtreatment and undertreatment of prostate cancer.
79 development of invasive SBC may help reduce overtreatment and undertreatment of women from minority
82 me INSS stage 1 patients (1) are at risk for overtreatment, and (2) have poor-prognostic biologic fin
83 to individualize glycemic goals and prevent overtreatment, and can serve as a template for applying
84 biology will improve early detection, reduce overtreatment, and foster preventative therapies targeti
85 to guide salvage treatment decisions, reduce overtreatment, and limit the number of staging tests in
88 d cancers; the evidence of overdiagnosis and overtreatment; and provide overviews of existing interna
89 and indirect evidence that overdiagnosis and overtreatment are likely to be substantial with populati
91 has resulted in overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagn
95 : OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.36; P = .004) and overtreatment (Black patients: OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.
97 o a 35% decrease (95% UI:31.2-39.8%) in NMFI overtreatment, but also a 19.5% reduction (95% UI:11-27.
98 n important option to reduce prostate cancer overtreatment, but it remains underutilized in many coun
99 c stewardship can decrease overdiagnosis and overtreatment, but optimal implementation of such interv
100 nagement would have hypothetically decreased overtreatment by 94%, eliminating a median of 44 overtre
102 surgeon-led initiatives to address potential overtreatment can reduce the burden of surgical manageme
103 is treatment paradigm has been challenged by overtreatment concerns and evidence that suggests that D
104 rising steadily because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment conferred by widespread use of sensitive i
105 ency and characteristics of patients meeting overtreatment criteria and outcomes associated with seps
107 le range, 43-47) per patient and 2,169 total overtreatment days (95% confidence interval, 1,938-2,400
108 treatment by 94%, eliminating a median of 44 overtreatment days (interquartile range, 43-47) per pati
109 g the new model to indicate aRT might reduce overtreatment, decrease unnecessary adverse effects, and
110 rtality; and harms, including overdiagnosis, overtreatment, diagnostic procedure-related harms, fear,
111 herapy and to monitor their response so that overtreatment does not completely abrogate host defense
115 nt controversies surrounding prostate cancer overtreatment emphasize the critical need to delineate t
120 guideline-based treatment (undertreatment or overtreatment) for kidney cancer, as defined by accepted
130 ptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, potential overtreatment in older adults with frailty persists.
131 rategy could help to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.
133 reduce the number of invasive procedures and overtreatment in patients with treatment-related changes
134 quality of care, has the potential to halve overtreatment in public and mission health facilities in
140 nefit from neo-adjuvant therapy and to avoid overtreatment in those patients who can proceed directly
141 equently leads to inappropriate stenting and overtreatment in up to one-third of patients and the ass
144 gressive, existing practice often results in overtreatment including unnecessary surgeries that degra
146 he US, understanding the negative effects of overtreatment is critical to help guide prescribing prac
150 ximizing screening efficacy while minimizing overtreatment is vital, especially when considering how
154 es using the terms undertreatment (n = 236), overtreatment (n = 71), or both (n = 51) met criteria fo
158 The adverse effects of overdiagnosis and overtreatment observed in men with clinically insignific
160 tifying children with malaria, and that much overtreatment of children without parasitaemia could be
163 may provide an opportunity to further reduce overtreatment of disease that is unlikely to progress to
164 Recent recognition of the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detecte
166 e most adequate treatment, thus avoiding the overtreatment of frail patients and the undertreatment o
168 ntify HGAIN in need of treatment, preventing overtreatment of HGAIN with a low cancer progression ris
170 s what information will be needed to prevent overtreatment of indolent DCIS lesions without compromis
174 prostate cancer (PC) are suboptimal, causing overtreatment of indolent PC and risk of delayed treatme
175 to guide clinical decision-making and avoid overtreatment of indolent PC and undertreatment of aggre
176 clinical trajectory frequently leads to both overtreatment of indolent processes and delayed treatmen
180 eatment selection, but the data suggest both overtreatment of low-risk disease and undertreatment of
181 stratification are urgently needed to avoid overtreatment of low-risk patients and to prioritize alt
182 l quality indicator is essential to minimize overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer and by extensi
184 nsequences associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Lyme disease, although previously recog
185 as been proposed as an approach for reducing overtreatment of malaria in the current era of widesprea
187 according to an algorithm designed to avoid overtreatment of mild disease and to accelerate treatmen
188 es treated with ACT, but also an increase in overtreatment of NMFI, with 70% NMFI cases (95% UI:56.4-
191 y clinicians could reduce undertreatment and overtreatment of older children and adults with acute di
192 s causing a high degree of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of otherwise clinically insignificant case
196 cancer will develop metastases leads to the overtreatment of patients with benign disease and to the
202 screening results to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment of persons with isolated clinic hypertensi
204 ecific antigen screening has led to enormous overtreatment of prostate cancer because of the inabilit
214 ch patients while avoiding overdiagnosis and overtreatment of those with slow-growing, indolent tumou
216 recommendations regarding overdiagnosis and overtreatment of thyroid nodules and low-risk papillary
219 oordination, $29.6 billion to $38.2 billion; overtreatment or low-value care, $12.8 billion to $28.6
220 oordination, $27.2 billion to $78.2 billion; overtreatment or low-value care, $75.7 billion to $101.2
221 care delivery, failure of care coordination, overtreatment or low-value care, pricing failure, fraud
222 erity of illness and mortality risk, whereas overtreatment or undertreatment (relative to the individ
225 atment intensity over time in order to avoid overtreatment or undertreatment, and the use of supporti
226 ce the thyrotropin level is at goal to avoid overtreatment or undertreatment, both of which are assoc
227 9-3.01; P < .001) and lower adjusted odds of overtreatment (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.77; P < .001).
228 -0.88; P < .001) and higher adjusted odds of overtreatment (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.24-1.30; P < .001) co
230 erformance at finding infections, minimizing overtreatment, reducing clinical case counts, and interr
231 he tuberculosis burden, although concerns of overtreatment remain because of false positive diagnoses
235 ment, reducing pCRM involvement and avoiding overtreatment through selective preoperative therapy and
236 f all potential organisms, carrying risks of overtreatment, toxicity, and selection of multidrug-resi
237 ert Ultra will likely result in considerable overtreatment unless the possibility of higher specifici
238 AT programs need to weigh trade-offs between overtreatment versus delayed or no treatment for women w
240 l or low-grade pathology when calculation of overtreatment was restricted to patients diagnosed with
243 as lower (with a possibility of no increased overtreatment) when using specificity data only from low
244 persistent high rates of mastectomy suggest overtreatment, whereas lower than expected rates of radi
245 ment to meet the clinical need for resolving overtreatment, which continues to be a pervasive problem
246 te balance between high cancer cure rate and overtreatment, which could potentially lead to unnecessa
247 Here, we discuss the potential problem of overtreatment with anti-PD-1 directed agents in general
251 only a treat-to-target approach may motivate overtreatment with high-dose statins, potentially leadin
253 ts that included the terms undertreatment or overtreatment with regard to older adults with cancer.
254 , presumptive treatment leads to substantial overtreatment without additional morbidity reduction und
255 sults, universal screening may cause initial overtreatment without reducing the rates of late detecti