コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rction; 90 patients [42.1%], unstable angina pectoris).
2 coronary syndrome (82 MI, 44 unstable angina pectoris).
3 een patients with unstable and stable angina pectoris.
4 ith new-onset chest pain or worsening angina pectoris.
5 ith new-onset chest pain or worsening angina pectoris.
6 pectoris in most patients with stable angina pectoris.
7 ith ischemic heart disease and stable angina pectoris.
8 erse outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris.
9 ms and myocardial perfusion in stable angina pectoris.
10 ndovascular approach in the relief of angina pectoris.
11 r combined CHD death/nonfatal MI plus angina pectoris.
12 cases of fatal CHD; and 124 cases of angina pectoris.
13 ocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina pectoris.
14 e reserve in patients with refractory angina pectoris.
15 9%) men and 41 (5.2%) women developed angina pectoris.
16 ge less than the duration of unstable angina pectoris.
17 develop in association with unstable angina pectoris.
18 firmed acute myocardial infarction or angina pectoris.
19 ed incident coronary events including angina pectoris.
20 roses in other patients with unstable angina pectoris.
21 e clinical manifestations of unstable angina pectoris.
22 ignificance in patients with unstable angina pectoris.
23 0 cases of fatal CHD, and 60 cases of angina pectoris.
24 e procedure-related complications and angina pectoris.
25 symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris.
26 ith sympathetic phenotypes, including angina pectoris.
27 ciation exists between edentulism and angina pectoris.
28 nd 673,810 (2.3%) were diagnosed with angina pectoris.
29 ical outcomes in patients with stable angina pectoris.
30 ere more likely to be associated with angina pectoris.
31 4 cases of fatal CHD, and 68 cases of angina pectoris.
32 ith myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris.
33 atment for ischaemia in patients with angina pectoris.
34 nction, congestive heart failure, and angina pectoris.
35 ostic benefit in patients with stable angina pectoris.
36 d for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris.
37 chronic heart failure, and in stable angina pectoris.
38 approach to the treatment of chronic angina pectoris.
39 er acute coronary syndromes or stable angina pectoris.
40 in patients undergoing PCI for stable angina pectoris.
41 ssion in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.
42 -term outcome in patients with stable angina pectoris.
43 or patients with chronic, symptomatic angina pectoris.
44 rapeutic approach to the treatment of angina pectoris.
45 ns exist for patients with refractory angina pectoris.
46 d to be normal and those with typical angina pectoris.
47 ailure (0.635 [95% CI, 0.615-0.655]), angina pectoris (0.649 [95% CI, 0.630-0.667]), and ischemic str
48 ease, 0.45% (95% CI: 0.13%, 0.77%) in angina pectoris, 0.75% (95% CI: 0.38%, 1.13%) in acute myocardi
49 ($20 764 [95% CI, $17 500-$24 027]), angina pectoris ($18 428 [95% CI, $16 102-$20 754]), and ischem
50 5%, a prior myocardial infarction; 5% angina pectoris; 2.3%, intermittent claudication; and 7%, a car
52 ted the efficacy of TMR for relieving angina pectoris, although no study to date has specifically add
54 ily for treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris and are thought to act as allosteric modulators
55 pective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor wer
58 d significantly activated in unstable angina pectoris and is not affected by severity of CAD or medic
59 Male patients (n = 328) with stable angina pectoris and ischemia on treadmill testing were randomly
60 erate drinking decreases the risk for angina pectoris and myocardial infarction in apparently healthy
61 tion, 10 angina pectoris, and 12 both angina pectoris and myocardial infarction) after the diagnosis
62 y atherosclerotic lesions, leading to angina pectoris and myocardial infarction, damages the heart, r
64 opulation of patients with refractory angina pectoris and to present the therapeutic options currentl
65 dentified 80 conventional (eg, stable angina pectoris and type 2 diabetes) and unconventional (eg, di
66 events (11 myocardial infarction, 10 angina pectoris, and 12 both angina pectoris and myocardial inf
67 tients with recurrent or deteriorated angina pectoris, and 99 (95% confidence interval 69 to 129) uns
68 s of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, angina pectoris, and atrial fibrillation provides even more int
72 heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmias, angina pectoris, and peripheral artery disease), sociodemograph
74 of patients (94%) had class III or IV angina pectoris, and two patients (6%) had unstable symptoms pr
75 with stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris,and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
76 se (CHD); myocardial infarction (MI); angina pectoris; and performance of coronary bypass or angiopla
80 Cardiac amyloidosis can present as angina pectoris associated with coronary flow reserve abnormali
81 pendent proportional hazards methods; angina pectoris at 5 years was modeled using univariate and mul
82 of nonfatal myocardial infarction and angina pectoris at 5 years, even after consideration of powerfu
83 noprost was linked to conditions like angina pectoris, atrial tachycardia and Meniere's disease, bima
84 of nitroglycerin in the treatment of angina pectoris began not long after its original synthesis in
85 ts in 60-90% of diseases that include angina pectoris, bronchial asthma, herpes simplex, and duodenal
87 antagonists are widely prescribed for angina pectoris but their effect on clinical outcome is controv
88 tory ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris, but it remains to be established whether suppr
90 ascular event (myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, cerebrovascular accidents, or major coronary s
92 ian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class 2 or higher (n=839, 34 events), increased
93 ian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class interaction was observed in SCD risk (P=0
94 ian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris class, and exercise capacity were used as covar
96 ction, CHD death, angiogram-confirmed angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stents,
97 time risks of coronary heart disease (angina pectoris, coronary insufficiency, myocardial infarction,
101 oronary ECG ST-segment elevation, and angina pectoris during the same 1-minute coronary occlusion.
