戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ization (CS; alteration and amplification of pain perception).
2 en GBOs and the cortical activity subserving pain perception.
3 nwanted abnormalities in mechanosensation or pain perception.
4 entral role in cognition, affective mood and pain perception.
5 nd's adjuvant (CFA), without affecting basal pain perception.
6 ent chest pain caused by heightened coronary pain perception.
7 tigated whether vision of the body modulates pain perception.
8  E(2), and capsaicin as well as reduced cold pain perception.
9 endogenous nNOS-2 activity acted to minimize pain perception.
10  (SNP) rs563649 and individual variations in pain perception.
11 n, context, injury) can separately influence pain perception.
12 triction, reduction of edema, and diminished pain perception.
13 rve as a neural center for the modulation of pain perception.
14 nsity on afferent nociceptive processing and pain perception.
15 te to subsequently emerging abnormalities in pain perception.
16 ical responses, including blood clotting and pain perception.
17  a significant role of top-down processes in pain perception.
18 upporting the behavioural results of reduced pain perception.
19  be important targets for agents that modify pain perception.
20 n endogenous cannabinoid tone that modulates pain perception.
21 laces VRs in a much broader perspective than pain perception.
22 lgesic consumption was generally parallel to pain perception.
23 early places VR1 in a much broader role than pain perception.
24 ies in locomotor activity, visual tasks, and pain perception.
25  neuropathic pain, as well as in fundamental pain perception.
26 ermal pain thresholds are related to anginal pain perception.
27 that this suppression is causally related to pain perception.
28 ate the spinal cord dorsal horn and modulate pain perception.
29 sic and counteranalgesic pathways modulating pain perception.
30 e control of memory, cognition, movement and pain perception.
31 ntify neuroanatomical correlates of abnormal pain perception.
32  spinal projection neurons are essential for pain perception.
33 erse health outcomes that include heightened pain perception.
34 stem dynamics, each contributing uniquely to pain perception.
35 our understanding of the basic physiology of pain perception.
36 tion, and descending modulation circuits for pain perception.
37 effects of zona incerta stimulation on human pain perception.
38 d behaviors including feeding, sleeping, and pain perception.
39 ive affective qualities of acute and chronic pain perception.
40 ation in which listening to music influences pain perception.
41 hin the aMCC highlight a change in affective pain perception.
42 ease of activation in brain areas related to pain perception.
43 ies nociceptive input to the brain, altering pain perception.
44  knee-joint and articular cartilage, reduced pain perception.
45  had no mental illness or disorder affecting pain perception.
46 uch as energy balance, stress responses, and pain perception.
47  associated with within- and interindividual pain perception.
48 , whereas resting ANS activity can influence pain perception.
49 ror size has an immediate functional role in pain perception.
50  for the sensory and affective components of pain perception.
51 sal horn is a key regulator of physiological pain perception.
52 psy, musculo-skeletal anomalies, and altered pain perception.
53 chanism for their integration underlying our pain perception.
54 e tone, motor coordination, respiration, and pain perception.
55 hich may contribute to altered interoceptive pain perception.
56 siological roles, including cold sensing and pain perception.
57 bfamily, member 1, a nociceptor for heat and pain perception.
58 brainstem circuitry responsible for altering pain perception.
59 sting a molecular link between EGFR/KRAS and pain perception.
60 t afferent nociceptive signals into a stable pain perception.
61 n the brain's own mechanisms for controlling pain perception.
62 , weight of surgical specimen, and patients' pain perception.
63  we investigated which computations underlie pain perception.
64  of nociceptive inputs by SpVc, and regulate pain perception.
65 g of the functional postnatal development of pain perception.
66  channel subtype that has been implicated in pain perception.
67 al nociceptive circuit and are essential for pain perception.
68 al nociceptive network and are essential for pain perception.
69  close relationship between inflammation and pain perception.
70 ffective and cognitive factors can influence pain perception.
71 nomas and is implicated in heart failure and pain perception.
72 ems become sensitized, leading to heightened pain perception.
73  domains including working memory, mood, and pain perception.
