ライフサイエンスコーパス: peer review

1 s, and that less than 6% used a form of open peer review.

2 before embarking on the weary march through peer review.

3 (95%) and ethical (73%) form of training in peer review.

4 e how to respond to the issues raised during peer review.

5 cts, and Letters to the Editor without clear peer review.

6 e how to respond to the issues raised during peer review.

7 with establishing the highest standards for peer review.

8 h the current dominant approach to radiology peer review.

9 another before sending out a decision after peer review.

10 he reproducibility of inferences and improve peer review.

11 tive artifacts are evaluated and selected by peer review.

12 rms of biases inherent within the process of peer review.

13 received fewer citations than those sent for peer review.

14 e how to respond to the issues raised during peer review.

15 aracteristics is a sign of the robustness of peer review.

16 revision, and resubmission causing redundant peer review.

17 study published in the English language, (2) peer-reviewed, (3) primary research, (4) inclusion of sc

18 in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed abstract at a scientific conference; exami

19 rnational professional societies, requesting peer review and endorsement (by 31 societies listed in t

20 , with implications for experimental design, peer review and funding, sharing of result, education, m

21 Internet, have been used in conjunction with peer review and publication in journals in the physical

22 ile environment for experimentation with new peer review and research evaluation initiatives, which w

23 reports, and that area of research, type of peer review and reviewer gender had little or no impact.

24 er recommendation, area of research, type of peer review and reviewer gender.

25 anaging a new laboratory, and their views on peer review and scientific publishing.

26 etting of constantly updated data; (5) rapid peer-review and reporting; and (6) transitions from a fo

27 A search of peer-reviewed and "gray" literature from January 2012 to

28 systematic review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed and gray full-text documents in English wi

29 e conducted a systematic review of published peer-reviewed and gray literature analyzing the relation

30 This systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literature examines the human hea

31 We searched peer-reviewed and gray literature for articles reporting

32 mployed: 1) a systematic review of published peer-reviewed and gray literature; 2) retrospective quan

33 We first comprehensively reviewed the peer-reviewed and grey literature for rigorously evaluat

34 In this systematic review we searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature publications reporting

35 A systematic review of published peer-reviewed and grey literature was undertaken, along

36 We searched 12 databases for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed reports with primary

37 A total of 109 peer-reviewed and original research-oriented dental jour

38 We hereby review the peer-reviewed and pre-print reports pertaining to cardio

39 We searched peer-reviewed and preprint articles in PubMed, BioRxiv a

40 rigins of the journal, the eLife approach to peer review, and current challenges in scientific publis

41 etween the Art Exhibition Game and scholarly peer review are discussed and the implications for the d

42 Distortions in peer review are driven by economic forces and enabled by

43 and citations received by the corresponding peer-reviewed article, we assembled a dataset of 74,239

44 A systematic review of 48 peer- reviewed articles with postlicensure data from 24

45 They had a median 34.5 peer-reviewed articles (25th, 75th: 14, 105), 401 citati

46 esize indications for DC surgery reported in peer-reviewed articles between 1983 and 2014 into a redu

47 and Embase were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles from January 2007 through Februar

48 To date, 3 peer-reviewed articles have been published after a media

49 to identify US authors who have contributed peer-reviewed articles on a neurosurgery topic that rema

50 ls, and Scopus to identify English-language, peer-reviewed articles on clinical and prognostic factor

51 eployed PaperBot to help identify and manage peer-reviewed articles pertaining to digital reconstruct

52 English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 1964 and 2016 w

53 sis, data were abstracted from 1303 original peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2011, t

54 NFO were systematically searched to identify peer-reviewed articles published in English before Janua

55 PsychINFO-were searched to retrieve relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English.

56 A search was conducted for peer-reviewed articles related to food acceptability, fl

57 A EMBASE/PubMed search of English-language, peer-reviewed articles reporting ABL and DBS for OCD was

58 A systematic search of peer-reviewed articles resulted in a pool of 1107 articl

59 itles, abstracts, and full texts to identify peer-reviewed articles that used an experimental protoco

