戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  how data from extant species can complement paleontological accounts of evolutionary history, openin
2 ary interplay between traditional taphonomic-paleontological analysis and artificial intelligence-bas
3 tons also present a rich record that enables paleontological analysis of coral origins, tracing them
4      Taphonomic works aim at discovering how paleontological and archaeofaunal assemblages were forme
5                                   Quaternary paleontological and archaeological evidence often is cru
6 mbined with further syntheses of Pleistocene paleontological and archaeological records and spatio-te
7 from Egyptian antiquity with direct lines of paleontological and archeological evidence to infer loca
8                                 The combined paleontological and comparative approach taken here allo
9                                  Integrating paleontological and developmental data shows that long-t
10                               Integration of paleontological and developmental data suggests that hin
11  group,(4)(,)(5) an idea later challenged by paleontological and developmental data.(4)(,)(6)(,)(7)(,
12                                  Comparative paleontological and developmental studies will allow fur
13 ary biology is the apparent conflict between paleontological and embryological evidence regarding the
14      We show that combining ancient DNA with paleontological and geochronological evidence can constr
15 the KNM-ER 2598 locality and investigate its paleontological and geological context.
16 itat occupancy, geographic distribution, and paleontological and geological information.
17                              In combination, paleontological and molecular approaches indicate that l
18  in primate evolution is the discord between paleontological and molecular clock estimates for the ti
19 ovides a powerful context for integration of paleontological and neontological approaches.
20  supplies an interesting case-study in which paleontological and neontological data can integrate and
21 rd origins provides a premier example of how paleontological and neontological data can interact to r
22 t is made difficult by discrepancies between paleontological and neontological data, mammalian tooth
23 d therefore are best analyzed by integrating paleontological and neontological data.
24                              Models built on paleontological and paleoecological data can help to elu
25                 These results, summed to the paleontological and paleoenvironmental record of the reg
26 new paleogenetic archive for archaeological, paleontological and paleoenvironmental research.
27                     Here, we used a combined paleontological and paleogenomic approach to provide a r
28 ng with floral, invertebrate, and vertebrate paleontological and taphonomic evidence associated with
29             Here, integrating morphological, paleontological, and ecological evidence, we project the
30 gruent evidence obtained from morphological, paleontological, and genetic data for the majority of ex
31       By integrating genomic, morphological, paleontological, and geographical data, we present a rob
32                        Using archaeological, paleontological, and herbarium plant tissues, researcher
33        Considerable geological, geochemical, paleontological, and isotopic evidence exists to support
34 osteological canid data from archaeological, paleontological, and modern sites.
35 rate ancestry is supported by morphological, paleontological, and paleoclimatic evidence, which colle
36 he dating and correlating of archaeological, paleontological, and paleoenvironmental data between seq
37  on assessment of phylogenomic, geochemical, paleontological, and stratigraphic evidence.
38 nized through anatomical, developmental, and paleontological approaches [1-4].
39 ontological approach complements more common paleontological approaches to discover directional trend
40         Thus, DNA persisting in specimens of paleontological, archaeological or forensic interest is
41 monstrates that genetic information spanning paleontological, archaeological, and modern contexts is
42  element alteration of phosphatic tissues in paleontological, archeological, and crystal-chemical con
43                         One of the strongest paleontological arguments in favor of the origin of bila
44 ierarchical phylogeny and discontinuities of paleontological change.
45 he same time, the long timescales over which paleontological changes are usually assessed are beyond
46 uman primates and extensive osteological and paleontological collections to refine our assessment of
47 tral India has been the subject of debate in paleontological communities.