74 phin that is implicated in the modulation of pain perception.
75 le contribution to individual differences in pain perception.
76 ntense than the aversiveness associated with pain perception.
77 alysis on neuroimaging studies of empathetic pain perception.
78 ntitatively the temporal dynamics of thermal pain perception.
79 ansient receptor potential (TRP) channels in pain perception?
80 question: does statistical learning modulate pain perception?
81                                  We compared pain perception (100 mm visual analogue scale), muscle s
82 bo hyperalgesia is an increase in subjective pain perception after a patient or subject underwent an
83                    There are limited data on pain perception after periodontal or implant surgery or
84  regulate diverse brain functions, including pain perception, alcoholism, and substance addiction.
85 at while inequality per se did not influence pain perception, altruistic behavior had an intrinsic an
86 dulation (CPM), may play a role in enhancing pain perception among some RA patients.
87 e, painful stimulation can lead to increased pain perception and activation in pain-processing brain
88  opioid receptor (OPRM1) plays a key role in pain perception and addiction.
89  in motor control, in motor behavior, and in pain perception and also predict involvement of Go in Ca
90 ting many physiological functions, including pain perception and analgesia, responses to stress, aggr
91                Secondary outcomes of patient pain perception and analgesic intake were also evaluated
92   These results further the understanding of pain perception and are potentially relevant for the dec
93 rticularly in regions of the cord related to pain perception and autonomic tone.
94 gated the effects of attention on esophageal pain perception and brain activity.
95  of controllability and uncontrollability on pain perception and cerebral pain processing.
96 genetic polymorphisms are mediators of human pain perception and clinical pain phenotypes.
97 stand the ultimate role of this structure in pain perception and descending control of pain.
98 king to explore the role of baroreceptors in pain perception and descending modulation.
99 worms-from mate attraction and aggression to pain perception and empathy.
100              These results are evidence that pain perception and engagement of endogenous opioid syst
101  Our study indicates for the first time that pain perception and expectation elicit different hemodyn
102 te pain associated with differences in acute pain perception and fibromyalgia symptoms.
103                   While the relation between pain perception and homeostatic regulation of bodily sys
104  is fundamental to our understanding of both pain perception and how opioids modulate pain.
105 le of voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7 in pain perception and how we can advance our understanding
106 tablished the participation of the cortex in pain perception and identified a long list of brain stru
107 h a role for neuronal polyamine transport in pain perception and identify a target for therapeutic in
108  significant role of higher-order schemas in pain perception and indicates that pain perception is bi
109 ABAergic neurotransmission, is implicated in pain perception and is a potential marker of individual
110  common features that reliably contribute to pain perception and its modulation.
111 eptor (KOR) may represent a means to control pain perception and modulate reward thresholds.
112 he subthalamic nucleus is a key structure in pain perception and modulation.
113  to, as well as coordinate, effects of SP on pain perception and mood.
114 ntially valuable and quantifiable markers of pain perception and placebo response.
115 pectations and confidence were used to weigh pain perception and prediction.
116  for modulation of neural systems subserving pain perception and processing in Parkinson's disease.
117                                              Pain perception and QOL were evaluated by using specific
118 eatures, we developed a system for detecting pain perception and reaction in the brain, which success
119 that low dose ketamine administration blunts pain perception and reduces blood pressure, but not musc
120 rtex (rACC), a region putatively involved in pain perception and regulation.
121                                              Pain perception and related cortical activation patterns
122 whereas their acute activation reduces basal pain perception and relieves inflammatory and neuropathi
123 sly reported potential gender differences in pain perception and reporting, reinforces that gender di
124 tion between the brain mechanisms underlying pain perception and representation of the body.
125  other populations, our results suggest that pain perception and severity are important when evaluati
126 ssociated with thermoregulation, action, and pain perception and showed positive functional connectiv
127                         The relation between pain perception and spatial representation of the body i
128 s finding provides fresh insights into human pain perception and suggests a new avenue for the develo
129 ning the trial-by-trial relationship between pain perception and task performance revealed that pain'
130 re associated with larger trade-offs between pain perception and task performance, suggesting that th
131 te diverse physiological responses including pain perception and the control of vascular tone.
