ライフサイエンスコーパス: pathologist

1 d accuracy using manual tumor annotations by pathologist.

2 e histology was confirmed by a genitourinary pathologist.

3 s that shaped my career as a molecular plant pathologist.

4 d histopathology findings from the reference pathologist.

5 d scoring showed a concordance of 83% with a pathologist.

6 allocation in consensus with a second expert pathologist.

7 type-specific markers and subclassified by a pathologist.

8 g histological analysis by an expert cardiac pathologist.

9 creatic transection line frozen samples by a pathologist.

10 thologist and, when appropriate, a molecular pathologist.

11 length against measurements by the reporting pathologist.

12 n of hematoxylin & eosin stained tissue by a pathologist.

13 he assessment of a kidney biopsy sample by a pathologist.

14 es the expertise of an experienced perinatal pathologist.

15 rd color bright-field image, familiar to the pathologist.

16 quires annotation of the tumour regions by a pathologist.

17 g nephrologists, oncologists, urologists and pathologists.

18 The results may vary among pathologists.

19 erver and inter-observer variability amongst pathologists.

20 issue blocks were examined by expert cardiac pathologists.

21 thologists were higher than those made by US pathologists.

22 robserver agreement was determined between 3 pathologists.

23 s are concordant and reproducible as read by pathologists.

24 were analyzed by local and blinded reference pathologists.

25 amples of BE tissues between US and European pathologists.

26 s), as assessed centrally by two independent pathologists.

27 uld help save time and cost for surgeons and pathologists.

28 interpreted by a reference group of 3 expert pathologists.

29 sues per participant, were reviewed by study pathologists.

30 misclassified as high risk by institutional pathologists.

31 the surface that are readily interpreted by pathologists.

32 nd its interpretation remains a challenge to pathologists.

33 sections were independently scored by three pathologists.

34 t appears histologically normal according to pathologists.

35 ing to Metavir classification by two blinded pathologists.

36 patologists and one of two experienced liver pathologists.

37 were reviewed independently by two pulmonary pathologists.

38 lls in tissue microarrays were scored by two pathologists.

39 can decrease interobserver variations among pathologists.

40 fer markedly between entomologists and plant pathologists.

41 ter than manually annotated stages by cancer pathologists.

42 which empowers mass cytometers to 'see' like pathologists.

43 ications and are often based upon scoring by pathologists.

44 e was systematically assessed by two blinded pathologists.

45 hological diagnoses were made by experienced pathologists.

46 ually labeled by experienced speech language pathologists.

47 regions of the world lack access to trained pathologists.

48 biopsy samples were then analysed by masked pathologists.

49 e and knowledge sharing between site and CPL pathologists.

50 e of the corresponding values for the expert pathologists (0.60-0.73).

51 sia) were identified, randomly assigned to 7 pathologists (4 from the United States and 3 from Europe

52 ng 528 patients with high-risk GIST by local pathologist, 5-year IFFS was 79% versus 73%; among 336 c

53 an Association of Ophthalmic Oncologists and Pathologists (AAOOP) with support of the American Associ

54 The biopsies were scored by 2 blinded expert pathologists according to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis c

55 hed tools available in a College of American Pathologists-accredited and Clinical Laboratory Improvem

56 ent Amendments-certified College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory.

57 of Medical Genetics and American College of Pathologists (ACMG/AMP) variant classification guideline

58 How is the role of the pathologist affected?

59 for progression increased greatly when all 3 pathologists agreed on LGD (odds ratio, 47.14; 95% confi

60 Two other renal pathologists agreed with the digital classification with

61 Twelve ophthalmic pathologists analyzed scanned hematoxylin and eosin-stai

62 slides were reviewed by a single pancreatic pathologist and classified on the basis of epithelial ty

63 or sample and subjecting it to analysis by a pathologist and, when appropriate, a molecular pathologi

64 ce standard differed by 26.1% (SD 28.1%) for pathologists and 34.5% (SD 23.3%) for clinicians.

65 ould decrease interobserver variations among pathologists and are likely to be implemented in patholo

66 t a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for pathologists and clinicians alike.

67 e been written aimed at offering a guide for pathologists and clinicians in diagnosing and treating P

68 linded to the interpretations of other study pathologists and consensus panel members.