60 Peer-reviewed articles were identified through searches

61 On average, chairs authored 98 peer-reviewed articles, 2 books, and 11 book chapters.

62 Peer-reviewed articles, including case reports, case ser

63 Using a dataset synthesized from 83 peer-reviewed articles, this study mainly investigated t

64 This underscores the limitations of peer review as a means of assessing grant applications i

65 reprint, and validation via a combination of peer review at a journal and additional evaluation by th

66 Peer review at JEM during COVID-19

67 , including expert committee development and peer review by designated committees of each of the part

68 -rejected manuscripts, deemed as unworthy of peer review by editors, received fewer citations than th

69 The 2020 Guidelines underwent blinded peer review by subject matter experts and were also revi

70 o the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee a

71 o the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee a

72 Peer review can seem like a barrier we have to scale in

73 ed preprint servers prior to journal-managed peer review, can play a key role in addressing these ECR

74 There was limited published peer-reviewed clinical literature available regarding US

75 ta-driven process distilled a gene list from peer-reviewed comprehensive microarray studies that disc

76 lth, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed cross-sectional or longitudinal studies re

77 assessments can be performed by using expert peer-review, crowdsourcing or computer-based methods.

78 formerly AIDS) Society-USA reviewed relevant peer-reviewed data that were published or presented at s

79 EXTRACTION: A detailed review of scientific, peer-reviewed data was performed.

80 A detailed review of scientific, peer-reviewed data was performed.

81 from inception to February 2016 to identify peer-reviewed data-based articles.

82 The PR peer review database had fewer major events (one of 64 [

83 untary QA quality assurance and mandatory PR peer review databases were searched for obstetrics and g

84 In QA quality assurance and PR peer review databases, respectively, perceptional (47 of

85 radiologists in QA quality assurance and PR peer review databases, respectively; 23 and nine radiolo

86 age restrictions, we systematically searched peer-reviewed databases, searched the grey literature, a

87 Preprints, non-peer-reviewed drafts of manuscripts available on the Int

88 er, an external validation of the quality of peer reviews during the laboratory experiment, based on

89 Peer-reviewed empirical studies, theoretical reports or

90 Peer-reviewed, empirical papers conducted in non-patient

91 nception through January 2015, including any peer-reviewed English-language publication that describe

92 hortly after publication to add links to the Peer Review file.In addition, affiliations 16 and 17 inc

93 ed, subjective and biased, but research into peer review has been hindered by a lack of access to pee

94 our science, the process of pre-publication peer review has few agreed-upon standards defining its g

95 tion and for maximizing the effectiveness of peer review have not been determined.

96 formed a systematic literature review of the peer-reviewed health policy and economics literature to

97 Peer-reviewed historical and contemporary literatures ar

98 n endonasal DCR from 2001 by identifying new peer-reviewed human studies reported since 2000 in the E

99 iorepository; dedicated resources to support peer-reviewed, hypothesis-driven research; access to ded

100 Examples of inadequacies of peer review in medical literature and perpetuation of er

101 Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparen

102 eLife is making changes to its policies on peer review in response to the impact of COVID-19 on the

103 he debate about the role and transparency of peer review in scholarly publishing.

104 Peer review is central to the process through which epid

105 Peer review is often criticized for being flawed, subjec

106 Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing a

107 Although peer review is widely seen as vital to scientific evalua

108 Peer review is widely used to assess grant applications

109 ses were searched using keywords to identify peer-reviewed journal articles in English.

110 We selected 124 peer-reviewed journal articles published between Jan 1,

111 ACS, IBECS, and Web of Science databases for peer-reviewed journal articles published by March 2019.

112 eceased" and "controls" to identify relevant peer-reviewed journal articles.

113 his study will be shared through a series of peer-reviewed journal articles.

114 We included original research published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language.

115 They were also significantly involved in peer-reviewed journal literature, serving as editors (20

116 wing eligibility criteria: be published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed ab

117 Peer-reviewed journal publication is the main means for

118 Articles published in an English language peer-reviewed journal that described an educational inte

119 if they were original studies published in a peer-reviewed journal; recruited children (aged 0-18 yea

120 m credit for a discovery, we publish it in a peer-reviewed journal; to get a job in academia or money

121 -date review of the information published in peer-review journals on direct N2O emissions from agricu

122 s and call on researchers, funding agencies, peer-reviewed journals and universities to coordinate ef

123 y reports of FIH trials of mAbs published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and April 20

124 out the nurses' use of CPGs and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and August 2

125 earch of four databases and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were conduc

126 1965 and March 1, 2016, and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were perfor

127 small fraction of the articles published in peer-reviewed journals have previously been released as

128 articles published between 1971 and 2018 in peer-reviewed journals of ophthalmology.

