ライフサイエンスコーパス: peach

1 tent varied from 3% (Surinam cherry) to 39% (peach).

2 The highest ash content was 3.9% (melon and peach).

3 and sorbitol accumulation in flower buds of peach.

4 tool to assist fruit quality improvement in peach.

5 rsification of almond and its close relative peach.

6 hrimp, peanut, hazelnut, celeriac, apple and peach.

7 ergic subjects that tolerate both peanut and peach.

8 ulatory networks for fruit quality traits in peach.

9 ved clinical association between cypress and peach.

10 .3% of GB positive patients were positive to peach.

11 scale post-harvest physiological disorder in peach.

12 pression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) for peach.

13 for future genomic research and breeding in peach.

14 breeding for extending the harvest season in peach.

15 ieved to regulate some aspect of maturity in peach.

16 to environmental stresses in flower buds of peach.

17 o a dwarf phenotype similar to that of dw/dw peaches.

18 esent in both cultivated and wild grapes and peaches.

19 ng after school lunch, which included canned peaches.

20 nd color are important quality attributes in peaches.

21 linking organic acid and color regulation in peaches.

22 us Prunus, including cherries, apricots, and peaches.

23 kg) and pollen (18-28 ug/Kg), thiacloprid in peaches (21-35 ug/kg) and acetamiprid was identified in

24 and the most common were to hazelnut (9.3%), peach (7.9%) and apple (6.5%).

25 ciation mapping population consisting of 132 peach accessions was phenotypically evaluated for MD and

26 was performed to reveal the genomic bases of peach adaptation to diverse climates.

27 on of specific IgEs (sIgEs) to the principal peach allergen (Pru p 3) in real serum samples.

28 t immunoassay using three pools of sera from peach allergic patients.

29 es to pollen. We found that more than 90% of peach-allergic patients in both populations evolved to L

30 ization profile and severity of reactions in peach-allergic patients sensitized to nsLTP from two Med

31 nut allergy and tolerance to peach; Group 3, peach allergy and tolerance to peanut; Group 4, nonaller

32 Patients with peach allergy due to nsLTP sensitization constitute a he

33 Peach allergy is common too in Southern Europe.

34 Mediterranean patients: Group 1, peanut and peach allergy; Group 2, peanut allergy and tolerance to

35 Peach hybrid (Empyrean 1) and peach-almond hybrids (Cornerstone, Bright's Hybrid 5, an

36 Fruits of 'Suncrest' and 'Babygold 7' peach and 'Big Top' nectarine cultivars were irradiated

37 gic: those that presented reaction only with peach and (b) LTP-Allergy: those that presented reaction

38 eta-cryptoxanthin and beta-carotene in kaki, peach and apricot.

39 r, pepper, spinach, zucchini, grape, cherry, peach and apricot.

40 -Allergy: those that presented reaction with peach and at least another plant-food containing LTP.

41 the DORMANCY ASSOCIATED MADS-BOX genes from peach and hypothesize that it may play a direct role in

42 d carrying the nonautonomous mariner element peach and mRNA encoding the transposase.

43 yphenolic extracts and fractions of selected peach and plum genotypes were evaluated for cell viabili

44 created from cold-acclimated bark tissue of peach and selectively probed using an antibody directed

45 Whole genome sequences of apple, peach and strawberry are available to browse or download

46 y important species; however, SV profiles of peach and their functional impacts remain largely unexpl

47 16 pesticide residues in canned apricots and peaches and in orange juice.

48 y of enhancing phenolic compound contents in peaches and nectarines by post-harvest irradiation with

49 ompound was also tested in freshly harvested peaches and oranges, exhibiting promising control profil

50 plant Arabidopsis thaliana, Prunus persica (peach) and four most popular assemblers, ABySS, SOAPdeno

51 cal Exercise and Appetite in CHildren Study (PEACHES) and repeated by 113 mothers 3 y later.

52 sibling deciduous and evergreen genotypes of peach, and also inducible by water deficit in cv. Rio Os

53 strongly correlated with IgE against walnut, peach, and apple and against Chenopodium, plane tree, an

54 , steppe cherry, mahaleb cherry, blackthorn, peach, and apricot.