69 highlight the synergistic possibilities for pathologists and DNNs to radically scale up our ability

70 r open reading of both sample types by local pathologists and final diagnosis at a second MDA (MDA2),

71 disease of abnormally aggregated proteins by pathologists and molecular biologists and a disease of c

72 Renal pathologists and nephrologists met on February 20, 2015

73 The IHC results were evaluated by 2 pathologists and the nuclear intensity staining was scor

74 wed high interobserver reproducibility among pathologists and was validated in a second PTCL-NOS coho

75 Samples were scored by the local breast pathologist, and consecutive HER2-negative IHC results (

76 he collaboration of the clinician, the renal pathologist, and the biochemical and genetic laboratory

77 and practical interest to plant biologists, pathologists, and breeders.

78 Nephrologists, pathologists, and gastroenterology sub-specialists shoul

79 luded representative ophthalmic oncologists, pathologists, and geneticists from retinoblastoma referr

80 Expert panel of ophthalmic oncologists, pathologists, and geneticists.

81 ts, physical therapists, speech and language pathologists, and others can positively affect patient c

82 l cases were reviewed by GI gastrointestinal pathologists, and pathologic features were analyzed to i

83 Clinicians, radiologists, pathologists, and the MDTMs assigned their patient diagn

84 s on 170 breast and colon cancer images with pathologist-annotated nuclei, finding that both cellular

85 Our CNNs are able to classify TCGA pathologist-annotated tumor/normal status of whole slide

86 Although computers will not replace pathologists any time soon, properly designed AI-based t

87 Pathologists are in critical need of accurate biomarkers

88 we define 9 morphologic criteria by which a pathologist arrives at a histomorphologic diagnosis.

89 mitted to Associated Regional and University Pathologists (ARUP) Laboratories and tested by clinicall

90 EPA can be clinically used by pathologists, as a complementary device, for real-time d

91 Purpose ASCO and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) recently recommended further cha

92 Independent radiologists and pathologists assessed the MRI and histopathology of the

93 to a modification of diagnosis from initial pathologist assessment for eight cases.

94 he participants' (95 clinicians and 72 renal pathologists) assigned diagnoses were compared to the Ba

95 This report describes a pathologist-assistive software tool that reduces these u

96 stologic features were assessed by a blinded pathologist at week 26.

97 al implementation of these approaches, guide pathologists at the CPL and CHAMPS sites through standar

98 for transplantation were analyzed by expert pathologists, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, lipid biochemical a

99 ely to have favorable opinions of safety and pathologist availability, and more influenced by safety,

100 d diagnosis of SRH images was noninferior to pathologist-based interpretation of conventional histolo

101 disciplinary group of pediatric oncologists, pathologists, biologists, and radiologists convened duri

102 A genitourinary pathologist blinded to MP MR findings outlined prostate

103 was diagnosed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist blinded to the colonoscope allocation in con

104 The biopsy specimens were analyzed by a pathologist blinded to the results of VCTE for the stage

105 A pediatric pathologist, blinded to study group, reviewed biopsies f

106 A renal pathologist, blinded to tissue source, systematically qu

107 ly Bloom-Richardson (BR) grade determined by pathologists can be variable.

108 hallenges and discuss the contributions that pathologists can make to this emerging field.

109 Pathologists can substantially improve their diagnoses b

110 mpared with those of the College of American Pathologist (CAP) regression grading.

111 grading systems, namely College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Evans' grading system.

112 tration according to the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Royal College of Pathologists (RC

113 The College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Society of Hematolog

114 Design The College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society for Clinical Pathol

115 of 1988 (CLIA '88), the College of American Pathologists (CAP), and the Joint Commission on Accredit

116 inical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology

117 In a first session, pathologists categorized 40 liver biopsies of patients w

118 The first task of transplant pathologists, clinicians, and surgeons was to establish

119 ling tasks (83% and 87%), as compared to the pathologist concordance achieved by the automated method

120 cal Association, and the College of American Pathologists, conducted a systematic literature review o

121 r-observer agreement increased with level of pathologist confidence.

122 The number of pathologists confirming LGD and persistence of LGD over

123 The number of pathologists confirming LGD was strongly associated with

124 tween outcomes and factors such as number of pathologists confirming LGD, multifocality of LGD, and p

125 infectious disease specimen volume to have a pathologist dedicated full time to this crosscutting sub

126 d be confirmed by an expert gastrointestinal pathologist (defined as a pathologist with a special int

127 One pathologist delineated cancers on whole-mount prostatect

128 niches suitable for evaluation by diagnostic pathologists, describes neoplastic lesions associated wi

129 tool to increase efficiency and accuracy of pathologists detecting head and neck cancers in histolog

130 A sequencing estimation of T-cell subset and pathologist-determined TIL score.

131 Notably, 4.2% of pathologists disagreed in their analyses of duodenal mor

132 Areas of high inter-pathologist discordance and rising biopsy rates necessit

133 ompare visual estimation of G4 and MCCL to a pathologist-driven digital measurement.