129 mate effects and of studies not published in peer-reviewed journals to underestimate them.

130 Studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals using both quantitative and quali

131 Only papers published in English in peer-reviewed journals were considered.

132 e language studies published through 2017 in peer-reviewed journals were included.

133 n-based studies published in any language in peer-reviewed journals were systematically searched from

134 nostic accuracy and full-text publication in peer-reviewed journals within 5 years after abstract sub

135 s posted before 2017 were later published in peer-reviewed journals, and find a relationship between

136 viral Society-USA reviewed data published in peer-reviewed journals, presented by regulatory agencies

137 d were conducted for articles in English, in peer-reviewed journals, reporting on "psilocybin," "lyse

138 able versions of reviewed FS can be cited in peer-reviewed journals.

139 Results were limited to publications in peer-reviewed journals.

140 ts who leave residency programs) outcomes in peer-reviewed journals.

141 shed in English from across the world and in peer-reviewed journals.

142 eeting do not reach full-text publication in peer-reviewed journals.

143 ng criteria: (1) full-length publications in peer-reviewed journals; (2) evaluated cell therapy use i

144 We included studies that were published in peer-reviewed journals; used probabilistic sampling meth

145 a free, open-source, open-data, curated and peer-reviewed knowledge base of biomolecular pathways.

146 el approach to case selection and structured peer review leading to actionable quality interventions.

147 provide a brief, narrative appraisal of the peer reviewed literature over the past 10 years related

148 examination questions using evidence-based, peer-reviewed literature and adheres to accepted psychom

149 ary encode the process science gathered from peer-reviewed literature and regulatory reports.

150 for inclusion if they were published in the peer-reviewed literature and used a validated method to

151 Studies that were published in the peer-reviewed literature and used validated assessment m

152 We did a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature for human melioidosis cases bet

153 -2015) scores have not been published in the peer-reviewed literature for nationally representative s

154 We searched the peer-reviewed literature for studies that reported quant

155 of 242 microarray studies extracted from the peer-reviewed literature found that current practices fo

156 We performed a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to February 2

157 omprehensively analyzes all manuscripts in a peer-reviewed literature on 2,2,2-trifluorodiazoethane s

158 Peer-reviewed literature on health is almost exclusively

159 Available information in the peer-reviewed literature regarding diagnostic efficacy a

160 Peer-reviewed literature searches were conducted last in

161 ed genes upon analysis of 12,316 independent peer-reviewed literature sources.

162 address this, we systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change im

163 studies of the EVD epidemic published in the peer-reviewed literature to assess the key uncertainties

164 Searches of peer-reviewed literature were conducted in PubMed and th

165 rce for the key numbers (based mostly on the peer-reviewed literature) about the SARS-CoV-2 virus tha

166 h an increase in retracted articles from the peer-reviewed literature, is beginning to erode the trus

167 t base constructed by a team of experts from peer-reviewed literature, users can integrate new data i

168 btained from government sources or published peer-reviewed literature.

169 enealogy" may influence the landscape of the peer-reviewed literature.

170 research papers and reviews published in the peer-reviewed literature.

171 that clinical decisions are informed by the peer-reviewed literature.

172 rst for these regions to be published in the peer-reviewed literature.

173 s been documented with water quality data in peer-reviewed literature.

174 t of which have not been cited previously in peer-reviewed literature.

175 The increasing amount of peer-reviewed manuscripts requires the development of sp

176 ublications with data for 188 countries: 101 peer-reviewed manuscripts with 13 reporting data for hig

177 While intended to guide the preparation of peer-reviewed manuscripts, the principles of transparent

178 view of global PK indications as reported in peer-reviewed manuscripts.

179 Unfortunately, there is a paucity of peer-reviewed material specifically focused on nutrition

180 We reviewed the peer-reviewed medical and health policy literature from

181 ment of Justice; and searches (1975-2018) of peer-reviewed medical literature (PubMed), business jour

182 nterventions that may improve the quality of peer-reviewed medical research publications.