132 vations illustrate the complexity of nNOS in pain perception and the existence of opposing nNOS syste
133  numerous physiological functions, including pain perception and the motivational drive associated wi
134  Continued research into the neurobiology of pain perception and the placebo effect has also played a
135  relationship, although their involvement in pain perception and their functioning in chronic pain ha
136        MC1R variants may influence orofacial pain perception and, in turn, predispose individuals to
137 ls are believed to play an important role in pain perception, and anesthetic steroids such as alphaxa
138 y directly changes breathing rate, affective pain perception, and anxiety.
139 and impairments in cognitive function, mood, pain perception, and autonomic activity.
140  and (b) evaluate the quality of life (QOL), pain perception, and efficacy in terms of time to local
141 ntromedial medulla bidirectionally influence pain perception, and locus coeruleus activity mirrors th
142 ponse, muscle atrophy, exercise intolerance, pain perception, and mitochondrial energy metabolism.
143 reatment sessions and surgical intervention, pain perception, and procedure time.
144        HCN channel activation contributes to pain perception, and propofol, a widely used anesthetic,
145  enabled light-inducible inhibition of acute pain perception, and reversed mechanical allodynia and t
146 ver activation in rACC leads to control over pain perception, and that these effects were powerful en
147  play important roles in cognitive function, pain perception, and the reinforcing properties of nicot
148 lved in modulation of dopaminergic circuits, pain perception, and thermoregulation.
149 g the cingulate cortex's role in suppressing pain perception, any harm inflicted upon this region of
150                                   Changes in pain perception are a feature of C9orf72 expansion carri
151 the dynamics of neuronal activity underlying pain perception are not fully known.
152                    Individual differences in pain perception are of interest in basic and clinical re
153 ments strongly suggest that these changes in pain perception are predominantly based on altered perce
154 ensory neurons transducing thermal, itch and pain perception are specified in early development is un
155                                              Pain perception arises from the integration of prior exp
156                   Thus, our finding suggests pain perception as an aspect of the nervous system that
157        Predictive cues dynamically modulated pain perception as contingencies changed, regardless of
158 eta-band power are covarying with subsequent pain perception, as well as lowered frontolateral theta-
159  (NSAIDs) and demographic characteristics on pain perception associated with panretinal photocoagulat
160         The VAS showed a significantly lower pain perception at 6 h after the surgery for the DEX + E
161 enhanced sensitivity to morphine in tests of pain perception attributable to impaired desensitization
162  but not nitroglycerin reduced aggregate and pain perception averaged over four distention levels.
163 athways specific to chronic and acute sickle pain, perception-based targets of "top-down" mechanisms
164 ect cortical processing involved directly in pain perception, because their magnitude correlates with
165 servationally learned information can affect pain perception, both consciously and non-consciously.
166 7 is therefore not only essential for normal pain perception but also for normal C-LTMR function, coo
167 the importance of expectations in modulating pain perception, but in everyday life we don't need an e
168 e encoding in the periaqueductal gray during pain perception, but no cue or prediction error-related
169         Expectations substantially influence pain perception, but the relationship between positive a
170 egative expectations substantially influence pain perception, but their relationship remains unclear.
171 -gated sodium channel is implicated in human pain perception by genetics.
172 nnabinoids may affect memory, cognition, and pain perception by means of this cellular mechanism.
173 pose that the DLPFC exerts active control on pain perception by modulating corticosubcortical and cor
174                             It is known that pain perception can be altered by mood, attention and co
175                                              Pain perception can be powerfully influenced by an indiv
176 creased mortality, but it is unknown whether pain perception can directly affect aging.
177 thyltransferase (COMT) is a key regulator of pain perception, cognitive function, and affective mood.
178    All interventions significantly decreased pain perception compared to a hemostatic collagen sponge
179 these effects of prestimulus connectivity on pain perception covary with pain-relevant personality tr
180 ls do not allow for consistent modulation of pain perception depending on movement.