134 were worn by the surgeon, theater nurse, and pathologist during 3 procedures.

135 ted by independent measures of tumor purity, pathologists' estimate of lymphocyte density, imputed im

136 nostic workup of lung adenocarcinomas (LAC), pathologists evaluate distinct histological tumor growth

137 ment in level of agreement among experienced pathologists, even after accounting for inflammation.

138 ur protocols are written for researchers and pathologists experienced in conventional fluorescence mi

139 ep learning have the potential to supplement pathologist expertise to ensure constant diagnostic accu

140 s born, the examination of the placenta by a pathologist for abnormalities, such as infection or mate

141 When examining variability between pathologists for any single assay, the concordance betwe

142 f 0.525 and an agreement of 66.6% with three pathologists for classifying the predominant patterns, s

143 rdance (240/254) between local and consensus pathologists for hHSIL vs less than hHSIL (kappa = 0.86

144 psies were independently scored by six liver pathologists for interobserver agreement.

145 t cancer cells (PGCCs) have been observed by pathologists for over a century.

146 Images were scored by two experienced pathologists for pathological features or analysed by im

147 e of its central figures, the American plant pathologist Frederick L.

148 er-observer agreement among gastrointestinal pathologists from 5 tertiary centers in the United State

149 ng clinical management, ERS is determined by pathologists from immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of

150 vidually graded by 23 experienced urological pathologists from the International Society of Urologica

151 125) for LGD, confirmed by at least 1 expert pathologist, from October 1992 through December 2013 at

152 of at least one clinician, radiologist, and pathologist, from seven countries (Denmark, France, Ital

153 ng, otolaryngologists and oral/maxillofacial pathologists garnered the most funding.

154 For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selec

155 Pathologists guide surgeons during these operations by d

156 Although pathologists have described these changes for over a cen

157 everity of disease across treatment cohorts, pathologists have historically assigned a semi-quantitat

158 While pathologists have performed autopsies on infected decede

159 In the first phase of the study, 3 pathologists held a consensus conference at which they d

160 Radiologists and pathologists help play an important role in the evaluati

161 instances of fibrosis, as identified by the pathologist, highlights the advantage of the DFIR imagin

162 First, the clinician, radiologist, and pathologist (if lung biopsy was completed) independently

163 realities of a practicing infectious disease pathologist in the hospital setting?

164 The role of plant pathologists in addressing these threats to plant health

165 nd truth, are eliminating the direct role of pathologists in algorithm development.

166 n is required by the gastroenterologists and pathologists in diagnosing these cases as these tumors c

167 d in clinical practice, our model can assist pathologists in improving classification of lung adenoca

168 We show that the system could aid pathologists in improving diagnostic accuracy and preven

169 uating adequacy of LN yield for surgeons and pathologists in the treatment of papillary thyroid cance

170 stologic findings, read by experienced renal pathologists, in 975 postreperfusion biopsy specimens co

171 greement, even among expert gastrointestinal pathologists, in the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (L

172 greement, even among expert gastrointestinal pathologists, in the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (L

173 In this study of pathologists, in which diagnostic interpretation was bas

174 cally complete resection (according to local pathologists), included in the central pathology review,

175 Three expert pathologists independently reviewed baseline and subsequ

176 Two pathologists individually evaluated tumor regression in

177 scores obtained greater concordance with the pathologist interpretations for both image-labeling and

178 de, overall agreement between the individual pathologists' interpretations and the expert consensus-d

179 These findings suggest that pathologists involved in skin tumor evaluation should be

180 of presence and extent of breast cancer by a pathologist is critical for patient management for tumor

181 Referral to a specialist cardiac pathologist is recommended.

182 Tissue biomarker scoring by pathologists is central to defining the appropriate ther

183 Achieving consistency between pathologists is difficult due to the subjective nature o

184 ant patterns, slightly higher than the inter-pathologist kappa score of 0.485 and agreement of 62.7%

185 erver agreement was substantial among the US pathologists (kappa, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66) and Europe

186 kappa, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.61-0.66) and European pathologists (kappa, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97).

