コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ective method of biological control of plant parasite infection.
2 t an autonomous response to the challenge of parasite infection.
3 les the immune response to a tissue-invasive parasite infection.
4 with the development of Th2 immunity during parasite infection.
5 -) mice and examined their responsiveness to parasite infection.
6 immunological status of the lungs induced by parasite infection.
7 arvum via upregulation of survivin, favoring parasite infection.
8 ase in C57BL/6 mice with Leishmania mexicana parasite infection.
9 and genotypic differences not related to the parasite infection.
10 ignaling enhances immune responses following parasite infection.
11 sufficient to reproduce the major effects of parasite infection.
12 ective role in the innate immune response to parasite infection.
13 ll subset in the protection against systemic parasite infection.
14 ion, a defense mechanism against pathogen or parasite infection.
15 ation of the inflammatory response following parasite infection.
16 standing the biological processes underlying parasite infection.
17 t cell actin polymerization is necessary for parasite infection.
18 to wheeze in the presence of high-intensity parasite infection.
19 T cells has been shown to be important in a parasite infection.
20 oidan) whereas high concentrations inhibited parasite infection.
21 ad an IgE of 1000 IU/L had fungal allergy or parasite infection.
22 sure a 95% chance of protection from malaria parasite infection.
23 the central repeat region of CSP can prevent parasite infection.
24 which contrasted with enhanced resistance to parasite infection.
25 release without affecting cell viability or parasite infection.
26 haviour, can minimize the risks and costs of parasite infection.
27 r the evolution of migration to minimize the parasite infection.
28 3 in shaping host innate immune responses to parasite infection.
29 y of specific inhibitors designed to prevent parasite infection.
30 tures having the potential to synergise with parasite infection.
31 aRs influence the host's capacity to control parasite infection.
32 expressing mice were much more vulnerable to parasite infection.
33 thereby rendering populations refractory to parasite infection.
34 s coding for proteins that are important for parasite infection.
35 echanism of regulating PV development during parasite infection.
36 l initiator of the type 2 immune response to parasite infection.
37 kinetes and sporozoites (CelTOS) can inhibit parasite infection.
38 received a diagnosis of blood-stage malaria parasite infection.
39 tive immune responses that depend on ongoing parasite infection.
40 n essential early step in successful malaria parasite infection.
41 nfected host cells during the early hours of parasite infection.
42 esponding effector T cells (Teff) in chronic parasite infection.
43 features of nematodes are recognized during parasite infection.
44 sure a 95% chance of protection from malaria parasite infection.
45 way, altering macrophage polarization during parasite infection.
46 e host immune system to sense and respond to parasite infection.
47 these flies were thus highly susceptible to parasite infection.
48 n 1) that were associated significantly with parasite infection.
49 l active today and can be exploited to treat parasite infection.
50 lood stage parasite growth and clear malaria parasite infections.
51 tions, Viral Syndromes, and Blood and Tissue Parasite Infections.
52 issues of allergic conditions and helminthic parasite infections.
53 trol their overall inflammatory responses to parasite infections.
54 n important protective role in bacterial and parasite infections.
55 hway during immune induction by pathogen and parasite infections.
56 ibitors are emerging to manage microbial and parasite infections.
57 at levels theoretically sufficient to clear parasite infections.
58 ologic changes associated with hemoprotozoan parasite infections.
59 nt strategies to compensate for the costs of parasite infections.
60 tions, Viral Syndromes, and Blood and Tissue Parasite Infections.
61 allergic reactions, and host defense against parasite infections.
62 nity, and resistance to concurrent or future parasite infections.
63 use, are now under investigation for various parasite infections.
64 atory method for diagnosing gastrointestinal parasite infections.
65 the doses, will efficiently clear resistant parasite infections.
66 ty, and have wide applicability for studying parasite infections.
67 ular functions and are involved in viral and parasite infections.
68 squitoes as individuals with patent (asexual parasite) infection.
70 been shown to confer mosquito resistance to parasite infection, a major challenge for field implemen
71 ed significantly increased susceptibility to parasite infection accompanied by increased numbers of p
74 localization of QTL conferring resistance to parasite infection and beetle fitness may result from th
75 abnormal amphibians are associated with both parasite infection and chemical contaminants, but that t
76 gets because of their indispensable roles in parasite infection and development, especially in the pr
78 ve trait loci (QTL) mapping of resistance to parasite infection and fitness traits using the red flou
79 from suppression of collateral damage during parasite infection and from reduced allergic, autoimmune
81 consequences of these changes for recurrent parasite infection and infection-associated pathologies
82 hat type I IFN can be induced in response to parasite infection and influence the outcome of infectio
83 at TLR9 mediates the innate response to oral parasite infection and is involved in the development of
84 onal light microscopy in detecting low-grade parasite infection and offers an exceptional advantage f
86 section of human immune responses to malaria parasite infection and the evaluation of therapeutics an
87 bodies against P. vivax CSP strongly inhibit parasite infection and thus support the notion that thes
89 e roles of miRNAs in hepatic fibrogenesis by parasite infections and discusses the strategies using m
90 contaminants, (ii) land use practices, (iii) parasite infection, and (iv) targeted interactions betwe
92 TPLEELYPT211, was observed after the initial parasite infection, and the anti-iB-1 antibodies were no
94 ors, limited power to detect effects on rare parasite infections, and that it was not feasible to bli
96 ortality tolerance-higher survival following parasite infection-and in parasites adapting to microbia
98 .20; 2.29-7.11), and a history of intestinal parasite infection (AOR = 1.17; 0.55-2.49) were found to
102 e findings call for further investigation of parasite infection as a cause of amphibian deformities i
104 l host responses to a non-replicating type I parasite infection associated with development of long-l
105 arbor seals (Phoca vitulina), a weak HFC for parasite infection based on 27 microsatellites strengthe
106 the expected long-term effect of climate on parasite infections but can also shift the seasonal peak
107 evamisole is commonly used to treat nematode parasite infections but therapy is limited by resistance
108 -macroglobulin responded strongly to malaria parasite infection, but displayed little or no response
109 s can reduce the negative fitness effects of parasite infection by avoiding contact with parasites or
110 IIGP is reported to constrain intracellular parasite infection by disrupting the parasitophorous vac
111 1, has been found to constrain intracellular parasite infection by disrupting their vacuole membranes
115 nally, we find that the transmission rate of parasite infection can either decrease or increase the t
119 roles in diverse chronic diseases, including parasite infections, cancer, and allergic responses.
