ライフサイエンスコーパス: pain scale

1 g Scale that ranged from 0 to 10 (horizontal pain scale).

2 cMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale.

3 with the numeric rating scale or behavioral pain scale.

4 t, measured by tender joint count (TJC) or a pain scale.

5 al Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a pain scale.

6 er Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale.

7 ore of > or =30 mm on a 100-mm visual analog pain scale.

8 nts and evaluated pain severity on King's PD pain scale.

9 uration of morning stiffness; and a 10-point pain scale.

10 greater than or equal to 6 on the Behavioral Pain Scale.

11 termined using the UNESP-Botucatu Goat Acute Pain Scale.

12 easured at the same time intervals using two pain scales.

13 iated pain, a movement to promote subjective pain (scale, 0 to 10) to the status of a "fifth vital si

14 rn Ontario and McMaster Universities [WOMAC] pain scale, 0-20: 0, no pain; 20, extreme pain), and car

15 the psychometric properties of 6 behavioral pain scales, 10 sedation/agitation scales, and 5 deliriu

16 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, 2 to 4 points on the Roland-Morris Disabilit

17 mean improvement in the 100-mm visual analog pain scale, -9.95 [95% CI, -15.6 to -4.3]).

18 he 2 treatments was 13.8 points on the WOMAC pain scale (95% confidence interval -3.9, 31.4 [P=0.13])

19 sessment scales (PROMIS-GI(R)), an abdominal pain scale and map, and a health anxiety measure.

20 symptom inventory questionnaire, neuropathic pain scale) and QoL (SF-36, pre-R-ODS and hospital anxie

21 es (49 degrees C noxious heat; visual analog pain scales) and distinct functional magnetic resonance

22 is Disability Questionnaire [RDQ] and analog pain scales) and subjective (mobility, narcotic use) sco

23 The Visual Analog Scale, Functional Pain Scale, and EQ-5D-3L measured patient-reported pain

24 d Oswestry questionnaires, a visual-analogue pain scale, and measurements of range of motion and stra

25 d with WOMAC (B: 1.029) and VAS (B: - 2.003) pain scales, anxiety (B: - 0.813), and age (B: - 0.306).

26 Prospective trials with validated pain scales are needed to examine this further.

27 e metastases (worst pain score >=2 on a 0-10 pain scale) arising from a solid tumor.

28 Pain scale assessment (PS), pain medication consumption

29 sociated with significant lowering of median pain scale at 6 hours (1.0 [0-2.0] versus 8.0 [6.0-8.0],

30 stration, safety technologies and the use of pain scales can be successfully integrated into rheumato

31 atio (OR), 1.3 per 10-mm visual analog scale pain scale], chronic constipation (OR, 4.9), prostatism

32 omes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain scales demonstrated worsened pain at 3-months posto

33 The Graded Chronic Pain Scale evaluates pain-related disability and its dic

34 ned intervals and filled out a visual analog pain scale every 2 hours for the first 12 hours after su

35 differences reported on the visual analogue pain scales for the worst pain (mean difference between

36 point numeric rating scale, or other numeric pain scale), function (measured by the 24-point Roland M

37 gh, IIb to IV; low, 0 to IIa) graded chronic pain scale (GCPS) status is predictive of the total cost

38 cteristic Pain Index from the Graded Chronic Pain Scale [GCPS]), 2) jaw function (Jaw Functional Limi

39 l communication, and facial expression-based pain scales have been developed for different species.

40 The region of sensory loss and visual analog pain scale improved in the treated group (-1.5 vs -0.5;

41 experts using the Glasgow composite measure pain scale in combination with the well-documented and c

42 lass correlation coefficient, 0.92; behavior pain scale intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.83; and

43 life, pancreatic insufficiency, alternative pain scales, length of hospital admission, number of int

44 symptoms, examination scores, visual analog pain scale, nerve conduction, and quantitative sensory t

45 for all patients at final follow-up, PROMIS pain scales, neuroma size, and patient function.

46 pain intensity, assessed with the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), and corticospinal excitability, measur

47 r Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), and modified Single Assessment Numeric

48 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secon

49 s Osteoarthritis Index and the visual analog pain scale of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Que

50 to 20 points on a 100-point visual analogue pain scale, or relative risk of 1.25 to 2.00 for the pro

51 The majority of items in the 2 function and pain scales overlapped and were highly and significantly

52 le, mean (+/-SD) scores on the Knee-Specific Pain Scale (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicati

53 east once weekly and pain of at least 4 on a pain scale ranging from 0 to 10.

54 mean pain scores at 6 and 14 weeks, using a pain scale ranging from 0.0 (no pain) to 1.75 (extremely

55 The resulting Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale (RAPS) is a quantitative, single-score, self-

56 Together, this rat pain scale revealed that paternal opioid exposure increa

57 ion in global distress measured by the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) at the end of treatment compa

58 as self-reported by patients using the FACES Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).

59 mes were patient pain (measured by the Faces Pain Scale-Revised) and anxiety (measured by a visual an

60 domain had fair correlation with Behavioral Pain Scale (rho = 0.24) and was reliable in clinician-cl

61 r synchronization correlated with Behavioral Pain Scale (rho = 0.54), and reliability in clinician-cl

62 , survey criteria for fibromyalgia (Regional Pain Scale score > or =8 and fatigue score > or =6), and

63 AE was intraoperative pain (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale score >=5), with 19 (2.8%) events in the Shan

64 siflexion, and 3) body mass index and a knee pain scale to measure obesity and knee pain, respectivel

65 nts (n = 95) using the Unesp-Botucatu Cattle Pain Scale (UCAPS).

66 using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) in piglets before and after castratio

67 The Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS) was validated to diagnose pain in pre

68 using the Unesp-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS).

69 red by the area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scale using data from day 1.

70 Quantitative pain scale values were compared by using Friedman and Tu

71 pain (mean +/- SD scores on a visual analog pain scale [VAPS] 3.12 +/- 2.23 for the RPD and 4.83 +/-

72 e primary outcome, was assessed by the WOMAC pain scale (visual analog scale version).

73 subsequently also to SRP using both a verbal pain scale (VPS) and a visual analog scale (VAS).

74 a single hospital to compare an emoji-based pain scale with a conventional numeric rating scale.

75 o morphine in offspring, we developed a "rat pain scale" with high-speed imaging, machine learning, a

76 rted shoulder pain dropped 3.17 points (0-10 pain scale), with significant (>= 20%) relief in 89.73%.