187 tory, and Associated Regional and University Pathologists Laboratories.

188 formed by Associated Regional and University Pathologists Laboratory in Salt Lake City, Utah.

189 It highlights the importance of pathologist/machine interactions for the construction of

190 When all pathologists made a diagnosis with high confidence, the

191 A blind comparison, by board-certified pathologists, of this virtual staining method and standa

192 The worldwide shortage of pathologists offers a unique opportunity for the use of

193 en early breast neoplastic lesions for which pathologists often disagree in classification.

194 nd critical care intensivists, radiologists, pathologists, organ procurement personnel, and research

195 l proximal polyps were reviewed by an expert pathologist panel.

196 Board-certified radiologists and pathologists performed lobewise correlations of pulmonar

197 egarding reproducibility between studies and pathologists, potentially masking successful treatments.

198 A speech-language pathologist provided all treatments.

199 om whole-slide digitized images, without any pathologist-provided locally annotated regions.

200 ASCO and the College of American Pathologists published immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fl

201 psies and a worldwide shortage of urological pathologists puts a strain on pathology departments.

202 with mesangial matrix expansion scored by a pathologist (R.E.C.), which differed in these animals.

203 COPD overlap was discussed among clinicians, pathologists, radiologists, epidemiologists, and investi

204 The agreement among pathologists ranges between fair (kappa = 0.35 +/- 0.13

205 ican Pathologists (CAP) and Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) on long-term survival of 180 patients

206 We also measured pathologists' read rates to evaluate workflow efficiency

207 In a second reading session, each pathologist reclassified the same slides by using the FL

208 ety of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for HER2 testing in breast

209 ety of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists recommendations for human epidermal growth

210 ut prostate core biopsies by two independent pathologists resulted in an area under the receiver oper

211 Pathologist review of CellaVision images identified an a

212 A bone and soft tissue pathologist reviewed the distal femoral histologic slice

213 Four expert pathologists reviewed these lesions using current termin

214 Sensitivity and specificity of the pathologist's comment of concern for phyllodes tumor on

215 rm a revision, we suggest leaving it to each pathologist's discretion whether to use i0 or i1 as the

216 ostic techniques extend the frontiers of the pathologist's view beyond a microscopic slide and enable

217 diologists to perform and the donor hospital pathologist/s to interpret PLB.

218 Study pathologists scored 12 descriptors in NEPTUNE renal biop

219 high accuracy of our system based on expert pathologists' scores (cancer = 97.1%, stromal = 89.1%) a

220 was detected only when using the mean of 13 pathologists' scores.

221 or any single assay, the concordance between pathologists' scoring for PD-L1 expression in tumor cell

222 o August 30, 2016, to compare antibodies and pathologists' scoring of tumor and immune cells.

223 Three pathologists separately evaluated histopathologic phenot

224 Two clinicians, two radiologists, and two pathologists sequentially reviewed clinical-radiologic f

225 that images grouped semi-quantitatively by a pathologist share similar statistics.

226 in clinical practice, and consider ways the pathologist should be involved in interpreting liquid bi

227 Pathologists should be informed if biopsies are obtained

228 Practice Advice 3: Expert pathologists should report audits of their diagnosed cas

229 The pathologists showed excellent concordance when scoring t

230 Surgeon and pathologist SLNB technical errors may lead to incorrect

231 I started as a field pathologist specializing in fungal diseases of legumes,

232 ts due to variability in IHC preparation and pathologist subjectivity.

233 ble method when is performed carefully under pathologist supervision.

234 a committee of radiologists, hepatologists, pathologists, surgeons, lexicon experts, and ACR staff,

235 were blindly assessed by an external expert pathologist (T.V.C.).

236 significant interobserver variability among pathologists, the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus with

237 For pathologists, the greatest discordance was in the case o

238 A specialized pathologist then analyzed the histology of the detected

239 ubjective and difficult to reproduce between pathologists, tissue morphology often takes a back seat

240 Our model can work side-by-side with a pathologist to accurately quantify the percentages of gr

241 The method requires a pathologist to differentiate healthy tissue from tumor t

242 features of ATI were reevaluated by a single pathologist to increase diagnostic accuracy.

243 ption for H. pylori that can potentially aid pathologists to accurately diagnose H. pylori presence o

244 ere "software-assisted sign-out" will enable pathologists to conduct objective analyses that can be i

245 tasets and performance were evaluated by two pathologists to determine the concordance.