55 commercialized in Brazil (strawberry, mango, peach, and orange) were analyzed and indicated the absen

56 Apple, peach, and pear as non-citrus fruit fibres were examined

57 (eg, birch and alder) and foods (eg, apple, peach, and soy).

58 presence/absence variants between almond and peach, and we show that the recent history of TE movemen

59 The green peach aphid (GPA) (Myzus persicae Sulzer) is an importan

60 Green peach aphid (GPA) Myzus persicae (Sulzer) is a phloem-fe

61 persicae Sulzer, commonly known as the green peach aphid (GPA), which is an important phloem sap-cons

62 rsicae (Sulzer), commonly known as the green peach aphid (GPA).

63 Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae Sulzer), we found that

64 PAD4) is essential for defense against green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae) and the pathogens Pseu

65 Extract of the green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae) triggers responses cha

66 ana shoots by the phloem sap-consuming green peach aphid (GPA; Myzus persicae), an agronomically impo

67 globally important economic pest - the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) - growing on 34 plant taxa,

68 The impact of NAM on green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) behaviors was assessed in a

69 8 also show enhanced resistance to the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) compared with wild-type con

70 In this study, we showed that green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) displayed an intrinsic circ

71 se pathways was investigated following green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) feeding on Arabidopsis.

72 idopsis thaliana) infestation with the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) were analyzed.

73 ays with the generalist phloem-feeding green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), and in weight-gain assays

74 se to feeding by its aphid vector, the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), and increases aphid fecund

75 w (Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis) and green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), but retained susceptibilit

76 oEL displayed reduced fecundity of the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), indicating enhanced resist

77 is gap we exposed four naive clones of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), maintained on the model cr

78 gated in Arabidopsis infested with the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae).

79 e against a phloem-feeding insect, the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae).

80 system, also reduced potato aphid and green peach aphid fecundity, respectively.

81 e took advantage of the ability of the green peach aphid Myzus persicae to colonize divergent plant s

82 in host plant physiology and increased green peach aphid reproduction.

83 the alarm pheromone in Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) and many other aphid species.

84 When Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) feeds on Arabidopsis aliphatic glucosinolat

85 ial diet both decrease Myzus persicae (green peach aphid) reproduction, suggesting a direct toxic or

86 Remarkably, the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, colonises plant species acr

87 eding herbivore-host plant system: the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, feeding on multiple brassic

88 ; parasitoid Aphidius colemani) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae.

89 ea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, and the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae.

90 ssion of Arabidopsis resistance to the green peach aphid.

91 Although green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) are able to avoid most con

92 Here we provide the transcriptome of green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) carrying PLRV and virus-fr

93 However, settling and survival of green peach aphids (Myzus persicae) were not affected.

94 sis (cotton mealybug), Myzus persicae (green peach aphids) and Bemisia tabaci (silver leaf whitefly).

95 with this hypothesis, Myzus persicae (green peach aphids) prefer to settle on Nicotiana benthamiana

96 context, the syntenic regions identified in peach, apple and strawberry might be useful to interpret

97 Carotenoids in orange, cherry, peach, apple, and kale were stable (except alpha-caroten

98 ratified according to clinical symptoms with peach/apple, respectively.

99 ma perception defining Chardonnay character (peach, apricot and gun flint); ii) did not impact the ar

100 The fruits were: cherry, raspberry, peach, apricot, grape, plum, orange and apple.

101 characterised by floral and fruity flavours (peach/apricot, Muscat, melon, banana and strawberry) whi

102 hod to small RNA sequence data from soybean, peach, Arabidopsis and rice and provide experimental val

103 Peach aroma is important for consumer preference and det

104 e identification of 177 aroma compounds from peaches as indicators of fruit quality.

105 e one or more allergies to fruits other than peaches, as in these cases, and relevant fruits differ d

106 gene for the br mutation in Prunus persica (peach) associated with vertically oriented growth of bra

107 In the extrafloral nectar of peach, B was present as a mixture of sorbitol-B-sorbitol

108 Peach-based intensification was pronounced (300-400%) an

109 It is demonstrated that LTPs from wheat and peach bind a range of lipids in a variety of conditions,

110 nd F(2) families from the Clemson University peach breeding program (CUPBP).