103 se tolerance test, and stable chronic angina pectoris (for at least 2 months) were recruited into a d
104 In patients with suspected stable angina pectoris, global longitudinal peak systolic strain asses
106 k Heart Association class or comorbid angina pectoris, had lower activity levels, lived in Eastern Eu
108 ine GITS to conventional treatment of angina pectoris has no effect on major cardiovascular event-fre
110 sk for ACS in individuals with stable angina pectoris (hazard ratio, 1.163 [95% CI, 1.082-1.251]) com
111 pared with individuals without stable angina pectoris (hazard ratio, 1.531 [95% CI, 1.497-1.565]).
112 y heart disease/heart failure, angina/angina pectoris, heart attack, and stroke, who provided complet
114 evascularization, hospitalization for angina pectoris, hospitalization for congestive heart failure,
115 ality, myocardial infarction, stroke, angina pectoris, hospitalization for heart failure, ESRD, or do
117 The indication for PTCA was stable angina pectoris in 69 patients, unstable angina in 22 and acute
119 of association between edentulism and angina pectoris in Mexican adults aged 35 years and older.
120 sponsible for myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris in most patients with stable angina pectoris.
122 TMR improved the functional class of angina pectoris in patients with end stage coronary artery dise
123 h or without FFR guidance) for stable angina pectoris in Sweden between January 2005 and March 2016.
125 lar events (myocardial infarction and angina pectoris) in 498 women with systemic lupus erythematosus
126 D progression in patients with stable angina pectoris is associated with increased C-reactive protein
130 50 diseases monitored, a single one, angina pectoris, is significantly elevated (3.3x) in iciHHV-6+
133 n network meta-analyses of stroke and angina pectoris, limiting the conclusiveness of findings for th
135 ] for every 0.26 mmol/L increase) and angina pectoris (multivariate odds ratio, 1.049 [95% confidence
136 focal microscope x z - scanning of cutaneous pectoris muscle fibres varied linearly with [1/extracell
138 to assess risk for a first CHD event (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or cardiac death) alone
139 7.9 years, 76 subjects developed CEs (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or coronary death).
140 5 subjects developed coronary events (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or coronary death): 21
143 ents with clinically suspected stable angina pectoris, no previous cardiac history, and normal left v
144 treatment of myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris not amenable to conventional percutaneous or su
145 treatment of myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris not amenable to conventional percutaneous or su
146 lf-reported QoL parameters related to angina pectoris, notably in terms of angina frequency and disea
147 ial infarction, but the prevalence of angina pectoris, of smoking, and of chest pain in the attack wa
148 860 patients underwent PCI for stable angina pectoris; of these, FFR guidance was used in 3,367.
151 t failure OR myocardial infarction OR angina pectoris OR acute coronary syndrome OR coronary artery d
153 ican region, older age, no history of angina pectoris or asthma, no use of hypoglycemic agent, more a
156 of 1473 patients with either unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (NQWMI) enr
157 ars or older, with stable or unstable angina pectoris or patients who had a myocardial infarction at
158 and less likely to have a history of angina pectoris (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99) compared with non-R
159 brillation, renal dysfunction, stable angina pectoris, or advanced New York Heart Association class s
161 or adults with myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or following coronary artery bypass graft, or
163 had stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
164 defined as new myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or stroke, which developed between baseline an
166 est in patients with suspected stable angina pectoris predicts the presence of coronary artery diseas
168 tch-off hours in patients with stable angina pectoris receiving a beta-adrenergic blocking agent or c
169 performed in patients with refractory angina pectoris reduces ischemic wall motion abnormalities and
170 CHD, including myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, revascularization, and coronary death, occurre
171 rts of patients with suspected stable angina pectoris (SAP) (3033 patients; median 10.7 y follow-up;
172 nary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris (SAP) (n = 4131) and an independent cohort of p
175 tion myocardial infarction and stable angina pectoris , similar patterns were found albeit less prono
176 t self-reported CHD (heart attack and angina pectoris), stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and diab
178 outcomes in patients with refractory angina pectoris treated with transmyocardial laser revasculariz
179 the best available therapy group) and angina pectoris (two [3%] of 74 in the ruxolitinib group vs non
181 l infarction (MI) (n =57) or unstable angina pectoris (UAP) (n =60) were consecutively recruited toge
184 es in patients presenting with stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris,and ST-segment elevat
187 e duration of the episode of unstable angina pectoris were observed in 6 of 21 patients who died afte
190 catheter-based therapy for refractory angina pectoris when bypass surgery or angioplasty is not possi
191 an operative treatment for refractory angina pectoris when bypass surgery or percutaneous translumina
192 We observed a patient with unstable angina pectoris who developed foci of ischemic necroses in the
193 e observed in 10 patients with stable angina pectoris, with well-defined single vessel coronary arter