246 and ultimately, the active participation of pathologists to encourage buy-in and oversight.

247 operative communication between surgeons and pathologists to ensure appropriate and timely treatment

248 Its clinical application would allow pathologists to exclude 65-75% of slides while retaining

249 ers with assistance and guidance from speech pathologists to help improve HNC complications and QOL f

250 lso known as NKX2-1), is used as a marker by pathologists to identify lung adenocarcinomas since TTF-

251 suggest that QPI shows promise in assisting pathologists to improve prediction of prostate cancer re

252 per storage solutions has made it easier for pathologists to manage digital slide images and share th

253 ticipants, ranging in experience from senior pathologists to medical students, to delineate tissue re

254 Global change is pressing forest pathologists to solve increasingly complex problems.

255 nucleus, as shape and size, have served for pathologists to stratify and diagnose cancer patients; h

256 his comprehensive review attracts more plant pathologists to the study of this key plant defense resp

257 A Web site was established to train pathologists to use the CRS system.

258 ts of the digestive tract were analysed by a pathologist unaware of the piglets' status.

259 Pathologists use visual classification of glomerular les

260 Pathologists used standardized reporting and were blinde

261 imens were reviewed in a blinded manner by a pathologist using METAVIR criteria.

262 compared with DS slide assessments by three pathologists using a microscope and a fourth pathologist

263 slides were scored by three expert pulmonary pathologists using a standardized nomenclature and scori

264 outcome, biopsies were reanalyzed by central pathologists using clinical information.

265 d by the AI system and the expert urological pathologists using Cohen's kappa.

266 Pathologists using current conventions almost always int

267 ed in resection specimens by two independent pathologists using the Mandard tumor regression grading

268 Yet, inter-pathologist variability in the interpretation of ambiguo

269 ficient for glomerular counting performed by pathologists versus the network was 0.94.

270 pathologists using a microscope and a fourth pathologist via manually ticking off each cell, the latt

271 cted by the AI and assigned by the reporting pathologist was 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.97) for the independ

272 diagnostic interpretations of participating pathologists was 75.3% (95% CI, 73.4%-77.0%; 5194 of 690

273 and a consensus reading by three specialized pathologists was used.

274 s survey and through a congress of concerned pathologists, we propose strategies that will catapult t

275 Pathologists were blinded to group allocation.

276 Sixty-five percent of invited, responding pathologists were eligible and consented to participate.

277 pa values for all diagnoses made by European pathologists were higher than those made by US pathologi

278 Pathologists were masked to the PMCTA findings, unless a

279 nvestigators, clinical trial site staff, and pathologists were masked to treatment assignment through

280 Funder and site personnel, participants, and pathologists were masked to treatment.

281 aluation metrics for our model and the three pathologists were within 95% confidence intervals of agr

282 ples, roughly double the accuracy of trained pathologists when presented with a metastatic tumour wit

283 nfectious disease clinicians tend to consult pathologists when there are questions regarding terminol

284 on mechanism on tumoral areas annotated by a pathologist whereas the second ("CHOWDER") does not requ

285 The slides were scanned and scored by 13 pathologists who estimated the percentage of malignant a

286 Study of pathologists who interpret breast biopsies in clinical p

287 CI, 75%-80%] for lower, P < .001), and among pathologists who interpreted lower weekly case volumes (

288 Review histologic findings with experienced pathologists who specialize in gastroenterology.

289 lanoma (MEL) scale of 0 to 5 by one of three pathologists who were blinded to clinical outcome; a sco

290 digital classification agreed with a senior pathologist whose classifications were used as ground tr

291 Academic research pathologists will be challenged over the coming years an

292 ng cases and their clinical information with pathologists will help to conduct consistent and reliabl

293 intracellular signaling pathways, diagnostic pathologists will play an increasingly important part in

294 t gastrointestinal pathologist (defined as a pathologist with a special interest in Barrett's esophag

295 in a blinded fashion by an expert veterinary pathologist with attention paid to the applicability of

296 imens were reviewed in a blinded manner by a pathologist with the use of METAVIR criteria.

297 ssment of G4 proportion uses estimation by a pathologist, with a higher proportion of G4 more likely

298 infrastructures, modification of laboratory/pathologist workflows, appropriate reimbursement/cost-of

299 aging for cancer screening, thereby reducing pathologist workload and improving patient care.

300 group electronically surveyed clinicians and pathologists worldwide regarding diagnosis and treatment