111 Fruit quality traits are essential peach breeding program objectives since they determine c

112 ide new resources for future genomics-guided peach breeding.

113 Fractionation of peach BY00P6653 extracts gave 4 fractions, with fraction

114 enbuconazole, propiconazole, or pyridaben in peaches; carbendazim, imazalil, terbutryn, and thiabenda

115 myl was quantified in stone fruits (apricot, peach, cherry) and nuts (pistachio, almond, walnut) with

116 Since matrix effects were observed in the peach commodity, organic acids were quantified by the st

117 chains were more flexible in simulations of peach compared with barley LTP1.

118 mediate sorbitol synthesis in flower buds of peach concomitantly with specific chromatin modification

119 Pulp from peaches contained polygalacturonic acid and arabinogalac

120 677 and weaker Penta rootstock on 'Rich May' peach cultivar.

121 tionship between susceptibility of different peach cultivars (cvs) to the Mediterranean fruit fly (me

122 The volatile compounds of four peach cultivars (Prunus persica L.) were studied: Sudane

123 esults indicate that the phenolic extract of peach cultivars inhibits Abeta and alphaS fibril formati

124 ce' (850 h CR) and 'Springprince' (650 h CR) peach cultivars through winter 2008-2009.

125 tonic crude phenolic extracts of six Georgia peach cultivars were prepared and separated into low- an

126 We used peach cultivars with contrasting chilling requirements (

127 potential of phenolic extracts from Georgia peach cultivars.

128 it quality, particularly for southern Europe peach cultivation conditions.

129 al dehydrins (V. riparia YSK2, 60 kilodalton peach dehydrin [PCA60], barley dehydrin5 [Dhn5], Thellun

130 The peach dehydrin gene encodes 472 amino acids with a predi

131 The capacity of peach DMSO extracts to inhibit Candida albicans growth w

132 tial number of SVs have been selected during peach domestication and improvement, which together affe

133 hylaxis while running after consuming canned peaches during school lunch.

134 Here, we report eight fossil peach endocarps from late Pliocene strata of Kunming Cit

135 The fossils are identical to modern peach endocarps, including size comparable to smaller mo

136 Our results elucidate the genetic basis of peach evolution and provide new resources for future gen

137 Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of peach evolution based on genome sequences of 480 wild an

138 ow that China has been a critical region for peach evolution since long before human presence, much l

139 Peaches evolved their modern morphology under natural se

140 en compared to other phenolic classes in the peach extract, in these two biologically relevant assays

141 t assays indicated that the HMW fractions of peach extracts were major contributors to the antioxidan

142 cs revealed that UV-B has a strong impact on peach flesh metabolome, determining an initial decrease

143 he enzymatic browning in minimally processed peaches for 8 days of storage.

144 ble (except alpha-carotene and zeaxanthin in peach) for 13, 9.7, 5.7, 2.5 and 7.5months, respectively

145 sfully applied to the analysis of samples of peach from two cultivars.

146 Several cultivars of peach fruit (Prunus persica L.) were investigated.

147 o analyse 238 kaki, cashew apple, guava, and peach fruit and pulp samples, which were also analysed f

148 MPG1 and MPG2 were closely related to peach fruit and tomato abscission zone PGs, and MPG3 was

149 Here we described the peach fruit as a system to link the phenotype of a slow

150 driven modulation of secondary metabolism in peach fruit by enhancing the biosynthesis of specific ph

151 roperties, such as sweetness and acidity, in peach fruit by mid infrared spectroscopy is of interest

152 ic content and the antioxidant capacities of peach fruit extracts was found, indicating that phenolic

153 od for the determination of organic acids in peach fruit has been developed.

154 me that gluconic acid has been determined in peach fruit.