181 from cognitive schemas continue to influence pain perception despite increasing prediction errors ari
182 ide range of behaviors, including cognition, pain perception, drug addiction, and memory consolidatio
183 reas related to the consequence of increased pain perception during CS, we found that only cortical a
184 e 1:100 000 to a physiologic level decreases pain perception during periocular, subcutaneous anesthes
185 ve activity and haemodynamics, but decreased pain perception, during a cold pressor test compared wit
186 e sensors and restoring tactile perceptions, pain perception dynamics and its decoding using effectiv
187                                              Pain perception elicited late theta and alpha activity (
188                        It is well known that pain perception for patients and normal subjects can be
189        While the static magnitude of thermal pain perception has been shown to follow a power-law fun
190                                              Pain perception has evolved as a warning mechanism to al
191 citance on atrial defibrillation success and pain perception has not been studied in patients.
192 de range of functions, including tactile and pain perception, hearing, proprioception, and control of
193 ons and to an efficacious attenuation of the pain perception in an in vivo model of NP.
194  showed greatly reduced thermal inflammatory pain perception in AQP1(-/-) mice evoked by bradykinin,
195                 Neural correlates of altered pain perception in C9orf72 expansion carriers were the b
196 oved efficacy of almost 10-fold in relieving pain perception in diabetic neuropathic rats as compared
197    Hypervigilance is considered important in pain perception in functional gastrointestinal disorders
198 ur understanding of the neural correlates of pain perception in humans has increased significantly si
199  connectivity patterns related to subsequent pain perception in humans, we contrasted painful with no
200 e that variation in the TRPA1 gene can alter pain perception in humans.
201 oint to a mechanism by which the body blocks pain perception in moderate states of tissue damage, all
202 n in participants with no-pain but increases pain perception in participants with chronic pain.
203 ithin the central nervous system, increasing pain perception in patients.
204    A number of potential mechanisms underlie pain perception in PCNL, and these mechanisms can be lev
205 ltered and whether it is related to abnormal pain perception in people with FM.
206  score of ankle and knee joints and enhanced pain perception in the C-Ab induced RA animals. Ashwashi
207 ecally administered 8d significantly reduced pain perception in the formalin model of rat sensory ner
208 ed significant alterations in locomotion and pain perception in the knock-out mouse.
209                                       During pain perception, in the absence of any treatment, an exp
210              In mice, it attenuates visceral pain perception, indicating an antinociceptive effect, p
211                                We argue that pain perception involves some of the representational pr
212 tion of the stress hormone axis by conscious pain perception is a likely explanation, but the magnitu
213  after periodontal or implant surgery or how pain perception is affected by presurgical anxiety.
214 r periodontal surgery and implant treatments pain perception is affected by the level of presurgical
215 chemas in pain perception and indicates that pain perception is biased more toward predictions and le
216                                              Pain perception is decreased by shifting attentional foc
217                                              Pain perception is one of the most complicated measurabl
218                                              Pain perception is strongly influenced by descending pat
219 jor factor that influences the likelihood of pain perception is the threshold for activation of nocic
220                            Sex dependency in pain perception is well documented and is thought to be
221 ce has severe consequences on TRPV1-mediated pain perception leading to altered capsaicin consumption
222 nmental and endogenous irritants to initiate pain perception, local inflammation, and protective beha
223 nd blood, many of which were associated with pain perception/maintenance (SRP14/BMF, GDAP1, MLLT10, B
224  Visceral hyperalgesia or heightened central pain perception may contribute to pain in chronic pancre
225                                         Mean pain perception measured with a visual analog scale decr
226 rectal barostat studies to evaluate visceral pain perception measured with a visual analog scale.
227 ll as potentially contributing to changes in pain perception, memory and synaptic plasticity.
228  sex differences in somatic but not visceral pain perception, motility, and central processing of vis
229                            Ratings of muscle pain perception (MPP) and perceived exertion (RPE), musc
230 s disorder (PTSD) is associated with altered pain perception, namely increased pain threshold and hig
231 ng machine-learning algorithms to infer that pain perception occurred.
232 ce and hyperalgesia, without affecting basal pain perception or locomotor functions.