183 We completed searches of peer-reviewed (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO), internet,

184 appropriate prescribing, monthly prescribing peer-review meetings, and brief caregiver education.

185 may be to establish basic rules that render peer review more transparent, such as publishing the rev

186 e involvement of early-career researchers in peer review, most of them about early-career researchers

187 early-career researchers are involved in the peer review of manuscripts for scientific journals, typi

188 enterprise depends on the fair and objective peer review of research grants, leading to the distribut

189 Peer reviews of the European compiler organizations were

190 Articles were included if they were: (1) peer-reviewed original primary research studies, (2) pub

191 O, Web of Science and Scopus) and limited to peer-reviewed original studies.

192 r a variety of engagements, including media, peer review, panel participation, educational outreach,

193 found that the percentile scores awarded by peer review panels correlated with productivity as measu

194 er of studies have questioned the ability of peer review panels to predict the productivity of applic

195 This paper examines the success of peer-review panels in predicting the future quality of p

196 cience were searched until June 3, 2019, for peer-reviewed papers and conference abstracts reporting

197 ontrol and Prevention websites and from both peer-reviewed papers identified by PubMed search and non

198 at were published in the English language as peer-reviewed papers.

199 uthors also offer an alternative approach to peer review: peer feedback, learning, and improvement (o

200 re are conflicting data about the ability of peer review percentile rankings to predict grant product

201 Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences

202 Peer review practices differ substantially between journ

203 and weaknesses of American Heart Association peer review practices, and recommends best practices for

204 statement reviews the current literature on peer review practices, describes the current American He

205 Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the

206 st of the papers included in the review were peer-reviewed proceedings of technological conferences o

207 ribes the current American Heart Association peer review process and those of other agencies, analyze

208 An example of the peer review process for "Distinct molecular trajectories

209 An example of the peer review process for "Mir-17~92 Confers Differential

210 An example of the peer review process for "Single-Cell Transcriptomics Res

211 This article shows an example of the peer review process for "Sphingolipid Modulation Activat

212 This article shows an example of the peer review process for Circadian Entrainment Triggers M

213 it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewe

214 The current peer-review process can lead to long delays between subm

215 utilizing quantitative bias analysis in the peer-review process, editors can potentially avoid unnec

216 e problems at the level of the editorial and peer-review process, funding agencies and academic insti

217 show that women are underrepresented in the peer-review process, that editors of both genders operat

218 s raised were in fact dealt with through the peer-review process.

219 ors, funding agencies, as well as during the peer-review process.

220 bility of a user is assessed through digital peer-review processes that aggregate ratings into reputa

221 vers or other second-generation devices in a peer-reviewed publication (by July 1, 2016).

222 a name, a short description, and a URL to a peer-reviewed publication.

223 only web-based database available compiling peer reviewed publications and case studies on PFS.

224 Studies included (1) peer-review publications with 3 or more patients, and (2

225 To evaluate the available evidence in peer-reviewed publications about the diagnosis and treat

226 account perspectives not usually included in peer-reviewed publications and after-action reports, inc

227 Moreover, these studies resulted in over 140 peer-reviewed publications and training of many students

228 Peer-reviewed publications are crucial to career advance

229 s extramural NIH K award and, on average, 70 peer-reviewed publications at the time of application.

230 to automatically find and efficiently index peer-reviewed publications based on periodic full-text s

231 In the past 25 years, over 1800 peer-reviewed publications have focused on SECM, includi

232 es produce only 1.0% of the global output of peer-reviewed publications in mental health research.

233 iling and analyzing a database of scientific peer-reviewed publications over a period of 50 y (1965 t

234 English-language, peer-reviewed publications published from January 1, 194

235 Peer-reviewed publications reporting patient outcomes af

236 Eleven randomized trials (8 peer-reviewed publications, 3 abstract-only presentation

237 e of evidence from codes and regulations, to peer-reviewed publications, and best practice standards.

238 e review yielded 71 estimates from 54 unique peer-reviewed publications, government-based reports, an

239 positions posed by several policy documents, peer-reviewed publications, organization proposals, and

240 By synthesizing 1,845 measurements from 164 peer-reviewed publications, we show that around 1.5 degr

241 d all been in studies reported previously in peer-reviewed publications, were diagnosis and treatment

242 5296 VFs obtained via manual annotation from peer-reviewed publications, with 4648, 179, 105 and 364

243 commitments, ClinicalTrials.gov, and matched peer-reviewed publications.