48 namented microfossils comprise a distinctive paleontological component of sedimentary rocks deposited
49  of cerium geochemistry at the microscale in paleontological contexts, in particular across fossil hi
50        Such claims have been made using both paleontological data and molecular estimates of the age
51 lyse detailed phylogenies of amniote clades, paleontological data and simulations to reveal the mecha
52 e new phylogenetic tree, paleoecological and paleontological data as well as data on the biology of p
53                                              Paleontological data can be used to explicitly test many
54 easonable estimates of functional diversity, paleontological data could provide information on ecolog
55                                Molecular and paleontological data demonstrate that modern bird orders
56                                              Paleontological data for the diversity of marine animals
57  allows for the integration of molecular and paleontological data in deciphering one of the most inno
58 he reliability of continuous geochemical and paleontological data in individual sections and of inter
59 n modern taxa highlights the significance of paleontological data in understanding drivers of evoluti
60 ium isotopes, Pacific volcanic ash beds, and paleontological data just above OJN basalts illustrate t
61 rhine monkeys, and the scarcity of available paleontological data precludes elucidating firmly their
62                                              Paleontological data provide essential insights into the
63                                              Paleontological data show that Cypriniforms, a clade of
64                                              Paleontological data show that older marine invasions ha
65        Therefore, both our developmental and paleontological data suggest a single origin for the tym
66 nalyses of embryological, morphological, and paleontological data suggest that proboscideans and sire
67           We use developmental, genetic, and paleontological data to demonstrate that the therian ste
68 0) We combine developmental information with paleontological data to evaluate the evolution of the ty
69  for three research directions: (i) leverage paleontological data to reveal long-term biodiversity re
70 al difference in how ages are estimated from paleontological data versus molecular phylogenies.
71 likely to come from morphological studies of paleontological data, whether known or still to be disco
72 t evolutionary and ecological processes from paleontological data.
73 ut this prediction has not been tested using paleontological data.
74 d extant taxa, integrating embryological and paleontological data.
75 onsistent with extinction rates derived from paleontological databases.
76 s the utility of bridging archaeological and paleontological datasets to disentangle complex biogeogr
77 two phenotypes vary across neontological and paleontological datasets, we find that the major Middle
78            However, although it is true that paleontological dates are often too young (missing fossi
79  explain discrepancies between molecular and paleontological dates for explosive radiations in the fo
80 wever, the discrepancy between molecular and paleontological dates for three key "explosive" radiatio
81         The relative merits of molecular and paleontological dates of major branching points in the t
82 es comparisons with paleoanthropological and paleontological dates, which are few and uncertain.
83 lar date estimates are up to twice as old as paleontological dates.
84                                  Integrating paleontological, developmental and genetic data, we prop
85                           This difficulty in paleontological diagnoses stems from (1) the inability t
86 ined with additional ecological experiments, paleontological documentation, isotope geochemistry and
87 esolve the discordance between molecular and paleontological estimates for divergence date estimates
88           Both estimates are consistent with paleontological estimates.
89 ple well-documented sea-level, tectonic, and paleontological events.
90 teps by providing a framework; however, only paleontological evidence can determine the sequence of m
91 chemical evidence for anoxic conditions, but paleontological evidence for at least episodically oxic
92 ttus split or a more basal split, conclusive paleontological evidence for the nodal assignments has b
93                            Morphological and paleontological evidence for this molecular phylogeny is
94             The cytological, biochemical and paleontological evidence for this theory is presented, a
95                                              Paleontological evidence from an exceptionally preserved
96                                              Paleontological evidence indicates that rapid brain evol
97                                       Taking paleontological evidence of early vertebrates into accou
98 stimates of divergence times consistent with paleontological evidence over a range of perissodactyl r
99                                              Paleontological evidence reveals that the rapid growth c
100 eater bamboo lemur is critically endangered, paleontological evidence shows that it was once broadly
101                                              Paleontological evidence suggests acanthomorphs exhibit
102 pedal terrestrial precursor, yet some recent paleontological evidence suggests that adaptations for b
103                        On a planetary scale, paleontological evidence suggests that this transition w
104                           Conversely, recent paleontological evidence supports a deeper evolutionary
105                  The model is congruent with paleontological evidence that plumulaceous feathers are
106 ne is dysmorphic, prompted us to reconstruct paleontological evidence, highlighting specific transiti
107 om a theoretical standpoint and supported by paleontological evidence, we lack a practical understand
108 oboration from molecular, morphological, and paleontological evidence.