155 o increase the health-promoting potential of peach fruits and indirectly to ameliorate the aesthetic

156 Here, chemical biodiversity of peach fruits from fifteen varieties, at harvest and afte

157 -FTIR) was tested here on two populations of peach fruits issued from contrasting genitors providing

158 Peach fruits subjected to prolonged cold storage (CS) to

159 regions in the eight pseudomolecules of the peach genome (Peach v2.0), with an average of 53% locate

160 82, annotated as hypothetical protein in the peach genome sequence, was identified as a candidate gen

161 ecular bases of how environments have shaped peach genomes by natural selection and adds candidate ge

162 nt an integrated map of 202,273 SVs from 336 peach genomes.

163 no acid sequence of LTP was identical in all peach genotypes but, for the first time, peel LTP was fo

164 g selection (MASS) targeted towards widening peach germplasm for maturity, particularly early maturit

165 he conservation and exploitation of European peach germplasm resources and, ultimately, as a true her

166 Here, we report a peach graph-based pangenome constructed from sixteen ind

167 gy; Group 2, peanut allergy and tolerance to peach; Group 3, peach allergy and tolerance to peanut; G

168 A SPT implied that he had peach GRP allergy.

169 and blood examination suggested that he had peach GRP allergy.

170 The oldest evidence for the peach has been Chinese archaeological records dating to

171 p 3 in vivo, a mouse model of anaphylaxis to peach has been produced and changes in the humoral and b

172 Allergic cross-reactions between cypress and peach have been reported, including an oral allergy synd

173 Peaches have a short shelf life and require chilling dur

174 Cultivated grapes and peaches have advantages in fruit size, soluble sugar con

175 Among these, the peach HEC3-like gene FLESHY showed a strongly altered ex

176 on is very bright but shows subtle yellow to peach hues which probably arise from the production of c

177 Peach hybrid (Empyrean 1) and peach-almond hybrids (Corn

178 cted in the related species, Prunus persica (peach), indicating that artificial selection during dome

179 dels calibration to non-destructively assess peach internal quality and maturity was followed.

180 Peach is widely thought to have origins in China, but it

181 in clarification of apple, kiwi, orange and peach juices and enhanced their reducing sugar content.

182 Peach juices of distinct varieties, namely yellow- and r

183 sed analysis (PCA) proved useful to classify peach juices on the basis of variety.

184 IgE-immunoblotting with peach leaf extract revealed in six patient sera a pair o

185 The SBCT with peach leaf extract was positive in the asthmatic sensiti

186 pecific bronchial challenge test (SBCT) with peach leaf extract.

187 Those bands could be two isoforms of peach leaf lipid transfer proteins( LTP), so the recogni

188 nation of As, Cd, Hg and Pb in NIST SRM 1547 peach leaves and SRM 1573a tomato leaves reference mater

189 n NIST standard reference materials SRM 1547 Peach Leaves and SRM 1573a Tomato Leaves.

190 Sensitization to peach leaves was the cause of occupational respiratory s

191 dard reference materials for polluted water, peach leaves, and tomato leaves.

192 The allergen Pru p 3, a peach lipid transfer protein, has been well studied.

193 There, peach LTP (Pru p 3) seems to be the primary sensitizer,

194 osis of LTP allergy and sensitization to the peach LTP allergen Pru p 3, were compared to UK subjects

195 Peach LTP was initially cleaved at Tyr79-Lys80 and then

196 onditions do not disrupt the 3D structure of peach LTP, explaining why LTPs retain their ability to b

197 KEY MESSAGE: Pru p 3, a peach LTP, is located in pollinated flower styles and se

198 cross-reactive allergen between cypress and peach might be responsible for the observed clinical ass

199 our physical and eight sensory properties of peach nectar were explored using the best-fit multiple l

200 hylfurfural in apple juice, orange juice and peach nectar were monitored during storage.

201 Contrary, in peach nectar, 3-deoxyglucosone formation was the dominan

202 d with aroma active compounds of PEF-treated peach nectar.

203 itized to peach were mainly positive for the peach-nonspecific lipid-transfer protein.

204 h high olive pollen exposure, leading to the peach nsLTP sensitization.

205 d patients exhibit a co-sensitization to the peach nsLTP, Pru p 3.

206 immunoblot inhibition using sera specific to peach or pellitory pollen.