244 riety of quality measurement programs and 51 peer-reviewed publications.

245 luded unpublished programmatic documents and peer-reviewed publications.

246 c evidence ( approximately 14,000 pieces) in peer-reviewed publications.

247 , and this data has been used in high-impact peer-reviewed publications.

248 rdiac arrest, and pediatric critical illness peer-reviewed published literature.

249 eference transcriptomes, RefTrans, combining peer-reviewed published RNA-Seq as well as EST datasets,

250 ars ago, in 2005, we did a scoping review of peer-reviewed, published articles on palliative care dev

251 on has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation s

252 Eligible studies reported peer-reviewed qualitative research on experiences of agi

253 English peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method

254 , landmines, UXO, and AXO to locate original peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method

255 We searched 6 electronic databases for peer-reviewed, quantitative studies from inception to 26

256 s have demonstrated that surgeons with lower peer-reviewed ratings of surgical skill had higher compl

257 half of the respondents have ghostwritten a peer review report, despite 81% responding that ghostwri

258 ve: authors decide when and what to publish; peer review reports are published, either anonymously or

259 ne the linguistic characteristics of 472,449 peer review reports.

260 iew has been hindered by a lack of access to peer review reports.

261 rched 12 databases for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed reports with primary data on botulism in c

262 me of pathogen-host interactions reported in peer reviewed research articles.

263 inority groups has historically been sparse, peer-reviewed research in this area has grown considerab

264 adership, practice, and advocacy, as well as peer-reviewed research, organisation reports, and grey l

265 Based on extensive peer-reviewed research, this statement concludes that tr

266 ies, or presented as conference abstracts at peer-reviewed scientific conferences since the 2014 repo

267 18, including data published or presented at peer-reviewed scientific conferences through August 22,

268 MA guidelines, we did a systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific evidence describing the associa

269 d definition of the disorder based on proper peer-reviewed scientific information.

270 tors acquire data through manual curation of peer-reviewed scientific literature and from direct subm

271 cardiovascular disease based on the existing peer-reviewed scientific literature.

272 In this study, we evaluated 379 peer-reviewed scientific papers to explore how Nmin and

273 ional Science Foundation have suggested that peer review scores of funded grants bear no association

274 We find that better peer-review scores are consistently associated with bett

275 ing agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.

276 provides a comprehensive metaanalysis of 838 peer-reviewed studies (>2,500 sites in 73 countries) tha

277 from 16 cardiovascular journals that publish peer-reviewed studies in cardiovascular physiology and p

278 English-language, peer-reviewed studies measuring hand hygiene compliance

279 We identified no peer-reviewed studies of AXO effects, so we extended the

280 English language, peer-reviewed studies that evaluated an intervention to

281 pating ICU teams adapt data from hundreds of peer-reviewed studies to operationalize a systematic and

282 Peer-reviewed studies with direct comparison of patient

283 nfo electronic databases yielded 40 original peer-reviewed studies.

284 res of PTSD symptoms; and unpublished or non-peer-reviewed studies.

285 For the American Heart Association, a Peer Review Subcommittee is charged with establishing th

286 that emerging flaws in the integrity of the peer review system are largely responsible.

287 , although many have noted problems with the peer-review system for both manuscripts and grant submis

288 and trust, we have found that scoring-based peer review tends to drive radiologists inward, against

289 practices in hypothesis-driven research with peer review that occurs before the research is conducted

290 , we reflect on our consultative approach to peer review, the challenges of reproducibility, and the

291 ical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterol

292 ical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterol

293 generic recommendations but not tested in a peer-reviewed trial for their manufacturer's ICDs.

294 Funding source--industry versus peer review versus mixed--did not impact citation rates.

295 what would happen if, instead, the focus of peer review was to help everyone in the field improve th

296 Standard peer-review was performed.

297 's Note indicating that the article has been peer-reviewed was missing.

298 e the effect of competitive incentives under peer review, we designed a novel experimental setup call

299 ist performance improvement is scoring-based peer review, which reflects a traditional quality assura

300 Peer review would benefit from changes in both journal p