123 lead to a simple blood test for sub-clinical parasite infection detection, reducing anthelmintic use
124 etermine whether protective immunity against parasite infection develops following repeat CHMI and th
128 rmation, the exploration of the effects that parasite infections exert on populations of commensal gu
135 stigated in treatments of cancer, virus, and parasite infections (i.e., malaria) as well as in crop s
136 to hemocytes to differentiate and respond to parasite infection, implicating hemocytes as critical mo
137 en-related protein 1 (FREP1) is critical for parasite infection in Anopheles gambiae and facilitates
139 monstrated that Wnt5a-mediated inhibition of parasite infection in macrophages is Rac1/Rho dependent.
141 ing 20E signaling pathways to reduce malaria parasite infection in the mosquito vector and provide ne
143 _P reduces host-seeking behavior and malaria parasite infection in vector mosquitoes in ways that fur
144 demonstrated that 1294 significantly reduces parasite infection in vitro, with a half maximal effecti
145 damage during development and by controlling parasite infections in adults that can otherwise reduce
146 ombined field-derived estimates of trematode parasite infections in aquatic snails with measurements
152 reduction in the risk of mortality in mixed parasite infections, indicating that T. ovis confers het
153 ne whether total or species-specific current parasite infection is associated with a reduced risk of
155 s of their physiology that may influence the parasite infection is essential to better understanding
156 rst, obligatory replication phase of malaria parasite infections is characterized by rapid expansion
159 antibodies were not readily produced during parasite infection, it may be desirable to direct antibo
160 periodic relapses of symptomatic blood stage parasite infections likely initiated by activation of do
161 urs (through anaesthesia exposure) increased parasite infection loads in isolated hosts by 62-102% re
162 e, two such proteins that antagonize malaria parasite infections, LRIM1 and APL1C, circulate in the h
163 dataset of 934 collections (without data on parasite infection), malformation frequency was best pre
164 urce availability, and seasonal variation in parasite infections may further alter ruminant body cond
165 bin mediated) and secondary changes (Babesia parasite infection mediated) to the RBC membrane using w
168 man PBMCs from HVL, similar to the wild type parasite infection, mimicking a naturally acquired prote
170 development of effective vaccines that block parasite infection of erythrocytes is identifying the pl
171 P. berghei we are able to robustly quantify parasite infection of hepatocyte cell lines by flow cyto
173 tive caseinolytic protease, as important for parasite infection of host macrophages and a potential t
176 ity have decreased substantially, malaria, a parasite infection of red blood cells, still kills rough
177 lished on mosquito midguts, greatly limiting parasite infection of salivary glands and transmission t
178 for gametocyte-expressed genes required for parasite infection of the mosquito Anopheles coluzzii.
182 e to confirm previously described effects of parasite infection on host dopamine either in vitro or i
183 the effects of rainfall and gastrointestinal parasite infections on springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis
184 ittle is known of the effects of concomitant parasite infections on the immune response or severity o
186 e mice were shown to protect against mucosal parasite infection (P < 0.05), demonstrating that mucosa
191 l and plant species.(5)(,)(6) By suppressing parasite infection, protective microbiota could reduce t
192 city of macrophages is evident in helminthic parasite infections, providing protection from inflammat
193 ell derived neurons show an ~50% decrease in parasite infection rate when compared to unstimulated cu
194 recombinant fragments of EphA2 enhanced the parasite infection rate, thus establishing its role in P
198 ally, each pair of matched source/nosocomial parasite infections showed <1% of different STRs and <6.
200 cing fibrinogen-related protein 30 increased parasite infection significantly, whereas ablation of fi
203 pose an improved indicator that incorporates parasite infection status (as assessed by a rapid diagno
205 may not have other means of diagnosing blood parasite infections such as parasitology thick and thin
208 d be more sustainable control strategies for parasite infections than mass drug administration, while
210 available to organisms for dealing with the parasite infection, that is they migrate to a different
211 of 20-50 mg/kg given after establishment of parasite infection, the compounds reduced parasitemia in
212 an important and preferential target cell of parasite infection, the injection of ROP16 has multiple
213 es, daily fluctuations in temperature affect parasite infection, the rate of parasite development, an
214 ate their functions in mosquito survival and parasite infection, these genes were knocked down by RNA
215 odified course of infection, controlling its parasite infection to levels below detection by thick bl
219 sults from previous studies at local scales; parasite infection was more influential in the West and
223 evalence, as well as the intensity of midgut parasite infections were found to be significantly highe
224 hrough active screening algorithms, or blood-parasite infection, which is likely to be diagnosed if t
225 er progress to either asymptomatic skin-only parasite infection, which would not be diagnosed through
226 choriomeningitis virus and Leishmania major parasite infections, which were rescued with diet supple
227 FREP1(Q) allele has been reported to prevent parasite infection, while supporting essential physiolog
228 t has a complex life cycle; however, asexual parasite infection within the blood stream is responsibl