207 h oranges (OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.51) and peaches (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13-0.67) had a decreased o

208 However, few studies used intact peaches, or used equilibrium sampling methods subject to

209 TP being more resistant to cleavage than its peach ortholog.

210 (P = .023), fresh oranges (P = .002), fresh peaches (P = .002), and collard greens/kale (P = .014).

211 rotenoid extracts from two Amazonian fruits, peach palm (7.83+/-0.21) and mamey (6.90+/-0.44).

212 Tucuma (Astrocaryum vulgare) and peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) are Amazonian fruits with

213 n of carotenoids from the peel of tucuma and peach palm fruits and their carotenoid profile were inve

214 Thus, peels of tucuma and peach palm fruits were classified as very high carotenoi

215 otenoid (7.8 and 7.3 mg/100 g for tucuma and peach palm, respectively), followed by gamma-carotene an

216 portant family which includes apple, cherry, peach, pear, raspberry, rose and strawberry.

217 A risk variable-derived PEACH (PErioperative ACHd) score was calculated for each

218 The peach physical map can be viewed using WebFPC/WebChrom,

219 able Rosaceae ESTs, the genetically anchored peach physical map, Rosaceae genetic maps and comprehens

220 mes, the children were offered fruit (apple, peach, pineapple, or all 3 types).

221 This suggests a new biological activity for peach polysaccharides.

222 hibits diverse fruit types, including drupe (peach), pome (apple), drupetum (raspberry), and achenetu

223 The peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae, is one of the most i

224 abidopsis thaliana by the highly polyphagous peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae), we identified cell

225 , chlorpyrifos, against the common pest, the peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae).

226 , we targeted the VGSC (MpNa(v)) gene in the peach-potato aphid Myzus persicae, by oral feeding of ar

227 Behavioural studies on peach-potato aphids showed that a reduced response to al

228 pression of the two GID1-like genes found in peach, PpeGID1c and PpeGID1b, was analyzed.

229 We have shown that peach PpeS6PDH gene is down-regulated in flower buds aft

230 se data define potential for improvements to peach production efficiency and fruit quality, particula

231 luate the allergenic properties of LTPs from peach (Pru p 3) and pellitory (Par j 1/Par j 2), major f

232 caused by lipid transfer protein (LTP) from peach (Pru p 3) is frequently associated with sensitizat

233 Here we initiated a study of peach (Prunus persica L.

234 al of 1.8 cM corresponding to ~364 Kb in the peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) genome.

235 ivated in Tunisia: kaki (Diospyros kaki L.), peach (Prunus persica L.) and apricot (Prunus armeniaca

236 graveolens L.) and the extrafloral nectar of peach (Prunus persica L.).

237 distant species we estimated that almond and peach (Prunus persica) diverged around 5.88 million year

238 Peach (Prunus persica) fruits from different varieties d

239 uence-based genotyping, and the high-quality peach (Prunus persica) genome reference sequence for sin

240 Peach (Prunus persica) has undergone more than 5000 year

241 sign, and realization of the first multisite peach (Prunus persica) reference collection (PeachRefPop

242 a recessive brachytic dwarfism trait (dw) in peach (Prunus persica) that has little or no effect on f

243 stone fruits such as cherry (Prunus avium), peach (Prunus persica), and apple (Malus domestica).

244 tein (LTP, Pru p 3) is the major allergen of peach (Prunus persica), and is in a greater abundance in

245 30% similar to an endopolygalacturonase from peach (Prunus persica).

246 Peach (Prunus persica, Rosaceae) is an extremely popular

247 esentative crops such as apple (Malus spp.), peach (Prunus spp.), and strawberry (Fragaria spp.).

248 ADS-box transcription factors (DAM genes) in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] as potential candidat

249 and nutritional homogeneity and quality with peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch].

250 l bloom and maturity, are highly variable in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch].

251 d ripening stages in three climacteric (i.e. peach [Prunus persica] and two tomato [Solanum lycopersi

252 Peach pulp and dietary fiber were incorporated in cookie

253 hree different cookies formulated with 10.5% peach pulp incorporation and 50% fat or added-sucrose re

254 ation showed that heavier crop loads reduced peach quality (DMC, SSC) and delayed maturity (I(AD)) an

255 ors such as crop load and canopy position on peach quality and maturity was evaluated.