109 mates that are grossly inconsistent with the paleontological evidence.
110                     In the archaeological or paleontological field, PMF is known as zooarchaeology ma
111                                       Recent paleontological findings and genetic insights in non-mam
112 d production of local rare earth patterns in paleontological fossil tissues through X-ray fluorescenc
113 in time, a finding that is in agreement with paleontological inferences.
114 Less clear, however, is how to integrate the paleontological information with molecular phylogeny and
115 with previous comparative, developmental and paleontological information, our findings suggest that t
116                                 Using mainly paleontological insights and data, we illustrate how we
117 oorganisms, and provide good comparisons for paleontological interpretation of ancient hydrothermal s
118      Next, we use systematic, molecular, and paleontological lines of evidence to argue that the late
119                                 In contrast, paleontological localities of the greater bamboo lemurs
120 and applying spatiotemporal phylogenetic and paleontological models of diversification for tetrapod s
121  process are unable to explain this uniquely paleontological observation of faunawide coordinated sta
122                    We conclude that observed paleontological patterns, including the prevalence of st
123  inappropriate framing and reporting of most paleontological publications.
124                The importance of diet in the paleontological realm has led to the employment of multi
125                                     However, paleontological reconstructed transition forms lack a fu
126                                              Paleontological reconstructions of plankton community st
127 sils also serve as invaluable references for paleontological reconstructions.
128                                          The paleontological record documents increased herbivory dur
129                     A notable feature of the paleontological record of animal evolution is the establ
130                                          The paleontological record of Beringia(3)-the unglaciated ar
131                        As a consequence, the paleontological record of biodiversity provides an indir
132 ural selection versus other processes in the paleontological record of evolution.
133 phology, ecology, chemical defenses, and the paleontological record of the group's ancient history.
134                                          The paleontological record of the lower and middle Paleozoic
135 hip between temperature and diversity in the paleontological record over the last 145 million years.
136 gnitude greater than rates inferred from the paleontological record.
137 chaeological record and terminal Pleistocene paleontological record.
138 d the lack of comprehensive, well-calibrated paleontological records, especially in terrestrial envir
139 ent proteins found in the archaeological and paleontological records.
140 ng a low representation of felid lineages in paleontological remains.
141                                              Paleontological research into this transformation has fo
142 zed and characterized, and open new lines of paleontological research with taxonomic, taphonomic, phy
143 model can reproduce important aspects of our paleontological results.
144 tionship through time, which we attribute to paleontological sampling biases.
145  enough duration so as to rarely register in paleontological sampling.
146        We apply our integrated model to five paleontological sites to illustrate mismatches in the pa
147 ompiled lists of direct radiocarbon dates on paleontological specimens of extinct genera from North a
148  and makes different predictions that future paleontological studies can test.
149                                     Numerous paleontological studies have examined trait-based extinc
150                  Recent engineering-inspired paleontological studies have reconstructed feasible loco
151 tudies of baboons and from archeological and paleontological studies of hominins.
152                        Twenty-nine published paleontological studies suggest preservational or scient
153 an-chimpanzee divergence, from molecular and paleontological studies, are unlikely to be correct.
154                Morphological, molecular, and paleontological studies, however, have presented conflic
155 us have always been a controversial topic in paleontological studies.
156                                          Yet paleontological systematics has routinely dealt in (main
157 ic causal drivers with available genetic and paleontological techniques.
158  fossils from sub-Saharan Africa has limited paleontological testing of competing models of recent hu
159                                        Using paleontological time series, we demonstrate that the ARR
160 of morphological evolution obtained from the paleontological time-series with phylogenetic rates indi
161 e persistence of DNA over archaeological and paleontological timescales in diverse environments has l
162 plant) evolution, but also offers additional paleontological treasures, including animals (mostly art
163                                              Paleontological work carried out over the last 3 decades

 
Page Top