コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 diagnosed at US-guided biopsy (9 mm each at pathologic examination).
2 al and 17 HCM hearts) underwent micro-CT and pathologic examination.
3 o cystic hemorrhage or necrosis was noted at pathologic examination.
4 aortic areas of interest that were sent for pathologic examination.
5 rived from the history, imaging studies, and pathologic examination.
6 quantitative measures of wall composition at pathologic examination.
7 mes, as determined with follow-up MRI and/or pathologic examination.
8 bulking, and osteosarcoma was confirmed with pathologic examination.
9 d to have negative surgical margins at final pathologic examination.
10 central review of notes from surgery and/or pathologic examination.
11 omically susceptible lymph nodes for ex vivo pathologic examination.
12 There were 19 pRCCs and 55 ccRCCs at pathologic examination.
13 ence of dysplasia remote from cancer site on pathologic examination.
14 iated with the presence of fatty pancreas on pathologic examination.
15 k lymph node basins submitted separately for pathologic examination.
16 e features were not identified in systematic pathologic examination.
17 e PZ tumor larger than 0.1 cm(3) at surgical pathologic examination.
18 and the NVB was demonstrated at both US and pathologic examination.
19 e difficult to characterize by radiologic or pathologic examination.
20 ded tumor ablation followed by resection and pathologic examination.
21 as assessed by using computed tomography and pathologic examination.
22 ith a diffuse area of chronic prostatitis at pathologic examination.
23 sponded to a focus of chronic prostatitis at pathologic examination.
24 to nodular and diffuse peritoneal disease on pathologic examination.
25 primarily associated with medial necrosis on pathologic examination.
26 were sacrificed and the retia harvested for pathologic examination.
27 of 47 separate tumor sites were detected at pathologic examination.
28 d the explanted liver underwent quantitative pathologic examination.
29 The excised tissue was fixed in formalin for pathologic examination.
30 es, endoscopy, computed tomography scan, and pathologic examination.
31 bdominal (n = 26) or extraabdominal (n = 25) pathologic examination.
32 bleeding site confirmed by both clinical and pathologic examinations.
33 o 3 days after RF ablation), and the time of pathologic examination (0-72 hours after treatment) were
36 lesions larger than 0.1 cm(3) were found at pathologic examination; 43 were detected by the radiolog
38 ted by serial measurements of tumor size and pathologic examination after definitive surgery after ch
39 ients, no contrast enhancement was seen, and pathologic examination after surgical resection of the a
43 re subsequently confirmed at colonoscopy and pathologic examination among 20 potential flat masses (>
44 e support the critical importance of careful pathologic examination and adequate nodal staging, we ch
47 o (diameter / length) were measured at gross pathologic examination and compared at each combination
48 those patients who were CRs by both clinical/pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT (n = 19) compared
49 lute differences between lesion diameters at pathologic examination and MR imaging were evaluated by
50 orrelated with blood-filled nodules at gross pathologic examination and with blood-filled vascular ch
51 erize US-indeterminate adnexal lesions, with pathologic examination and/or follow-up as the reference
52 lyp size measurement at optical colonoscopy, pathologic examination, and computed tomographic (CT) co
53 e in 56 patients on the basis of surgery and pathologic examination, and false-positive in two patien
54 ng findings were correlated with findings at pathologic examination, and new international terminolog
55 in five patients on the basis of surgery and pathologic examination, and true-negative in 36 patients
56 dillo carcasses were suitable for postmortem pathologic examinations between February 2017 and 2020.
57 descending aorta, which are characterized on pathologic examination by smooth muscle cell (SMC) proli
59 elated with those at direct cholangiography, pathologic examination, cross-sectional imaging, and cli
63 ging results were compared with surgical and pathologic examination findings in 27 patients who under
64 e correlated with the results of surgery and pathologic examination from 61 patients or from clinical
65 in tumor characteristics, including size at pathologic examination, grade, hormone receptor status,
67 finitions of cholecystitis included surgery, pathologic examination, hepatic iminodiacetic acid scan
69 was the most difficult device to identify at pathologic examination in all participants, and the twin
72 ly did not differ from those without, tissue pathologic examination may be required to diagnose the c
73 ages were closest to those measured at gross pathologic examination (mean absolute difference, 0.72 m
75 follow-up CT images (n = 28), and results of pathologic examination (n = 40) by the authors in consen
76 ed with repeat FNA (n = 2, 0.5%) or surgical pathologic examination (n = 7, 1.8%), 330 (84.0%) were b
77 e identified at screening and confirmed with pathologic examination; noncancer cases were followed up
82 o consensus regarding the optimal method for pathologic examination of SLN, or the prognostic signifi
84 re than 90 days for recurrent HCV (proven by pathologic examination of the explant and exclusion of o
86 rigorous application of guidelines covering pathologic examination of the mammary gland and the whol
87 pathogenesis is unknown, in part because no pathologic examination of the pituitary gland has been r
88 ire intensive fetal surveillance or detailed pathologic examination of the placenta after delivery.
94 in an unfilled segment if tumor was found at pathologic examination or follow-up CT urography in the
96 rrelated with increasing mitotic activity on pathologic examination (P = .02), but not with tumor siz
99 ll with percentage necrosis as determined at pathologic examination (r = 0.60, P <.001), as did a two
100 a strong correlation with tumor necrosis at pathologic examination (R(2) = 0.9657 and R(2) = 0.9662
101 ne of two radiologists blinded to results of pathologic examination recorded location of unfilled seg
103 even of 215 enrolled patients had PET/CT and pathologic examination results for the abdomen and pelvi
104 patients underwent nodule resection and had pathologic examination results positive for cancer; 185
117 prior episode of presumed appendicitis, with pathologic examination significant for a primary signet
119 normal facial structure, and cores on muscle pathologic examination, thus phenocopying the mild form
121 e 3 lesions, whereas the fourth was shown on pathologic examination to represent chronic prostatitis.
122 t was obtained to analyze images from CT and pathologic examination under an institutional review boa
127 en volume measurements from imaging and from pathologic examination were assessed by using concordanc
129 vage radical prostatectomy with step-section pathologic examination were performed in nine patients w
130 and discordance rates between radiologic and pathologic examinations were compared between the two bi
133 the agreement of gallstone sizes measured at pathologic examination with those measured on segmented
134 d more discordance existed in radiologic and pathologic examinations, with a similar percentage of ca