256 , blueberries, sweet cherries, table grapes, peaches, raspberries, and strawberries) in a postharvest

257 n blot analysis, indicating transposition of peach rather than random integration of the plasmid DNA.

258 subjects had a positive SPT to LTP-enriched peach reagent, compared to 91% of the 35 UK LTP subjects

259 10,981,971-11,298,736 bp on chromosome 4 of peach reference genome used for haplotype analysis revea

260 wing two patterns: patients also allergic to peach, responding to Ara h 2 and Pru p 3, and patients a

261 ciated with bloom date advance, representing peach responses to global warming, was identified.

262 in the extraction of pesticides from canned peach samples.

263 of this region, BES were mapped against the peach scaffold_3 and BACs were anchored to the apricot m

264 ple 3-tiered risk stratification was formed: PEACH score 0 (in-hospital mortality 0.2%), 1-2 (3.6%),

265 al value these seeds, especially apricot and peach seeds, could be exploited to produce value-added p

266 evelopment, DRO1 homologs in Arabidopsis and peach showed root-specific expression.

267 and genomes of the rosid species poplar and peach, showed areas of conserved gene order, with overal

268 Much later, peach size and variety increased through domestication a

269 d the UV-B-induced metabolic changes only in peach skin subjected to direct UV-B irradiation.

270 ettlement in the American Southeast and that peaches spread independently of interactions with Spanis

271 h event in the southwestern USA, the 18.8 Ma Peach Spring Tuff, were formed by pyroclastic flows that

272 Testing to LTP-enriched peach SPT reagent and/or LTP allergens in peach, walnut,

273 The integrated peach SV map and the identified candidate genes and vari

274 ers of the dehydrin gene family may exist in peach that vary in their relation to ppdhn1.

275 es of intact fruit from six cultivars (three peaches, three nectarines) before and after storage at 1

276 reared to adulthood, and the transmission of peach to the F1 generation was tested by PCR.

277 Specific IgE to GB, peach, tomato and nut-mix was measured.

278 upational respiratory diseases in workers of peach tree crops have been reported punctually and have

279 ed with extracts from leaves and branches of peach tree.

280 Most patients suffered symptoms when peach trees had leaves, specifically during thinning and

281 symptoms related to occupational exposure to peach trees.

282 ugh there are some exceptions, blood-fleshed peaches typically have a sour taste.

283 these SNPs on downstream products from the 'peach v1.0' genome sequence was carried out.

284 e eight pseudomolecules of the peach genome (Peach v2.0), with an average of 53% located in exonic re

285 rification of LTP from peel and pulp of four peach varieties [Gladys (white flesh), California (necta

286 Peach varieties clustered into four groups: two groups o

287 g technologies should be designed to improve peach varieties with rich functional contents because of

288 The phenolic extracts from two peach varieties, showing contrasting antioxidant capacit

289 es and VOCs discriminated amongst cultivars, peach versus nectarines and between treatments.

290 ed peach SPT reagent and/or LTP allergens in peach, walnut, mugwort and plane tree may enhance diagno

291 rd and sensitization to the LTP allergens in peach, walnut, mugwort and plane tree These sensitizatio

292 of Pru p 3, the major allergenic protein of peach, was studied.

293 nonspecific lipid transfer protein (LTP) of peach were compared with the homologous LTP1 of barley a

294 Patients sensitized to peach were mainly positive for the peach-nonspecific lip

295 cal modeling, these early dates suggest that peaches were likely in the interior prior to permanent S

296 Peaches were UV-B-irradiated either 10 or 60 min, and th

297 rst shown to directly impact endodormancy in peach where a deletion of a series of DAM resulted in lo

298 r two highly homologous genes are present in peach, whereas an additional member was detected under l

299 Robustness was demonstrated using fresh peaches, which provided recovery values within acceptabl

300 rases encoded by mycobacteriophages Bxz2 and Peaches with unusual and unpredictable specificities.