233 ence in early palatal wound healing, patient pain perception, or analgesic consumption between use of
234 l intensity result in minimal habituation of pain perception (over 60 s) and minimal stimulation arte
235  all test groups indicated significant lower pain perception (P < 0.0001), lower analgesic consumptio
236 urgical specimen (P = 0.54) or the patients' pain perception (P = 0.28).
237  differences between repeated VAS scores for pain perception (P = 0.91) or anxiety (P = 0.75) from tw
238       There were significant improvements in pain perception (P:=0.026) and role limitation resulting
239 ility in the GABAB pathway of inhibition, in pain perception pathways via opioid receptors, and is al
240                                  The data of pain perception (PP), quantity of analgesics (QA), secon
241  cortex-spinal connectivity directly changes pain perception (r = 0.55).
242 on in acute pain decreases the activation in pain perception regions while activating the pain modula
243 malities encompass emotional, autonomic, and pain perception regions, implying that they likely play
244 ut the extent to which schemas can influence pain perception relative to bottom-up sensory inputs and
245                        We propose that human pain perception relies on an ancient chemical sensor con
246 portance of genes versus experience in human pain perception remains unclear, rodent populations disp
247 oid hormone signaling to insulin release and pain perception, respectively.
248 enetic variability clearly appears to affect pain perception, response to analgesics and predispositi
249 th exaggerated (orthostasis) and suppressed (pain perception) responses, compared with healthy young
250 id receptor agonists alter food consumption, pain perception, responses to stress, and drug reward.
251 anism underlying the effects of ELP on adult pain perception.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Pain and stress i
252  cotransporter NKCC1 in hearing, salivation, pain perception, spermatogenesis, and the control of ext
253 the CNS and can serve as a means to modulate pain perception, stress responses, and affective reward
254  result in deficits in explicit and implicit pain perception, supporting a critical role of anterior
255 subdivisions for monetary reward and thermal pain perception tasks: pshell signaling impending pain a
256                                              Pain perception temporarily exaggerates abrupt thermal s
257 ing the fundamental mechanism that underlies pain perception, these new results indicate that decepti
258 s stimuli leads to a progressively increased pain perception; this temporal summation is enhanced in
259 d with angina; symptoms have been related to pain perception thresholds.
260 e hypothesis that catastrophizing influences pain perception through altering attention and anticipat
261 atastrophizing has been suggested to augment pain perception through enhanced attention to painful st
262 o be equally diverse and range from roles in pain perception to male aggression.
263 ain and helping understand how VR influences pain perception.Trial registration: NCT04245475.
264 cending pain modulatory system (DPMS) shapes pain perception via monoaminergic modulation of sensory
265     The role of H(3) receptors in regulating pain perception was further demonstrated using other str
266                         In all participants, pain perception was higher in females (p < 0.001), patie
267                                              Pain perception was measured at the same time intervals
268                                         Heat pain perception was never affected.
269  when prediction errors (PEs) increased, but pain perception was only partially updated when measured
270                                              Pain perception was separately scored to a pain-inducing
271 rgeting the human Nav1.7 channel involved in pain perception, we present a protein-engineering strate
272 vity of the somatosensory system involved in pain perception, we show that Cav3.2 channels are expres
273 y hypnotizable subjects (HHs) who eliminated pain perception were included in the present study.
274   In contrast, no changes in coordination or pain perception were observed using the rotarod or hot-p
275             Presurgical anxiety and surgical pain perceptions were measured by visual analog scale (V
276 cephalographic (EEG) response correlate with pain perception when stimuli are presented in isolation,
277 ion to allow reemergence of consciousness or pain perception, whether resumption of cardiac activity
278 tations and prediction errors is crucial for pain perception, which suggests that aversive prediction
279 brain NMDA receptors can therefore influence pain perception, which suggests that forebrain-selective
280  strongly supports the phenomenon of reduced pain perception whilst attention is distracted away from
281 ing studies to date have confounded visceral pain perception with anticipation.
282  depression undergoing DBS during two tasks: pain perception with painful/non-painful scenarios and a

 
Page Top